Opinion paper
PEGylated and zwitterated silica nanoparticles as doxorubicin carriers applied in a breast cancer cell line: Effects on protein corona formation

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jddst.2022.103325Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Silica nanoparticles exposed to biological fluids form protein coronas on the surface, changing their original properties.

  • Poly (ethylene glycol) and zwitterionic-based surface modifications of SiNPs were able to prevent protein corona formation.

  • PEG and ZWT-SiNP increased the biocompatibility in MCF-7 cells when compared with bare SiNPs.

  • PEG and ZWT-SiNP improved doxorubicin (DOX) delivery in MCF-7 cells.

  • In higher salt concentration at 37 °C: SiNP-PEG severe aggregation state; this was not observed for SiNP-ZWT.

Abstract

Nanomaterials exposed to biological fluids form protein coronas on their surfaces, changing their original properties. Surface functionalization with nonfouling moieties is a strategy to synthesize silica nanoparticles (SiNPs) with the ability to hinder protein corona formation. We report a simple poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) and zwitterionic (ZWT)-based surface modification method to prepare doxorubicin-loaded SiNPs to avoid protein corona formation in breast cancer cells. Drug-loaded SiNPs were characterized in terms of particle size, charge, and drug loading content. A comparison of the stability between PEG and ZWT on SiNP surfaces was performed at 25 °C and 37 °C in a high salt solution using turbidimetry. At 37 °C, the PEGylated SiNPs showed aggregation. In contrast, under the same conditions, zwitterated SiNPs did not show aggregation. Both PEG and ZWTSiNP savoided protein adsorption in the presence of increasing concentrations of bovine serum albumin (BSA). In vitro cell experiments demonstrated that both functionalization approaches (SiNPs-PEG and SiNPs-ZWT) improved biocompatibility in the breast cancer cell line MCF-7compared to SiNPs. The antitumour effects of doxorubicin-loaded SiNPs were evaluated via red neutral cell uptake and annexin V assays, and the results demonstrated that surface functionalization plays an important role in the cytotoxic profile of these systems, with SiNPs-DOX-PEG and SiNPs-DOX-ZWT exhibiting a superior cytotoxic effect compared to SiNPs-DOX.

Introduction

Silica nanoparticles (SiNPs) have emerged as promising platforms for drug delivery, biological sensing, imaging, gene therapy, and diagnosis due to their advantages, such as their biocompatibility, biodegradability, large surface area, and easily functionalized surface [1].

Surface functionalization of nanoparticles has been used as a strategy to improve colloidal stability, biocompatibility, circulation time in the body, and target specificity [2,3]. Functionalization through chemical groups on the nanoparticle surface allows for specific interactions with cells, improving the nanoparticle therapeutic effect, decreasing the toxicity, and inhibiting protein corona formation [4,5]. Protein corona is the term used for a set of proteins and biomolecules associated with the nanomaterial surface after exposure to biological fluids, which completely changes their fate, decreases blood circulation time, and increases phagocytosis [6,7].

The primary strategy for synthesizing an effective nanocarrier is to ensure a nontoxic surface, which can also inhibit protein corona formation [8]. Many studies have reported that SiNPs cause toxicity due to the hydroxyl groups (OH•) on their surface [[9], [10], [11]]. Thus, surface modifications may mitigate the cytotoxic effects of SiNPs. In addition, active targeting and effective drug delivery are achieved when there is a lack of nanomaterial recognition by plasma proteins [8], which may be achieved by surface modification. The most common compound used for avoiding protein corona formation is poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) due to the hydration layer formed on the nanomaterial surface, which improves the blood circulation time, colloidal stability, and biocompatibility of several types of nanoparticles [12]. However, in recent years, reports have shown that PEGylated nanoparticles induce immunogenicity and are susceptible to oxidative damage in the presence of oxygen and transition metal ions, changing the nanoparticle identity and reducing its biological effects [13]. An alternative to circumvent this limitation to hindering corona formation is functionalization with zwitterionic (ZWT) compounds.

Zwitterionic compounds are polymers that are biologically inspired by phosphatidylcholine (PC) headgroups, which are abundant in the phospholipid bilayer of cell membranes. These polymers are promising candidates for nanomaterial functionalization due to their antifouling properties [[14], [15], [16]]. The hydration layer formed with this compound is based on electrostatic interactions, which are stronger than the hydrogen bonds formed by PEG compounds. Several reports have explored the antifouling properties of ZWT compounds as an alternative to PEGylated nanomaterials [16]. As far as we know, the comparative behavior between PEGylated and ZWT-based nanomaterials has not been evaluated in the context of drug carriers in the treatment of breast cancer.

The progressively increasing incidence of breast cancer is a serious world health problem. It is the most common malignant disease affecting women, accounting for approximately 26% of all cancer cases [17]. In addition to surgery and radiation, chemotherapy is an essential tool in the treatment of cancer [17].

Doxorubicin (DOX) is an antitumoural used to treat breast cancer, but it is also used for many other cancer types, such as solid tumors in childhood, soft tissue sarcomas, osteosarcomas, malignant lymphoma carcinoma, and ovarian carcinoma [18,19]. Therefore, DOX is considered one of the most potent chemotherapeutic drugs approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) [20]. Although effective at killing cancer cells, DOX also exerts cytotoxic effects on healthy cells in various organs, including the heart, brain, kidney, and liver [21]. Most of the side effects of DOX are associated with an increase in reactive oxygen species (ROS), as is the case in cardiotoxicity [22]. Thus, low selectivity to cancer cells is a problem in the use of DOX [23].

One strategy to overcome the limitations of chemotherapy drugs is the use of nanomaterials as carriers, mainly due to their ability to increase drug accumulation inside tumor cells, leading to a decrease in side effects [24,25]. DOX is the most common drug used for assessing drug delivery by nanomaterials to cancer cells, and it has been evaluated with several types of nanoparticles [[26], [27], [28], [29]]. In this context, SiNPs are strong candidates for drug delivery due to their robust nature, tunable surface area, biodegradability, uniform distribution of molecules on the porous space, and the possibility of surface functionalization [30]. It is worth mentioning that SiNPs with a modified surface recently received FDA approval for stage I human clinical trials for imaging, demonstrating the potential of these nanomaterials [31].

Several reports have explored the antifouling properties of PEG on the surface of nanoparticles applied to anticancer therapy; however, few studies have examined ZWT compounds. Pourjavadi et al. showed that SiNPs coated with PEG and polyvinyl pyridine were efficient for DOX delivery triggered by pH in solid tumors [32]. Nguyen et al. demonstrated that SiNPs functionalized with PEG and polylysine were able to codeliver DOX and small interfering RNA into a breast cancer cell line [33]. Salcedo et al. synthesized SiNPs coated with ZWT to avoid protein corona formation for daunorubicin delivery in ovarian cancer [34].

In the present paper, we comparatively discuss the viability of the use of PEG and ZWT compounds(Fig. 1) as strategies to obtain hybrid nanosilica particles produced by the Stöber method to hinder protein corona formation without toxicity.

Thus, six systems were synthesized: two nonfunctionalized systems (SiNPs and SiNPs-DOX), two systems functionalized with PEG (SiNPs-PEG and SiNPs-DOX-PEG), and two systems functionalized with ZWT (SiNPs-ZWT and SiNPs-DOX-ZWT). Nanoparticle characterization was performed by measuring size, colloidal stability, protein corona formation, drug release, cytotoxicity, and hemolytic effects. In vitro assays in a breast cancer cell line (MCF-7) were performed to evaluate the potential for doxorubicin delivery via SiNPs with a modified surface.

Section snippets

Materials

Tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS, 99%) was purchased from Sigma–Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA), and 3-{[dimethyl(3-trimethoxysilyl)propyl]ammonio}propane-1-sulfonate (ZWT, 99%) and 2-[methoxy(polyethyleneoxy)6-9propyl]trimethoxysilane (PEG, 99%) were purchased from Gelest (Morrisville, PA, USA). Ethanol (HPLC grade) was obtained from Merck, and ammonium hydroxide (NH4OH, 28–30%) was obtained from Analytics (São Paulo, SP, Brazil). All chemicals and reagents were used as received, without further

Results and discussion

Stöber sol-gel synthesis was employed to obtain homogenous SiNPs with low polydispersity. Monodisperse SiNPs-DOX were generated via ammonia-catalyzed hydrolysis of TEOS and then functionalized with PEG or ZWT. This synthesis protocol is similar to the modified Stöber method recently reported by our group [36]. The functionalization of SiNPs was carried out by grafting PEG or ZWTorganosilaneonto the silica framework via stable chemical Si–C bonding [43,44]. Table 1 shows the characterization

Conclusions

In summary, we report modification of nanomaterials with zwitterionic compounds as an alternative to PEGylation and applied these nanomaterials to breast cancer cell lines. A surface modified with polymers with the ability to avoid nonspecific protein adsorption is mandatory to allow for and guarantee efficient drug delivery by SiNPs. Both PEG and ZWT surface functionalization effectively prevented protein corona formation without causing toxicity to the breast cancer cell line MCF-7.

However,

Authors's statement

Jussânia Almeida Gnoatto – investigation, formal analysis, methodology, roles/writing - original draft. Ana Moira Morás – investigation. Joao Vitor de Oliveira - investigation. Eduarda Arndt - investigation. Alexsandro Dallegrave - investigation. Ana Cristina Borba da Cunha-validation. Dinara Jaqueline Moura – conceptualization, methodology, writing - review & editing. João Henrique Zimnoch dos Santos - conceptualization, methodology, writing - review & editing, fund acquisition.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgments

J. A. G. thanks CAPES for financial support. J. H. Z. S. thanks CNPq (310408/2019-9) and FAPERGS (19/2551-0001869-0) for financial support. The authors are thankful to LNLS (Project D11A-SAXS1-20180499) for the measurements in the SAXS beamline.

References (79)

  • J.A. Gnoatto et al.

    Hybrid nanosilicas produced by the Stöber sol-gel process: in vitro evaluation in MRC-5 cells

    J. Non-Cryst. Solids

    (2020)
  • L.M.D. Loiola et al.

    Shielding and stealth effects of zwitterion moieties in double-functionalized silica nanoparticles

    J. Colloid Interface Sci.

    (2019)
  • J.I. Hare et al.

    Challenges and strategies in anti-cancer nanomedicine development: an industry perspective

    Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev.

    (2017)
  • C.M. Dawidczyk et al.

    State-of-the-art in design rules for drug delivery platforms: lessons learned from FDA-approved nanomedicines

    J. Contr. Release

    (2014)
  • H. Ou et al.

    Surface-adaptive zwitterionic nanoparticles for prolonged blood circulation time and enhanced cellular uptake in tumor cells

    Acta Biomater.

    (2018)
  • S. Zanganeh et al.

    Protein corona: opportunities and challenges

    Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol.

    (2016)
  • B. Riva et al.

    Impact of the strategy adopted for drug loading in nonporous silica nanoparticles on the drug release and cytotoxic activity

    J. Colloid Interface Sci.

    (2018)
  • M. Hasany et al.

    Silica nanoparticle surface chemistry: an important trait affecting cellular biocompatibility in two and three dimensional culture systems

    Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces

    (2019)
  • A. Kurtz-Chalot et al.

    Impact of silica nanoparticle surface chemistry on protein corona formation and consequential interactions with biological cells

    Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl.

    (2017)
  • X. Zeng et al.

    Nanoparticle-directed sub-cellular localization of doxorubicin and the sensitization breast cancer cells by circumventing GST-mediated drug resistance

    Biomaterials

    (2014)
  • A. Solorio-Rodríguez et al.

    A comparison of the human and mouse protein corona profiles of functionalized SiO

    Nanoscale

    (2017)
  • W. Zhang et al.

    Advances in functionalized mesoporous silica nanoparticles for tumor targeted drug delivery and theranostics

    Curr. Pharmaceut. Des.

    (2017)
  • B. Pelaz et al.

    Surface functionalization of nanoparticles with polyethylene glycol: effects on protein adsorption and cellular uptake

    ACS Nano

    (2015)
  • A. Karabasz et al.

    In vivo studies on pharmacokinetics, toxicity and immunogenicity of polyelectrolyte nanocapsules functionalized with two different polymers: poly-L-glutamic acid or PEG

    Int. J. Nanomed.

    (2019)
  • H. Wang et al.

    The protein corona on nanoparticles as viewed from a nanoparticle-sizing perspective

    Wiley Interdiscip Rev NanomedNanobiotechnol

    (2018)
  • V. Pareek et al.

    formation and characterization of protein corona around nanoparticles: a review

    J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol.

    (2018)
  • V.H. Nguyen et al.

    Protein corona: a new approach for nanomedicine design

    Int. J. Nanomed.

    (2017)
  • L. Chen et al.

    The toxicity of silica nanoparticles to the immune system

    Nanomedicine

    (2018)
  • H. Zhang et al.

    Processing pathway dependence of amorphous silica nanoparticle toxicity: colloidal vs pyrolytic

    J. Am. Chem. Soc.

    (2012)
  • B.W. Neun et al.

    Understanding the role of anti-PEG antibodies in the complement activation by doxil in vitro

    Molecules

    (2018)
  • V.B. Damodaran et al.

    Bio-inspired strategies for designing antifouling biomaterials

    Biomater. Res.

    (2016)
  • J. Liu

    Interfacing zwitterionic liposomes with inorganic nanomaterials: surface forces, membrane integrity, and applications

    Langmuir

    (2016)
  • O. Tacar et al.

    Doxorubicin: an update on anticancer molecular action, toxicity and novel drug delivery systems

    J. Pharm. Pharmacol.

    (2013)
  • R.M. Damiani et al.

    Pathways of cardiac toxicity: comparison between chemotherapeutic drugs doxorubicin and mitoxantrone

    Arch. Toxicol.

    (2016)
  • B. Kepsutlu et al.

    Cells undergo major changes in the quantity of cytoplasmic organelles after uptake of gold nanoparticles with biologically relevant surface coatings

    ACS Nano

    (2020)
  • K. Ahmad et al.

    Nanoparticle-based drugs: a potential armamentarium of effective anti-cancer therapies

    Curr. Drug Metabol.

    (2018)
  • L.H. Tsai et al.

    Doxorubicin loaded PLGA nanoparticle with cationic/anionic polyelectrolyte decoration: characterization, and its therapeutic potency

    Polymers

    (2021)
  • F. Hu et al.

    PEGylated-PLGA nanoparticles coated with pH responsive tannic acid-Fe(III) complexes for reduced premature doxorubicin release and enhanced targeting in breast cancer

    Mol. Pharm.

    (2020)
  • S. Piehler et al.

    Iron oxide nanoparticles as carriers for DOX and magnetic hyperthermia after intratumoral application into breast cancer in mice: impact and future perspectives

    Nanomaterials

    (2020)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text