Computer-assisted planning of distraction osteogenesis for lower face reconstruction in gunshot traumas
Introduction
Lower face defects resulting from gunshot wounds often cause severe functional and cosmetic deformities. Distraction osteogenesis (DO) is already a well-established technique to treat those facial wounds, because this type of injury requires the reconstruction of bone and soft tissues (Labbé et al., 2005). As well as in bone elongation, it results in the simultaneous formation of new skin, muscles, and subcutaneous tissues. The objectives of this reconstruction are both functional and aesthetic: to restore facial contours, to provide labial function and also to provide masticatory function through dental rehabilitation. The principal interest of the DO is the simultaneous creation of the facial soft tissues. Therefore, there is no need to harvest muscles or composite flaps (free or pedicled). DO also recreates the alveolar ridge with its attached gum, suitable for dental reconstruction by osseointegrated implants. Thus, the problems of inflammation around dental implants are largely overcome (Taupin et al., 2012). DO is also interesting from an economic point of view due to the smaller cost for DO in comparison with free flaps (Wojcik et al., 2011). The total duration of treatment is longer than with microsurgery techniques, although the duration of hospitalization is shorter.
Previously, we have reported our experience of DO using a customized external device (DEOS) with an endless screw. This bidirectional device was successfully used for reconstruction of the lower and midface regions (Labbé et al., 2009). However, the three-dimensional control of the distraction remained very difficult in conventional operations based on the sole surgeon's experience, because of the difficulties in locating anatomical landmarks in those facial gunshot wounds. Preoperative planning of mandibular reconstruction has moved from mechanical simulations with stereolithographic models or dental model casts into almost completely virtual planning. Currently available software permits virtual surgery with digital control of the three-dimensional (3D) movements of mandibular stumps. Computer-assisted surgery also allows the design and the machining of surgical cutting and drilling guides, as well as of patient-specific pins for fixation of the device named Plate Implant for Flat Bones (PIFB) (Fig. 1).
Those digital simulations can overcome the technical problems of management of the spatial position of the reconstructed mandible, with reference to the upper jaw and occlusal plane.
Computer-assisted planning of DO (SurgiCase CMF 5.0®, Materialise, Leuven, Belgium) was tried in our last two cases of gunshot wounds. Here, we report our procedure and experience in the use of preoperative virtual surgery to better achieve acute intraoperative goals using a computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) technique for mandibular distraction in gunshot wounds.
Section snippets
Patients
Two patients with gunshot injuries (from suicide attempts) underwent osteogenic distraction with the help of computer-assisted planning in our department since 2012. The patients were both male and were 42 and 63 years old. The facial lesions were described (Table 1) according to the classification system previously reported (Bénateau et al., 2001). The facial area is divided into three horizontal sections (level I is mandibular or lower face, level II is maxillary or midface, and level III is
Results
A summary of the demographics of the two patients is presented in Table 1.
The preoperative planning procedure lasted about 60 min, including the interactive Web session.
The surgical time was 170 min for the first patient and 140 min for the second one.
In the two cases, distraction was completed, with reconstruction of bone and soft tissues without the need for a flap.
For the two patients, the device was activated after a 5-days latency period at a speed of 0.5 mm twice per day. The patients
Discussion
Preoperative digital planning is accurate and allows an acute fixation of the distraction device in the required position. It also permits intraoperative guidance of the osteotomies and vector positioning control.
Compared with the relatively simple unidirectional distraction of long bones as described by Ilizarov, the three-dimensional distraction of the mandible is extremely complex (Gateno et al., 2000a, Gateno et al., 2000b). In our experience, preoperative digital planning allows
Conclusion
In conclusion, our results encourage the adoption of computer-assisted distraction planning to treat lower face reconstruction in gunshot wounds with DO. This procedure allowed better control and accuracy in repositioning the mandibular stumps, in determining the distraction vector, and in controlling bone alignment and mandibular symmetry. This developing technique enhanced the functional and cosmetic outcomes of lower face reconstruction by DO. This was performed with the help of precise
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they had no financial interests, conflicts of interest or commercial associations relevant to this study.
References (21)
- et al.
Patient-specific reconstruction plates are the missing link in computer-assisted mandibular reconstruction: a showcase for technical description
J Craniomaxillofac Surg
(2015) - et al.
Comparison of two computer-assisted surgery techniques to guide a mandibular distraction osteogenesis procedure. Technical note
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg
(2005) - et al.
Use of computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing to produce orthognathically ideal surgical outcomes: a paradigm shift in head and neck reconstruction
J Oral Maxillofac Surg
(2009) - et al.
Computer simulation and rapid prototyping for the reconstruction of the mandible
J Oral Maxillofac Surg
(2009) - et al.
Gunshot wounds: two cases of midface reconstruction by osteogenic distraction
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg
(2009) - et al.
Three-dimensional preoperative virtual planning and template use for surgical correction of craniostenosis
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg
(2014) Custom-made prefabricated titanium miniplates in Le Fort I osteotomies: principles, procedure and clinical insights
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg
(2013)- et al.
Three-dimensional treatment planning of orthognathic surgery in the area of virtual imaging
J Oral Maxillofac Surg
(2009) - et al.
Shaping the fibula without fumbling: the SynpliciTi customised guide-plate
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg
(2015) - et al.
Implant insertion in distracted bone for reconstruction after gunshot injury
Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac
(2012)
Cited by (8)
Improving the accuracy of the preoperative planning of mandibular osteogenic distraction by an external custom-made device
2023, Annales de Chirurgie Plastique EsthetiqueUpdates in Management of Craniomaxillofacial Gunshot Wounds and Reconstruction of the Mandible
2021, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Clinics of North AmericaCitation Excerpt :With the advent of computer surgical planning, DO is once again a useful tool in the reconstructive armamentarium. Benateau and colleagues54 described the use of computer-assisted custom distraction devices and cutting guides for reconstruction of the lower face after gunshot injury.54 Similar to computer surgical planning discussed earlier, planning for DO facilitates management of the spatial position of the neo-mandible in reference to the dentition and occlusal plane of the maxilla.
Customized Cutting Template to Assist Sternotomy in Pectus Arcuatum
2019, Annals of Thoracic SurgeryThe advantages of advanced computer-assisted diagnostics and three-dimensional preoperative planning on implant position in orbital reconstruction
2018, Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial SurgeryCitation Excerpt :The focus of CAS is on improving accuracy, usability and possible shortening of operation time (Hassfeld et al., 1995; Siessegger et al., 2001; Dubois et al., 2015c). It is used for several purposes, ranging from trauma treatment to orthognathic surgery and pathological resections (Rana et al., 2015; Benateau et al., 2016; Azarmehr et al., 2017). CAS can be divided into four steps: 1.
Updates in Management of Craniomaxillofacial Gunshot Wounds and Reconstruction of the Mandible
2017, Facial Plastic Surgery Clinics of North AmericaCitation Excerpt :Similar to computer surgical planning discussed earlier, planning for DO facilitates management of the spatial position of the neo-mandible in reference to the dentition and occlusal plane of the maxilla. Akin to the authors' experience with self-inflicted mandible GSW injures, Benateau and colleagues54 found the ramus/condyle unit tends to be spared. The segments were repositioned virtually; osteotomy lines were planned; and predictive markers were used on the cutting guides for placement of the distraction device.