Elsevier

Journal of Hepatology

Volume 53, Issue 2, August 2010, Pages 230-237
Journal of Hepatology

Research Article
Care of hepatitis C virus infection in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients: Modifications in three consecutive large surveys between 2004 and 2009

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2010.03.009Get rights and content

Background & Aims

To analyze the care of HCV infection in HIV–HCV coinfected patients and its progression between 2004 and 2009.

Methods

Three hundred eighty HIV–HCV coinfected patients were prospectively included from November 22 to 29, 2004 (2004 survey), 416 patients from April 3 to 10, 2006 (2006 survey), and 419 patients from June 15 to 22, 2009 (2009 survey).

Results

The rate of liver biopsy decreased (14% vs. 38% vs. 56%), while the use of non-invasive liver damage tests increased (47% vs. 24% vs. ND) in the 2009, 2006, and 2004 surveys, respectively. The rate of patients that had never been treated for HCV infection progressively decreased in the 2009, 2006, and 2004 surveys (37%, 42%, and 54%). The main reasons for HCV non-treatment changed as HCV treatment was deemed less questionable and the lack of liver biopsy became a very rare reason (6%, 18%, and 34%). Among patients treated for HCV infection, the rate of sustained virological response increased (49%, 29%, and 29%). The main factors independently associated with HCV treatment were a liver fibrosis score ⩾F2 (odds ratio = 3.5; 95% CI 2.1–5.7), a liver biopsy activity grade ⩾A2 (2.7; 1.4–5.3), a CD4 cell count ⩾350 ml (2.7; 1.6–4.4), European origin (2.1; 1.3–3.4), daily alcohol consumption < 30 g (2.1; 1.2–3.8), and male gender (2.0; 1.2–3.3).

Conclusion

Compared to the 2004 and 2006 surveys, the 2009 coinfected patients had liver damage assessment more frequently, more patients had received HCV treatment and more patients had achieved a sustained virological response.

Introduction

Coinfection with hepatitis C virus (HCV) and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is a frequent and particularly serious problem [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6]. About 30% of HIV-infected patients in France are also infected with HCV, i.e. close to 30,000 patients [1], [2], [5], [6]. Since the widespread use of combined antiretroviral therapy (cART) was begun, AIDS mortality has progressively decreased, while chronic liver disease, linked primarily to HCV, has become one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality [2], [4], [6].

Considerable therapeutic progress has been achieved in HCV-infected patients due to combination therapy with pegylated interferon and ribavirin, resulting in a 55–60% sustained virological response (SVR) in HCV mono-infected patients (40–50% in HCV genotype 1, the most frequent HCV genotype worldwide) [7]. Results from large therapeutic trials in HIV–HCV coinfected patients have provided important information. A particularly encouraging result was that the pegylated interferon and ribavirin combination achieved an SVR in 27–44% of coinfected patients [8], [9], [10], [11], resulting in histopathological improvement in most of them. Recent results report similar SVR rates in coinfected more than in HCV mono-infected patients [12], [13], [14], [15]. HCV treatment, however, is given to a small number of HIV–HCV coinfected patients for many reasons, e.g., HCV treatment deemed questionable (minimal hepatic lesions, alcohol abuse, active drug use), lack of available liver biopsy, psychiatric contraindication, and physicians’ conviction of poor patient compliance [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25]. Following the First European Consensus Conference on the treatment of chronic hepatitis B and C in HIV-infected patients in 2005, the coinfection guidelines in HIV medicine from the European AIDS Society in 2008 as well as their recent update at the European AIDS Clinical Society conference, it may be assumed that differences in the guidelines may have had an impact on treatment compliance and management standards [26], [27].

The aim of the present study was to analyze the care of HIV–HCV coinfected patients in France in 2009 (including initial workup, mode of treatment, follow-up modalities, and virological response) through a survey and to compare results with surveys conducted in 2004 and 2006 [17], [22].

Section snippets

Patients and methods

The same methodology was used in the three surveys, and details have been published elsewhere [17], [22]. In brief, physicians involved in the management of HIV-infected patients were recruited from 50 specialized centers from all of metropolitan France. These centers were representative of those providing the standard of care in HIV cART in France. Each physician was asked to prospectively fill out a standardized data collection form for all HIV–HCV coinfected patients seen between November 22

Results

Sixty-two, 58, and 71 physicians following HIV–HCV coinfected patients participated in the 2009, 2006, and 2004 studies, respectively (two-thirds of physicians participated in all surveys). The profiles of these physicians did not differ in the three surveys, as they practiced in university hospitals (70–74%), general hospitals (22–25%), or other areas (3–7%). They were from departments of infectious disease (52% vs. 47% vs. 39%, respectively), internal medicine (33% vs. 26% vs. 27%), HIV/AIDS

Discussion

In the last decade, chronic liver disease, linked primarily to HCV, has become one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in HIV-infected patients [2], [4], [6]. In the present study we had the opportunity to analyze the care of HIV–HCV coinfected patients in France in 2009 (including initial workup, mode of treatment, follow-up modalities, and virological response) and to compare the results with those obtained in the 2004 and 2006 surveys. We showed that the care of HIV–HCV

Conflicts of interest

All co-authors participated to advisory board meetings sponsored by SCHERING-PLOUGH.

References (61)

  • E. Rosenthal et al.

    Mortality due to hepatitis C-related liver disease in HIV-infected patients in France (Mortavic 2001 study)

    AIDS

    (2003)
  • E. Rosenthal et al.

    Liver-related deaths in HIV-infected patients between 1995 and 2005 in the French GERMIVIC Joint Study Group Network (Mortavic 2005 study in collaboration with the Mortalité 2005 survey, ANRS EN19)

    HIV Med

    (2009)
  • Macías J, Berenguer J, Japón MA, Girón JA, Rivero A, López-Cortés LF, et al. Fast fibrosis progression between repeated...
  • S.J. Hadziyannis et al.

    Peginterferon-alpha-2a and ribavirin combination therapy in chronic hepatitis C: a randomized study of treatment duration and ribavirin dose

    Ann Intern Med

    (2004)
  • R.T. Chung et al.

    PEG-interferon-alfa-2a plus ribavirin versus interferon-alfa-2a plus ribavirin for chronic hepatitis C virus infection in HIV-co-infected persons

    N Engl J Med

    (2004)
  • F.J. Torriani et al.

    Peginterferon-alfa-2a plus ribavirin versus interferon-alfa-2a plus ribavirin in HIV-infected patients

    N Engl J Med

    (2004)
  • F. Carrat et al.

    A randomized controlled trial of pegylated interferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin versus standard interferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin for initial treatment of chronic hepatitis C in HIV-infected patients (RIBAVIC-ANRS HC02)

    JAMA

    (2004)
  • M. Laguno et al.

    Peginterferon-alfa-2b plus ribavirin versus interferon-alfa-2b plus ribavirin for treatment of HIV–HCV co-infected patients

    AIDS

    (2004)
  • J. Berenguer et al.

    Sustained virological response to interferon plus ribavirin reduces liver-related complications and mortality in patients coinfected with human immunodeficiency virus and hepatitis C virus

    Hepatology

    (2009)
  • M. Laguno et al.

    Randomized trial comparing pegylated interferon alpha-2b versus pegylated interferon alpha-2a, both plus ribavirin, to treat chronic hepatitis C in human immunodeficiency virus patients

    Hepatology

    (2009)
  • E. Righi et al.

    Therapeutical aspects and outcome of HIV/HCV coinfected patients treated with pegylated interferon plus ribavirin in an Italian cohort

    Infection

    (2008)
  • M. Crespo et al.

    Efficacy of pegylated interferon and ribavirin for retreatment of chronic HCV infection in HIV co-infected patients failing a previous standard interferon-based regimen

    J Antimicrob Chemother

    (2008)
  • C.A. Fleming et al.

    Hepatitis C virus and human immunodeficiency virus coinfection in an urban population: low eligibility for interferon treatment

    Clin Infect Dis

    (2003)
  • P. Cacoub et al.

    Treatment of hepatitis C virus and human immunodeficiency virus coinfection: from large trials to real life

    J Viral Hepat

    (2006)
  • S.H. Mehta et al.

    Limited effectiveness of antiviral treatment for hepatitis C in an urban HIV clinic

    AIDS

    (2006)
  • D. Nunes et al.

    Barriers to treatment of hepatitis C in HIV/HCV-coinfected adults with alcohol problems

    Alcohol Clin Exp Res

    (2006)
  • B.R. Edlin et al.

    Overcoming barriers to prevention, care, and treatment of hepatitis C in illicit drug users

    Clin Infect Dis

    (2005)
  • H. Scheft et al.

    Psychiatric barriers to readiness for treatment for hepatitis C Virus (HCV) infection among injection drug users: clinical experience of an addiction psychiatrist in the HIV–HCV coinfection clinic of a public health hospital

    Clin Infect Dis

    (2005)
  • A.A. Butt et al.

    Rates of HCV treatment eligibility among HCV-monoinfected and HCV/HIV-coinfected patients in tertiary care referral centers

    HIV Clin Trials

    (2009)
  • M. McLaren et al.

    Barriers to hepatitis C virus treatment in a Canadian HIV-hepatitis C virus coinfection tertiary care clinic

    Can J Gastroenterol

    (2008)
  • Cited by (12)

    • Hepatitis C treatment and SVR: The gap between clinical trials and real-world treatment aspirations

      2013, General Hospital Psychiatry
      Citation Excerpt :

      The findings also indicate the need for development of new interventions to help patients engage in treatment and achieve success in completing treatment. In France, Cacoub and colleagues [6] noted recent substantial increases in the proportions of patients with HCV who received treatment, and these yielded improved SVR rates. The main forces behind the increase in treatment rates were that treatment was considered less questionable and the increasing use of noninvasive liver damage tests reduced the barrier historically presented by reliance on liver biopsies.

    • Direct-acting antivirals for hepatitis C virus infections in patients co-infected with human immunodeficiency virus

      2011, Clinics and Research in Hepatology and Gastroenterology
      Citation Excerpt :

      The main reason for this, according to a 2009 survey, is that HCV therapy was not offered to around half of these patients for various reasons, ranging from minimal hepatic lesions, excessive alcohol or drug consumption, fear of side-effects or medical contra-indications, unfavourable socioeconomic conditions and the reluctance of patients to be treated [1]. Another reason is that only half of those treated with the standard pegylated interferon-ribavirin combination are able to achieve a sustained virological response (SVR), despite continuous and significant improvements in SVR rates, since the first therapeutic trials in HIV- HCV co-infected patients decreasing to < 25% in genotype-1-infected patients [1, 2]. This highlights the need to improve the rate of cured HCV infection in patients with HIV, as one of the main consequences of HIV- HCV co-infection is liver disease that, with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS)-related diseases and non-AIDS-defining cancers, is one of the three leading causes of morbidity and mortality [3, 4] Moreover, as a consequence of the growing incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma in HIV-infected patients [4], it has recently been suggested that liver-related deaths are the leading cause of mortality (17.6%) when hepatocellular-carcinoma-related deaths are included in liver-related deaths rather than in non-AIDS cancers [Ruppik M et al.’Changing patterns of causes of death: SHCS, 2005 to 2009.’

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text