A radiocarbon chronology for Sāmoan prehistory

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2007.12.001Get rights and content

Abstract

The corpus of radiocarbon dates for Sāmoan archaeology has grown exponentially since the pioneering work of Green and Davidson in the 1960s, enabling us to re-analyze the archipelago's cultural chronology. A reliable and valid radiocarbon chronology forms the basis for describing and explaining cultural variability and change in the central Pacific. Towards that end, in this paper we compile the available radiocarbon dates from published and unpublished (“grey literature”) sources. We critically evaluate 236 radiocarbon dates following a chronometric hygiene protocol to identify the most secure and reliable age estimates. We accept 147 dates (62.3%) as a means of addressing two significant issues for Sāmoan prehistory: (1) the chronology of settlement and human expansion across the archipelago pre-2000 cal BP, which relates to issues of Lapita colonization, and the effect of island geomorphology on settlement; and (2) analysis of the so-called “Dark Ages” (ca. 1500–1000 cal BP), a period relevant to issues of social complexity and East Polynesian settlement. Our research highlights the need for a rigorous sampling protocol for radiocarbon dating.

Section snippets

Sāmoan prehistory

Green (2002) has provided a recent review of Sāmoan prehistory, one that generally follows the culture history originally proposed over 30 years ago (see Smith, 2002). His more recent overview was meant to provide an organization of settlement pattern data, and, as others have noted (Addison and Asaua, 2006), there has been a conscious resistance to dividing Sāmoan prehistory into culture historical phases (Green and Davidson, 1974b: p. 212). The early emphasis on settlement pattern studies (

Radiocarbon dating and “chronometric hygiene”

The development of an absolute chronology of Sāmoan prehistory was an implicit yet critical objective of Green and Davidson, 1969a, Green and Davidson, 1974a seminal research program. Green (1969a: p. 5) outlined the main research objectives, which were primarily concerned with typological descriptions of features and portable artifacts, as well as field surveys and settlement pattern analysis. The radiocarbon dates from their excavations provided an absolute chronology for their settlement

Radiocarbon events and target events

Radiocarbon dating must be understood as a direct measure of a radiocarbon event, which is used to infer the age of an archaeological target event (Dean, 1978). By measuring the residual radiocarbon content of a sample that has been isolated from the carbon reservoir(s), the age of this separation from atmospheric or marine carbon, i.e., the death of an organism, can be calculated. This event must then be correlated, by a bridging argument, with a target event of archaeological interest. The

Chronometric hygiene results

Of a total of 236 radiocarbon dates available for the archipelago, we accept 147 (62.3%) dates. Appendix A (in the online supporting materials) provides a complete tabulation of the radiocarbon dates and explanations for their classification. We excluded most dates based on criteria A and B, dating by the Gakushuin Laboratory and a CRA standard deviation ≥100 years, respectively. The Gakushuin Laboratory problem can be rectified with additional dates from the same deposits. New dates may

Initial colonization of Sāmoa: a review of the pre-2000 cal BP dates

There is broad consensus (see papers in Clark et al., 2002) that Lapita appears near-instantaneously across Fiji-West Polynesia region, and that it rapidly simplifies into Polynesian Plainware. Evaluating the earliest human presence in the Sāmoan archipelago requires a critical review of the pre-2000 cal BP radiocarbon dates to refine the accuracy of the radiocarbon chronology. This is a necessary first step in assessing any model for the colonization of the archipelago. Fig. 9 shows the location

The “Dark Ages,” ca. 1500–1000 cal BP

The compilation of radiocarbon dates from the archipelago also allows examination of a later period in Sāmoan prehistory, which has not garnered as much research to date. Approximately 1400 cal years after initial colonization and settlement in the Sāmoan archipelago, the period from ca. 1500 to 1000 cal BP has been noted by archaeologists as a poorly understood Dark Age with little associated cultural material (Davidson, 1979: pp. 94–95; see also Poulsen, 1974 for Tonga). Presumably, it was

Conclusions

Archaeological research in Sāmoa was pioneered by a program of extensive survey and excavation in Western Sāmoa, which established a culture historical framework that archaeologists continued to follow (Green and Davidson, 1969a, Green and Davidson, 1974a, Jennings et al., 1976, Jennings and Holmer, 1980a). The majority of the more recent research in the archipelago has centered on cultural resource management projects in American Sāmoa (Addison et al., 2006, Carson, 2005, Cleghorn and Shapiro,

References (121)

  • D.J. Addison et al.

    100 new dates from Tutuila and Manu‘a: additional data addressing chronological issues in Samoan prehistory

    Journal of Samoan History

    (2006)
  • D.J. Addison et al.

    Ceramic deposit below fifth to sixth century AD volcanic ash fall at Pava‘ia‘i, Tutuila Island, American Samoa: preliminary results from site AS-31-171

    New Zealand Journal of Archaeology

    (2006)
  • A. Anderson

    The chronology of colonization in New Zealand

    Antiquity

    (1991)
  • A. Anderson et al.

    The age of Lapita settlement in Fiji

    Archaeology in Oceania

    (1999)
  • A. Anderson et al.

    An inventory of Lapita sites containing dentate-stamped pottery

  • Ayres, W.S., Eisler, D., 1987. Archaeological Survey in Western Tutuila: A Report on Archaeological Site Survey and...
  • B.A. Barry

    Errors in Practical Measurement in Science, Engineering and Technology

    (1978)
  • S. Best

    At the halls of the Mountain Kings. Fijian and Samoan fortifications: comparison and analysis

    Journal of the Polynesian Society

    (1993)
  • Best, S., Leach, H., Witter, D., 1989. Report on the Second Phase of Fieldwork at the Tataga-Matau Site, American...
  • S. Best et al.

    Necromancing the stone: archaeologists and adzes in Samoa

    Journal of the Polynesian Society

    (1992)
  • C. Bronk Ramsey

    OxCal Version 3.10. Manual

    (2005)
  • D.V. Burley

    Tongan archaeology and the Tongan past: 2850–150 BP

    Journal of World Prehistory

    (1998)
  • D.V. Burley et al.

    The archaeology of Fiji-West Polynesia in the post-Lapita era

  • D.V. Burley et al.

    A radiocarbon chronology for the eastern Lapita frontier in Tonga

    Archaeology in Oceania

    (1999)
  • V.L. Butler

    Lapita fishing strategies: the faunal evidence

  • Carson, M.T., 2005. Draft. Archaeological Data Recovery for the American Samoa Power Authority Phase IIb Sewer...
  • J.T. Clark

    Radiocarbon dates from American Samoa

    Radiocarbon

    (1993)
  • J.T. Clark

    Prehistory of Alega, Tutuila Island, American Samoa: a small residential and basalt-industrial valley

    New Zealand Journal of Archaeology

    (1993)
  • J.T. Clark

    Samoan prehistory in review

    Oceanic Culture History: Essays in Honour of Roger Green

    New Zealand Journal of Archaeology Special Publication

    (1996)
  • J.T. Clark et al.

    Prehistoric settlement system in eastern Tutuila, American Samoa

    Journal of the Polynesian Society

    (1993)
  • J.T. Clark et al.

    An early settlement in the Polynesian homeland: excavations at ‘Aoa Valley, Tutuila island, American Samoa

    Journal of Field Archaeology

    (1996)
  • Cleghorn, P.L., McIntosh, J., 1999. Results of Archaeological Monitoring of Overhead Electrical Pole and Anchor...
  • Cleghorn, P.L., Shapiro, W.A., 2000. Archaeological Data Recovery Report for the Proposed Ta‘u Road Reconstruction, at...
  • Cochrane, E.E., Carson, M.T., Athens, J.S., 2004. Archaeological Inventory Survey for the Tualauta County Phase IIb...
  • J.M. Davidson

    Survey of sites and analysis of associated artifacts, Luatuanu‘u

  • J.M. Davidson

    Settlement patterns in Samoa before 1840

    Journal of the Polynesian Society

    (1969)
  • J.M. Davidson

    Introduction to the upper Falefa Valley: the site survey

  • J.M. Davidson

    Test excavations in the Falefa Valley

  • J.M. Davidson

    The upper Falefa Valley project: summary and conclusions

  • J.M. Davidson

    Samoa and Tonga

  • J.M. Davidson et al.

    Excavations at SU-Le-12, Leuluasi

  • J.S. Dean

    Independent dating in archaeological analysis

  • W.R. Dickinson et al.

    Geoarchaeological context of Holocene subsidence at the Ferry Berth Lapita site, Mulifanua, Upolu, Samoa

    Geoarchaeology

    (1998)
  • T.S. Dye

    Apparent ages of marine shells: implications for archaeological dating in Hawai'i

    Radiocarbon

    (1994)
  • T.S. Dye

    Effects of 14C sample selection in archaeology: an example from Hawai'i

    Radiocarbon

    (2000)
  • Eisler, D., 1995. Fagaitua Bay Phase II Research Project: Final Report on the American Samoa Power Authority Watermain...
  • S. Fitzpatrick

    A critical approach to 14C dating in the Caribbean: using chronometric hygiene to evaluate chronological control and prehistoric settlement

    Latin American Antiquity

    (2006)
  • Frost, J., 1978. Archaeological Investigations on Tutuila Island, American Samoa. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Department...
  • R.C. Green

    Archaeological investigations of western Samoan prehistory

  • R.C. Green

    A review of portable artifacts from western Samoa

  • R.C. Green

    Pottery from the lagoon at Mulifanua, Upolu

  • R.C. Green

    Lapita

  • R.C. Green

    A retrospective view of settlement pattern studies in Samoa

  • R.C. Green et al.

    Radiocarbon dates for western Samoa

    Journal of the Polynesian Society

    (1965)
  • R.C. Green et al.
    (1969)
  • R.C. Green et al.

    Description and classification of Samoan adzes

  • R.C. Green et al.
    (1974)
  • R.C. Green et al.

    A radiocarbon and stratigraphic sequence for Samoa

  • R.C. Green et al.

    Lapita pottery and a lower sea level in western Samoa

    Pacific Science

    (1975)
  • Cited by (54)

    • Hypotheses to explain the few early coastal archaeological deposits in Sāmoa: Preliminary evaluations

      2019, Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports
      Citation Excerpt :

      Island subsidence, however, may not be the correct explanation for the general lack of archaeological sites dating to first 1000 years of Sāmoan settlement. After extensive archaeological research on Tutuila island, the oldest documented site dates to approximately 300 years after Mulifanua (Rieth and Hunt, 2008). In the small islands of the Manu‘a group farther east (Fig. 1), Clark et al.’s (2016) Bayesian model suggests that the start of human occupation on Ofu begins 2774–2647 cal BP (95.4% HPD), just after or coeval with occupation of Mulifanua (see also Petchey and Kirch, 2019).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text