Cognitive behaviour therapy for low self-esteem: A preliminary randomized controlled trial in a primary care setting

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbtep.2012.04.006Get rights and content

Abstract

Background and Objectives

Low self-esteem (LSE) is associated with psychiatric disorder, and is distressing and debilitating in its own right. Hence, it is frequent target for treatment in cognitive behavioural interventions, yet it has rarely been the primary focus for intervention. This paper reports on a preliminary randomized controlled trial of cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) for LSE using Fennell’s (1997) cognitive conceptualisation and transdiagnostic treatment approach (Fennell, 1997, Fennell, 1999).

Methods

Twenty-two participants were randomly allocated to either immediate treatment (IT) (n = 11) or to a waitlist condition (WL) (n = 11). Treatment consisted of 10 sessions of individual CBT accompanied by workbooks. Participants allocated to the WL condition received the CBT intervention once the waitlist period was completed and all participants were followed up 11 weeks after completing CBT.

Results

The IT group showed significantly better functioning than the WL group on measures of LSE, overall functioning and depression and had fewer psychiatric diagnoses at the end of treatment. The WL group showed the same pattern of response to CBT as the group who had received CBT immediately. All treatment gains were maintained at follow-up assessment.

Limitations

The sample size is small and consists mainly of women with a high level of educational attainment and the follow-up period was relatively short.

Conclusions

These preliminary findings suggest that a focused, brief CBT intervention can be effective in treating LSE and associated symptoms and diagnoses in a clinically representative group of individuals with a range of different and co-morbid disorders.

Highlights

► We compare cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) for low self-esteem to a waitlist condition. ► CBT is more effective in reducing low self-esteem than a waitlist condition. ► The CBT group had fewer psychiatric diagnoses at the end of treatment. ► Improvement in LSE was maintained at 11-week follow-up.

Introduction

Self-esteem has been defined as the “conviction that one is competent to live and worthy of living” (Branden, 1969; p.110) and is a term used to reflect a person’s overall evaluation or appraisal of his or her own worth. It can be seen as a schema, in that it is a broad, pervasive theme or pattern, comprised of memories, emotions, cognitions and bodily sensations regarding oneself and one’s relationships with others, developed during childhood or adolescence and is elaborated throughout one’s lifetime (Young, Klosko, & Weishaar, 2003). Evidence suggests that the majority of people with mental health problems suffer from low self-esteem (LSE) (Silverstone & Salsali, 2003), in that they evaluate their competence and worthiness negatively. However, due to difficulties operationalizing and evaluating the concept of self-esteem (Mruk, 1999), it has been inadequately studied.

Although LSE is not a psychiatric diagnosis, it has been shown to have far-reaching consequences. It is associated with dropping out of school (Guillon, Crocq, & Bailey, 2003), self-harm and suicidal behaviour (Kjelsberg, Neegaard, & Dahl, 1994) and teenage pregnancy (Plotnick, 1992). It also has a negative impact on economic outcomes, such that those with LSE experience greater unemployment and lower earnings (Feinstein, 2000).

LSE has been associated with and cited as an etiological factor in a number of different psychiatric diagnoses including depression (Brown, Bifulco, & Andrews, 1990), psychosis (Hall & Tarrier, 2003), eating disorders (Gual, Perez-Gaspar, Martinez-Gonzallaz, Lahortiga, & Cervera-Enguix, 2002), obsessive compulsive disorder (Ehntholt, Salkovskis, & Rimes, 1999), substance abuse (Akerlind et al., 1988, Brown et al., 1986, Button et al., 1996) and chronic pain (Soares & Grossi, 2000).

Silverstone and Salsali (2003) report that the effects of psychiatric diagnoses on self-esteem may be additive, in that those patients with more than one diagnosis had the lowest self-esteem, particularly when one of the diagnoses was major depression. Furthermore, LSE has been shown to predict poorer outcome in psychological treatments (Button & Warren, 2002) and to predict relapse following treatment (Brown et al., 1990, Fairburn et al., 1993). It may also affect the natural course of disorders, making recovery more difficult (Fairburn et al., 1993, van der Ham et al., 1998).

While LSE has been associated with many psychiatric conditions, the nature of this relationship remains unclear with some studies showing that having a psychiatric disorder lowers self-esteem (Ingham, Kreitman, Miller, Sashidharan, & Surtees, 1987) and others showing lowered self-esteem to pre-dispose one towards a range of psychiatric illnesses (Brown et al., 1986, Miller et al., 1989). There is also evidence that changes in either depression or self-esteem can affect the other (Hamilton and Abramson, 1983, Wilson and Krane, 1980), suggesting that the relationship between LSE and psychiatric illness may be circular.

In summary, LSE is common, distressing and disabling in its own right; it also appears to be involved in the aetiology and persistence of disorders across the range of diagnoses. Thus attending to LSE has the potential to improve treatment outcome and is in accord with recent calls to develop transdiagnostic approaches to treating common mental health problems, particularly those with high rates of co-morbidity (Harvey et al., 2004, McManus et al., 2010, Mansell et al., 2009, Norton and Philipp, 2008). Hence, it is a priority to develop effective treatments for LSE that can be applied across the range of diagnoses associated with LSE.

A cognitive conceptualisation of LSE has been proposed and a cognitive behavioural treatment (CBT) program described (Fennell, 1997, Fennell, 1999). As shown in Fig. 1, Fennell’s (1997) conceptualization of LSE is an elaboration of the cognitive model of emotional disorder (Beck, 1976) and accounts for the presence of anxiety as well as depressive symptoms. It suggests that people form global negative judgements about themselves (‘the bottom line’) as a result of experiences, typically early on in their lives (Fennell, 1997, Fennell, 2006). The development of dysfunctional assumptions (‘rules for living’) enables them to function and cope with or compensate for their negative beliefs as long as the ‘rules for living’ are adhered to. However, when situations are encountered where the ‘rules for living’ may be or have been transgressed, the ‘bottom line’ belief is activated and triggers vicious cycles of thoughts, feelings and behaviour that maintain and exacerbate the bottom line belief. In particular, anxiety is triggered when it is perceived that the rules may be transgressed, and depression is triggered when it is perceived that the rules have been transgressed.

Fennell’ treatment approach (Fennell, 1997, Fennell, 1999) is consistent with other transdiagnostic approaches that emphasize common pathways across diagnostic categories (Barlow et al., 2004, Fairburn et al., 2009, Clark et al., submitted for publication). The treatment protocol arises from a transdiagnosic formulation of LSE which provides a framework for making sense of both anxiety and depressive symptoms and this forms the basis of a coherent treatment approach (Butler, Fennell, & Hackmann, 2008). The focus is on understanding how the person’s difficulties interrelate rather than treating them separately and all interventions are carried out in the context of the enduring negative beliefs about the self (the ‘bottom line’). Specific interventions are derived from established evidence-based protocols for specific emotional disorders and from cognitive approaches to working with enduring negative beliefs about the self (Beck and Freeman, 1990, Young et al., 2003).

The CBT for LSE protocol incorporates techniques from standard CBT (e.g., Beck, Rush, Shaw, & Emery, 1979) and also schema approaches (Young, Klosko, & Weishaar, 2003), but specifies how they can best be applied to LSE, and in particular to changing pervasive negative self-evaluative beliefs and related behaviour patterns. Depending on the nature of the individual’s difficulties, early sessions may include elements from other well-established cognitive therapy approaches for specific disorders. For example, a patient with social anxiety may carry out behavioural experiments to manipulate safety behaviours and shift to external attention (Clark and Wells, 1995, McManus et al., 2009). As well as techniques designed to attenuate negative beliefs and behaviours, Fennell’s treatment also incorporates strategies to enhance self-esteem and promote positive self-evaluative beliefs, such as identifying, recording and reviewing positive qualities in order to correct the perceptual bias of noticing and placing greater weight on perceived failings or flaws and screening out information that is inconsistent with this.

As with Young et al.’s (2003) schema therapy, dysfunctional assumptions and core beliefs are addressed, and there is consideration of the childhood origins of such beliefs. However, unlike schema therapy, CBT for LSE begins by utilising standard CBT techniques to address the current maintenance cycles of depression and anxiety, and does not apply Young’s category system to identify problematic schemas. Instead, the focus is limited to negative self-evaluative beliefs. Techniques such as continuum work, the use of the Prejudice model (Padesky, 1993), reviewing and reinterpreting evidence consistent with the old belief and a search for new evidence through a positive data log are used to consider the evidence for core beliefs and to modify the degree to which beliefs are held. In order to then establish and strengthen a new and more positive perspective, the evidence collected from therapy is used to generate alternative beliefs and rules for living and these are written out on flashcards to consolidate change before moving onto relapse prevention.

Although CBT for LSE is widely used in routine clinical practice, it has yet to be systematically evaluated and to date the evidence-base for this treatment protocol consists only of single case examples (Butler et al., 2008, Chatterton et al., 2007, Fennell, 1997, Fennell, 1998, McManus et al., 2009), and small uncontrolled evaluations of adaptations for group settings (Rigby & Waite, 2007), for those with learning disabilities (Whelan, Haywood, & Galloway, 2007), for those with psychosis (Hall & Tarrier, 2003) or psychosis with substance abuse (Oestrich, Austin, Lykke, & Tarrier, 2007), and for those in a forensic setting (Laithwaite, 2007). While these case studies suggest that this treatment approach may be an effective way to treat LSE, it has yet to systematically evaluated with a control group, independent assessors who are ‘blind’ to treatment and using validated outcome measures. Hence the current study reports on a small randomized controlled trial of CBT for LSE that compares the impact of 10 sessions of individual CBT with workbooks for LSE to a waitlist control group, in patients with the full range of diagnoses presenting in primary care to a CBT service. The impact of the intervention is assessed on self-report measures of self-esteem, depression, anxiety and general functioning as well as by independent diagnostic assessment of Axis I disorders (DSM-IV-TR, 2000).

It was hypothesized:

  • 1.

    Compared to waitlist, CBT for LSE will lead to greater improvements in self-esteem, anxiety, depression, and general functioning and a greater reduction in psychiatric diagnoses

  • 2.

    Any treatment gains from CBT for LSE will be maintained at an 11-week follow-up assessment.

Section snippets

Method

The study hypotheses were tested through a small randomized controlled trial (ISRCTN75675072). Ethical permission for the study was granted by the NHS Central Office for Research Ethics Committee (COREC).

Pre-treatment comparisons

Table 1 shows the demographic characteristics and baseline (pre-intervention) scores for participants in the IT and WL groups. There were no significant differences between the groups on any of the demographic or clinical variables, or in the source of referral. Most importantly, there was not a significant difference between the IT and WL groups in scores on the main outcome measure, the RSCQ, or on any of the other symptom measures or the mean number of Axis I diagnoses.

Hypothesis 1: compared to waitlist, CBT for LSE will lead to greater improvements in self-esteem, anxiety, depression, and general functioning and a greater reduction in psychiatric diagnoses

Means and standard

Discussion

The results of this preliminary study provide encouraging evidence that ten sessions of CBT, based on a widely used and respected protocol (Fennell, 1997, Fennell, 1999) with accompanying workbooks as an adjunct to sessions (Fennell, 2006), is more effective in reducing LSE, and associated symptoms and diagnoses, than a waitlist condition in participants with a range of co-morbid disorders.

An intention-to-treat analysis demonstrated that the participants who received CBT had significantly more

Disclosure statement

This study was funded by a research grant from the British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies (BABCP).

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Dr Melanie Fennell for generously sharing her ideas, the BABCP for funding this research, to Constable and Robinson Publishers for providing workbooks, to Dr Sue Cruddace for carrying out all assessments and Emma Dobson for rating adherence to the protocol.

References (60)

  • A.T. Beck

    Cognitive therapy and the emotional disorders

    (1976)
  • A.T. Beck et al.

    Cognitive therapy of personality disorders

    (1990)
  • A.T. Beck et al.

    Cognitive therapy of depression

    (1979)
  • A.T. Beck et al.

    Beck anxiety inventory manual

    (1990)
  • A.T. Beck et al.

    Beck depression inventory 2nd edition manual

    (1996)
  • N. Branden

    The psychology of self-esteem

    (1969)
  • G.W. Brown et al.

    Social support, self-esteem and depression

    Psychological Medicine

    (1986)
  • G.W. Brown et al.

    Self-esteem and depression. IV. Effect on course and recovery

    Social Psychiatry and Epidemiology

    (1990)
  • G. Butler et al.

    Cognitive-behavioral therapy for anxiety disorders: Mastering clinical challenges

    (2008)
  • E.J. Button et al.

    A prospective study of self-esteem in the prediction of eating problems in adolescent schoolgirls: questionnaire findings

    British Journal of Clinical Psychology

    (1996)
  • E.J. Button et al.

    Self-image in anorexia nervosa 7.5 years after initial presentation to a specialized eating disorders service

    European Eating Disorders Review

    (2002)
  • L. Chatterton et al.

    Cognitive therapy for low self-esteem in the treatment of depression in an older adult

    Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy

    (2007)
  • D.M. Clark et al.

    The cognitive model of social phobia

  • J. Cohen

    Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences

    (1988)
  • C. Evans et al.

    Towards a standardised brief outcome measure: psychometric properties and utility of the CORE-OM

    British Journal of Psychiatry

    (2002)
  • C.G. Fairburn et al.

    Transdiagnostic cognitive-behavioral therapy for patients with eating disorders: a two-site trial with 60-week follow-up

    American Journal of Psychiatry

    (2009)
  • C.G. Fairburn et al.

    Predictors of 12-month outcome in bulimia nervosa and the influence of attitudes to shape and weight

    Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

    (1993)
  • L. Feinstein

    The relative economic importance of academic, psychological and behavioural attributes developed in childhood

    (2000)
  • M.J.V. Fennell

    Low self-esteem: a cognitive perspective

    Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy

    (1997)
  • M.J.V. Fennell

    Low self-esteem

  • Cited by (60)

    • The effects of cognitive behaviour therapy and assertiveness training in chronic low self-esteem clients

      2021, Enfermeria Clinica
      Citation Excerpt :

      Furthermore, providing CBT shows the significant improvement of self-esteem and possibly increases clients’ social functions. The condition occurs because a cognitive approach for clients with low self-esteem helps therapists focus on the signs, symptoms, and changes of clients’ difunctional confidence with more positive perceptions.9 Providing CBT can increase clients’ self-esteem, which has a role to emerge signs and symptoms and to recover schizophrenia condition.10,11

    • Low self-esteem: A refined cognitive behavioural model

      2023, Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    Tel.: +44 1865 613145; fax: +44 1865 738817.

    2

    Tel.: +44 118 378 5534; fax: +44 118 378 6665.

    View full text