Research paper
The effect of cultural distance on medical tourism

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdmm.2016.03.001Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Investigates the impact of cultural distance on medical tourism at aggregate and specialty levels.

  • The effects of the proposed factors across specialties vary.

  • Cultural distance has an impact on the choice of destination for medical treatment.

  • Religious similarity influences the choice of destination across specialties.

Abstract

This study analyses the relationships between the origin countries of international patients and their cultural distance from the destination country in the context of medical tourism. A novel panel dataset is used, covering 109 origin countries whose citizens came to Turkey and received medical treatment during 2012–2014. After accounting for control variables such as religious similarity, Turkish diaspora in the origin country, physical distance, GDP per capita and number of inbound tourists, the study finds that cultural distance has an impact on the choice of destination for medical tourism. This impact persists at the medical specialty level.

Introduction

Medical tourism has grown tremendously in the last decade and international health care has become a global industry (Connell, 2013, Horowitz et al., 2007). Factors contributing to the expansion of this industry are related to the health-care provision problems of the origin countries, which are mainly high costs of care, health care users with low income, health care excluded by insurance, long waiting times and low-quality health care (Connell, 2006, Gan and Frederick, 2011, Runnels and Turner, 2011). The affordability of air travel to overseas destinations and favourable exchange rates are also contributing to the internationalisation of medical tourism (Connell, 2006).

Researchers aspire to better understand the demand factors of international patients and supply characteristics of destination countries in the face of the development of the medical tourism market. The most frequently mentioned demand factors are the relatively high cost of medical care in the origin country (Connell, 2006, Gan and Frederick, 2011, Heung et al., 2010, Smith et al., 2011, Turner, 2007) and the quality of medical care in comparison with that of the destination country (Glinos, Baeten, Helble & Maarse, 2010). As far as supply factors are concerned, hospital accreditation (Smith & Forgione, 2007), geographical distance (Adams & Wright, 1991) and cultural familiarity (Glinos et al., 2010) emerge as important determinants of destination country selection in the literature by patients. Geographically and culturally related issues are often analysed in conjunction with other factors that affect international medical tourism. For instance, Connell (2013) shows that this could be the case for medical travel in Europe, Thailand, India and Singapore through bordering countries with cultural affinity in order to minimise travel costs. Medical tourism in China has also attracted international patients, mostly from culturally and geographically close countries such as Taiwan, Hong Kong and Macau (Houyuan, 1998). Likewise, India receives patients from nearby countries such as Bangladesh, Mauritius, Nepal and Sri Lanka, which share similar customs to those of India (Gupta, Goldar & Mitra, 1998).

Even though culture has been emphasised as being an important factor in shaping patterns of medical tourism (Glinos et al., 2010, Jagyasi, 2010, Liu and Chen, 2013), few studies have analysed the effect of culture on the destination choice of international patients. In particular, the effect of quantified cultural distance between origin and destination countries on medical tourism movements remains mostly unanswered. Some empirical studies (Goodarzi et al., 2014, Hanefeld et al., 2015, Lee et al., 2010, Yu and Ko, 2012, Zhang et al., 2013) have addressed the effect of culture on medical tourism. However, they have only explored patient intentions or cross-cultural perceptual differences on destinations with survey methods using a micro approach.

Yu and Ko (2012) reported significant cross-cultural perceptual differences between Chinese, Japanese and Korean medical tourists in terms of selection of destination, inconveniences and preferred health-care services. Other studies have confirmed the impact of culture on medical tourism. For instance, Goodarzi et al. (2014) found that cultural affinity was an important factor in medical tourist preferences for visiting Iran. The role of cultural familiarity could also be as important as satisfactory health-care quality in the decision of international patients going to the motherland, such as in the case of the Korean population living in New Zealand (Lee et al., 2010). In addition to cultural familiarity with the destination country, Hanefeld et al. (2015) found that ability to speak the native language of the destination country and the presence of a family member in the origin country near the treatment centre can be important determinants of destination country selection for medical treatment. Although cultural distance is very important, Zhang et al. (2013) showed that the degree of severity of the illness can be relatively more important than cultural factors and, consequently, Chinese patients in their study tended to choose destinations culturally distant from China in more-developed countries than their country of residence.

Religion plays a strong role as an important element of cultural proximity, which can affect the choice of medical tourism destination. For example, the sensitivity of patients from the Middle Eastern and Arabic countries to ancillary services (halal food kitchen, Islamic employee-orientation programme) to medical treatment is taken into consideration in South Asia to attract international patients from these places (Bookman and Bookman, 2007, Cohen, 2008). Jordan and Malaysia, which take these factors into consideration besides having high-quality medical services, have thus become attractive to Muslim patients (Bookman and Bookman, 2007, Connell, 2013).

A stream of research underlines the importance of diaspora populations in international medical tourism in relation with cultural links for a number of reasons (Connell, 2013, Horton and Cole, 2011, Macias and Morales, 2001, La Parra and Mateo, 2008, Lee et al., 2010, Wooldridge, 2002). First, social and historical connectedness to a native country can affect people's health-care travel destination plans (Eyles & Williams, 2008). Second, communicating with physicians and health-care personnel in their native tongue in the origin country is often an appealing factor (Bergmark et al., 2008, Bookman and Bookman, 2007). For example, cultural proximity and health-care system familiarity have been found to tilt the decision of Mexicans in the United States, Indians and Middle Easterners worldwide, Koreans in New Zealand, and British people living in Spain in favour of their native country (Connell, 2013, La Parra and Mateo, 2008, Lee et al., 2010). The same tendency has been observed among the second generation of immigrants (Connell, 2013). Finally, personal ties may be significant when diaspora patients are choosing the clinic or the physician for treatment (Hanefeld et al., 2015). Not surprisingly, Middle Eastern patients prefer their native country for gamete donation during fertility treatment for cultural reasons (Inhorn, 2011).

Geographical proximity seems to be one of the decisive factors in the decisions of diaspora communities because of travel costs. Most cross-border medical tourists opt for destinations near their country of residence rather than distant medical tourism destinations (Ormond, 2008). For instance, Mexicans in the United States prefer Mexico not only because of their cultural affinity but also because of its low cost (Horton and Cole, 2011, Macias and Morales, 2001, Wooldridge, 2002). The fact that the proportion of the diaspora population has been the largest in the total amount of medical tourists in countries such as India, Mexico, Turkey and the Philippines (Connell, 2013) shows that the impact of diaspora on medical tourism should be incorporated in studies.

To sum up, various factors can exercise influence on the decisions of international patients in selecting the destination country for their medical treatment. Of these factors, cultural distance often comes up as an important determinant in the literature. However, few existing studies have incorporated this factor into their empirical research. These studies, typically using small samples, measure cultural distance qualitatively based on the attitudes, perceptions, intentions and experiences of international patients. Verbal or written statements from international patients reflecting on the cultural aspects of their own personal experiences can be taken as being subjective opinions; these are not independent from the temporal and contextual factors present at the time of the survey. Even so, the subjective evaluation of international patients in choosing medical destinations can offer valuable insights. However, further studies are needed that incorporate alternative measures of cultural distance based on secondary data to show more strongly the presence of the impact of cultural distance on the choice of destination. A study in this tradition comes from Johnson and Garman (2015), who estimate determinants of inbound medical tourists to USA using two variables to measure cultural distance: fluency of English among the population of the origin country and the number of outbound travellers from USA to that country. According to their study, none of these variables had an influence on medical tourism. Their study excluded Mexico and Canada: two neighbouring countries; hence they disregarded one of the important factors. Moreover, despite being informative of destination choices of international patients in general, their study provides no information with respect to destination choices at the specialty level.

The present study differs from that of Johnson and Garman (2015) in four ways. First, cultural distance is measured based on Hofstede's cultural framework. Second, the study uses panel data, which can smooth out the temporary and contextual effects. Third, neighbouring countries are included in the sample. Fourth, the data were aggregated at the specialty level in order to explore the effect of cultural distance on different specialties. Similar to Johnson and Garman (2015), this study also accounts for other country characteristics, such as national income per capita, number of diaspora, religious similarity, number of inbound tourists and physical distance.

The remainder of the paper is structured as follows. The next section discusses the methods, variables, model and data. The third section presents the results of the study. The fourth section discusses the implications of the results and summarises conclusions. The last section then evaluates the limitations of the data and explores further research areas.

Section snippets

Variables, model and data

There is no consensus as to what variables should be included in a study that analyses the determinants of destination choices of international patients. This study will therefore draw on the literature reviewed above to select the variables that are assumed to affect the number of international patients from the origin country. Accordingly, the study specifies the following model to estimate:lnnumofpatit=i+β1lnGDPpcit+β2lnCDi+β3lnCDsqi+β4relsimi+β4lnphydisti+β5diasporai+β6touristsit+ϵitwhere

Results

Data for all the variables were not available for the entire sample. To keep the number of countries constant in the regressions, the analysis began with four variables and 109 countries. From these countries, 411,933 international patients received medical treatment from 2012 to 2014. Hence, the data sample covered 73.5% of total international patients recorded by the MoH. Based on a three-year average, 95.5% of international patients covered by the sample came from 25 countries listed in

Discussion and conclusions

The empirical evidence provided by the baseline model in Table 3 indicates that cultural distance should be incorporated in marketing and management strategies and policy planning in medical tourism. There is a quadratic relationship between cultural distance and number of international patients, which eliminates the possibility of implications based on a linear relationship. To explain the nature of this relationship clearly, possible mediating factors should be considered by policy makers and

Limitations and further research

There are a few limitations of this study. First Hofstede's cultural dimension scores were not available for all the countries. This drawback decreases the number of countries in our sample. Second, Hofstede's scores do not change over time. This assumption rules out cultural interaction. Third, because of data availability, it was assumed that the proportion of religious groups and the proportion of Turkish population abroad do not change. As these two variables are not likely to change

References (46)

  • J.M. Wooldridge

    Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data

    (2002)
  • J.J. Yu et al.

    A cross-cultural study of perceptions of medical tourism among Chinese, Japanese and Korean tourists in Korea

    Tourism Management

    (2012)
  • J. Zhang et al.

    The impact of psychological distance on Chinese customers when selecting an international healthcare service country

    Tourism Management

    (2013)
  • E.K. Adams et al.

    Hospital choice of Medicare beneficiaries in a rural market: Why not the closest?

    Journal of Rural Health

    (1991)
  • R. Bergmark et al.

    Mexican immigrants in the US living far from the border may return to Mexico for health services

    Journal of Immigrants and Minority Health

    (2008)
  • J.R. Betancourt et al.

    Cultural competence and health care disparities: Key perspectives and trends

    Health Affairs

    (2005)
  • M. Bookman et al.

    Medical tourism in developing countries

    (2007)
  • E. Cohen

    Medical tourism in Thailand

  • J. Eyles et al.

    Sense of place, health and quality of life

    (2008)
  • L.L. Gan et al.

    Medical tourism facilitators: Patterns of service differentiation

    Journal of Vacation Marketing

    (2011)
  • M. Goodarzi et al.

    Factor analysis of effective factors on the improvement of medical tourism in Shiraz megalopolis

    Environmental Management and Sustainable Development

    (2014)
  • Gupta, I., Goldar, B., & Mitra, A. (1998). The case of India. In Proceedings of the UNCTAD-WHO Joint Publication...
  • Cited by (47)

    • City association pattern discovery: A flow perspective by using cultural semantic similarity of place name

      2022, Applied Geography
      Citation Excerpt :

      Under varying degrees of cultural similarity, international response to changes is in the direction of migration (Selmer & Lauring, 2009; Suanet & Van de Vijver, 2009). In addition, place name data are widely used in GIS cultural geography, and tourism (Choi & Wong, 2018; Esiyok et al., 2017; Hu et al., 2018). Place names often survive the changes in the local landscape; thus, they become powerful tools to rebuild the previous land-use data (Conedera et al., 2007).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text