Elsevier

Journal of Dentistry

Volume 42, Issue 6, June 2014, Pages 637-644
Journal of Dentistry

Review
Perceptibility and acceptability thresholds for colour differences in dentistry

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2013.11.017Get rights and content

Abstract

Introduction

Data on acceptability (AT) and perceptibility thresholds (PT) for colour differences vary in dental literature. There is consensus that the determination of ΔE* is appropriate to define AT and PT, however there is no consensus regarding the values that should be used. The aim of this clinical review was to provide a systematic approach to the topic of colour science of high clinical relevance to dental research.

Materials and methods

MEDLINE/PubMed, WoS and EBSCO databases were searched up to January 7, 2013; the outcome was restricted to English, and to clinical studies were spectrophotometers were used for measurement.

Results

Forty-eight studies were eligible and met the inclusion criteria. Of the 48 studies there appeared to be a trend in their source references: 44% referred to the same study for the PT (ΔE* = 1); and 35% referred to the same article for the AT (ΔE* = 3.7).

Conclusions

More than half the studies defined PT as ΔE* = 1, and one third of the studies referred to ΔE* = 3.7 as the threshold at which 50% of observers accepted the colour difference. Most clinical studies refer to the same few in vitro literature that have attempted to determine PT and AT from decades ago.

Introduction

Colour science is an area within dental research that has been extensively studied over the last three decades. An initial search for the words ‘colour’ or ‘colour’ within dental journals included in PubMed yields over 5400 articles. Colour has become an increasingly important topic partially because many different research areas such as prosthodontics, aesthetics and dental materials science, use colour quantification to gain scientific data. The clinical relevance of such studies depends on how much colour change is considered perceptible and/or acceptable. Considering the fact that colour perception and/or acceptation, being subjective, can vary significantly among people, it is important to agree upon perceptibility and acceptability threshold values to be used within dental colour research.

Different colour difference formulas exist which are designed to provide a quantitative representation of the perceived colour difference between two objects within dental research. The most extensively used colour difference formula within dental research is derived from the CIE-L*a*b* system1 which approximates uniformed distances between colour coordinates while entirely covering the visual colour space:ΔE*=((ΔL*)2+(Δa*)2+(Δb*)2)ΔL*, Δa*, and Δb* are the differences in lightness–darkness, green–red coordinate and blue–yellow coordinate, respectively. ΔE* is the colour difference between two objects, where the higher the value the bigger the difference in colour and hence the more perceptible the difference is to the human eye. The mere determination of a colour difference between two objects is of little clinical value2 without an understanding of the magnitude of colour difference that is visually detectable (perceptibility threshold) and the magnitude that constitutes an unacceptable alteration to dental aesthetics (acceptability threshold). The ISO Standardization Technical Report3 also suggests such interpretation through colour difference thresholds, and provides guidelines for future standardization related to dental shade conformity and interconvertibility.

All dental research that evaluates colour, involves the author selecting a perceptibility and/or acceptability threshold with which to compare the results. The quantitative assessment of a colour difference is worthless unless the following two thresholds are identified; the difference that is perceivable to an observer and the colour difference that is clinically acceptable.2 Ample literature exists on perceptibility and acceptability thresholds in dentistry;4, 5, 6 however there has never been a review on this subject, and therefore this will be a key element of evidence-based dentistry. As more and more research is performed on colour science in dentistry there appears to be no consensus on the thresholds of perceptibility and acceptability. This review of the colour literature is intended to define current practices and trends in the use of ΔE* and to provide a basis for setting an acceptable and consistent standard for determining colour in a practical setting. It will also help researchers improve the accuracy of clinical interpretations of colour differences and aid research targeted at refining the colour reproduction process in dentistry.5

This review aims to establish, through the available literature, what is currently the colour difference value used in dental research as the perceptibility threshold (PT) and the acceptability threshold (AT). The general objective is to suggest the need for a uniformed PT and AT to be used in clinical research. The specific review questions to be addressed are:

  • 1)

    Which PT and AT values are currently used in dental research.

  • 2)

    What are the original source references for these ΔE* values.

Section snippets

Materials and methods

To ensure a complete assessment of the dental literature, bibliographic records were retrieved from PubMed/MEDLINE (NCBI), Web of Science (Thomson), and Dental and Oral Sciences Sources (EBSCO) on 7 January 2013 using terms for colour acceptability, colour perceptibility, colour mismatch, or ΔE* and terms for teeth, prostheses, or restorations (The Appendix gives complete search strategies). Headings from controlled vocabularies were used when available. To ensure a consistent pool of studies

Results

A total of 682 records were retrieved from bibliographic databases. Removal of duplicate records left 380 unique articles. Of these 326 were excluded based on review of the titles and abstracts. Full text articles were obtained for the remaining 54 records. Six of these did not meet the inclusion criteria. 48 articles were included in the review (Fig. 1). Table 1 shows the details of studies proposed for inclusion in the review.

Looking at the literature included in this review, only 9 articles

Discussion

Clearly the dental literature does not unanimously agree on how much colour difference establishes an acceptable shade mismatch or how much colour difference constitutes as perceivable to observers. Looking at the results of this study we can see that 54% of the literature reports a ΔE* value of 1 as visually detectable 50% of the time (PT). The majority of these studies refer to the same articles (Kuehni10, Seghi et al.19, Ruyter et al.34) for the above PT value.

As for the acceptability

Conclusion

The following conclusions were made within the limitations of the studies included in the present review:

  • 1)

    More than half the studies use a threshold of perceptibility of ΔE* = 1, and one third of the studies refer to ΔE* = 3.7 as the threshold at which 50% of the observers accepted the colour difference.

  • 2)

    Most clinical studies refer to the same few literature that have attempted to determine perceptibility and acceptability thresholds from three decades ago under in vitro conditions.

References (60)

  • S. Alsaleh et al.

    Evaluation of self shade matching ability of dental students using visual and instrumental means

    Journal of Dentistry

    (2012)
  • H. Lopes Filho et al.

    Influence of optical properties of esthetic brackets (color, translucence, and fluorescence) on visual perception

    American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

    (2012)
  • D. Ongul et al.

    Visual and instrumental evaluation of color match ability of 2 shade guides on a ceramic system

    Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

    (2012)
  • J.C. Ontiveros et al.

    Clinical effectiveness and sensitivity with overnight use of 22% carbamide peroxide gel

    Journal of Dentistry

    (2012)
  • A. Sarafianou et al.

    Matching repeatability and interdevice agreement of 2 intraoral spectrophotometers

    Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

    (2012)
  • CIE ICoI

    Colorimetry: official recommendations of the international commission on illumination

    (1971)
  • ISO IOfS

    Dentistry-dental shade conformity and interconvertibility

    (1999)
  • A. Dozic et al.

    Performance of five commercially available tooth color-measuring devices

    Journal of Prosthodontics

    (2007)
  • W.J. O’Brien et al.

    Coverage errors of two shade guides

    International Journal of Prosthodontics

    (1991)
  • M.D. Russell et al.

    In vivo measurement of colour changes in natural teeth

    Journal of Oral Rehabilitation

    (2000)
  • R.G. Kuehni et al.

    An experiment in visual scaling of small colour differences

    Colour Research and Application

    (1979)
  • S. Paul et al.

    Visual and spectrophotometric shade analysis of human teeth

    Journal of Dental Research

    (2002)
  • W.M. Johnston et al.

    Assessment of appearance match by visual observation and clinical colorimetry

    Journal of Dental Research

    (1989)
  • S.J. Chu

    Use of a reflectance spectrophotometer in evaluating shade change resulting from tooth-whitening products

    Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry

    (2003)
  • S. Ishikawa-Nagai et al.

    Comparison of effectiveness of two 10% carbamide peroxide tooth-bleaching systems using spectrophotometric measurements

    Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry

    (2004)
  • S.J. Paul et al.

    Conventional visual vs. spectrophotometric shade taking for porcelain-fused-to-metal crowns: a clinical comparison

    International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry

    (2004)
  • A.J. Hassel et al.

    Interexaminer reliability in clinical measurement of L*C*h* values of anterior teeth using a spectrophotometer

    International Journal of Prosthodontics

    (2007)
  • W.J. O’Brien et al.

    A new, small-color-difference equation for dental shades

    Journal of Dental Research

    (1990)
  • A. Karamouzos et al.

    Precision of in vivo spectrophotometric colour evaluation of natural teeth

    Journal of Oral Rehabilitation

    (2007)
  • R.R. Seghi et al.

    Visual and instrumental colorimetric assessments of small color differences on translucent dental porcelain

    Journal of Dental Research

    (1989)
  • Cited by (170)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text