Selective elimination of chromophoric and fluorescent dissolved organic matter in a full-scale municipal wastewater treatment plant

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2016.11.003Get rights and content

Abstract

Effluent organic matter (EfOM) from municipal wastewater treatment plants potentially has a detrimental effect on both aquatic organisms and humans. This study evaluated the removal and transformation of chromophoric dissolved organic matter (CDOM) and fluorescent dissolved organic matter (FDOM) in a full-scale wastewater treatment plant under different seasons. The results showed that bio-treatment was found to be more efficient in removing bulk DOM (in term of dissolved organic carbon, DOC) than CDOM and FDOM, which was contrary to the disinfection process. CDOM and FDOM were selectively removed at various stages during the treatment. Typically, the low molecular weight fractions of CDOM and protein-like FDOM were more efficiently removed during bio-treatment process, whereas the humic-like FDOM exhibited comparable decreases in both bio-treatment and disinfection processes. Overall, the performance of the WWTP was weak in terms of CDOM and FDOM removal, resulting in enrichment of CDOM and FDOM in effluent. Moreover, the total removal of the bulk DOM (P < 0.05) and the protein-like FDOM (P < 0.05) displayed a significant seasonal variation, with higher removal efficiencies in summer, whereas removal of CDOM and the humic-like FDOM showed little differences between summer and winter. In all, the results provide useful information for understanding the fate and transformation of DOM, illustrating that sub-fractions of DOM could be selectively removed depending on treatment processes and seasonality.

Introduction

Urban water scarcity has been receiving greater than ever attention due to the increasing human population, which exacerbates the urbanization and/or degradation of water resources. In recent years, treated wastewater has been considered as an alternative resource to alleviate water shortages (Hoffbuhr, 2007). However, the presence of large amount of organic matter in wastewater presents a huge challenge to treatment processes (e.g., biological/chemical /physical) and/or technologies (e.g., membrane filtration) (Ishii and Boyer, 2012, Shon et al., 2006). Meanwhile, a large amount of the treated wastewater is discharged into receiving waters, thus effluent organic matter (EfOM) is increasingly having an adverse impact on water quality and aquatic ecosystems (Vaquer-Sunyer et al., 2015), and a potential influence on current drinking water supplies (Nam et al., 2008, Oulton et al., 2010). Hence, it is crucial that the fate of dissolved organic matter (DOM) throughout wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) should be examined to control the quantity and chemical characteristics of EfOM.

In municipal WWTPs, bio-treatment is a common approach for the elimination of nutrients (Mayor et al., 2004) and DOM (Shon et al., 2006, Park et al., 2010), whereas disinfection process is employed to inactivate pathogens before the bio-treated wastewater is discharged into aquatic ecosystems and is reclaimed (Han et al., 2015). The removal of DOM is primarily assessed by chemical parameters (e.g., dissolved organic carbon (DOC), chemical oxygen demand (COD) and biochemical oxygen demand (BOD)), which are influenced by the origins of DOM in raw wastewater, the variability of treatment processes (e.g., membrane bioreactors and nanofiltration) and other factors (e.g., environmental and instrument-related variability) (Park et al., 2010, Wei et al., 2012, Henderson et al., 2009). Seasonal variability (e.g., rainfall and temperature), for example, is known to have a strong influence on DOC and BOD/COD (Zhao et al., 2013). Quantification of DOC and BOD/COD provides only basic information about the chemical compositions and properties of DOM. More crucially, the design and optimization of WWTPs should focus not only on water-quality improvement but also on the toxicity of the treated water. For instance, antiestrogenic activity in biologically treated wastewater has been shown to significant increase following chlorination, probably caused by formation of antiestrogenic disinfection by-products (DBPs) (Wu et al., 2009). Therefore, more specific and sensitive analytical approaches are required to evaluate DOM removal as a function of treatment processes.

The optical methods have been widely applied in characterizing the DOM, particularly ultraviolet–visible (UV–vis) spectroscopy and fluorescence excitation emission matrix spectroscopy (EEMs) with parallel factor (PARAFAC) analysis. UV–vis spectroscopy has been used to trace the source, composition and reaction of chromophoric dissolved organic matter (CDOM) in natural water (Helms et al., 2008, Yan et al., 2013a, Yan et al., 2014a). The absorption spectral slopes (S275–295) or slope ratios (SR) have been linked to the molecular weight of CDOM (Helms et al., 2008). The log-transformed absorbance spectra have been employed to quantify DOM-metal interactions and generation of DBPs after chlorination (Yan et al., 2013a, Yan et al., 2014a). Meanwhile, combined EEMs with PARAFAC could shed light on the fingerprint of fluorescent dissolve organic matter (FDOM) and sources of DOM (Ishii and Boyer, 2012, Henderson et al., 2009, Maqbool et al., 2016, Murphy et al., 2011). A specific fluorescent component, as such a tryptophan-like component, could be used as an effective surrogate for monitoring DOM transformation in wastewater treatment (Yu et al., 2013). Similarly, UV–vis spectroscopy and fluorescence spectroscopy have been increasingly used for on-line monitoring of DOM in wastewater treatment as they do not require pretreatment and are non-destructive (Henderson et al., 2009, Carstea et al., 2016). Also, a range of studies were conducted to investigate the fate of DOM along the treatment lines in multiple WWTPs during extended periods of time using UV–vis spectroscopy and EEMs with PARAFAC (Murphy et al., 2011, Cohen et al., 2014, Lourenco et al., 2006). The prediction capability of on-line monitoring is based on the strong correlation between spectroscopic proprieties (e.g., intensity of either certain fluorescent components or absorbance at certain wavelengths) and the water quality parameters (e.g., BOD, COD and DOC) (Shutova et al., 2016). However, a majority of these studies mainly focused on the application of UV–vis spectroscopy or fluorescence spectroscopy in detecting the change of wastewater quality, while there are few studies performed using combined fluorescence and UV–visible absorbance. UV–vis absorbance measurement can provide as a complementary method for fluorescence measurement, because FDOM is a small fraction of CDOM. On the other hand, fluorescence measurement is more sensitive and selective relative to UV–vis absorbance (Henderson et al., 2009), so it is essential to examine simultaneously the fate and transformation of CDOM and FDOM to ensure reliability of treated wastewater (Louvet et al., 2013). Moreover, the effect of seasonal variation on DOM removal was rarely taken into consideration, although some studies were performed with a long-term examination.

In this study, we applied differential log-transformed UV–vis absorbance spectra with Gaussian fitting and differential EEMs in conjunction with PARAFAC analysis to identify the temporal variability of DOM in a full-scale WWTP; CDOM and FDOM were targeted to trace DOM transformation throughout the lifecycle of the processing in summer and winter. Sampling was designed to permit the examination of the effects of both seasonal variation (summer and winter) and treatment processes (sedimentation, bio-treatment and disinfection) on the selective removal of CDOM and FDOM from wastewater.

Section snippets

Sampling

All samples were collected from a WWTP located in Guangzhou City, China. Approximately 300,000 m3 of wastewater from domestic sources is treated in the WWTP daily, with solid retention time of 20 days. An anaerobic–anoxic–aerobic (A2/O) process is employed for wastewater treatment and chlorine dioxide (ClO2) is used as disinfectant. Primary sedimentation is performed to remove particular matter in primary clarifier, while activated sludge is separated from treated wastewater by gravitation in

Selective removal of CDOM at each treatment step

Given that UV–vis spectra of wastewater samples were nearly featureless except for their absorbance monotonically decreased with increasing wavelength (Appendix A Fig. S1), DLnA spectra (Fig. 2), which can present largely comparable features for wastewater effluent, were calculated to evaluate the evolution of CDOM properties after sedimentation, bio-treatment and disinfection. Meanwhile, one sample each from summer and winter was selected to represent typical tendencies observed in all

Conclusions

The DLnA spectra coupled with Gaussian fitting and EEMs with PARAFAC analyses were applied to characterize the dynamics of DOM in a full-scale WWTP. The major conclusions drawn are as follows: (1) The total removal efficiencies of bulk DOM (in term of DOC) and protein-like FDOM showed significant seasonal differences (P < 0.05), with higher removal efficiencies occurring in summer. (2) The bio-treatment process was more effective at removing the bulk DOM (in term of DOC) than that of CDOM and

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51478487).

References (58)

  • M.-H. Huang et al.

    Chemical composition of organic matters in domestic wastewater

    Desalination

    (2010)
  • C. Jarusutthirak et al.

    Understanding soluble microbial products (SMP) as a component of effluent organic matter (EfOM)

    Water Res.

    (2007)
  • G.V. Korshin et al.

    Monitoring the properties of natural organic matter through UV spectroscopy: a consistent theory

    Water Res.

    (1997)
  • N.D. Lourenco et al.

    UV spectra analysis for water quality monitoring in a fuel park wastewater treatment plant

    Chemosphere

    (2006)
  • J.N. Louvet et al.

    Monitoring of slaughterhouse wastewater biodegradation in a SBR using fluorescence and UV–visible absorbance

    Chemosphere

    (2013)
  • T. Maqbool et al.

    Characterizing fluorescent dissolved organic matter in a membrane bioreactor via excitation–emission matrix combined with parallel factor analysis

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2016)
  • F.G. Meng et al.

    Identifying the sources and fate of anthropogenically impacted dissolved organic matter (DOM) in urbanized rivers

    Water Res.

    (2013)
  • J. Peuravuori et al.

    Molecular size distribution and spectroscopic properties of aquatic humic substances

    Anal. Chim. Acta

    (1997)
  • P. Roccaro et al.

    Differential absorbance study of effects of temperature on chlorine consumption and formation of disinfection by-products in chlorinated water

    Water Res.

    (2008)
  • P. Westerhoff et al.

    Reactivity of natural organic matter with aqueous chlorine and bromine

    Water Res.

    (2004)
  • S. Xue et al.

    Effect of bromide ion on isolated fractions of dissolved organic matter in secondary effluent during chlorination

    J. Hazard. Mater.

    (2008)
  • M. Yan et al.

    In situ study of binding of copper by fulvic acid: comparison of differential absorbance data and model predictions

    Water Res.

    (2013)
  • M. Yan et al.

    Quantifying metal ions binding onto dissolved organic matter using log-transformed absorbance spectra

    Water Res.

    (2013)
  • M. Yan et al.

    Examination of disinfection by-product (DBP) formation in source waters: a study using log-transformed differential spectra

    Water Res.

    (2014)
  • M.Q. Yan et al.

    Effects of charging on the chromophores of dissolved organic matter from the Rio Negro basin

    Water Res.

    (2014)
  • L. Yang et al.

    Assessing trihalomethanes (THMs) and N-nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA) formation potentials in drinking water treatment plants using fluorescence spectroscopy and parallel factor analysis

    Chemosphere

    (2015)
  • H.B. Yu et al.

    Assessing removal efficiency of dissolved organic matter in wastewater treatment using fluorescence excitation emission matrices with parallel factor analysis and second derivative synchronous fluorescence

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2013)
  • J. Zhao et al.

    Characterization of fresh leachate from a refuse transfer station under different seasons

    Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad.

    (2013)
  • APHA

    Standards Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater

    (1998)
  • Cited by (33)

    • Identification of visible colored dissolved organic matter in biological and tertiary municipal effluents using multiple approaches including PARAFAC analysis

      2022, Journal of Environmental Sciences (China)
      Citation Excerpt :

      This portion of DOM or visible colored DOM, which manifests a yellowish hue (absorption of blue light), is optically measurable (200 to 700 nm) (Hoge et al., 1995), and exhibits fluorescence (>350 nm emission) (Coble, 2007; Marshall and Johnsen, 2017). The persistent yellowish color in discharged wastewater indicates the presence of complex aromatic compounds (Islam et al., 2021; Yang et al., 2017) with unknown physicochemical properties, raising concerns over the efficacy of advanced treatments. Besides, visible colored DOM from wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) has a pernicious effect on aquatic organisms (Yang et al., 2017).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text