Combining livestock and tree crops to improve sustainability in agriculture: a case study using the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) approach
Introduction
Climate change is one of the most important concerns for the international environmental policy. To reduce emissions and to develop proper mitigation and adaptation measures, governments need information and data on the most important source of greenhouse gas emissions. Emissions of CO2, CH4 and N2O from agriculture account for one-fifth of the annual forcing of climate change, or for one-third when land use changes are included (Cole et al., 1997). Agriculture is the main producer of CH4, mostly due to livestock (Mosier et al., 1998) and of N2O, mostly due to N fertilization of crops (Forster et al., 2007), two gases with about 23 and 300 times the global warming potential of CO2. Livestock alone accounts for 18% of global green-house gas emissions (FAO, 2006), or perhaps even more (Goodland and Anhang, 2009, Herrero et al., 2011). In the last decades, the environmental impacts of agriculture and animal production have been increasingly acknowledged. Modern agriculture must combine high productivity with a low impact to sustainably feed the growing world population. With increasing wealth in developing countries people will consume more meat; therefore, meat consumption, and consequently the high environmental impact from livestock production, is expected to increase at a greater rate than the population growth rate.
In this scenario, chicken meat, mainly due to the high efficiency in converting feed into meat, is particularly interesting because of its lower environmental impact relative to other meats (Williams et al., 2006).
Free-range chickens have a higher meat quality than chickens from intensive systems with no grazing (Castellini et al., 2006b), and at the same time, they also enjoy better health and animal welfare (Castellini et al., 2008). In fact, selection for a high growth rate and high feed conversion efficiency negatively affected animal welfare (Bessei, 2006) by impairing health status and behavior (Bokkers and Koene, 2003, Turner et al., 2003). A modern broiler is approximately 2.5 kg at 42 d, and the breast represents approximately 25% of the whole body (Groot Koerkamp et al., 2003), favoring skeletal imbalances (Kestin et al., 1992, Kestin et al., 2001, Corr et al., 2003a, Corr et al., 2003b) and other metabolic and muscle disorders (Branciari et al., 2009, Branciari et al., 2014). Accordingly, welfare and health issues are major concerns in intensive poultry systems (EU, 2000); organic and free-range production systems have been developed in response to such problems (EU, 1999).
The production system affects not only the animal welfare but also economic, qualitative, and ecological traits (Hermansen et al., 2004). While some authors found that free-range poultry has lower environmental impacts (Castellini et al., 2006a, Castellini et al., 2012b, Boggia et al., 2010), or that there are serious concerns surrounding the long-term sustainability of intensive poultry systems (Veleva et al., 2001, Tilman et al., 2002, Cerutti et al., 2011, Acosta–Alba et al., 2012, Lindsey, 2012, Zhang et al., 2012), others found that intensive systems are more sustainable (Bokkers and De Boer, 2009). Most of the discrepancies are due to the type of raw data used and to the methods used for measuring the impact (e.g., Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), emergy, or ecological footprint). Indeed, even if all of the methods are effective in representing the environmental features of a given activity, each method has both positive and negative aspects (Bastianoni et al., 2010). The factor that always plays a major role in the environmental impacts of these systems is the higher feed consumption per kilogram of meat of free-range birds (i.e., in free-range systems slower-growing animals are usually used, which have lower feed conversion efficiencies). Moreover, in free-range systems, birds need grazing space, which increases the amount of land used. In fact, although grazing provides bioactive compounds and increases meat quality (Fanatico et al., 2006), the energy and protein supplied for the birds’ diets are usually low (Walker and Gordon, 2003, Buchanan et al., 2007, Rivera-Ferre et al., 2007), and the additional land use due to grazing in free-range systems is not compensated for by a proportional reduction in land use for feed production.
However, there is no reason why chickens should occupy pastureland that is not already productive. In the past, it was common to rear chickens in fruit orchards (Bertoni, 1906, Donno, 1937). Trees have been shown to benefit chickens in terms of protection from predators (i.e., especially raptors), sun, wind, the elements and extreme temperatures, thus reducing animal losses and increasing the time and amount of grazing (Bubier and Bradshaw, 1998, Mirabito and Lubac, 2001, Dal Bosco et al., 2014a). Therefore, combining free-range animals with orchards, rather than grazing otherwise unproductive pastures, results in less land use and provides other environmental benefits in the orchard (i.e., reduced need for fertilization and weed control). According to the International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD), the integrated crop-livestock farming system “represents a winning combination that (a) reduces erosion; (b) increases crop yields, soil biological activity and nutrient recycling; (c) intensifies land use, improving profits; and (d) can therefore help reduce poverty and malnutrition and strengthen environmental sustainability” (IFAD, 2010).
While several older papers describe the benefits and the techniques of poultry rearing in orchards (e.g., Bertoni, 1906, Donno, 1937), a comparison of the environmental impact of free-range chickens reared in an orchard vs. rearing in a pasture solely for chickens has not been performed.
In the present work, we performed this analysis using the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) to compare free-range chickens reared in olive orchards vs. pure pastureland (i.e., dedicated only to chickens and otherwise unproductive). We also performed the LCA for the olive orchard, with and without grazing chickens. All of the main phases of the systems' life cycle were considered, from the production of raw materials to the final product at the farm gate, i.e. from cradle to gate, for both poultry and olive production. This is the first time the environmental impact of an integrated livestock-orchard system has been evaluated.
Section snippets
Materials and methods
A free-range poultry system and an olive orchard were analyzed using the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) approach. LCA indicators are used to analyze a product's environmental impact by considering its whole life cycle and by quantifying the resources involved and emissions produced.
In this particular case, two separate assessments were performed. In the first assessment (assessment A1 vs. A2, Fig. 1) we compared the impact of a free-range poultry system in a traditional pastureland (i.e. with
Results
The results of the LCA are reported separately for the free-range poultry and the olive orchard systems.
Discussion
Several previous studies aimed to understand the environmental impact of free-range compared to conventional poultry. The feed conversion efficiency usually plays a large role in the assessment of the environmental impacts, and breeds with slow growth, usually used in free-range systems, have lower feed conversion efficiencies (Fanatico et al., 2007, Castellini et al., 2012b). However, the higher impacts of free-range poultry systems are also due to the grazing space (Castellini et al., 2012a)
Conclusions
Free-range poultry enjoy better welfare and provide a higher meat quality and these benefits are making free-range systems increasingly popular. However, their environmental impact is often higher than in conventional systems, due to lower feed conversion efficiencies and a greater land use due to grazing.
This study is the first to investigate the environmental impact of combining free-range poultry and orchards using the LCA approach. The results indicate that having birds graze on land that
Acknowledgments
This study was partly funded by the AGFORWARD project (Grant Agreement N° 613520), co-funded by the European Commission, Directorate General for Research & Innovation, within the 7th Framework Programme of RTD, Theme 2 – Biotechnologies, Agriculture & Food.
We thank Dr. Darcy Gordon for language assistance with the English manuscript.
References (82)
- et al.
Exploring sustainable farming scenarios at a regional scale: an application to dairy farms in Brittany
J. Clean. Prod.
(2012) - et al.
Resource consumption and emissions from olive oil production: a life cycle inventory case study in Cyprus
J. Clean. Prod.
(2008) - et al.
Behaviour of fast and slow-growing broilers to 12 weeks of age and the physical consequences
Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci.
(2003) - et al.
Nutrient composition and digestibility of organic broiler diets and pasture forages
J. Appl. Poult. Res.
(2007) - et al.
A multicriteria approach for measuring the sustainability of different poultry production systems
J. Clean. Prod.
(2012) - et al.
Sustainability of poultry production using the emergy approach: comparison of conventional and organic rearing systems
Agric. Ecosyst. Environ.
(2006) - et al.
Evaluation of the sustainability of swine manure fertilization in orchard through ecological footprint analysis: results from a case study in Italy
J. Clean. Prod.
(2011) - et al.
Meat quality of slow– and fast–growing chicken genotypes fed low–nutrient or standard diets and raised indoors or with outdoor access
Poult. Sci.
(2007) - et al.
Evaluation of slower–growing broiler genotypes grown with and without outdoor access: sensory attributes
Poult. Sci.
(2006) - et al.
Integration of organic animal production into land use with special reference to swine and poultry
Livest. Prod. Sci.
(2004)
Livestock and greenhouse gas emissions: the importance of getting the numbers right
Anim. Feed Sci. Technol.
Carbon footprint of an olive tree grove
Appl. Energy
Herbage intake and use of outdoor area by organic broilers: effects of vegetation type and shelter addition
NJAS Wagening. J. Life Sci.
A review of life cycle assessment (LCA) on some food products
J. Food Eng.
Environmental impacts of olive oil production: a Life Cycle Assessment case study in the province of Messina (Sicily)
J. Clean. Prod.
Development of LCIA characterisation factors for land use impacts on biodiversity
J. Clean. Prod.
Effect of fast–medium– and slow–growing strain on meat quality of chickens reared under the organic farming method
Animal
Life cycle assessment of olive oil production in Greece
J. Clean. Prod.
Indicators of sustainable production
J. Clean. Prod.
Emergy-based analysis of four farming systems: insight into agricultural diversification in rural China
J. Clean. Prod.
Measuring environmental sustainability of intensive poultry-rearing system
Chickens and Poultry production (Original title: “Polli e pollicoltura”). Il coltivatore
G. Agric. Prat.
Welfare of broilers: a review
World Poult. Sci. J.
Manual of national emission factors. National Thematic Centre for Atmosphere, Climate and Air Emissions, Report n. 01 (Original title: “Manuale dei fattori di emissione nazionali. Centro Tematico Nazionale Atmosfera Clima ed Emissioni in Aria”)
Environmental impact evaluation of conventional, organic and organic-plus poultry production systems using life cycle assessment
World Poult. Sci. J.
Economic, ecological, and social performance of conventional and organic broiler production in the Netherlands
Brit. Poult. Sci.
The occurrence of giant fibres in different muscles of two chicken genotypes
Brit. Poult. Sci.
Effect of genotype and rearing system on chicken behavior and muscle fiber characteristics
J. Anim. Sci.
Movement of flocks of laying hens in and out of the hen house in four free–range systems
Brit. Poult. Sci.
Environment and life cycle analysis of organic meat production and processing
Qualitative attributes and consumer perception of organic and free–range poultry meat
World Poult. Sci. J.
Comparison of two chicken genotypes organically reared: oxidative stability and other qualitative traits
Int. J. Anim. Sci.
Global estimates of potential mitigation of greenhouse gas emission by agriculture
Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosyst.
The effect of morphology on the musculoskeletal system of the modern broiler
Anim. Welf.
The effect of morphology on walking ability in the modern broiler: a gait analysis study
Anim. Welf.
Effect of range enrichment on performance, behaviour and forage intake of free–range chickens
J. Appl. Poult. Res.
Effect of slaughtering age in different commercial chicken genotypes reared according to the organic system: 1. Welfare, carcass and meat traits
Ital. J. Anim. Sci.
Environmental impacts in the supply chain of olive oil (Original title: “Ricadute ambientali nella filiera dell’olio di oliva”)
Estimo Territ.
Poultry production and fruit production (Original title: “Pollicoltura e Frutticoltura”)
Riv. Avicoltura
Ecoinvent Data V2.2
Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control (IPPC)
Cited by (75)
Assessing Mediterranean agroforestry systems: Agro-economic impacts of olive wild asparagus in central Italy
2024, European Journal of AgronomyHow does Life Cycle Assessment capture the environmental impacts of agroforestry? A systematic review
2023, Science of the Total EnvironmentYield and related traits of three legume crops grown in olive-based agroforestry under an intense drought in the South Mediterranean
2023, Saudi Journal of Biological SciencesLife cycle assessment (LCA) in the olive oil value chain: A descriptive review
2023, Environmental Development