Research PaperStatistical comparison of leaching behavior of incineration bottom ash using seawater and deionized water: Significant findings based on several leaching methods
Introduction
Incineration may achieve an overall 70–90% of volume reduction of municipal solid waste (MSW), during which a small volume of residue (∼20–25% by mass) namely incineration bottom ashes (IBA) are generated [1]. Recycling of IBA is widely practiced with increasingly adopted waste to energy (WTE) facilities in the globe, while management practices for it vary in different jurisdictions, and there is still need for legislation on recycling of IBA [2].
One challenge in the development of IBA legislation is that, IBA may vary a lot in their quality ascribed to different applied technologies for incineration and the variation of feedstock for burning [3], while reserve most of the metals (>80%) at higher concentrations from the resource [4], [5], [6]. When the total content of elements is taken as a basis, IBA should be considered as hazardous waste from the perspective of eco-toxic hazard properties. Note that, however, substances should be in solution first in order to exert a potential eco-toxic effect, alternative assessments of wastes may consider the leached concentrations instead [7]. European Council Decision 2003/33/EC lists the waste acceptance criteria based on element-leached concentrations for the different categories of waste: inert wastes, nonhazardous wastes, hazardous wastes, pursuant to the Directive of 1999, as showed in Table 1. As such, IBA may not be considered as non-hazardous waste based on leaching data (EU) at pH = 7–12 [7]. National legislation has been implemented to regulate utilization of IBA in the Netherlands and in France, however, in the Netherlands, IBA is placed in a special category, because it does not always meet the regulatory requirement [4].
Another challenge in the development of IBA legislation is that, IBA utilization has to depend on its impact (mainly ascribed to element leaching) to the environment. There are varieties of applications being currently performed, such as substitutes of non-constructive aggregates, sub-base materials for road pavements, embankment fillings, concrete production or coast erosion protection, with involvement of distinct environmental boundaries [1], [8], [9], [10], [11]. Accordingly, many lab-based leaching methods have been developed to simulate the IBA leaching potential when it is applied in the field. In general, these leaching methods may be classified into several categories, such as the batch leaching tests under the natural pH, the pH-static leaching tests, and the column leaching tests, etc. For instance, column leaching tests are considered as simulating the flow of percolating groundwater through a porous bed of the targeting material [12]. On the contrary, batch leaching tests are static leaching method which generates chemical data at equilibrium for mechanistic applications. As compared to batch leaching tests under natural pHs, the pH-static leaching tests intend to establish the complicated leaching profile as a function of pH values, useful to quantify the IBA leachability [13], [14].
Although pH is the most relevant factor on the assessment of the differences between leaching methods due to its strong control on the pollutant release [15], there are many other factors which may significantly affect the leaching results, such as particle size distribution, liquid to solid (L/S) ratio, leaching regents, apparatus and scale, mixing time, leaching procedures, etc. [4], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20]. So far, many of these factors have been specified among various available methods designed for leaching analysis. However, it yields various leached data which is hard to cross-compare among one another and quantify the exact hazard associated with IBA [21]. In this regard, regulations imposed on IBA utilization must be scenario specific to map each other between the laboratory leaching results and the specific application. Furthermore, leaching method development for IBA classification in the laboratory is still at their preliminary stage of development, whereas factors that are considered in their leaching procedures are rather limited. For instance, in the case of IBA application in land reclamation, bottom ashes are in fact exposed to seawater environment. Leaching methods using deionized water (DI) as the basic leachant may not be feasible any longer. According to Schmukat et al. [22], ionic strength (in terms of NaCl) and salinity significantly influenced the release metal(loid)s in the water phase for copper slag. Cetin et al. [23] also mentioned that a raised ionic strength may decrease the surface negativity of the fly ash and released Ba2+, Cu2+ and Zn2+ ions from the solid surface into the aqueous solution by electrostatic interaction. It is hereby of great interest for investigation of seawater-leaching scenario, as IBA for land reclamation may be considered a viable strategy to “close the waste loop” in land-scarce countries/regions, such as Singapore and Japan.
To statistically understand the metal leaching potential caused from seawater, a series of experiments were carried out with several leaching methods in the paper. IBA was collected from 5 source locations across Singapore, subjected to both batch leaching tests (EN 12457-1:2002 at L/S 2 and EN 12457-2:2002 at L/S 10) and the column leaching tests (DD CEN/TS 14405:2004). Two specific leachants i.e. DI and seawater, were intentionally applied to all three leaching methods, simulating the IBA utilization as supplementary construction materials under two scenarios – terrestrial and ocean applications, respectively, for deterministic assessment of the leaching behaviors and the associated impacts on the leaching standards.
Section snippets
Sampling and IBA preparation
The IBA used for this study was collected from multiple sources, including four incineration plants (IP1-4) under operation in Singapore and a metal recovery plant (MR) as well, which is processing IBA from three out the four plants in Singapore. All IPs are WTE plants using MSW as the primary fuel equipped with moving-grate stoker furnaces. The IBA sampling scheme was developed based on BS EN14899:2005 Characterisation of waste – Sampling of waste materials – Framework for preparation of a
IBA characterization
Table S1 shows characterization of different IBA samples which have been used for the study. Based on laboratory separation processes with IBA samples from IP1-4, ferrous metals accounted for 7.18–13.90% by weight and non-ferrous metals accounted for 0.85-1.84% by weight, respectively. These values fall into the typical range of literatures [1], however, IBA from IP4 presented both lower ferrous and non-ferrous metal fractions as compared to the others likely because less metal sources from its
Conclusions
- (1)
Metal leaching behaviors from IBA were different among different leaching methods, while statistically correlated to the leachant types, i.e., seawater or DI.
- (2)
Based on the same leaching method, however, the effects by seawater was minor as compared to those exerted from IBA intrinsic properties.
- (3)
For batch tests with L/S = 2, seawater effects were noted while not as obvious as those with L/S = 10. For most metals with higher leached amounts (0.1–10 mg/kg), there was a similar trend between batch
Acknowledgement
The authors would like to thank National Environmental Agency, Singapore for financially supporting this work.
References (52)
- et al.
Review of MSWI bottom ash utilization from perspectives of collective characterization, treatment and existing application
Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.
(2017) - et al.
A review of municipal solid waste environmental standards with a focus on incinerator residues
Int. J. Sustain. Built Environ.
(2015) - et al.
Characteristics, treatment and utilization of residues from municipal waste incineration
Waste Manage.
(2001) Developments in evaluating environmental impact from utilization of bulk inert wastes using laboratory leaching tests and field verification
Waste Manage.
(1996)- et al.
Mobility of heavy metals and rare earth elements in incineration bottom ash through particle size reduction
Chem. Eng. Sci.
(2014) - et al.
Use of washed municipal solid waste incinerator bottom ash in pervious concrete
Cem. Concr. Compos.
(2013) - et al.
Use of incinerator bottom ash in concrete
Cem. Concr. Res.
(1997) Use of municipal solid waste ash in concrete
Resour. Conserv. Recycl.
(2010)- et al.
Mechanical properties of incineration bottom ash: the influence of composite species
Waste Manage.
(2010) - et al.
Suitability of leaching test methods for fly ash and slag: a review
J. Radiat. Res. Appl. Sci.
(2015)
Comparison of batch leaching tests and influence of pH on the release of metals from construction and demolition wastes
Waste Manage.
Construction and demolition waste: comparison of standard up-flow column and down-flow lysimeter leaching tests
Waste Manage.
Comparison of leaching characteristics of heavy metals in APC residue from an MSW incinerator using various extraction methods
Waste Manage.
Leaching behavior of mineral processing waste: comparison of batch and column investigations
J. Hazard. Mater.
Analysis of leaching procedures for environmental risk assessment of recycled aggregate use in unpaved roads
Constr. Build. Mater.
Leaching of metal(loid)s from a construction material: influence of the particle size, specific surface area and ionic strength
J. Hazard. Mater.
Experimental and numerical analysis of metal leaching from fly ash-amended highway bases
Waste Manage.
Municipal solid waste combustion ash: state-of-the-knowledge
J. Hazard. Mater.
The use of MSWI (Municipal solid waste incineration) bottom ash as aggregates in hydraulic concrete
Comparison of dynamic mobilization of Co, Cd and Pb in sediments using DGT and metal mobility assessed by sequential extraction
Chemosphere
Speciation of Cu in MSWI bottom ash and its relation to Cu leaching
Appl. Geochem.
Metal leaching from MSWI bottom ash as affected by salt or dissolved organic matter
Waste Manage.
Mineralogical characterization of municipal solid waste incineration bottom ash with an emphasis on heavy metal-bearing phases
J. Hazard. Mater.
The application of pH stat leaching tests to assess the pH-dependent release of trace metals from soils, sediments and waste materials
J. Hazard. Mater.
Leaching heavy metals from the surface soil of reclaimed tidal flat by alternating seawater inundation and air drying
Chemosphere
Study of trace metal leaching from coals into seawater
Chemosphere
Cited by (37)
Closed-loop process for Zn and Cu selective recovery from MSWI bottom ash fine fraction
2023, Minerals EngineeringUse of alternative recycled fillers in bituminous mixtures: a review
2023, Advance Upcycling of By-products in Binder and Binder-Based Materials