Deeply colored and black-appearing Roman glass: a continued research
Introduction
Glassblowing, introduced halfway through the 1st century BC, contributed to turning glass from an exclusive material into an affordable common commodity. As a consequence, the glass market expanded and large amounts of glass were produced and distributed in Rome and its provinces. In this context, the diachronic investigation of black glass, a minor but empire-wide distributed product provides an interesting opportunity to explore the dynamics of the two different steps of glass production, namely glassmaking – the production of raw glass by melting the raw materials (primary production) – and glassworking – the remelting of raw glass to produce consumer goods (secondary production).
In ancient times, as nowadays, the technological level and practical conditions required to control glassmaking were significantly more complex than those needed for glassworking (Stern and Schlick-Nolte, 1994, Stern, 1999). Primary workshops needed to master the glassmaking knowledge to mix and melt vast volumes of raw materials to produce workable raw glass. The large slabs of glass made in the primary centers were broken into chunks and shipped along various trade routes to the secondary workshops (Henderson, 1985, Fontaine and Foy, 2007; Nenna, 2007) where glassworkers only needed to re-melt small amounts of the pre-fabricated raw glass to manufacture finished products.
Hence, it has been stated that during the Roman imperial period, glass objects were manufactured in secondary glass workshops all over the Empire (Stern and Schlick-Nolte, 1994, Stern, 1999) by re-melting and shaping imported raw glass. Archaeological findings identified the Syro-Palestinian coast as key area for primary glass production (Foy, 2000, Nenna, 2007, Jackson et al., 2009). The primary workshops had to be close to the supplies of raw materials such as lime-rich coastal sand and natron. The absence of reporting a separate addition of lime in Pliny the Elder's Naturalis Historia implicitly suggests the presence of lime in Roman glassmaking sand.
Hitherto, no clear evidence has yet been found to confirm the existence of primary glass production in the Western part of the Roman Empire. Nonetheless Pliny the Elder stated in his Naturalis Historia that glass was made from raw materials on the Italian Peninsula near Cumae where the Volturno river enters the Tyrrhenian Sea, on the Iberian Peninsula and in Gaul (Silvestri et al., 2006, Foster and Jackson, 2009). Although a work in progress, promising information in diagnosing sands from the Western Mediterranean suitable for glassmaking has been provided by isotopic ratio analysis (Degryse and Schneider, 2008, Degryse et al., 2010).
Some scholars have also suggested that late Roman glassworkers in the western part of the Roman Empire accumulated enough know-how to produce raw glass locally by means of imported natron (Wedepohl and Baumann, 2000, Shortland et al., 2006). At present, the main viewpoint assumes a predominance of large primary glass centers in the eastern Mediterranean and Empire-wide secondary workshops (Foy et al., 2000, Freestone et al., 2005, Nenna, 2007). However, a combined occurrence of regional primary production in the West and large scale distribution of raw glass from the South-Eastern Mediterranean must be taken into consideration (Picon and Vichy, 2003).
Black glass represents only a very small fraction of the entire Roman glass production; the interest such idiosyncratic material represents is based on its link to regional consumption and periodical fashion (Cosyns, 2011). Its changeable period- and location-specific distribution makes black glass a useful category within the archaeological assemblage of small glass finds.
Black glass is mainly encountered in two types of artifacts: vessels and jewelry. The production of vessels in black appearing glass was empire-wide and, particularly in the Western half, fashionable a first time from about 30 to 70–80 AD (Cosyns and Fontaine, 2009). The reappearance of black-appearing vessels from 170–180 to 230–250 AD was only a regional phenomenon within the North-Western provinces Gallia Belgica, Germania Inferior and Germania Superior (Cosyns and Hanut, 2005, Cosyns et al., 2006, Cosyns, 2011). A third re-emergence of black glass vessels took place in the course of the 4th–5th century AD and was limited to the South-Eastern Mediterranean (Cosyns, 2011).
Black glass jewelry was manufactured throughout the entire imperial period, but became especially common in the entire Empire from the second half of the 2nd century AD onwards (Cosyns, 2011). Glass bangles, finger-rings, beads, pendants, hair pins, and gems gradually disappeared during the 5th century AD in the Western part, where only black glass beads decorated with applied trails in opaque glass remained in use up to the mid-6th century AD (Cosyns, 2011). In the Eastern part of the Empire, instead, a continuity of a wider range of jewelry in black glass can be observed, also during the early Byzantine era (Cosyns, 2011).
In previous papers (Van der Linden et al., 2009, Cagno et al., 2013) on black appearing and deeply colored glass, the most abundant and widespread type of coloration was found to be the deep green one. Two different compositions could be distinguished in this class: a low iron group (1–2% Fe2O3), which is associated with the Early Roman imperial period up to about 150 AD, and a high iron group (4–10% Fe2O3) that is characteristic for the period after 150 AD (Van der Linden et al., 2009). Moreover, it was possible to identify the presence of vegetable ash as added flux to the early Roman low iron black glass and of the use in the Late Roman period of High Iron, Manganese, Titanium glass (HIMT) glass (Cagno et al., 2013).
The results of both papers support the hypothesis that in a first phase, the craftsmen's knowledge in the Western provinces was limited to the production of objects by re-melting imported deeply colored glass in bars or chunks, in a similar fashion as was the case for ‘naturally’ colored or decolorized glass. In a later phase, from about the mid-2nd century AD, the glassmakers' expertise improved by acquiring the independent know-how of coloring the (remelted) glass (Van der Linden et al., 2009).
In this paper, next to discussing the analysis results of an additional relevant set of 44 samples and evaluating the complete set of over 400 glass samples, we also present a reflection of the opportunities that a minor segment of the Roman glass production can provide in order to better understand the history of Roman glass consumption.
Section snippets
Glass analyzed in the present study
All the new finds, with exception of seven samples from the province Aegyptus, originate from various locations in North-Western Europe and corresponding to the following provinces of the Roman Empire: Britannia (Colchester), Gallia Belgica (Roly; Treignes), Germania Inferior (Heerlen), Germania Superior (Augst; Avenches). Most of the black-appearing glass fragments show a green hue when looked through in thin sections. The remaining samples discussed in this paper are brown, purple and blue.
Global evaluation of the dataset
The LA-ICP-MS results (trace elements), together with the SEM–EDX data (major and minor elements composition) of the 44 samples are presented in Tables 4 and 5. These data were added to the already available dataset on black-appearing glass (Cagno et al., 2011), making up a total of 402 analysed samples. This matrix was analyzed with multivariate statistical methods using the commercial software SPSS; in particular principal component analysis (PCA) and hierarchical clustering (HC) were carried
Distribution of black glass groups and implications on glass consumption
In this section, the chronological, geographical and typological distribution of the compositional groups that were identified above is considered.
From a chronological point of view, in Table 7 it can be observed how in the earlier period (pre-Christian era), only the BG2 composition (high Mn glass) is present. In the 1st to mid-2nd century AD, the BG1.1 and BG1.2 compositions (vegetable-ash glass) are predominant, but also a few BG2 and BG3 (LMG-high Fe glass) samples are present. In the
Conclusions
The evaluation of the entire corpus of analyzed samples of deeply colored-black appearing glass allowed us to gain a more profound understanding of the production of this material and the (black) glass market throughout the Roman Empire.
Two recipes were in use for the production of black glass until the mid-2nd century AD: the prevalent type was made with Syro-Levantine raw glass (produced with relatively pure sand and natron) and colored with a variable amount of Mn; the other type that
Acknowledgments
We would like to express our profound gratitude to the Archaeological Service of Augst and Avenches, the Thermenmuseum, Heerlen, the UCL Flinders Petrie Museum for Egyptian Archaeology, London, the Archaeological Museum, Colchester, ULB-CReA, Brussels and the Musée du Malgré Tout, Treignes for having granted permission to sample and study their materials.
This research was supported by the Interuniversity Attraction Poles Programme – Belgian Science Policy (IUAP VI/16) and the Hercules fund,
References (37)
- et al.
Change in silica sources in Roman and post-Roman glass
Spectrochim. Acta B
(2003) - et al.
Evidence of early medieval vegetable-ash glass in the archaeological site of San Genesio (Tuscany)
J. Archaeol. Sci.
(2012) - et al.
Pliny the Elder and Sr-Nd isotopes: tracing the provenance of raw materials for Roman glass production
J. Archaeol. Sci.
(2008) - et al.
Considerations on the provenance determination of plant ash glasses using strontium isotopes
J. Archaeol. Sci.
(2010) - et al.
A flexible and accurate quantification algorithm for electron probe X-ray microanalysis based on thin-film element yields
Spectroch. Acta B
(2003) - et al.
Natron as a flux in the early vitreous materials industry: sources, beginnings and reason for decline
J. Archaeol. Sci.
(2006) - et al.
Analysis of glass from the post-Roman settlement Tonovcov grad (Slovenia) by PIXE–PIGE and LA-ICP-MS
Nucl. Instr. Methods Phys. Res. B
(2013) - et al.
Critical evaluation of quantitative methods for the multi-elemental analysis of ancient glasses using laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry
J. Anal. Spectrom.
(2013) - et al.
Manganese browning of stained glass windows: SR-μ-XANES and SR-CT as a tool to evaluate the effectiveness of conservation procedures
J. Anal. At. Spectrosc.
(2011) - et al.
Composition data of a large collection of black-appearing Roman glass
Open J. Archaeom.
(2013)
A XANES study of chromophores: the case of black glass, Anal
Methods
The Production, Distribution and Consumption of Black Glass in the Roman Empire during the 1st to 5th Centuries AD. An Archaeological, Archaeometric and Historical Approach
Le verre noir romain du 1er siècle: un aperçu
Black glass of second to third-century date in northern Gaul: a preliminary survey
Black glass in the Roman empire: a work in progress
Du verre méditerranéen pour la production de bracelets laténienne en Europe septentrionale. Résultats d'analyses SEM-EDX et LA-ICP-MS de bracelets en verre La Tène tardive de Odijk, Tiel et Meteren
L'épave Ouest-Embiez 1, Var. Le commerce maritime du verre brut et manufacturé en Méditerranée occidentale dans l'Antiquité
Revue Archéol. Narbonn.
The composition of naturally coloured late Roman vessel glass from Britain and the implications for models of glass production and supply
J. Archaeol Sci.
Cited by (33)
Small and overlooked: Roman glass counters from archaeological sites in Poland
2023, Journal of Archaeological Science: ReportsCitation Excerpt :Both samples are similar to the BG1 group as defined by scholars (Cagno et al., 2014; van der Linden et al., 2009). Iron oxide in both samples was above 1.2 wt% (1.377 wt% and 1.252 wt%), and it is believed that such amounts of Fe2O3 in PA glasses are natural (Cagno et al., 2014), moreover, such iron content (1–2 wt%) would not colour glass an appealing black on its own. In transmitted light it was impossible to establish the hue of these two glasses, however, neither are opaque – the amounts of antimony oxide and tin oxide in both samples are traces (Pr_13: Sb2O5: 0.0123 wt%, SnO2: 0.0080 wt%; Pr_28cz: Sb2O5: 0.0109 wt%, SnO2: <0.0013 wt%).
Searching for insights on production technologies in the Late-Antique/Byzantine period: glass tesserae from Tyana (Cappadocia, Turkey)
2022, Journal of Archaeological Science: ReportsCitation Excerpt :Obsidian has been used since prehistory in the production of arrowheads, scrapers and similar sharp tools (Barca et al., 2019). Although obsidian tesserae are attested in other mosaics (Avino et al., 2013; Wypyski and Becker, 2005), their use is generally rare because black, in glass objects and mosaics, is usually mimicked by synthetic glass with very dark purple, green, blue, or brown colours (e.g., Cagno et al., 2014; Cantone et al., 2020; Maltoni and Silvestri, 2018). Obsidian employed in archaeological artefacts was cold-cut only, without any manipulation of the chemical composition.
IBA analyses on glass beads from the Migration Period
2020, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and AtomsCitation Excerpt :The 18 cylindrical black/dark brown glass beads with various shapes/ cross-sections from Sărata-Monteoru also contain high amounts of iron (~10.6 wt% Fe2O3) and lead (~2.1 wt% PbO). Similar recipes for black glass, implying the use of iron slag for providing this intense coloring, were frequently encountered in various vitreous artefacts dated to the Late Roman period [5]. Trace amounts of SnO2 (~2000 ppm) were present in all black glass samples.
To be purple or not to be purple? How different production parameters influence colour and redox in manganese containing glass
2019, Journal of Archaeological Science: ReportsChemical compositional analysis of glass from the north cemetery of ancient Demetrias (Thessaly)
2018, Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports