ReviewPerceptibility and acceptability thresholds for colour differences in dentistry
Introduction
Colour science is an area within dental research that has been extensively studied over the last three decades. An initial search for the words ‘colour’ or ‘colour’ within dental journals included in PubMed yields over 5400 articles. Colour has become an increasingly important topic partially because many different research areas such as prosthodontics, aesthetics and dental materials science, use colour quantification to gain scientific data. The clinical relevance of such studies depends on how much colour change is considered perceptible and/or acceptable. Considering the fact that colour perception and/or acceptation, being subjective, can vary significantly among people, it is important to agree upon perceptibility and acceptability threshold values to be used within dental colour research.
Different colour difference formulas exist which are designed to provide a quantitative representation of the perceived colour difference between two objects within dental research. The most extensively used colour difference formula within dental research is derived from the CIE-L*a*b* system1 which approximates uniformed distances between colour coordinates while entirely covering the visual colour space:ΔL*, Δa*, and Δb* are the differences in lightness–darkness, green–red coordinate and blue–yellow coordinate, respectively. ΔE* is the colour difference between two objects, where the higher the value the bigger the difference in colour and hence the more perceptible the difference is to the human eye. The mere determination of a colour difference between two objects is of little clinical value2 without an understanding of the magnitude of colour difference that is visually detectable (perceptibility threshold) and the magnitude that constitutes an unacceptable alteration to dental aesthetics (acceptability threshold). The ISO Standardization Technical Report3 also suggests such interpretation through colour difference thresholds, and provides guidelines for future standardization related to dental shade conformity and interconvertibility.
All dental research that evaluates colour, involves the author selecting a perceptibility and/or acceptability threshold with which to compare the results. The quantitative assessment of a colour difference is worthless unless the following two thresholds are identified; the difference that is perceivable to an observer and the colour difference that is clinically acceptable.2 Ample literature exists on perceptibility and acceptability thresholds in dentistry;4, 5, 6 however there has never been a review on this subject, and therefore this will be a key element of evidence-based dentistry. As more and more research is performed on colour science in dentistry there appears to be no consensus on the thresholds of perceptibility and acceptability. This review of the colour literature is intended to define current practices and trends in the use of ΔE* and to provide a basis for setting an acceptable and consistent standard for determining colour in a practical setting. It will also help researchers improve the accuracy of clinical interpretations of colour differences and aid research targeted at refining the colour reproduction process in dentistry.5
This review aims to establish, through the available literature, what is currently the colour difference value used in dental research as the perceptibility threshold (PT) and the acceptability threshold (AT). The general objective is to suggest the need for a uniformed PT and AT to be used in clinical research. The specific review questions to be addressed are:
- 1)
Which PT and AT values are currently used in dental research.
- 2)
What are the original source references for these ΔE* values.
Section snippets
Materials and methods
To ensure a complete assessment of the dental literature, bibliographic records were retrieved from PubMed/MEDLINE (NCBI), Web of Science (Thomson), and Dental and Oral Sciences Sources (EBSCO) on 7 January 2013 using terms for colour acceptability, colour perceptibility, colour mismatch, or ΔE* and terms for teeth, prostheses, or restorations (The Appendix gives complete search strategies). Headings from controlled vocabularies were used when available. To ensure a consistent pool of studies
Results
A total of 682 records were retrieved from bibliographic databases. Removal of duplicate records left 380 unique articles. Of these 326 were excluded based on review of the titles and abstracts. Full text articles were obtained for the remaining 54 records. Six of these did not meet the inclusion criteria. 48 articles were included in the review (Fig. 1). Table 1 shows the details of studies proposed for inclusion in the review.
Looking at the literature included in this review, only 9 articles
Discussion
Clearly the dental literature does not unanimously agree on how much colour difference establishes an acceptable shade mismatch or how much colour difference constitutes as perceivable to observers. Looking at the results of this study we can see that 54% of the literature reports a ΔE* value of 1 as visually detectable 50% of the time (PT). The majority of these studies refer to the same articles (Kuehni10, Seghi et al.19, Ruyter et al.34) for the above PT value.
As for the acceptability
Conclusion
The following conclusions were made within the limitations of the studies included in the present review:
- 1)
More than half the studies use a threshold of perceptibility of ΔE* = 1, and one third of the studies refer to ΔE* = 3.7 as the threshold at which 50% of the observers accepted the colour difference.
- 2)
Most clinical studies refer to the same few literature that have attempted to determine perceptibility and acceptability thresholds from three decades ago under in vitro conditions.
References (60)
- et al.
Intraoral determination of the tolerance of dentists for perceptibility and acceptability of shade mismatch
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
(2007) - et al.
Assessment of perceptibility and acceptability of color difference of denture teeth
Journal of Dentistry
(2012) - et al.
Color difference thresholds in dental ceramics
Journal of Dentistry
(2010) - et al.
Clinical evaluation of perceptibility of color differences between natural teeth and all-ceramic crowns
Journal of Dentistry
(2009) - et al.
Clinical performance of a newly developed spectrophotometric system on tooth color reproduction
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
(2008) - et al.
Colour and surface analysis of carbamide peroxide bleaching effects on the dental restorative materials in situ
Journal of Dentistry
(2009) - et al.
Color change of vital teeth exposed to bleaching performed with and without supplementary light
Journal of Dentistry
(2009) - et al.
Color stability of dental composite resin materials for crown and bridge veneers
Dental Materials
(1987) - et al.
Dental color matching instruments and systems. Review of clinical and research aspects
Journal of Dentistry
(2010) - et al.
Assessment of a prototype computer colour matching system to reproduce natural tooth colour on ceramic restorations
Journal of Dentistry
(2011)
Evaluation of self shade matching ability of dental students using visual and instrumental means
Journal of Dentistry
Influence of optical properties of esthetic brackets (color, translucence, and fluorescence) on visual perception
American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Visual and instrumental evaluation of color match ability of 2 shade guides on a ceramic system
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Clinical effectiveness and sensitivity with overnight use of 22% carbamide peroxide gel
Journal of Dentistry
Matching repeatability and interdevice agreement of 2 intraoral spectrophotometers
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Colorimetry: official recommendations of the international commission on illumination
Dentistry-dental shade conformity and interconvertibility
Performance of five commercially available tooth color-measuring devices
Journal of Prosthodontics
Coverage errors of two shade guides
International Journal of Prosthodontics
In vivo measurement of colour changes in natural teeth
Journal of Oral Rehabilitation
An experiment in visual scaling of small colour differences
Colour Research and Application
Visual and spectrophotometric shade analysis of human teeth
Journal of Dental Research
Assessment of appearance match by visual observation and clinical colorimetry
Journal of Dental Research
Use of a reflectance spectrophotometer in evaluating shade change resulting from tooth-whitening products
Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry
Comparison of effectiveness of two 10% carbamide peroxide tooth-bleaching systems using spectrophotometric measurements
Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry
Conventional visual vs. spectrophotometric shade taking for porcelain-fused-to-metal crowns: a clinical comparison
International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry
Interexaminer reliability in clinical measurement of L*C*h* values of anterior teeth using a spectrophotometer
International Journal of Prosthodontics
A new, small-color-difference equation for dental shades
Journal of Dental Research
Precision of in vivo spectrophotometric colour evaluation of natural teeth
Journal of Oral Rehabilitation
Visual and instrumental colorimetric assessments of small color differences on translucent dental porcelain
Journal of Dental Research
Cited by (170)
Longevity of extrinsic stains on monolithic zirconia restorations: An in vitro study
2023, Journal of Prosthetic DentistryColor change in teeth due to burning: Spectrophotometric analysis
2023, Forensic Science InternationalColor match of ultra-translucency multilayer zirconia restorations with different designs and backgrounds
2024, Journal of Prosthodontics