Elsevier

Journal of Catalysis

Volume 268, Issue 2, 10 December 2009, Pages 201-208
Journal of Catalysis

The effect of Co-promotion on MoS2 catalysts for hydrodesulfurization of thiophene: A density functional study

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2009.09.016Get rights and content

Abstract

We present density functional theory (DFT) calculations of the hydrogenation (HYD) and direct desulfurization (DDS) pathways of thiophene hydrodesulfurization (HDS) over cobalt-promoted MoS2. We find that the Co–Mo–S edge in its equilibrium state under HDS conditions is reactive toward both hydrogenation and C–S bond scission without the initial creation of vacancies. This can be accomplished such that additional S is bound to the Co–Mo–S subsequent to C–S bond scission and then removed in the final reaction step. We find thus that coordinatively unsaturated sites (CUS) are present in the equilibrium structure, and at these sites HDS can take place without sulfur removal in the first step. No traditional vacancies are formed and the present mechanism is therefore very different from the previously proposed vacancy mechanisms requiring the initial creation of a sulfur vacancy for the reaction to proceed. We find that Co-promotion decreases the barrier of hydrogenation reactions and active site regeneration but increases the barrier of C–S-scission reactions. The net result of Co promotion is found to be an increase in the hydrogenation activity and also of the relative importance of the DDS pathway. We compare our results to available experimental information and find a number of consistencies and parallels. Therefore, we can rationalize the promoting effect of Co such that at the Co–Mo–S edge, good hydrogenation properties are combined with the ability to bind additional sulfur upon C–S-scission. Finally, we propose that the interactions between the Co-promoted S-edge and the non-promoted Mo-edge may play a role in the hydrogenation pathway.

Graphical abstract

Density functional theory (DFT) calculations of the hydrogenation (HYD) and direct desulfurization (DDS) pathways of thiophene hydrodesulfurization over cobalt-promoted MoS2. The Co–Mo–S edge is reactive toward both hydrogenation and C–S bond scission.

  1. Download : Download high-res image (78KB)
  2. Download : Download full-size image

Introduction

MoS2-based catalysts are widely used as hydrodesulfurization (HDS) catalysts and the need to optimize these catalyst is driven by both the need to process heavier feeds and the increasing demand for ultra clean diesel products. Typically, Co- or Ni-promoted MoS2 is used for industrial HDS catalysts, since promotion of MoS2 with Co or Ni increases the activity of the catalyst [1]. In this work, we focus on Co-promotion, and the structure responsible for catalytic activity in Co-promoted catalysts is the Co–Mo–S-type structure [2], which consists of MoS2 particles in which Mo-edge atoms are substituted by Co or Ni. The Co–Mo–S structure was initially identified by using a series of in situ techniques [1]; and recent joint theoretical and experimental investigations have revealed that Co substitutes Mo atoms at the (1¯010) edge of MoS2 [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8]. This edge is commonly denoted as the S-edge, whereas the other low-index (101¯0) edge is denoted as the Mo-edge. Despite the increased understanding of the Co–Mo–S structure, very little is known about the nature of the active site and the reaction mechanism of HDS over Co–Mo–S catalysts. Furthermore, there is still much debate on the effect of promotion with regard to the relative increase in hydrogenation and C–S-scission activity [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15] and the resistivity toward inhibitors such as H2S [9], [11], [16].

For a long time it has been a common belief that the catalytic activity of HDS is related to its ability to form sulfur vacancies, i.e., coordinatively unsaturated sites (CUS) at which sulfur can be bound subsequent to carbon–sulfur bond scission [1], [17], [18]. The present results show that this simple picture has to be modified somewhat. Therefore, this concept warrants further discussion. A natural starting point for each edge structure is its stoichiometric termination. However, this may not be the structure dominating under different experimental or reaction conditions, but such structures can be determined from DFT-based phase diagrams [6], [18], [19], [20], [21]. These phase diagrams reveal a large variety of structures with different sulfur and hydrogen coverages depending on temperature and H2 and H2S partial pressures. It is interesting that we found [22] that in several cases the equilibrium structures “as is” are reactive toward hydrogenation and/or sulfur scission. For example, we found in our previous study that the relevant Mo-edge structure can adsorb thiophene and catalyze HDS on unpromoted MoS2. In other cases, sulfur has to be removed first for the edge to be reactive at all, as was calculated for the S-edge in our previous study of MoS2 [22], [23]. For the unpromoted Mo-edge, we would thus consider this edge to be “born with sulfur vacancies”, which means that sulfur vacancies are already present in the equilibrium structure. In contrast, for the unpromoted S-edge, sulfur vacancies have to be created first. For promoted structures, Byskov et al. showed some years ago that the introduction of Co and Ni to the MoS2 edges increases the tendency to form vacancies [4]. In contrast, the incorporation of Fe, which is known not to be an efficient promoter, did not decrease vacancy formation energy [4]. More recently, scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) [24] revealed that MoS2 nano-clusters have bright brim structures (the so-called brim sites) which were subsequently identified by DFT to be formed by metallic edges states [25] and combined STM and DFT studies showed that these sites may play a role in adsorption, hydrogenation, and C–S-scission [26], [27]. These brim sites may be reactive without removal of sulfur in the first step, i.e. they may already contain sulfur vacancies in their equilibrium structure. In the present paper, we demonstrate a similar reaction mechanism for the Co–Mo–S edge. In its equilibrium structure, the sulfur coordination number is four, but additional sulfur atoms can be bound easily subsequent to C–S-scission.

For the case of unpromoted MoS2 catalysts, we have recently performed DFT calculations of the complete thiophene HDS pathway [22], [23]. In the present paper, we extend these mechanistic studies to Co-promoted systems and present the pathways for thiophene HDS over Co–Mo–S structures. In Section 3.1, we present the equilibrium edge configuration of the Co-promoted S-edge under typical HDS conditions and introduce the different investigated elementary reactions. In Sections 3.2 HYD pathway, 3.3 DDS pathway, we investigate the hydrogenation (HYD) and direct desulfurization (DDS) pathways, with the two pathways being defined in the same way as in Ref. [22]. Specifically, the DDS pathway is defined as the pathway which is initiated by an initial addition of an hydrogen atom to carbon 2 forming 2-hydro-thiophene-3-yl which reacts further by direct C–S-scission. In the HYD pathway,thiophene is hydrogenated such that 2,5-dihydrothiophene is formed prior to the initial C–S bond scission. In Section 3.4 we compare the results for Co–Mo–S for the two pathways to those for the unpromoted MoS2 catalyst. In Section 3.5, we discuss the overall effect of promotion.

Section snippets

Computational details

An infinite stripe model, which had previously been used successfully to model MoS2-based systems [4], [19], [22], [28], is used to investigate the edges of Co–Mo–S. The infinite stripe exposes both the Mo-edge and the S-edge. We use a unit cell consisting of 4 Mo atoms in the x-direction and 4 Mo atoms in the y-direction. The stripes are separated by 14.8 Å in the z-direction and 9 Å in the y-direction. This model represents MoS2 structures with no support interactions and can be regarded as a

The active sites in equilibrium structures

We investigate the Co-promoted S-edge, since experiment and theory have found that Co atoms preferentially substitute Mo atoms at the S (1¯010) edge [3], [5], [6], [7], [8]. We focus on the fully promoted S-edge which in addition to providing insight into the fully promoted MoS2 also provides a reference point for understanding partially substituted edges such as the structures proposed in reference [3], [44], [45] and observed for NiMoS [7]. We find that the Co–Mo–S edge at HDS conditions is

Conclusion

Co-promotion of MoS2 catalysts leads to the formation of the Co–Mo–S phase, in which Co atoms are incorporated into the (1¯010) S-edges of MoS2 particles, forming the Co–Mo–S edge and significantly changing both the catalytic and structural properties of the catalyst [2], [7], [58]. An important consequence of Co-promotion is that the resulting Co–Mo–S equilibrium structure contains sulfur vacancies, i.e., that no additional sulfur vacancies need to be formed at the start of the catalytic

Acknowledgments

The Center for Atomic-scale Materials Design is sponsored by the Lundbeck Foundation. The Danish Center for Scientific Computing is acknowledged for granting the computer resources needed for this project.

References (62)

  • E. Lecrenay et al.

    Hydrodesulfurization activity of CoMo and NiMo catalysts supported on some acidic binary oxides

    Applied Catalysis A: General

    (1998)
  • P. Raybaud et al.

    Ab initio study of the H2–H2S/MoS2 gas–solid interface: the nature of the catalytically active sites

    Journal of Catalysis

    (2000)
  • M. Sun et al.

    On the incorporation of nickel and cobalt into MoS2-edge structures

    Journal of Catalysis

    (2004)
  • P.G. Moses et al.

    The hydrogenation and direct desulfurization reaction pathway in thiophene hydrodesulfurization over MoS2 catalysts at realistic conditions: a density functional study

    Journal of Catalysis

    (2007)
  • P.G. Moses et al.

    Corrigendum to the hydrogenation and direct desulfurization reaction pathway in thiophene hydrodesulfurization over MoS2 catalysts at realistic conditions: a density functional study [J. Catal. 248 (2007) 188]

    Journal of Catalysis

    (2008)
  • J.V. Lauritsen et al.

    Hydrodesulfurization reaction pathways on MoS2 nanoclusters revealed by scanning tunneling microscopy

    Journal of Catalysis

    (2004)
  • N.Y. Topsøe

    Infrared study of sulfided Co–Mo/Al2O3 catalysts: the nature of surface hydroxyl groups

    Journal of Catalysis

    (1980)
  • W. Humphrey et al.

    VMD-Visual molecular dynamics

    Journal of Molecular Graphics

    (1996)
  • E. Krebs et al.

    Mixed sites and promoter segregation: a DFT study of the manifestation of Le Chatelier’s principle for the Co(Ni)MoS active phase in reaction conditions

    Catalysis Today

    (2008)
  • A.D. Gandubert et al.

    Optimal promoter edge decoration of CoMoS catalysts: a combined theoretical and experimental study

    Catalysis Today

    (2008)
  • J.F. Paul et al.

    Computational studies of (mixed) sulfide hydrotreating catalysts

    Catalysis Today

    (2008)
  • M.L. Vrinat

    The kinetics of the hydrodesulfurization process – a review

    Applied Catalysis

    (1983)
  • A. Borgna et al.

    Intrinsic kinetics of thiophene hydrodesulfurization on a sulfided NiMo/SiO2 planar model catalyst

    Journal of Catalysis

    (2004)
  • A.E. Hargreaves et al.

    An investigation of the mechanism of the hydrodesulfurization of thiophene over sulfided Co–Mo/Al2O3 catalysts II. The effect of promotion by cobalt on the C–S bond cleavage and double-bond hydrogenation/dehydrogenation activities of tetrahydrothiophene and related compounds

    Journal of Catalysis

    (1979)
  • K.F. McCarty et al.

    Deuterodesulfurization of thiophene: An investigation of the reaction-mechanism

    Journal of Catalysis

    (1987)
  • D.L. Sullivan et al.

    Mechanisms of thiophene hydrodesulfurization on model molybdenum catalysts

    Journal of Catalysis

    (1998)
  • F. Besenbacher et al.

    Recent STM, DFT and HAADF-STEM studies of sulfide-based hydrotreating catalysts: insight into mechanistic, structural and particle size effects

    Catalysis Today

    (2008)
  • R. Koide et al.

    A DFT study on benzene adsorption over a corner site of tungsten sulfides

    Catalysis Today

    (2008)
  • H. Topsøe et al.

    Hydrotreating Catalysis

    (1996)
  • H. Topsøe et al.

    On the state of the Co–Mo–S Model

    Bulletin des Sociétés Chimiques Belges

    (1984)
  • L.S. Byskov et al.

    Sulfur bonding in MoS2 and Co–Mo–S structures

    Catalysis Letters

    (1997)
  • Cited by (143)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text