An exploratory study of UK companies' taxonomy based on environmental drivers
Introduction
Environmental management has emerged as an issue of great interest among companies (Céspedes Lorente and De Burgos Jiménez, 2004). Environmental issues are receiving more and more attention from all sectors as customers demand companies be more responsible for environmental matters, demanding products and services that minimize environmental impact (Abarca and Sepúlveda, 2001, Park and Seo, 2006).
However, despite the importance and benefits of environmental management, the level of adoption and implantation of environmental management practices is still weak in firms of many countries (Jamil et al., 2015). Many companies remain reluctant to incorporate environmental improvements or do not exploit the potential of environmental management.
Several authors have studied the drivers that motivate firms to go a step further in environmental management issues. Nevertheless, a great number of companies are satisfied with simply having an environmental management system through a certification such as ISO 14001 (Guerrero-Baena et al., 2015). During the last two decades, many researchers have studied why some firms respond to ecological issues while others do not even comply with the existing regulation (Bansal and Roth, 2000, González-Benito and González-Benito, 2006). Consequently, not all the companies are motivated by the same drivers. Organizations might find different motivations depending on what they have already done with respect to environmental issues; hence, their maturity stage needs to be taken into account when proposing new environmental tools or actions. It might be difficult for practitioners and policy makers to focus on specific drivers if they do not know what driver or group of drivers will help each specific company to move forward. Thus, depending on the maturity stage in which the company is, the importance of the drivers proposed in the literature might be different. However, none of the environmental management studies in the literature has been based on this relationship.
Consequently, the main objective of this research is to develop a classification of companies that specifies which drivers are more important in each of the maturity stages. This will allow practitioners and policy makers to better focus on specific drivers and help companies move forward.
Section snippets
Background
Not all the companies have environmentally improved in the same way and there have been several studies defining different environmental management classifications among companies. Moreover, the environmental drivers that a company might have may be different depending on its maturity stage and what it has already achieved.
Methods
As mentioned before, this research envisages an exploratory categorization of companies based on their maturity stage as regards environmental management, as well as based on the drivers that contributed to achieve the aforementioned level of maturity stage.
The Environmental Management System with the greatest impact, in terms of the number of certifications at a global level, has been ISO 14001:2004 (Bernardo et al., 2009). In terms of the number of certifications among European countries, the
Results and discussion
Factor Analysis and Cluster Analysis were sequentially utilized to accomplish the research's objective.
Conclusions
Factor Analysis produced a meaningful structure as regards the drivers that contribute to the maturity stages. These drivers were grouped into three different factors labeled as Internal Improvement, External Awareness and Formal Requirements. Therefore, one can conclude that companies' framework perspectives reflect a distinction between internal factors, which include notably productivity and innovation, and external factors that include notably societal demands and corporate image.
Limitations and future research
The data were obtained from a convenience sample, which restricts the ability to generalize the obtained results. Furthermore, although the sample size fulfills the requirements from the utilized statistical techniques, a larger sample size would reinforce the conclusions.
On the other hand, different target populations can also be considered. In fact, a sample constituted by organizations coming from different sectors of activity provides a better portrait as regards global market behavior.
References (45)
- et al.
Green corporate image: moderating the connection between environmental product innovation and firm performance
J. Clean. Prod.
(2014) - et al.
How integrated are environmental, quality and other standardized management systems? an empirical study
J. Clean. Prod.
(2009) - et al.
The impact of environmental constraints on productivity improvement in integrated paper plants
J. Environ. Econ. Manage
(1999) - et al.
Does ISO 14001 work in Brazil?
J. Clean. Prod.
(2010) - et al.
Stimulating different types of eco-innovation in the UK: government policies and firm motivations
Ecol. Econ.
(2011) - et al.
Implementation of standardised environmental management systems in Swedish local authorities: reasons, expectations and some outcomes
Environ. Sci. Policy
(2002) - et al.
A multicriteria method for environmental management system selection: an intellectual capital approach
J. Clean. Prod.
(2015) Non-linear pathways of corporate environmental management: a survey of ISO 14001-certified companies in Brazil
J. Clean. Prod.
(2010)- et al.
Mixed methodology to analyze the relationship between maturity of environmental management and the adoption of green supply chain management in Brazil
Resour. Conserv. Recycl.
(2014) - et al.
Environmental management accounting practices in small medium manufacturing firms
Procedia Social Behav. Sci.
(2015)
Ecological modernisation: new perspectives
J. Clean. Prod.
Drivers, barriers and incentives to implementing environmental management systems in the food industry: a case of Lebanon
J. Clean. Prod.
Finding the connection: environmental management systems and environmental performance
J. Clean. Prod.
A knowledge-based approximate life cycle assessment system for evaluating environmental impacts of product design alternatives in a collaborative design environment
Adv. Eng. Inf.
The role of support programmes and policies in improving SMEs environmental performance in developed and transition economies
J. Clean. Prod.
Motivation for ISO 14000 certification: development of a predictive model
Omega
Relationship between green management and environmental training in companies located in Brazil: a theoretical framework and case studies
Int. J. Prod. Econ.
Environmental training: industrial needs
J. Clean. Prod.
Empirical influence of environmental management on innovation: evidence from Europe
Ecol. Econ.
Towards implementation of ISO 14001 environmental management systems in selected industries in China
J. Clean. Prod.
Eco-etiquetado: un instrumento para diferenciar productos e incentivar la competitividad
Comercio-Ambiente
A contingent resource-based view of proactive corporate environmental strategy
Acad. Manag. Rev.
Cited by (10)
Barriers to the adoption of circular economy practices in Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises: Instrument development, measurement and validation: Barrier to the adoption of circular economy practices
2022, Journal of Cleaner ProductionCitation Excerpt :In this context, SMEs are also severely affected by the pressure to integrate environmental management activities as they represent a major tier-I and tier-II suppliers for large firms (Singh et al., 2020). In general, SMEs represent heterogeneous units with different stages of environmental maturity levels (Ormazabal and Puga-Leal, 2016). Ormazabal et al. (2018) found that SMEs emphasise on environmental management practices, like environmental certification, reducing the number of materials consumed, while less focus was given on applications of ecological or biodegradable materials in their processes.
Implementation of circular economy approaches in the electrical and electronic equipment (EEE) sector: Barriers, enablers and policy insights
2022, Journal of Cleaner ProductionCitation Excerpt :On some occasions, the main motivations behind these shifts are concerns by company stakeholders over resource constraints and environmental impacts (Ranta et al., 2018). Furthermore, for some companies the potential for enhancing their ‘green’ image and reputation gives added impetus to their sustainability efforts (Ormazabal and Puga-Leal, 2016; Ormazabal et al., 2018). To address the research questions the study adopted a qualitative research approach based on case studies.
Bringing the circular economy closer to small and medium entreprises: Improving water circularity without damaging plant productivity
2020, Journal of Cleaner ProductionA systematic literature review on firm-level proactive environmental management
2019, Journal of Environmental ManagementCitation Excerpt :Yet, although all models describe the actions adopted under the three perspectives proposed by González-Benito and González-Benito (2006), a gap addressing the comprehension of how environmental management models (whether regarding evolutionary stages or typologies) can be related to the operationalization of proactive practices and their driving variables still remains unfulfilled. This perception is justified on current research about the implementation of environmental management systems, which focus on the identification of the motivations that drive organizational practices (González-Benito and González-Benito, 2006; Aragón-Correa et al., 2008; Valentine, 2010; Pondeville et al., 2013; Ormazabal and Puga-Leal, 2016; Ormazabal et al., 2017; Kumar and Shetty, 2018), and on the assessment of the operational performance of these practices (Singh et al., 2012; Teng et al., 2014; Phan and Baird, 2015; Madsen and Ulhøi, 2016; Boiral et al., 2018). Questions addressing diffusion and characterization mechanisms of proactive management actions remain unsolved.
An empirical taxonomy of corporate social responsibility in China's manufacturing industries
2018, Journal of Cleaner ProductionCitation Excerpt :Dahlsrud (2008) identified the key dimensions of CSR as stakeholders, society, economy, voluntariness, and environment. Lindgreen et al. (2009b) investigated CSR adoption in US firms by measuring CSR dimensions related to customers, suppliers, employees, investors, philanthropy, and the environment (see also Ormazabal and Puga-Leal, 2016; Shafiq et al., 2014; Rettab et al., 2009). Xu and Yang's (2010) work on CSR adoption in China identified nine CSR dimensions.
Circular Economy in Spanish SMEs: Challenges and opportunities
2018, Journal of Cleaner ProductionCitation Excerpt :In contrast, there are several opportunities that reduce uncertainty in the long term (Table 2). Firstly, the increase of prestige it is a result from the effective communication of the firms’ sustainable strategies which let improve the relationship with their consumers (Noci and Verganti, 1999) and increase their market share (Ormazabal and Puga-Leal, 2016). Nonetheless, this “green image” must be real and well supported by credible actions (Del Río et al., 2016).