Original Contributions
Association Between Trauma Center Level and Outcomes of Adult Patients with Motorcycle Crash–Related Injuries in the United States

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2020.06.018Get rights and content

Abstract

Background

Motorcycle crash–related injury mechanism is a criterion in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention field triage guidelines of injured patients, with a recommendation to transport affected patients to a trauma center need not be the highest level.

Objective

This study examines the evidence behind this recommendation because severe injuries can result from motorcycle crashes and patients can benefit from treatment at higher-level trauma centers.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study used the National Trauma Data Bank 2015 dataset. We conducted descriptive analyses (univariate and bivariate) followed by adjusted multivariate analysis to examine the association between trauma center designation levels and survival to hospital discharge.

Results

A total of 28,821 patients with motorcycle injuries were included. Most patients were men (n = 25,361; 88%) and aged between 16 and 64 years (n = 26,989; 93.6%). Survival rates were higher in level II (n = 10,658; 95.3%) and III (n = 2,129; 95.5%) trauma centers compared to level I centers (n = 14,498; 94.6%). After adjusting for confounders, decreased survival to hospital discharge was noted for patients treated at level III trauma centers compared to those at level I centers (odds ratio 0.543; 95% confidence interval 0.390–0.729). No difference in survival was noted between level I and II centers.

Conclusions

Patients with motorcycle crash–related injuries treated at higher-level trauma center (I or II) had increased survival. This warrants a re-evaluation and adjustment of the field triage criterion for such patients. Examining the evidence behind field triage guidelines in trauma systems is needed for improved patient outcomes.

Introduction

Motorcycle crash–related injury constitutes a significant cause of mortality and morbidity, along with a substantial financial burden worldwide. In the United States, motorcycle crash incidence is 68% higher than that for other automobiles, with a 28 times higher fatality rate, and accounting for up to 14% of all automobile crash fatalities (1). When compared with car crashes, patients involved in motorcycle crashes have higher injury prevalence (3×), injury severity (10×), mortality (5×), and medical costs (6×) (2).

The American College of Surgeons (ACS) designates trauma centers into four levels (level I or highest to level IV or lowest). The trauma center level is assigned based on trauma volume, resources, and educational and research commitment (3). Similarly, state designation of trauma center level is also used in the United States for trauma centers. Trauma center designation and higher trauma center levels have been previously associated with improved outcomes (4). The overall mortality rate was previously reported to be 25% lower for patients with traumatic injuries when treated at a trauma center compared to a non–trauma center (5). This difference in outcomes was more pronounced for patients with severe injuries based on stratification using the Abbreviated Injury Scale (5). Moreover, the treatment of trauma patients at level I trauma centers was also significantly associated with both lower mortality and lower severe disability at discharge compared to those treated at level II trauma centers (3).

Prehospital field triage criteria are used to guide prehospital providers to identify patients with severe traumatic injuries and to transport them to appropriate receiving facilities, mainly trauma centers (4). However, criteria for trauma patients’ referral to trauma center levels are still vague and lack sufficient validity (3).

Several prehospital parameters, such as training level and total number of emergency medicine technician (EMT) personnel, response, scene, and transport times, have been found to be significantly associated with mortality rates in trauma patients (6). The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines for field triage of injured patients use the mechanism of injury of “motorcycles > 20 mph” as criterion in step 3 for recommending transport to a trauma center need not be the highest trauma level (7). Patients with motorcycle crash–related injuries are, however, more likely to be severely injured and might benefit from treatment at higher-level trauma centers. This study examines the association between trauma center level and outcomes of patients with motorcycle crash-related injuries in an attempt to provide a more evidence-based recommendation for prehospital field triage in this patient population.

Section snippets

Methods

In this retrospective cohort study, we used the 2015 dataset of the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB). The NTDB is the largest registry for trauma patients in the United States, collecting data from more than 900 centers and consisting of more than 7.5 million medical records of trauma patients. This dataset includes prehospital and in-hospital patient data along with injury characteristics and severity (8).

We included adult patients (aged 16 years or older) with motorcycle crash–related

Results

The study population included 28,821 patients with motorcycle crash–related injuries. The median age of the patient population was 40 (IQR 27–53), with most being male (n = 25,361; 88%) and white (n = 22,082; 76.6%). Patients were transported to hospitals mainly by ground ambulance (n = 21,978; 76.3%), followed by air transport (n = 4,564; 15.8%). The overall rate of survival to hospital discharge was 94.6% (n = 27,355). More than 90% of the patients were transferred to trauma center levels I

Discussion

This study evaluated the relationship between trauma center level designation and outcomes of patients with motorcycle crash–related injuries. Overall rates of survival of this subpopulation were 94.6%, 95.3%, and 95.5% in trauma centers of levels I, II, and III, respectively. However, after adjusting for significant confounders, treatment at level III trauma centers was significantly associated with decreased survival to hospital discharge compared with level I or II trauma centers.

The

Conclusions

In this study, treatment at a higher-level trauma center (levels I or II) was associated with increased survival for patients with motorcycle crash–related injuries. This warrants a re-evaluation and adjustment of the field triage criterion for patients with motorcycle crash–related injuries. Examining the evidence behind field triage guidelines in trauma systems is also needed for better resource utilization and improved patient outcomes.

Article Summary

1. Why is this topic important?

  1. Motorcycle crash–related injury mechanism is a criterion

References (21)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (6)

  • Trauma center designation level and survival of patients with chest wall instability

    2022, American Journal of Emergency Medicine
    Citation Excerpt :

    In contrast to our results, decreased mortality has also been previously reported in the literature among trauma patients with specific injuries being transferred to level I trauma centers compared to level II and III centers. Oliphant et al. and Elsemesmani et al. showed improved survival of patients with pelvic ring injuries and patients with motorcycle crash related injuries respectively when cared for in level I vs. level II trauma centers [17,18]. Moreover, a study by Dakessian et al. found a survival benefit for patients with MVT injuries treated at level I vs. level II or III centers [7].

  • Rib Fracture Map in High-Energy Injuries

    2023, Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma
View full text