Case Report
The Use of Pneumatic Impact Lithotripsy in a Laparoscopic Retrieval Pouch for Removal of Large Cystoliths in Two Female Horses

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jevs.2020.103125Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Two mares were examined for signs of cytolithiasis.

  • Transrectal palpation and cystoscopy revealed a type I cystolith, measuring 10–12 cm.

  • Pneumatic impact lithotripsy enabled effective lithotripsy.

  • The use of a pouch prevented further mucosal trauma and spreading of calculi debri.

  • No complications were encountered when using this technique in two mares.

Abstract

Two mares, aged 15 and 21 years, were examined because of urinary incontinence, intermittent hematuria, and urine scalding. On admission of both horses, physical parameters were within normal limits and urine scalding of the skin at the ventral perineum was noted. Transrectal palpation and cystoscopy revealed a large type I cystolith (>10 cm) with associated hyperemia and focal ulceration of the bladder mucosa. In horse 1, hemogram, serum biochemical analysis, and renal ultrasound were not performed because of owner finances. In horse 2, results from hematological and serum biochemical analysis were unremarkable and renal ultrasonography did not reveal any abnormalities. Pneumatic impact lithotripsy in a laparoscopic retrieval pouch was performed under cystoscopic guidance after caudal epidural anesthesia, with the horses standing and under sedation. A laparoscopic retrieval device was passed alongside a flexible endoscope into the urinary bladder and the cystolith was manipulated into the pouch. A customized single stainless-steel rod scaler attached to an air compressor was used for fragmentation of the cystolith contained within the retrieval pouch. Lithotripsy time was 42 minutes for horse 1 and 31 minutes for horse 2. Both horses were released from hospital the day of surgery. Both horses were continent and voided normal streams of urine for the duration of the follow-up periods of 27 and 19 months for horse 1 and horse 2, respectively. Pneumatic impact lithotripsy in a laparoscopic retrieval pouch provided a time-efficient and minimally invasive surgical treatment option for removal of large cystoliths in mares.

Introduction

Cystolithiasis refers to the presence of one or more calculi in the urinary bladder and is more commonly diagnosed in male than in female horses [1]. Common clinical signs include hematuria exacerbated with exercise, pollakiuria, stranguria, and dysuria. In addition, urine scalding of the hind limbs and perineum may occur in mares because of urinary incontinence [1].

In horses, cystoliths are primarily composed of calcium carbonate and are classified as type I or type II [[1], [2], [3]]. Type I cystoliths account for approximately 90% of the cases, are yellow-green, have a spiculated surface, and have variable resistance to fragmentation [1,3]. Less commonly encountered, type II cystoliths are gray-white with a smooth surface and high resistance to fragmentation. Type II cystoliths typically contain phosphate in addition to calcium carbonate [[1], [2], [3]].

The rough and spiculated surface of type I cystoliths grabs into the mucosa of the urethra and bladder, thus causing trauma and making calculi removal through the urethra difficult. In mares, owing to the urethra being short and distensible, most cystoliths are still retrieved through the urethra [1,3]. However, mares with larger type I cystoliths typically require lithotripsy or sphincterotomy to avoid traumatic tearing of the bladder neck or urethra on calculi retrieval [1,3].

We report the use of pneumatic impact lithotripsy and a retrieval pouch for straightforward and time-efficient removal of large cystoliths (>10 cm) in two mares. A similar technique has been recently described in male horses after standing perineal urethrotomy [4]. To the authors’ knowledge, no reports exist of the use of this technique in female horses.

Section snippets

History and Clinical Findings

A 15-year-old 521 kg (1146.2 lb) Thoroughbred mare (horse 1) presented to the Washington State University Veterinary Teaching Hospital with a 3-month history of urinary incontinence, intermittent hematuria, and loss of body condition. The owner reported that the urinary incontinence was becoming progressively worse and that the hematuria seemed to be exacerbated with exercise. On presentation, the mare was bright, alert, and responsive. Her rectal temperature was 38.2°C (100.7°F), her heart

Discussion

In mares, because of their shorter and more distensible urethra, most cystoliths are retrieved “en bloc” through the urethra, either manually or with the aid of instruments [1,3,[5], [6], [7]]. However, for urethral removal of large cystoliths in female horses, urethral sphincterotomy and lithotripsy (alone or combined) have been advocated [1,3,8,9].

Sphincterotomy is easy to perform and enables passage of large cystoliths while avoiding traumatic laceration of the urethral sphincter on urolith

References (13)

  • M. Diaz-Espineira et al.

    Structure and composition of equine uroliths

    J Equine Vet Sci

    (1995)
  • K.F. Duesterdieck-Zellmer

    Equine urolithiasis

    Vet Clin Equine

    (2007)
  • S. Laverty et al.

    Urolithiasis in 68 horses

    Vet Surg

    (1992)
  • H.C. Schott et al.

    Bladder

  • N.P. De Bernardis et al.

    Theuse of pneumatic impact lithotripsy amd a retrieval pouch to create a closed system for removal of cystic calculi in standing male horses

    Equine Vet Educ

    (2019)
  • S.A. Katzman et al.

    Use of a laparoscopic specimen retrieval pouch to facilitate removal of intact or fragmented cystic calculi from standing sedated horses: 8 cases (2012-2015)

    J Am Vet Med Assoc

    (2016)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (0)

Animal welfare/ethical statement: To the authors’ understanding, this study does not require an ethical approval.

Conflict of interest statement: This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. The authors declare no conflict of interest.

View full text