Elsevier

Journal of Hepatology

Volume 50, Issue 6, June 2009, Pages 1247-1257
Journal of Hepatology

Special article
Operational tolerance after liver transplantation

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2009.03.006Get rights and content

The achievement of an immunosuppression (IS)-free state after transplantation represents the ultimate goal of any immunosuppressive regimen. While clinical operational tolerance (COT) remains the exception after other types of solid organ transplantation, several cases of COT have been described after liver transplantation (LT). Overall, the experience gained so far worldwide demonstrates that COT can be achieved safely in one quarter of selected individuals, irrespective of the immunological background of donor and recipient, patient age, indication for LT, study endpoint, length of the weaning period and of pre/post-weaning follow-up, presence or not of chimerism. However, most transplant physicians still believe that the achievement of COT is still out of reach for the majority of LT recipients because of the potential risk for transplant survival, the non-randomized nature of most of the studies reported so far, and the selective nature of the patients enrolled in such studies, making them non-representative of the whole population of LT recipients. Despite these concerns, the present article demonstrates that this attitude is potentially no longer justified, given the growing evidence that a permanent and stable IS-free state can be achieved in a proportion of individuals who have received a LT for non-immune mediated liver diseases.

Introduction

The clinical era of transplantation began on December 23rd 1954, when Dr. Joseph Murray and co-workers performed the first successful renal transplant on the Herrick twins [1]. As a result of the genetic identity between the brothers, Richard Herrick did not receive any immunosuppression (IS) after the operation, thus representing the very first case of clinical operational tolerance (COT) in solid organ transplantation (SOT). In the same year, Billingham, Brent and Medawar first introduced the term transplantation tolerance, with the report of skin graft acceptance in mice that had received neonatal injections of donor mononuclear cells [2]. More than 50 years later, COT remains an extremely difficult goal to achieve in the majority of transplant recipients. However, in liver transplantation (LT) there is a growing body of evidence that COT can be achieved safely in a proportion of recipients. In this article, we will summarize and comment on all of the cases of COT described after LT reported to date, and will demonstrate that the achievement of an IS-free state – namely, COT – is definitely possible and safe after LT. The manuscript will emphasise the clinical perspectives, and will touch only briefly on the immunological mechanisms relevant to the understanding of the IS-free state achieved in the different studies described herein where, despite improved knowledge, understanding of the immune mechanisms underlying the phenomenon remains inadequate.

The cases of COT discussed will be divided into four different groups and sorted timewise according to the weaning strategy adopted. The first group identifies cases in which no tolerogenic molecule- or cell-based protocols were used, whereas the second and third groups will include cases in which tolerogenic molecule- and cell-based regimens were implemented, respectively. The cases of COT that developed after bone marrow transplantation will be included in the last group.

The authors define COT as the condition whereby a liver transplant retains function and lacks histological signs of rejection in the absence of any IS. The LT recipient in question is an immunocompetent host capable of responding to other immune challenges, including infections [3].

Section snippets

Pittsburgh – the original work

The very first cases of COT after LT were documented by Starzl and colleagues in the early 1990s [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10]. Based on the finding that 11 LT recipients had been IS-free as a consequence of non-compliance or post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders, the authors designed a prospective trial in which IS was intentionally withdrawn in patients experiencing IS-derived chronic toxicity. Out of 95 patients enrolled, 28 (29%, Table 1) were successfully weaned off IS after a

Pittsburgh – the tolerogenic protocol

In 2003, Starzl and colleagues published the results of a trial in which they administered ab initio an immunosuppressive protocol expected to be tolerogenic, to 82 adult kidney, liver, pancreas and intestinal transplant recipients [33]. The hypothesis on which this protocol was designed was that the need for continuous high dose IS can be avoided in most cases with the use of a strong lymphocyte-depleting regimen prior to engraftment, followed by the administration of low dose tacrolimus

Innsbruck–Vienna

Gadner and colleagues reported on the case of a 4-month-old girl with familial hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis, an inherited disorder whose only curative treatment is allogeneic stem cell transplantation [46]. The little girl underwent stem cell transplantation from her haploidentical mother, 2 months after receiving a living-related LT from the same donor for acute hepatic failure of unknown origin. The diagnosis of familial hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis could only be made after the

Innsbruck

Margreiter and colleagues reported the case of a 7.5-year-old patient who received a deceased-donor LT for skin- and liver-based chronic GVHD, occurring 7 years after an allogeneic bone marrow transplantation performed for sideroblastic anemia [57]. The donor was an HLA-identical female cousin. After the operation, the pre-existing chronic GVHD of the skin disappeared, and the immunosuppressive therapy – consisting of azathioprine, prednisone and cyclosporine – was gradually tapered and finally

How does the mechanism for COT occur?

Thus far, our efforts to understand the mechanisms underlying the phenomenon of COT have been mostly in vain. We know that the liver has immunomodulatory properties and that LT recipients are more prone to develop COT than recipients of other types of solid organ allografts. However, we do not know how the cells and mechanisms involved cooperate in order to induce and maintain COT, why COT occurs and when the chances for COT to develop are at their highest. Production of donor-strain soluble

What is the ‘gold standard’ to induce COT after LT?

This article of the current literature demonstrates that strategies that have been investigated to date with the objective of achieving a permanent IS-free state are numerous and very heterogeneous in terms of concept, immunological background and rationale, patient age, underlying indication for LT, endpoint, type of LT (deceased versus living donor), length of the weaning period, length of follow-up, presence or not of donor chimerism, full or partial chimerism, tolerogenic tools adopted,

Conclusions

Effective COT has been reported more frequently in LT recipients than after transplantation of any other organ. In some cases COT has been documented as an accidental finding, but in the last decade it has been obtained intentionally in selected patients, in a number of clinical trials. The present paper reviews 163 cases of COT and demonstrates that the belief that COT cannot be achieved without exposing the recipient to an increased and unacceptable risk of graft loss is no longer justified

Future perspectives

The failure of tolerogenic molecule-based protocols means that the molecular strategies investigated to date may be sub-optimal. The pathways of the immune response triggered by the engraftment of an allogeneic organ, may be too numerous to be controlled by just one or few compounds. In the stem cell era, the field of SOT has just started to address its interest towards progenitor cells which show impressive immunomodulatory properties. As stem cells have been used to treat conditions

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to address a special thank to Robert J. Stratta and Peiman Hematti for critical review. Gratitude is expressed by GO to Giuseppe Tisone and Jan Lerut for education, and to Alberto Sanchez-Fueyo for inspiration.

Giuseppe Orlando is recipient of the Marie Curie International Outgoing Fellowship POIF-GA-2008-221850, financed by the European Commission under the 7th Framework Program for Research and Development.

References (61)

  • G. Tisone et al.

    Complete weaning off immunosuppression in HCV liver transplant recipients is feasible and favourably impacts on the progression of disease recurrence

    J Hepatol

    (2006)
  • G. Orlando et al.

    The Tor Vergat Weaning Off Immunosuppression Trial in HCV liver transplant patients. The updated follow up at 78 months

    Transpl Imm

    (2008)
  • L.W. Hsu et al.

    Immunosuppressive activity of serum taken from a liver transplant recipient after withdrawal of immunosuppressants

    Transpl Immunol

    (2007)
  • T.E. Starzl et al.

    Tolerogenic immunosuppression for organ transplantation

    Lancet

    (2003)
  • P. Trzonkowski et al.

    Homeostatic repopulation by CD28-CD8+ T cells in alemtuzumab-depleted kidney transplant recipients treated with reduced immunosuppression

    Am J Transplant

    (2008)
  • C.J. Watson et al.

    Alemtuzumab (CAMPATH 1H) induction therapy in cadaveric kidney transplantation – efficacy and safety at five years

    Am J Transplant

    (2005)
  • S.J. Knechtle et al.

    Campath-1H in renal transplantation: The University of Wisconsin experience

    Surgery

    (2004)
  • A. Agarwal et al.

    The role of alemtuzumab in facilitating maintenance immunosuppression minimization following solid organ transplantation

    Transpl Immunol

    (2008)
  • G. Ciancio et al.

    Alemtuzumab (Campath-1H) in kidney transplantation

    Am J Transplant

    (2008)
  • J.P. Pearl et al.

    Immunocompetent T-cells with a memory-like phenotype are the dominant cell type following antibody-mediated T-cell depletion

    Am J Transplant

    (2005)
  • H. Persson et al.

    Ursodeoxycholic acid for prevention of acute rejection in liver transplant recipients

    Lancet

    (1990)
  • S. Matthes-Martin et al.

    Successful stem cell transplantation following orthotopic liver transplantation from the same haploidentical family donor in a girl with hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis

    Blood

    (2000)
  • V. Donckier et al.

    Donor stem cell infusion after non-myeloablative conditioning for tolerance induction to HLA mismatched adult living-donor liver graft

    Transpl Immunol

    (2004)
  • L. Craciun et al.

    A rapid test of alloreactivity based on interleukin-2 mRNA expression might identify liver transplant recipients with donor-specific hyporesponsiveness

    Transplant Proc

    (2007)
  • P. Tryphonopoulos et al.

    The role of donor bone marrow infusions in withdrawal of immunosuppression in adult liver allotransplantation

    Am J Transplant

    (2005)
  • J.M. Mathew et al.

    Immune responses and their regulation by donor bone marrow cells in clinical organ transplantation

    Transpl Immunol

    (2003)
  • P. Hematti

    Role of mesenchymal stromal cells in solid organ transplantation

    Transplant Rev (Orlando)

    (2008)
  • M. Martı´nez-Llordella et al.

    Multiparameter immune profiling of operational tolerance in liver transplantation

    Am J Transpl

    (2007)
  • J.P. Merrill et al.

    Successful homotransplantation of the human kidney between identical twins

    JAMA

    (1956)
  • R.E. Billingham et al.

    Actively acquired tolerance of foreign cells

    Nature

    (1953)
  • Cited by (145)

    • Transplantation Pathology

      2023, MacSween's Pathology of the Liver, Eighth Edition
    • Introducing thymus for promoting transplantation tolerance

      2022, Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
    • Comparison of the characteristics of adult liver transplant recipients with prope (almost) tolerance and full immunosuppression regimen

      2021, Transplant Immunology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Two studies reported that weaning off IS in LT recipients with non-immunological disease was not harmful in terms of the increased risk of graft loss, and liver allograft rejection rarely affects the clinical outcomes. The clinical rejection during the weaning time is responsive to treatment with increased immunosuppression [22–24]. On the other hand, using clinical biomarkers that detect subclinical rejection could help the transplant team to monitor the patients and improve the therapeutic strategy [25].

    • How the transplant landscape is changing in the regenerative medicine era

      2021, Organ Repair and Regeneration: Preserving Organs in the Regenerative Medicine Era
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    The authors who have taken part in this study declared that they do not have anything to disclose regarding funding from industry or conflict of interest with respect to this manuscript.

    View full text