Elsevier

Journal of Catalysis

Volume 363, July 2018, Pages 18-25
Journal of Catalysis

Dipole effect on ethylene epoxidation: Influence of alkali metals and chlorine

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2018.04.008Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Alkali metals induce electric dipoles on the surface and increase the selectivity.

  • Alkali metals greatly increase the activity by facilitating the oxygen dissociation.

  • Chlorine, surface and subsurface, decreases the activity but markedly increases the selectivity.

  • Interplay of chlorine and cesium is important for the optimal performance.

Abstract

Ethylene epoxidation is one of the most important selective oxidation reactions in industry and is almost invariably carried out on silver catalysts. Empirically it is known that moderate selectivity of silver can be greatly enhanced with cesium and chlorine dopants, whereas a mechanistic understanding of the underlying reason remains elusive. In this work, we present a first-principles explanation of the dipole effect on reaction selectivity, which could, in principle, be effected by alkali metals. We show that, on a silver surface, alkali metals work in a similar fashion thanks to their low electronegative character. The selectivity is impacted by inducing electric dipoles on the catalytic surface, whereas the electronic properties of the catalyst remain largely unperturbed. Cesium, as the least electronegative metal, shows the most pronounced effect. This effect is shown to persist when alkali metals are treated as “naked” atoms or, more realistically, when oxidized. Additionally, alkali metals increase activity of the catalyst by favoring the rate-determining step of oxygen dissociation. Chlorine, which is strongly electronegative, acts differently. Subsurface chlorine would increase selectivity through the same mechanism, while surface chlorine stabilizes alkali metals and moderately increases selectivity. Interplay of both dopants is needed to precisely tailor the catalyst for the best performance.

Introduction

Controlled oxidation of ethylene to ethylene epoxide (EO) is an important and experimentally challenging technological process. EO is a precursor to a plethora of chemicals. It is the basis for production of ethylene glycol, detergents, ethanolamines, and so forth. The principal challenge is to prevent the total oxidation of ethylene, which is thermodynamically the most favorable pathway, and instead steer the reaction towards epoxide.

Industrially, the reaction is carried out on silver catalysts, which are mostly doped with cesium and chlorine. By doing so, selectivity of pure silver catalyst, which ranges from 40% to 50%, is improved to over 90%. Despite having been thoroughly studied both experimentally [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8] and theoretically [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], the promoter effect of these dopants is still not completely understood, and competing explanations (such as blocking oxygen vacant sites, influence on oxametallocycle formation, electric field, effects on surface reconstruction) have been put forth [12], [15], [16].

Silver is a commonly used catalyst. It is sufficiently mild not to break C–H bonds in the olefin but active enough to dissociate oxygen [17]. There exist other competing catalysts; for instance, pure copper is also predicted to have high selectivity [18]. Interestingly, under reaction conditions, copper-silver alloy transforms into a copper oxide-like layer on top of silver and favorably influences the reaction [19], [20]. However, under industrial reaction conditions pure metal co-exists in equilibrium with the oxide phase, where Ag2O vastly outperforms Cu2O and Au2O [18].

Since the pioneering work of Linić and Barteau [9], [10], it has been well known that epoxide and total combustion pathways proceed through the common intermediate oxametallocycle (OME) [21], [22], which then converts either into EO or, when undergoing full combustion, initially into acetaldehyde (AA) and ultimately to CO2. It is therefore understood that the difference in activation energies between their respective transition states determines the selectivity of the reaction. What is not known is how Cs and Cl influence the activation energies. Interestingly, the activity of the catalyst is determined earlier in the oxidation process. On pure silver, the rate-determining step is in fact oxygen dissociation [11]. When the catalyst gets doped and/or partially oxidized, this simple picture breaks down. As found by Greeley and Mavrikakis, oxygen might also be subsurface, where it adversely affects the selectivity [23]. On oxidized surfaces, oxide regeneration ceases to be the rate-controlling step [24]. Recently, ethylene epoxidation on silver has also been studied as a model reaction for enhancing activity with plasmonic excitations [25], [26], [27]. It has also been found that catalysts are more active near phase transitions [28].

Linić and Barteau [12] studied the effects of cesium on ethylene epoxidation on Ag(1 1 1) and tentatively argued that its promoter effect stems from the change in the difference between the EO and AA transition states owing to electric field effect. They argue that chlorine, which is strongly electronegative, might diffuse into Ag. Detailed theoretical calculations by Gava et al. cast some doubt on the possibility of interstitial subsurface chlorine [15], while a great deal of experimental data support the notion of subsurface chlorine even at lower temperatures and moderate coverages [5], [29], [30], [31]. It has been shown, however, that chlorine might mitigate the diffusion of oxygen into the subsurface [32].

Ren et al. [33] showed computationally that cesium lowers the oxygen adsorption energy on pure Ag(1 1 1), effectively making oxygen bind less strongly to the silver surface. They do not consider oxygen binding directly to the cesium. At the same time, they showed that cesium doping lowers the activation barrier of epoxide formation in the selectivity-determining step and thus increases selectivity of the catalyst.

For Ag2O(0 0 1), Özbek et al. argue [16] that chlorine blocks oxygen vacant sites and prevents OME formation and surface reconstructions. Instead, it forces ethylene to react with surface oxygen in a one-step epoxidation [34]. Cesium acts as a co-promoter and stabilizes the non-vacant Ag2O(0 0 1) surface. However, under industrial conditions, Ag2O is less stable than pure Ag with a surface oxide [35]. This one-step mechanism, however, has been ruled out time and again for pure silver [36].

In this work, we employ density functional theory (DFT) calculations to shed light on the effects of dipoles on the selectivity of the reaction on Ag(1 1 1). We show how alkali metals on Ag(1 1 1) can bring about surface dipoles and increase selectivity. We show that this effect persists even in oxidizing conditions when Cs is oxidized. Activity is also increased through more favorable oxygen dissociation. The effect of chlorine is less pronounced on Ag(1 1 1), because it mostly serves to stabilize alkali metals and speed up the conversion of OME, but is more important on oxides [16].

Section snippets

Computational details

For electronic structure computations with periodic boundary conditions, the vasp package was used [37], [38], [39], [40]. The Perdew–Burke–Ernzerhof formula [41], [42] was used for evaluating the semilocal exchange and correlation contribution, while the projector augmented wave method [43], [44] was used to describe the interaction between valence electrons and the core. Criteria for relaxation were 0.01 eV/Å for stable structures and 0.03 eV/Å for transition states. The latter were

Thermodynamics

Partial oxidation of ethylene to epoxide is exothermic with an ab initio [CCSD(T)] computed reaction energy of ΔEEO298K=-101 kJ mol−1 and a standard Gibbs free energy of ΔGEO298K=-77 kJ mol−1 at 298 K and 1 atm. At the PBE level, which was used for slab calculations throughout this paper, this value is ΔEEO298K=-105 kJ mol−1, which justifies its use. For further justification, see the comparison with previous work in Table 1.

Thus, successfully producing epoxide is a matter of kinetics. However,

Conclusions

We have shown how alkali metals and chlorine influence the selectivity of ethylene epoxidation on a silver catalyst, modeled as a Ag(1 1 1) surface. Through charge–electric-field interaction alkali metals stabilize the transition state that leads towards ethylene epoxidation relative to the transition state for acetaldehyde formation, which would ultimately yield CO2. Thus, alkali metals induce a dipole on the surface and increase selectivity. Cesium is most effective because of its lowest

Acknowledgement

We acknowledge financial support from the Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation Project 2015.0057, and the Swedish Research Council Project 2015-03773 (A.H.). The computations were performed on resources provided by the Swedish National Infrastructure for Computing (SNIC) at C3SE (Gothenburg) and NSC (Linköping).

References (73)

  • C.T. Campbell et al.

    Appl. Surf. Sci.

    (1984)
  • C.T. Campbell et al.

    J. Catal.

    (1985)
  • C.T. Campbell

    J. Catal.

    (1986)
  • J.T. Jankowiak et al.

    J. Catal.

    (2005)
  • J.T. Jankowiak et al.

    J. Catal.

    (2005)
  • M. Atkins et al.

    J. Catal.

    (2005)
  • K. Waugh et al.

    Catal. Today

    (2010)
  • T.C. Rocha et al.

    J. Catal.

    (2014)
  • S. Linić et al.

    J. Catal.

    (2003)
  • A. Kokalj et al.

    J. Catal.

    (2008)
  • M. Özbek et al.

    J. Catal.

    (2011)
  • S. Linić et al.

    J. Catal.

    (2004)
  • M. Bowker et al.

    Surf. Sci.

    (1983)
  • E.R. Frank et al.

    J. Catal.

    (1997)
  • D. Ren et al.

    Mol. Catal.

    (2017)
  • G. Kresse et al.

    Comput. Mater. Sci.

    (1996)
  • G. Mills et al.

    Surf. Sci.

    (1995)
  • A. Michaelides et al.

    Chem. Phys. Lett.

    (2003)
  • A. Roldán et al.

    Surf. Sci.

    (2008)
  • S. Linić et al.

    J. Am. Chem. Soc.

    (2002)
  • S. Linić et al.

    J. Am. Chem. Soc.

    (2003)
  • S. Linić et al.

    J. Am. Chem. Soc.

    (2004)
  • P. Christopher et al.

    J. Am. Chem. Soc.

    (2008)
  • A.C. Lukaski et al.

    Catal. Lett.

    (2009)
  • P. Gava et al.

    Phys. Rev. B

    (2008)
  • M.O. Özbek et al.

    ChemCatChem

    (2013)
  • S. Piccinin et al.

    J. Mater. Chem.

    (2010)
  • M. Mavrikakis et al.

    J. Phys. Chem. B

    (1998)
  • J.W. Medlin et al.

    J. Phys. Chem. B

    (1999)
  • J. Greeley et al.

    J. Phys. Chem. C

    (2007)
  • M.-L. Bocquet et al.

    J. Am. Chem. Soc.

    (2005)
  • P. Christopher et al.

    Nat. Chem.

    (2011)
  • P. Christopher et al.

    Nat. Mater.

    (2012)
  • S. Linic et al.

    Acc. Chem. Res.

    (2013)
  • M.T. Greiner et al.

    J. Am. Chem. Soc.

    (2017)
  • A.G. Shard et al.

    J. Phys. Chem. B

    (2000)
  • Cited by (43)

    • A systematic theoretical study the active sites of potassium promoter on the activity of water-gas shift reaction over Pt(1 1 1)

      2023, Applied Surface Science
      Citation Excerpt :

      Since K ions is rather large compared to that of Pt (1.588 vs. 1.455 Å), its electron density caused a Pauli repulsion with the nearby Pt atoms, so it is expected that the Pt atom directly bonded to the K additive did not take part in the catalytic reaction. This is indicating that the effect of alkali metals on the adsorbate adsorption on Pt(1 1 1) is a short-ranged direct interaction through space rather than the indirect interaction through the substrate [15,49–55]. How K atoms affect water adsorption and dissociation through direct steric interactions will be given in the following section.

    • Optimization of ethylene dichloride (EDC) and ethane concentrations to maximize catalytic ethylene oxide production rate and yield: Experimental study and modeling

      2022, Chemical Engineering Science
      Citation Excerpt :

      They also stated that rhenium performs in coexistence with cesium in the catalyst composition and draws electron density from the Ag site which leads to producing more electrophilic adsorbed oxygen and as a result more EO rather than CO2 will be generated, promoting SEO. Huš and Hellman (2018) using a computational method showed that chlorine which is strongly electronegative acts as an EO selectivity promoter, but it adversely impacts the activity of catalyst, while cesium which is the least electronegative element facilitates oxygen dissociation leading to the increase of both EO selectivity and catalyst activity. So, these two selectivity promoters act through different mechanisms, one by reducing catalyst activity and the other by raising it.

    • Towards the understanding of promoting effects of Re, Cs and Cl promoters for silver catalysts of ethylene epoxidation: A computational study

      2021, Catalysis Today
      Citation Excerpt :

      Many promoters have been proposed for Ag-based catalysts of ethylene epoxidation, with Cs, Cl, and Re being considered the most important ones. Cesium, the most studied promoter [30–34], was assumed to tune the electronic states of the adsorbed surface oxygen species due to blocking of the combustion sites, and rather affects the transition states to close the oxametallacycle into ethylene oxide [35,36] than its isomerization into acetaldehyde [37]. Chlorine effects also bring about a vivid research interest [38–47].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text