Research PaperHighly efficient As(III) removal in water using millimeter-sized porous granular MgO-biochar with high adsorption capacity
Graphical Abstract
Introduction
Arsenic (As) pollution of groundwater has been a severe environmental issue for decades (Nordstrom, 2002, Argos et al., 2010). Around 150 million people in more than 70 countries are chronically exposed to a toxic level of arsenic due to the consumption of arsenic-contaminated water (Brammer and Ravenscroft, 2009). As a confirmed Class I carcinogenic element, long-term drinking of water with excessive arsenic can cause serious health hazards to humans, such as cancers, neurological disorders (Brown and Ross, 2002). Soluble arsenic in aqueous environment mainly existed in the form of arsenite (As(III)) and arsenate (As(V)) (Cullen and Reimer, 1989). The predominant species of arsenic in groundwater is usually As(III) (Sorg et al., 2014, Chang et al., 2010). Unlike As(V) that exists as anions H2AsO4- and HAsO42-, As(III) exists as the neutral H3AsO3 below pH 9.2, which is more mobile and difficult to be removed due to its low affinity to most adsorbents (Mohan and Pittman, 2007). Furthermore, As(III) is more toxic than As(V) (Jain and Ali, 2000). Hence, the development of efficient, stable, and simple techniques for As(III) removal is urgently needed.
To tackle this need, various techniques have been developed and investigated for As(III) removal, such as ion exchange (Miller et al., 2000), membrane filtration (Weng et al., 2005), reverse osmosis (Akin et al., 2011), electro-coagulation (Bandaru et al., 2020) and adsorption (Zhang et al., 2013, Wei et al., 2019). Among them, adsorption is very promising due to its simplicity and low cost (Wei et al., 2019, Li et al., 2016). Accordingly, various adsorbents have been developed for this purpose. Among them, metal oxides modified biochars are highly preferred for As removal (Li et al., 2018). It combines the advantages of metal oxides and biochar. Metal oxides possess a specific affinity toward arsenic (Hristovski and Markovski, 2017). The biochar is stable, environmentally friendly, widespread availability, and low cost, and can be easily employed in fixed-bed columns due to its granular characteristics (Hu et al., 2015). Despite these advances, iron-modified biochar are always under the spotlight (Li et al., 2018). Because these adsorbents are prepared by pyrolyzing metal ions-impregnated biomass or directly pyrolyzing metal salt onto biochar, most of the produced metal oxides are inaccessible to As due to its unreasonable distribution and pore blockage (Wei et al., 2019, Ling et al., 2017). Furthermore, the affinity of As(III) to most metal oxides is weak (Mohan and Pittman, 2007, Dixit and Hering, 2003). As a result, the currently reported metal oxides modified biochars suffer from the fundamental problem of low adsorption capacity (Li et al., 2018).
To tackle this problem, a metal oxide with high affinity toward As(III) is first needed. Among various metal oxides that examined for As(III) removal from aqueous solution, magnesium oxide (MgO) exhibited extraordinary high adsorption capacity for As(III), which reached a staggering 500–900 mg/g (Purwajanti et al., 2016, Tresintsi et al., 2014, Liu et al., 2011, Yang et al., 2016, Jia et al., 2013). Secondly, a rational distribution of MgO in suitable biochar is also important. The biomass and metal salt should be dissolved in a specific solvent to form a homogeneous colloid and subsequent carbonization may make the generated metal oxides uniformly dispersed in the biochar. Chitosan, an abundant biomass, can be easily dissolved in a dilute acid solution, and the resulting colloid will be converted into a hydrogel when added to an alkaline solution (He et al., 2016). Freeze-drying is a highly efficient technology to prepare porous biochar from hydrogel (Wei et al., 2019, Liu et al., 2019). These features make it an ideal biochar precursor for the preparation of MgO-loaded biochar.
In this study, the macroporous magnesium-impregnated chitosan beads were first prepared by gel-bead method and freeze-drying, and then carbonized to obtain macroporous granular MgO-embedded biochar (g-MgO-Bc). The generated MgO was evenly dispersed in the entire biochar, and the abundant macroporous of the g-MgO-Bc made these MgO fully exposed to As(III), resulting in high adsorption capacity. Due to its granular characteristics, the g-MgO-Bc also possesses the advantage of convenient operation for fixed-bed column operation. Batch experiments were performed to investigate its adsorption capacity, kinetics, the influences of the solution chemistry, and regeneration. The underlying removal mechanisms were analyzed. Fixed-bed column experiment with As(III)-spiked natural groundwater was employed to evaluate its potential for practical application.
Section snippets
Materials
Magnesium chloride hexahydrate (MgCl2·6H2O, analytical grade) and glacial acetic acid (CH3COOH, analytical grade) were purchased from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Chitosan powder (deacetylation: 95%) was purchased from Aladdin Bio-Chem Technology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). The As(III) stock solution was prepared by dissolving As2O3 with a 0.05 M NaOH solution. Natural groundwater was collected from a well in Changsha, Hunan, China, and its water quality analysis was
Characterizations
The g-MgO-Bc precursor, uncalcined magnesium-chitosan aerogel beads, are white beads with a diameter of about 2.5 mm (Fig. S1). After calcination, these beads turned to black, resulting in g-MgO-Bc in an average size of 2.5 mm (Fig. 1a, Fig. S2). The g-MgO-Bc-X showed a porous structure (Fig. 1b, Fig. S2) and the pore wall was decorated with nanoparticles (Fig. 1c). Although the bare Bc also exhibited a porous structure, the pore wall was smooth (Fig. S3). The elemental mapping reveals that Mg
Conclusions
A high-efficiency granular MgO-embedded biochar (g-MgO-Bc) adsorbent was fabricated by a simple gelation-calcination method for the uptake of As(III). The MgO nanoparticles were homogenously dispersed in porous biochar matrix, which accelerated the diffusion and adsorption of As(III). The adsorbent exhibited fast kinetic and excellent adsorption capacities, giving a much higher adsorption capacity than most of the reported granular adsorbents and even nano-adsorbents. It could work effectively
CRediT authorship contribution statement
Tao Chen: Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Data curation. Yuanfeng Wei: Validation, Formal analysis, Supervision, Writing - original draft. Weijian Yang: Resources, Visualization. Chengbin Liu: Writing - review & editing, Project administration, Funding acquisition.
Declaration of Competing Interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by National Key Research and Development Project (2020YFC1807301), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51778218), the Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province (2019JJ10001, 2020JJ6043), and the Science and Technology Innovation Plan of Hunan Province (2017SK2420, 2019RS3015).
References (60)
- et al.
Removal of arsenate [As(V)] and arsenite [As(III)] from water by SWHR and BW-30 reverse osmosis
Desalination
(2011) - et al.
Arsenic exposure from drinking water, and all-cause and chronic-disease mortalities in Bangladesh (HEALS): a prospective cohort study
Lancet
(2010) - et al.
Effect of synthesis methods on magnetic Kans grass biochar for enhanced As(III, V) adsorption from aqueous solutions
Biomass Bioenergy
(2014) - et al.
Long-term electrode behavior during treatment of arsenic contaminated groundwater by a pilot-scale iron electrocoagulation system
Water Res.
(2020) - et al.
Arsenic in groundwater: a threat to sustainable agriculture in South and South-east Asia
Environ. Int.
(2009) - et al.
Arsenic, drinking water, and health: a position paper of the american council on science and health
Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol.
(2002) - et al.
Practical performance and its efficiency of arsenic removal from groundwater using Fe-Mn binary oxide
J. Environ. Sci.
(2010) Mechanisms of arsenic adsorption on amorphous oxides evaluated using macroscopic measurements, vibrational spectroscopy, and surface complexation modeling
J. Colloid Interface Sci.
(2001)- et al.
Novel chitosan goethite bionanocomposite beads for arsenic remediation
Water Res.
(2016) - et al.
Engineering metal (hydr)oxide sorbents for removal of arsenate and similar weak-acid oxyanion contaminants: a critical review with emphasis on factors governing sorption processes
Sci. Total Environ.
(2017)
Batch and column sorption of arsenic onto iron-impregnated biochar synthesized through hydrolysis
Water Res.
Arsenic: occurrence, toxicity and speciation techniques
Water Res.
Application of iron-modified biochar for arsenite removal and toxicity reduction
J. Ind. Eng. Chem.
An overview of carbothermal synthesis of metal–biochar composites for the removal of oxyanion contaminants from aqueous solution
Carbon
Arsenic removal in aqueous solution by a novel Fe-Mn modified biochar composite: characterization and mechanism
Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf.
Enhanced As(III) removal from aqueous solution by Fe-Mn-La-impregnated biochar composites
Sci. Total Environ.
3D hierarchical porous-structured biochar aerogel for rapid and efficient phenicol antibiotics removal from water
Chem. Eng. J.
Simultaneous removal of Cd(II) and As(III) by graphene-like biochar-supported zero-valent iron from irrigation waters under aerobic conditions: synergistic effects and mechanisms
J. Hazard. Mater.
The overlooked role of carbonaceous supports in enhancing arsenite oxidation and removal by nZVI: surface area versus electrochemical property
Chem. Eng. J.
The role of silicate in the adsorption/desorption of arsenite on goethite
Chem. Geol.
Effects of silicate, sulfate, and carbonate on arsenic removal by ferric chloride
Water Res.
A comment on arsenic species separation using ion exchange
Water Res.
Arsenic removal from water/wastewater using adsorbents—a critical review
J. Hazard. Mater.
Removal of Arsenic(III) from water using magnetite precipitated onto Douglas fir biochar
J. Environ. Manag.
Aminopolycarboxylic acid functionalized adsorbents for heavy metals removal from water
Water Res.
Arsenic(III,V) adsorption onto charred dolomite: charring optimization and batch studies
Chem. Eng. J.
Adsorption of As(III) and As(V) by Fe coated biochars and biochars produced from empty fruit bunch and rice husk
J. Environ. Chem. Eng.
Arsenic species in drinking water wells in the USA with high arsenic concentrations
Water Res.
A novel approach for arsenic adsorbents regeneration using MgO
J. Hazard. Mater.
Performance and mechanisms for remediation of Cd(II) and As(III) co-contamination by magnetic biochar-microbe biochemical composite: competition and synergy effects
Sci. Total Environ.
Cited by (40)
Enhanced copper removal by magnesium modified biochar derived from Alternanthera philoxeroides
2024, Environmental ResearchEnhanced oxidation and adsorption of arsenite by porous Fe-Mn binary chitosan beads and its application in fixed-bed column
2024, Journal of Molecular StructureImproving arsenic and cadmium contaminated paddy soil health and rice quality with plant-animal-based modified biochar: A mechanistic study
2024, Journal of Cleaner ProductionPristine/magnesium-loaded biochar and ZVI affect rice grain arsenic speciation and cadmium accumulation through different pathways in an alkaline paddy soil
2024, Journal of Environmental Sciences (China)Strategies for enhancing catalytic efficiency and stability of MgO-biochar catalysts in glucose isomerization to fructose
2024, Industrial Crops and Products