Original ContributionThe incidence of coagulopathy in pregnant patients with intrahepatic cholestasis: should we delay or avoid neuraxial analgesia?☆
Introduction
Many women request analgesia for labor or require surgical anesthesia for Cesarean delivery [1], [2]. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists has stated that neuraxial analgesia is the most flexible, effective, and least depressing analgesic modality to the central nervous systems of both the mother and the baby [3]. Delaying neuraxial analgesia may cause significant patient distress and suffering, especially when optimal analgesia is not achieved with systemic medications or other regional techniques [4], [5], [6], [7]. Due to the risk for spinal-epidural hematoma, parturients with diseases that may potentially adversely affect hemostasis are frequently denied neuraxial analgesia until abnormal coagulation is excluded by laboratory examination. A coagulopathy is considered a contraindication to neuraxial procedures because of the potential catastrophic consequences of spinal-epidural hematomas [8], [9], [10].
Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP) is the most common liver disease unique to pregnancy, with a reported incidence as high as 4% [11]. Patients with ICP have steatorrhea from fat malabsorption, which may adversely affect vitamin K absorption and impair coagulation [12]. In addition, the disease may cause transient liver damage, which may further impair coagulation. Small studies (≤ 100 subjects) examined the incidence of coagulopathy, evaluated by a prolonged prothrombin time (PT) in women with ICP and showed conflicting results, but the incidence of abnormal coagulation tests has been as high as 20% [13], [14]. Since the incidence of coagulopathy in patients with ICP is currently not well defined, some practitioners often delay neuraxial techniques in those patients until laboratory exclusion of abnormal hemostasis is obtained.
The main objective of the current investigation was to estimate the incidence of coagulopathy in women with ICP and to determine if the presence of abnormal liver function in patients with ICP was associated with a higher incidence of abnormal coagulation tests.
Section snippets
Materials and methods
The study was a retrospective cohort investigation. Approval for the study was obtained from the Northwestern University Institutional Review Board. Parturients with a possible diagnosis of ICP were identified by searching the Northwestern Medical Enterprise Data Warehouse using ICD-9 codes (646.70, 646.71, 646.73, and 576) from the years of 2005 to 2009, followed by individual chart reviews by two investigators (AD and MK) to confirm the diagnosis and exclude other liver diseases. Exclusion
Results
Three hundred nineteen patients met the study inclusion criteria, 223 of whom underwent coagulation tests. Demographic characteristics of parturients with ICP who had and did not have coagulation tests prior to delivery are presented in Table 1. The incidence (95% CI) of abnormal PT (INR) in the parturients with ICP was 0% (0 - 1.8%). Other coagulation tests were also normal in all subjects (Fig. 1).
Thirteen patients had liver enzymes (ALT and/or AST) values greater than 5 times normal but none
Discussion
The most important finding of the current investigation was the lack of abnormal coagulation studies in parturients with ICP. Even patients with evidence of significant liver damage (enzyme elevations greater than 5 times normal) did not have abnormal coagulation tests. No neuraxial hematoma complications were detected and the incidence of abnormal bleeding after delivery was consistent with the incidence reported in the literature for healthy obstetric patients [17], [18], [19]. Taken
References (31)
- et al.
Transversus abdominis plane block for postoperative analgesia after Caesarean delivery performed under spinal anaesthesia? A systematic review and meta-analysis
Br J Anaesth
(2012) - et al.
Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy
Clin Liver Dis
(2004) - et al.
Non-invasive haemoglobin measurement in patients undergoing elective Caesarean section
Br J Anaesth
(2012) - et al.
Maternal characteristics and satisfaction associated with intrapartum epidural analgesia use in Canadian women
Int J Obstet Anesth
(2012) - et al.
Combined spinal-epidural anesthesia and non-pharmacological methods of pain relief during normal childbirth and maternal satisfaction: a randomized clinical trial
Rev Assoc Med Bras
(2012) - et al.
Haemostatic monitoring during postpartum haemorrhage and implications for management
Br J Anaesth
(2012) - et al.
Comparison of thromboelastometry (ROTEM(r)) with standard plasmatic coagulation testing in paediatric surgery
Br J Anaesth
(2012) - et al.
A randomized controlled comparison of epidural analgesia and combined spinal-epidural analgesia in a private practice setting: pain scores during first and second stages of labor and at delivery
Anesth Analg
(2013) - et al.
Intermittent epidural bolus compared with continuous epidural infusions for labor analgesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Anesth Analg
(2013) on Obstetric Practice. ACOG Committee Opinion number 269 February 2002. Analgesia and cesarean delivery rates. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
Obstet Gynecol
(2002)
Unknowns in the use of remifentanil PCA for labour analgesia
Anaesthesia
Modified patient-controlled remifentanil bolus delivery regimen for labour pain
Anaesthesia
A single preoperative dose of gabapentin does not improve postcesarean delivery pain management: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled dose-finding trial
Anesth Analg
Epidural hematoma after epidural blockade in the United States: it's not just low molecular heparin following orthopedic surgery anymore
Anesth Analg
Prospective longitudinal study of thromboelastography and standard hemostatic laboratory tests in healthy women during normal pregnancy
Anesth Analg
Cited by (0)
- ☆
Supported by departmental funding only.