Does functional appliance treatment truly improve stability of mandibular vertical distraction osteogenesis in hemifacial microsomia?

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2008.03.002Get rights and content

Summary

Aim

After mandibular unilateral distraction osteogenesis (DO) a gradual reappearance of the vertical asymmetry during growth is observed. A pre- and post-surgical functional-orthodontic treatment was added to our distraction protocol in the attempt to increase long-term stability. In order to evaluate the actual efficacy of such a combined treatment, two samples of children affected by hemifacial microsomia were compared long-term.

Material

Ten children were treated by a combined orthodontic–distraction treatment, seven by distraction only.

Method

Only the vertical changes in the mandible and maxilla in the panoramic and postero-anterior cephalometric X-rays were measured.

Results

All of the patients showed a gradual return of the asymmetry with growth. Occlusal plane correction and, to a much lesser extent, mandibular vertical ramus height correction were better maintained over 5 years post-DO in the orthopaedic group.

Conclusion

Although orthopaedic treatment allows for a more stable occlusal plane and for a slower return of the mandibular vertical asymmetry, it has mainly a dento-alveolar effect. Therefore, the decision of applying an orthopaedic treatment associated with distraction, should be taken by surgeon and orthodontist together, considering both the advantages and the disadvantages of this treatment.

Introduction

Although some authors suggest that distraction osteogenesis (DO) applied to growing patients affected by hemifacial microsomia (HFM) is a relatively stable procedure (Molina and Ortiz Monasterio,, Shetye et al., 2006), a commonly reported problem during subsequent growth, is a gradual recurrence of the asymmetry, particularly of the vertical asymmetry (Hollier et al., 1999, Mommaerts and Nagy, 2002, Meazzini et al., 2005).

Many authors suggest that the addition of an orthodontic treatment or an orthopaedic plate will significantly improve the stability of the results (Tehranchi and Behnia, 2000, Takashima et al., 2003, Shetye et al., 2006), but no case–control studies are available in the literature to prove this suggestion.

The purpose of this study was to verify the long-term advantage of the addition of orthopaedic treatment to DO.

Section snippets

Materials and methods

Two samples were compared. One sample comprised 10 patients affected by unilateral HFM consecutively treated with unilateral distraction and orthopaedic preparation, the other sample comprised seven patients who underwent distraction only. The age of the patients in the orthopaedic sample at the time of distraction was 5.4 ± 0.8 years, the age of the non-orthopaedic sample was 5.9 ± 1.1 years. Only patients with a condyle and ramus (type I and II Pruzansky) were included in the study, given that

Maxillary asymmetry

Differences in the angular inclination of the occlusal plane to the reference plane from the initial records to the post-distraction records and to the 5-year post-operative records for the orthopaedic and non-orthopaedic groups are summarized in Table 1. While the non-orthopaedic group at 5 years post-DO shows an inclination which has returned to the same value as the pre-DO records, the orthopaedic group still shows an average preservation of the correction of over 50% of angular improvement (

Discussion

Although the samples are not large, this is the only case–control study attempting to verify the actual effect of orthodontic functional treatment on the long-term stability of DO in growing HFM patients. The application of DO to growing HFM patients started in the early 1990s and it was “speculated that gradual expansion of the mandible performed at an early age, could result in expansion of the muscles”, “and motor nerves”, “and an improvement in neuromuscular function”, “and attendant growth

Conclusion

Orthopaedic treatment associated with DO allows for a delay in the recurrence of the occlusal cant and, to a much lesser extent, of the mandibular vertical asymmetry in HFM patients after DO. On the other hand, it has two drawbacks. First, it only delays the return to the original disproportion, but does not interrupt this natural process. Second, functional treatment decreases the relative height of the mandibular body on the affected side, making final surgical planning slightly more complex.

References (23)

  • L.B. Kaban et al.

    Surgical correction of hemifacial microsomia in the growing child

    Plast Reconstr Surg

    (1988)
  • Cited by (24)

    • Dental and maxillofacial features of condylo-mandibular dysplasia: A case series of 21 patients

      2020, Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery
      Citation Excerpt :

      There have been very few reports to date of condylo-mandibular dysplasia in the literature. As highlighted by Meazzini et al. (Meazzini et al., 2008a, b), a casual example of condylo-mandibular dysplasia was published in the form of ‘misdiagnosed’ hemifacial microsomia, characterized by successful orthodontic treatment despite substantial condyle deformities (Figueroa et al., 1984; Kaplan et al., 1989; Melsen et al., 1986; Sidiropoulou et al., 2003; Silvestri et al., 1996; Kahl-Nieke and Fischbach, 1998). The main differences between condylo-mandibular dysplasia and craniofacial microsomia are the permanent absence of soft-tissue involvement and a normal appearance of the ears (Meazzini et al., 2011).

    • Structural comparison of hemifacial microsomia mandible in different age groups by three-dimensional skeletal unit analysis

      2018, Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, supporters of delayed treatment prefer to take advantage of the growth potential of HFM and to avoid growth impairment due to early intervention (Polley et al., 1997; Nagy et al., 2009). Long-term studies after distraction osteogenesis reported limited vertical bone growth, reduced growth ratio of the affected side, or relapse (Marquez et al., 2000; Huisinga-Fischer et al., 2003; Meazzini et al., 2005, 2008). The main treatment goal for HFM needs to focus on the restoration of normal function and structure as well as the induction of normal growth.

    • Surgical Correction of Maxillofacial Skeletal Deformities

      2017, Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
    • Three-dimensional virtual-surgery simulation-assisted asymmetric bilateral mandibular distraction osteogenesis for a patient with bilateral condylar fractures

      2017, American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
      Citation Excerpt :

      The vertical growth of the maxilla on the affected side would be coupled with the correction of the transverse cant of occlusal plane (Figs 14 and 15).16 Although the transverse cant correction of the occlusal plane was reported to be more stable than that of other planes such as the biantegonial plane and bijugal plane, some postdistraction osteogenesis relapse was reported in hemifacial microsomia patients.17 However, our patient's corrected occlusal plane was well maintained and even slightly improved during the retention period (Table II).

    • Craniofacial Microsomia

      2016, Facial Plastic Surgery Clinics of North America
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text