Sarcopenia (and sarcopenic obesity) in older patients with gynecological malignancies

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgo.2020.09.014Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Sarcopenia is very frequent in older patients with cancer and it is associated to many adverse outcomes.

  • Sarcopenia could go under-detected, especially in overweight people, unless body composition assessment is performed.

  • Implementing body composition analysis would help risk stratification and treatment of older patients with cancer.

Abstract

Cancer is often complicated by the deterioration of both muscle mass and function, which may be more pronounced in older people. The prevalence of sarcopenia varies according to tumour type, stage and sarcopenia definition; in gynaecologic malignancies it ranges from 25 to 50%. Unfortunately, sarcopenia is often underdiagnosed especially in overweight and obese patients. The consequences of sarcopenia are serious: shorter time of tumour progression, increased chemotherapy-related toxicity, post-operative complications, poor functional status, hospitalisation, increased length of hospital stay, high 30-day readmission rate and mortality. Therefore, its precocious recognition and treatment is of paramount importance. We demonstrated that obesity can mask sarcopenia, taking into consideration a sample of older patient with cancer, unless body composition evaluation and comprehensive geriatric assessment, including measures of muscle strength and performance, is executed. Our work underlines the importance of a multidisciplinary approach to older patients with cancer to optimize their management.

Introduction

Aging is characterized by a progressive decline in both muscle mass and function. Beyond a certain threshold this reduction is configured as a pathologic condition named sarcopenia [1]. Sarcopenia is more frequent among patients with cancer because of many factors concurring to the deterioration of muscles: inflammation, tumour-derived catabolic factors, malnutrition, reduced physical activity and the effect of cytotoxic and targeted treatment on muscle mass and quality.

The prevalence of sarcopenia varies according to tumour type, stage and sarcopenia definition [2]; in gynaecologic malignancies it ranges from 25 to 50% [[3], [4], [5]]. Sarcopenia can precede the neoplastic disease and further complicate its course predisposing to a shorter time of tumour progression, increased chemotherapy-related toxicity, post-operative complications, poor functional status, hospitalisation, increased length of hospital stay, high 30-day readmission rate and mortality [3].

Unfortunately, sarcopenia is often underdiagnosed: the global epidemics of overweight and obesity render particularly challenging to identify muscle loss. Nowadays between 40 and 60% of oncologic patients are overweight or obese, even in the setting of metastatic disease [6]. Body composition varies widely among people of identical body mass index (BMI) [3] who can display different percentages of lean and fat tissues. Some obese individuals have little muscle mass, comparable to very underweight patients.

Performing a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) [7] helps in the early detection of sarcopenia and positively impacts on the management of older patients with cancer.

CGA implies a systematic evaluation of multiple domains (physical, cognitive, affective, social, financial, and environmental) influencing older adults' health. Therefore, CGA allows the evaluation of the major aetiologies of sarcopenia and helps its differentiation from other wasting conditions [1]. Moreover, CGA.

provides the basis for the development of tailored interventions. The major oncologic societies promote the CGA use [7] because its implementation is associated with more favourable outcomes.

Section snippets

Aim

The objective of this study was ascertaining retrospectively the prevalence of sarcopenia in a sample of older women with gynaecologic malignancies. The original aim of the project [4] was evaluating the impact of a multidisciplinary approach on the management of old gynaecologic patients with cancer. In the past years aggressive antineoplastic management was frequently denied to older people because of the misconception that older age was an absolute contraindication. On the contrary it has

Methods

The patients were recruited at the onco-gynaecologic unit of a tertiary hospital in Rome, Italy [4]. The Hospital Ethical Review Board approved the study. For the present analysis we selected the subgroup of patients who underwent both a comprehensive geriatric evaluation and body composition assessment through dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Six definitions of sarcopenia were applied. The one by Baumgartner who considered sarcopenia a reduction in relative muscle mass (appendicular skeletal

Results

Forty-four patients (mean age 73.6 ± 6.5 years) with good cognitive (mean Mini Mental State Examination 27.9 ± 2.6) and functional (mean Activities of Daily Living(ADL) 5.3 ± 1.1; mean Instrumental ADL 6.6 ± 2.2) performance were enrolled. The main gynecological diagnoses were ovarian (59%) and uterine (29.5%) neoplasms. The number of comorbidities they suffered from (Cumulative Illness Rating Scale severity mean 1.6 ± 0.2) and medications assumed (4 ± 2.37) were not elevated. Considering their

Discussion

Our study has proved that obesity can mask sarcopenia in gynaecologic patients unless body composition evaluation and CGA, including measures of muscle strength and performance are performed.

DXA is a non-invasive instrument for the body composition assessment. It measures the different attenuation of an X-ray source from human tissues at two different energy levels. DXA is the most commonly used technic in the geriatric research field but it is not routinely available in the oncologic clinical

Future Perspectives

We showed the prevalence of sarcopenia in older people with cancer by using different definitions of this disease. The retrospective nature of the study did not allow comparisons of sarcopenic versus non sarcopenic patients in terms of outcomes. However, showing the magnitude of the problem could be a stimulus for future research.

Identification of sarcopenia through CGA should be promoted in the oncologic context to avoid the negative outcomes associated with decreased muscle depots. Moreover,

Authors' Contributions

MC designed the study and significantly contributed in writing and revising the article.

GFC and AF actively participated in the assessment of the patients and in the conception of the study protocol. Moreover, they substantially contributed in the literature review and in writing the article.

SD reviewed the literature, wrote the article and participated in the statistical analyses.

DC contributed to the statistical analyses and reviewed the article.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References (11)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (0)

View full text