Special articleOperational tolerance after liver transplantation☆
Introduction
The clinical era of transplantation began on December 23rd 1954, when Dr. Joseph Murray and co-workers performed the first successful renal transplant on the Herrick twins [1]. As a result of the genetic identity between the brothers, Richard Herrick did not receive any immunosuppression (IS) after the operation, thus representing the very first case of clinical operational tolerance (COT) in solid organ transplantation (SOT). In the same year, Billingham, Brent and Medawar first introduced the term transplantation tolerance, with the report of skin graft acceptance in mice that had received neonatal injections of donor mononuclear cells [2]. More than 50 years later, COT remains an extremely difficult goal to achieve in the majority of transplant recipients. However, in liver transplantation (LT) there is a growing body of evidence that COT can be achieved safely in a proportion of recipients. In this article, we will summarize and comment on all of the cases of COT described after LT reported to date, and will demonstrate that the achievement of an IS-free state – namely, COT – is definitely possible and safe after LT. The manuscript will emphasise the clinical perspectives, and will touch only briefly on the immunological mechanisms relevant to the understanding of the IS-free state achieved in the different studies described herein where, despite improved knowledge, understanding of the immune mechanisms underlying the phenomenon remains inadequate.
The cases of COT discussed will be divided into four different groups and sorted timewise according to the weaning strategy adopted. The first group identifies cases in which no tolerogenic molecule- or cell-based protocols were used, whereas the second and third groups will include cases in which tolerogenic molecule- and cell-based regimens were implemented, respectively. The cases of COT that developed after bone marrow transplantation will be included in the last group.
The authors define COT as the condition whereby a liver transplant retains function and lacks histological signs of rejection in the absence of any IS. The LT recipient in question is an immunocompetent host capable of responding to other immune challenges, including infections [3].
Section snippets
Pittsburgh – the original work
The very first cases of COT after LT were documented by Starzl and colleagues in the early 1990s [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10]. Based on the finding that 11 LT recipients had been IS-free as a consequence of non-compliance or post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders, the authors designed a prospective trial in which IS was intentionally withdrawn in patients experiencing IS-derived chronic toxicity. Out of 95 patients enrolled, 28 (29%, Table 1) were successfully weaned off IS after a
Pittsburgh – the tolerogenic protocol
In 2003, Starzl and colleagues published the results of a trial in which they administered ab initio an immunosuppressive protocol expected to be tolerogenic, to 82 adult kidney, liver, pancreas and intestinal transplant recipients [33]. The hypothesis on which this protocol was designed was that the need for continuous high dose IS can be avoided in most cases with the use of a strong lymphocyte-depleting regimen prior to engraftment, followed by the administration of low dose tacrolimus
Innsbruck–Vienna
Gadner and colleagues reported on the case of a 4-month-old girl with familial hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis, an inherited disorder whose only curative treatment is allogeneic stem cell transplantation [46]. The little girl underwent stem cell transplantation from her haploidentical mother, 2 months after receiving a living-related LT from the same donor for acute hepatic failure of unknown origin. The diagnosis of familial hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis could only be made after the
Innsbruck
Margreiter and colleagues reported the case of a 7.5-year-old patient who received a deceased-donor LT for skin- and liver-based chronic GVHD, occurring 7 years after an allogeneic bone marrow transplantation performed for sideroblastic anemia [57]. The donor was an HLA-identical female cousin. After the operation, the pre-existing chronic GVHD of the skin disappeared, and the immunosuppressive therapy – consisting of azathioprine, prednisone and cyclosporine – was gradually tapered and finally
How does the mechanism for COT occur?
Thus far, our efforts to understand the mechanisms underlying the phenomenon of COT have been mostly in vain. We know that the liver has immunomodulatory properties and that LT recipients are more prone to develop COT than recipients of other types of solid organ allografts. However, we do not know how the cells and mechanisms involved cooperate in order to induce and maintain COT, why COT occurs and when the chances for COT to develop are at their highest. Production of donor-strain soluble
What is the ‘gold standard’ to induce COT after LT?
This article of the current literature demonstrates that strategies that have been investigated to date with the objective of achieving a permanent IS-free state are numerous and very heterogeneous in terms of concept, immunological background and rationale, patient age, underlying indication for LT, endpoint, type of LT (deceased versus living donor), length of the weaning period, length of follow-up, presence or not of donor chimerism, full or partial chimerism, tolerogenic tools adopted,
Conclusions
Effective COT has been reported more frequently in LT recipients than after transplantation of any other organ. In some cases COT has been documented as an accidental finding, but in the last decade it has been obtained intentionally in selected patients, in a number of clinical trials. The present paper reviews 163 cases of COT and demonstrates that the belief that COT cannot be achieved without exposing the recipient to an increased and unacceptable risk of graft loss is no longer justified
Future perspectives
The failure of tolerogenic molecule-based protocols means that the molecular strategies investigated to date may be sub-optimal. The pathways of the immune response triggered by the engraftment of an allogeneic organ, may be too numerous to be controlled by just one or few compounds. In the stem cell era, the field of SOT has just started to address its interest towards progenitor cells which show impressive immunomodulatory properties. As stem cells have been used to treat conditions
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to address a special thank to Robert J. Stratta and Peiman Hematti for critical review. Gratitude is expressed by GO to Giuseppe Tisone and Jan Lerut for education, and to Alberto Sanchez-Fueyo for inspiration.
Giuseppe Orlando is recipient of the Marie Curie International Outgoing Fellowship POIF-GA-2008-221850, financed by the European Commission under the 7th Framework Program for Research and Development.
References (61)
- et al.
Early tolerance in pediatric liver allograft recipients
J Pediatr Surg
(1994) - et al.
Clinical tolerance following liver transplantation: long term results and future prospects
Transpl Immunol
(2007) - et al.
Dendritic cell subset ratio in peripheral blood correlates with successful withdrawal of immunosuppression in liver transplant patients
Am J Transplant
(2003) - et al.
Dendritic cell subset ratio in tolerant, weaning and non-tolerant liver recipients is not affected by extent of immunosuppression
Am J Transplant
(2005) - et al.
Long-term outcome of immunosuppression withdrawal after liver transplantation
Transplant Proc
(2005) - et al.
Analysis of alloreactivity and intragraft cytokine profiles in living donor liver transplant recipients with graft acceptance
Transpl Immunol
(2001) - et al.
Clinical, immunological, and pathological aspects of operational tolerance after pediatric living-donor liver transplantation
Transpl Immunol
(2007) - et al.
Analyses of peripheral blood mononuclear cells in operational tolerance after pediatric living donor liver transplantation
Am J Transplant
(2004) - et al.
The roles of CD25+CD4+ regulatory T cells in operational tolerance after living donor liver transplantation
Transplant Proc
(2005) - et al.
Operational tolerance in clinical liver transplantation: emerging developments
Transpl Imm
(2007)
Complete weaning off immunosuppression in HCV liver transplant recipients is feasible and favourably impacts on the progression of disease recurrence
J Hepatol
The Tor Vergat Weaning Off Immunosuppression Trial in HCV liver transplant patients. The updated follow up at 78 months
Transpl Imm
Immunosuppressive activity of serum taken from a liver transplant recipient after withdrawal of immunosuppressants
Transpl Immunol
Tolerogenic immunosuppression for organ transplantation
Lancet
Homeostatic repopulation by CD28-CD8+ T cells in alemtuzumab-depleted kidney transplant recipients treated with reduced immunosuppression
Am J Transplant
Alemtuzumab (CAMPATH 1H) induction therapy in cadaveric kidney transplantation – efficacy and safety at five years
Am J Transplant
Campath-1H in renal transplantation: The University of Wisconsin experience
Surgery
The role of alemtuzumab in facilitating maintenance immunosuppression minimization following solid organ transplantation
Transpl Immunol
Alemtuzumab (Campath-1H) in kidney transplantation
Am J Transplant
Immunocompetent T-cells with a memory-like phenotype are the dominant cell type following antibody-mediated T-cell depletion
Am J Transplant
Ursodeoxycholic acid for prevention of acute rejection in liver transplant recipients
Lancet
Successful stem cell transplantation following orthotopic liver transplantation from the same haploidentical family donor in a girl with hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis
Blood
Donor stem cell infusion after non-myeloablative conditioning for tolerance induction to HLA mismatched adult living-donor liver graft
Transpl Immunol
A rapid test of alloreactivity based on interleukin-2 mRNA expression might identify liver transplant recipients with donor-specific hyporesponsiveness
Transplant Proc
The role of donor bone marrow infusions in withdrawal of immunosuppression in adult liver allotransplantation
Am J Transplant
Immune responses and their regulation by donor bone marrow cells in clinical organ transplantation
Transpl Immunol
Role of mesenchymal stromal cells in solid organ transplantation
Transplant Rev (Orlando)
Multiparameter immune profiling of operational tolerance in liver transplantation
Am J Transpl
Successful homotransplantation of the human kidney between identical twins
JAMA
Actively acquired tolerance of foreign cells
Nature
Cited by (145)
Cell transplantation-based regenerative medicine in liver diseases
2023, Stem Cell ReportsTransplantation Pathology
2023, MacSween's Pathology of the Liver, Eighth EditionIntroducing thymus for promoting transplantation tolerance
2022, Journal of Allergy and Clinical ImmunologyComparison of the characteristics of adult liver transplant recipients with prope (almost) tolerance and full immunosuppression regimen
2021, Transplant ImmunologyCitation Excerpt :Two studies reported that weaning off IS in LT recipients with non-immunological disease was not harmful in terms of the increased risk of graft loss, and liver allograft rejection rarely affects the clinical outcomes. The clinical rejection during the weaning time is responsive to treatment with increased immunosuppression [22–24]. On the other hand, using clinical biomarkers that detect subclinical rejection could help the transplant team to monitor the patients and improve the therapeutic strategy [25].
Isolated Liver Rejection After Lung and Combined Kidney-Liver Transplantation: A Case Report
2021, Transplantation ProceedingsHow the transplant landscape is changing in the regenerative medicine era
2021, Organ Repair and Regeneration: Preserving Organs in the Regenerative Medicine Era
- ☆
The authors who have taken part in this study declared that they do not have anything to disclose regarding funding from industry or conflict of interest with respect to this manuscript.