How do natural climate variability, anthropogenic climate and basin underlying surface change affect streamflows? A three-source attribution framework and application
Introduction
Projections of climate change impacts on water resources have been an increasing requirement for water management decisions, due to their critical role in the sustainability and security of societies all over the world (Dey and Mishra, 2017, Fu et al., 2007, Sunde et al., 2017, Lee et al., 2014, Peng et al., 2017, Vo et al., 2016), especially for China with its vast population and rapid economic development. China is eager to know what will happen in the future and how to respond. Thus, an adaptation and mitigation strategy is very important to decision makers. However, all actions shall aim at the human-induced change, while the internal climate variability (natural climate variability) shall be separated since it could not be changed. Assessments of the regional impacts of human-induced climate change on a wide range of social and environmental systems are fundamental for determining the appropriate policy responses to climate change (Parry et al., 1996, Wiglegy et al., 1996, IPCC, 1998). Delineating the relative role of anthropogenic forcing, natural forcing, and long-term natural variability in climate change presents a significant challenge (Stott et al., 2000, Broccoli et al., 2003, Nkomozepi and Chung, 2014). It is not only a scientific issue but a real and current demand. The internal-seasonal variability might overwhelm the climate change signals. For example, the summer monsoon rain band and the northward propagation of the East Asian summer monsoon (EASM) are most important for China, and their unusual behaviors often cause local flooding and drought (Ding, 2004). Quantifying whether there is a large role for long-term natural variability in the climate system is important, since such variability could exacerbate or ameliorate the impact of climate change in the near future (Swanson et al., 2009). Attributing such changes to the human forcing of the climate system, where possible, is important for the development of effective mitigation and adaptation (Rosenzweig and Neofotis, 2013). Without rigorous attribution, detection studies can be of limited use for planning and could even lead to mal-adaptation, thereby increasing risks to society and the environment, or wasting limited economic resources (Harrigan et al., 2014). But so far, the streamflow change has been still widely ascribed to two-source of climate change and human activity, without further revealing the natural and human forcing in climate variation.
Human activity leads to changes in the atmospheric composition either directly (via emissions of gases or particles) or indirectly (via atmospheric chemistry) (IPCC, 2013) and is called anthropogenic climate change. The precipitation pattern might change and cause streamflow variation under climate change. Moreover, human activities play a crucial role in the hydrological circulation change (Kuchment, 2004). Streamflow generation is also affected by human activities in terms of underlying surface as well as natural factors (Liu et al., 2010, Zhang et al., 2012a, Zhang et al., 2012b). The underlying surface changes, including urbanization, changes in agricultural practices and construction of hydraulic structures and water extraction, have affected the runoff generation and routing processes. Thus, the human activity brings human-induced climate change and underlying surface change, which both influence streamflow variation as anthropogenic elements. The attribution work shall focus on revealing the contribution of anthropogenic elements.
Historical attribution is of great importance in understanding the future projections for streamflow changes resulting from different drivers. The Haihe Basin is a crucial economic center of China, and this area experienced a long-term drought from the 1980s to 1990s. In the past 30 years, the runoff from the mountain region has decreased sharply (Yang and Tian, 2009, Cong et al., 2010, Bao et al., 2012a), and the groundwater level in the plain area has severely declined (Liu and Xia, 2004, Liu et al., 2001, Bluemling et al., 2010, Zhang et al., 2012a, Zhang et al., 2012b). The annual runoff has a decreasing trend in most rivers, such as in the Luan River (Wang et al., 2013, Xu et al., 2013), Chaobai River (Wang et al., 2009, Ma et al., 2010, Bao et al., 2012b), and Zhang River (Wang et al., 2013). The water shortage has been a barrier to economic development. Thus, the attribution of multiple drivers is necessary for decision makers to plan effective mitigation and adaptation strategies. There have been a great number of studies that have analyzed the reasons for the decrease in runoff in Haihe Basin and have attributed it to the impacts of climate change and human activities. Land use/cover change was estimated as the main and most likely factor for the runoff decline (Yang and Tian, 2009, Wang et al., 2009), and water use or extraction might also play an important role (Ren et al., 2002). Tributaries with different geographical locations in the Haihe River were demonstrated. For example, climate variability was the major driving factor in the Luan River, and human activities were the main driving factor in the northern and southern parts of Haihe Basin (Bao et al., 2012b). The local human activities accounted for 79.5% of the estimated decrease in the annual inflow for the Panjiakou Reservoir in the Luan River (Xu et al., 2013). In general, although there are different conclusions presented for different proportions of runoff, human activities were the dominant driver for runoff or streamflow decrease. However, decision makers need to know how the anthropogenic drivers affect streamflow variation, which is valuable for sustainable management. It is taken for granted that the climate change and underlying surface change are caused by human activities when doing streamflow change attribution, without considering the natural climate variability. When talking about climate change adaptation or mitigation, we actually mean anthropogenic climate change, rather than the natural climate variability. Thus, the role of natural climate variability should be better understood before any effective and efficient decisions are made.
This study focuses on the new view and further understanding of the attribution of streamflow variation, in terms of three sources: natural climate variability (NCV), anthropogenic climate change (ACC) and a basin’s underlying change. A three-source attribution and decomposition framework is proposed incorporating current popular methods. The case study is the Zhanghe catchment in Haihe Basin, China. TOPMODEL is used to deduce rainfall-runoff processing, which is also used to discriminate the impacts of climate change (including NCV and ACC) and the basin’s underlying changes on hydrological systems as a hydrological model method. Then it makes use of a seasonal resampling method to simulate the climate natural variability and separates the roles of natural climate variability and anthropogenic climate change, to achieve a three-source decomposition.
Section snippets
Three-source attribution and decomposition framework
Climate change may be caused by natural internal processes or external forcing factors such as modulations of the solar cycles, volcanic eruptions and persistent anthropogenic changes in the composition of the atmosphere or in land use. According to the definition of the Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), in its Article 1, climate change is: ‘a change of climate which is attributed directly or indirectly to human activity that alters the composition of the global atmosphere and
Study area and data
The Haihe River basin has a tremendous conflict between water supply and demand, with the water volume per capita of 305 m3 from 1956 to 1998, merely 1/7 of the national average and 1/24 of the world average (Haihe River Commission, 2010). Furthermore, there has been a statistically significant decreasing trend for streamflow in some catchments in the Haihe River basin. Given the large area (320,600 km2) of whole catchment of Haihe River basin, a typical sub-catchment shall be picked out to
Conclusion
The decline of rivers’ observed streamflows as a result of environmental changes has attracted much attention from researchers and decision makers. It is very critical to understand the role of the environmental factors of climate, the underlying surface, and water utilization. There have been numerous studies focused on the climate and human activities in terms of the underlying surface. However, for water resources management and planning, it is crucial to identify the effects of natural
Acknowledgments
This work was jointly financed by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51679145, No. 91747103, No. 41330854, No. 51779144, No. 51679144, No. 51779145), and National Non-profit Institute Basic Research Foundation funded special project (No. Y514007). The reviewers are thanked for constructive comments. The Editor is also thanked for encouragement.
References (54)
- et al.
Attribution for decreasing streamflow of the Haihe River basin, northern China: climate variability or human activities?
J. Hydrol.
(2012) Impact of climate change on river flooding assessed with different spatial model resolutions
J. Hydrol.
(2005)- et al.
Understanding the hydrological trends of river basins in China
J. Hydrol.
(2010) - et al.
Separating the impacts of climate change and human activities on streamflow: a review of methodologies and critical assumptions
J. Hydrol.
(2017) - et al.
Analysis of the effect of climate change on the Nakdong river stream flow using indicators of hydrological alteration
J. Hydro-environ. Res.
(2014) - et al.
Towards a limits of acceptability approach to the calibration of hydrological models: extending observation error
J. Hydrol.
(2009) - et al.
Impact of climate variability and human activity on streamflow decrease in the Miyun Reservoir catchment
J. Hydrol.
(2010) - et al.
Study of parameter stability of a lumped hydrologic model in a context of climatic variability
J. Hydrol.
(2003) - et al.
The effects of climate change on the water resources of the Geumho River Basin, Republic of Korea
J. Hydro-environ. Res.
(2014) - et al.
What is a dangerous climate change?
Global Environ. Change
(1996)
Responses of soil moisture to climate change based on projections by the end of the 21st century under the high emission scenario in the ‘Huang–Huai–Hai Plain’ region of China
J. Hydro-environ. Res.
Development of a one-parameter variable source area runoff model for ungauged basins
Adv. Water. Resour
Impacts of human activity on river runoff in the northern area of China
J. Hydrol.
A deterministic hydrological approach to estimate climate change impact on river flow: vu gia-thu bon catchment, Vietnam
J. Hydro-environ. Res.
Runoff reduction due to environmental changes in the Sanchuanhe River Basin
Int. J. Sediment. Res.
Abrupt change of runoff and its major driving factors in Haihe River Catchment, China
J. Hydrol.
The application of conceptual modelling to assess the impacts of future climate change on the hydrological response of the Harvey River catchment
J. Hydro-environ. Res.
Sensitivity of hydrological variables to climate change in the Haihe River basin, China
Hydrol. Process
A physically based variable contributing model of basin hydrology
Hydrol. Sci. Bull.
TOPMODEL: a critique
Hydrol. Process
Adoption of agricultural water conservation practices – a question of individual or collective behaviour? The case of the North China Plain
Outlook Agric.
Twentieth-century temperature and precipitation trends in ensemble climate simulations, including natural and anthropogenic forcing
J. Geophys. Res.
Seasonal march of the East Asian summer monsoon
East Asian Monsoon
Using regional climate model data to simulate historical and future river flows in northwest England
Clim. Change
A two-parameter climate elasticity of streamflow index to assess climate change effects on annual streamflow
Water. Resour. Res
Attribution of detected changes in streamflow using multiple working hypotheses
Hydrol. Earth Syst Sci.
Cited by (9)
Uncertainties of urban flood modeling: Influence of parameters for different underlying surfaces
2020, Environmental ResearchCitation Excerpt :By changing the rain-runoff path in traditional urban construction, sponge cities intend to increase the natural infiltration of rainwater and change the rapid runoff yield and concentration process of impervious surface in cities through the construction of low-impact development (LID) facilities and related drainage facilities transformation, in order to alleviate the effect of urban flood (Wang et al., 2017b). In the process of sponge city construction, it mainly involves the change of underlying surface characteristics (Liu et al., 2018). However, whether the construction of sponge city can bring the desired effects needs to be further verified by model simulation, and the refined simulation and uncertainty analysis of model information are needed (Ahiablame and Shakya, 2016; Hu et al., 2017).
Boosting algorithms for projecting streamflow in the Lower Godavari Basin for different climate change scenarios
2024, Water Science and TechnologyQuantifying climate and anthropogenic impacts on runoff using the SWAT model, a Budyko-based approach and empirical methods
2023, Hydrological Sciences JournalAnalysis of indicators of climate extremes and projection of groundwater recharge in the northern part of the Rio de Janeiro state, Brazil
2021, Environment, Development and Sustainability