Research reportBipolar Disorder is a two-edged sword: A qualitative study to understand the positive edge
Introduction
“I have often asked myself whether given the choice, I would choose to have manic depressive illness…..strangely enough I think I would” (Jamison, 1996, pp 217–218)
Bipolar Disorder (BD) is generally seen as a severe and enduring mental illness with serious negative consequences for the individual and their friends and family (Calabrese, 2003, Hirschfeld et al., 2003). Long-term unemployment rates are high (Dickerson et al., 2004), relationships are marred by high levels of family burden (Perlick et al., 2007) and quality of life is often poor (Michalak et al., 2005). High rates of substance misuse are reported (Weiss et al., 2007) and suicide rates are twenty times that of the general population (Tondo et al., 2003). The impact of BD is estimated to cost the UK £5.2billion per year (McCrone et al., 2008).
However, since the first description of manic depressive illness by Kraepelin (1921), the positive aspects of these experiences have been noted. Kraepelin proposed that “the disease may under certain circumstances set free powers which otherwise are constrained by all kinds of inhibition” (Kraepelin, 1921 p17). Despite this, clinical assessment tools and academic research have focused almost exclusively on the negative aspects of bipolar. This is a problem for 2 key reasons.
Firstly, focusing only on negative aspects paints a biased picture that perpetuates the view of bipolar as a wholly negative experience. Long-term follow-up studies are often conducted with people recruited via mental health services and therefore findings are biased towards describing outcome only for those people who remain engaged with services. This is only a subsample of people who meet criteria for BD and is likely to consist of those with the poorest outcomes and requiring the most support (Frye et al., 2005). Consequently, clinicians working in this area develop an experiential understanding of BD through contact only with people who are significantly impaired by their experiences. Subsequently, when giving a diagnosis, the picture presented by these clinicians is informed by biased research evidence and by their own biased clinical experiences. This picture is generally one of long-term disability, the need to avoid stress and the prospect of daily medication with severe side effects. Given the strength of the self-fulfilling prophecy (Merton, 1948), it is reasonable to expect that painting this picture will itself trigger emotional and behavioural responses in the individual receiving the diagnosis, which may lead to reduced levels of functioning and poorer quality of life (Lovejoy, 1982).
The second problem is failure to understand ambivalence towards treatment. Although there is a range of biological and psychological interventions available with proven efficacy in reducing relapse and improving outcome (NICE, 2006, Scott et al., 2007), there are high levels of non-adherence and poor engagement with services (Lingam and Scott, 2002). This phenomenon is generally understood in clinical settings in terms of “lack of insight” (e.g. Copeland et al., 2008, Trauer and Sacks, 2000), comorbid drug or alcohol abuse (e.g. Keck et al., 1997) and “personality disorder” (e.g. Colom et al., 2000). However, it may be that in understanding the positive aspects of bipolar we can better understand ambivalence towards engaging with services, as an entirely predictable and rational response. In order to test this, we first need to comprehend the full range of bipolar experiences – positive as well as negative.
There is a growing ‘popular literature’ which tells us in great detail about the positive aspects of bipolar experience. Book titles such as ‘The Bipolar Advantage’ (Wootton, 2005), ‘The Hypomanic Edge’ (Gartner, 2005), ‘Touched with Fire’ (Jamison, 1996) and ‘Bipolar Breakthrough’(Fieve, 2006) reflect the way in which this literature, written by people with personal experience of the disorder and highly experienced clinicians, presents aspects of bipolar experiences often ignored in more academic literature. US psychiatrist Gartner (2005) discusses ‘grandiose types’ whose unusual energy, creativity and enthusiasm result in ‘spectacular entrepreneurial zeal’ and ‘drive for innovation.’ In ‘Bipolar Expeditions’, Martin (2007) argues that people with BD are ‘the kind of person who is highly desirable in corporate America: adaptive, scanning the environment, continuously changing in innovative ways’ (p 216). The personal value of bipolar experiences was demonstrated in a British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) documentary (UK) in which a highly biased sample of high achievers and celebrities with bipolar diagnoses were asked, ‘If there were a button you could press which would take away your bipolar disorder, would you press it?’ No one said yes (Wilson, 2006). Slightly more representative (though still self-selecting) was a survey of 3330 adults with BD, from which only 54% said that they definitely would push a hypothetical button which would eradicate their illness (Equilibrium: The Bipolar Foundation, 2008).
Positive aspects of BD have been the focus of academic research. Jamison et al. (1980) showed that people were able to identify short- and long-term positive effects of their mood experiences in areas of sensitivity and alertness, productivity, social outgoingness, sexual enjoyment, and creativity. She also reported that levels of manic or hypomanic symptoms are overrepresented in people defined by high levels of creative achievement, such as writers and artists (Jamison, 1989). More recently Murray & Johnson (2010) have addressed this question from the alternative perspective, looking for evidence of elevated levels of creativity and accomplishment in people with mania. They suggest that hypomanic experiences are associated with more creative, occupational and educational attainments, but that episodes of full-blown mania interfere with this process. A recent review of the literature in this area (Galvez et al., 2011) suggests support for enhanced levels of spirituality, empathy, creativity, realism and resilience in BD.
A key limitation of current research is that experiences have been evaluated along dimensions prescribed by researchers. Consequently, they may miss positive aspects of bipolar experiences that are valued by service users. A qualitative approach that explores people's experiences more openly would overcome this problem and explore the full range of positive experiences. Michalak et al. (2006) used such an approach in their study of the impact of BD on quality of life. Although mainly identifying negative impacts, some participants described how bipolar experiences had opened up new opportunities for them by positively changing their career paths or social networks.
In this study we invited people with a diagnosis of BD to tell us about the positive aspects of their bipolar experiences. We used their responses to help us understand the varied and often ambivalent relationship people have with this condition, and to consider the implications of this for clinical interventions.
Section snippets
Design
Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) (Smith et al., 1999) was used to understand the data. This approach is grounded in interpretive epistemology and emphasises the perceptions and experiences of individual participants from their point of view. It attempts to understand how participants make sense of their world and, in this instance, the positive aspects of their bipolar experiences. IPA recognises the active role of the interviewer and analysts and, therefore, prior to the interviews
Participants
Demographic and clinical data is presented for participants in Table 1.
The median age of participants was 39.5 years (range 24–57). Half were in full- or part-time work, and two worked voluntarily. All met BD criteria (six bipolar I and four bipolar II) and eight reported that they had received a clinical diagnosis of BD in mental health services. The two without a clinical diagnosis had been diagnosed with depression and treated for this. Scores on the MDQ ranged from 10 to 13 and all but 1
Discussion
It was very easy to find people with BD who wanted to talk about the positive aspects of their experiences. Contrary to our initial concerns there was no evidence that participants felt we were somehow minimising the negatives, or failing to understand the distress this disorder can cause. Participants highly valued the positive changes in their lives attributed to their bipolar experiences and talked at length about this topic. These positive changes are described in the first theme as an
Role of funding source
This research was funded by the Spectrum Centre for mental health research.
Conflict of interest
There are no conflicts of interest to report.
Acknowledgements
There are no further acknowledgements.
References (53)
- et al.
Positive aspects of mental illness: a review in bipolar disorder
Journal of Affective Disorders
(2011) - et al.
Leisure activities, alcohol, and nicotine consumption in people with a hypomanic/hyperthymic temperament
Personality and Individual Differences
(2005) - et al.
Hypomanic personality features and addictive tendencies
Personality and Individual Differences
(2007) - et al.
The clinical significance of creativity in bipolar disorder
Clinical Psychology Review
(2010) - et al.
Positive clinical psychology: a new vision and strategy for integrated research and practice
Clinical Psychology Review
(2010) The temperamental foundations of affective disorders
- et al.
Objective assessment of circadian activity and sleep patterns in individuals at behavioral risk of hypomania
Journal of Clinical Psychology
(2009) Understanding bipolar disorder: why some people experience extreme mood states and what can help
(2010)Impact of bipolar on a U.S. community sample
The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
(2003)- et al.
Facilitating Posttraumatic Growth: A Clinician's Guide
(1999)
Phenomenology and diagnosis of bipolar disorder in children, adolescents, and adults: complexities and developmental issues
Development and Psychopathology
Clinical factors associated with treatment noncompliance in euthymic bipolar patients
The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
Treatment adherence and illness insight in veterans with bipolar disorder
The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease
Association between cognitive functioning and employment status of persons with bipolar disorder
Psychiatric Services
Development and validation of a scale for hypomanic personality
Journal of Abnormal Psychology
International Bipolar Disorder Survey
Bipolar breakthrough: the essential guide to going beyond moodswings to harness your highs
Escape the cycles of recurrent depression and thrive with bipolar II
Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders, Research Version, Patient Edition
Use of health care services among persons who screen positive for bipolar disorder
Psychiatric Services
The Hypomanic Edge: The Link Between a Little Craziness and a Lot of Success in America
Perceptions and impact of bipolar disorder: how far have we really come? Results of the national depressive and manic-depressive association 2000 survey of individuals with bipolar disorder
The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
Development and validation of a screening instrument for bipolar spectrum disorder: the Mood Disorder Questionnaire
The American Journal of Psychiatry
‘I actually don't know who I am’: the impact of bipolar disorder on the development of self
Psychiatry: Interpersonal and Biological Processes
Mood disorders and patterns of creativity in British writers and artists
Psychiatry: Journal for the Study of Interpersonal Processes
An Unquiet Mind
Clouds and silver linings: positive experiences associated with primary affective disorders
The American Journal of Psychiatry
Cited by (44)
Mediation analysis of recovery-focused therapy for recent-onset bipolar disorder
2021, Journal of Affective Disorders ReportsCitation Excerpt :Consistent with established definitions of personal recovery such as Anthony's (Anthony, 1993) and service user accounts analysed in qualitative research which informed the development of the current intervention (Morrison et al., 2016) it was proposed that changes in broader processes of personal growth and improved perception of the self might influence treatment outcome. Here the specific focus was on changes in self-esteem, stigma, hope and sense of personal growth informed by prior research in bipolar disorder and wider recovery literature (Jones et al., 2013; Knowles et al., 2007; Lobban et al., 2012; Morrison et al., 2016; Pavlickova et al., 2014). This paper reports on additional analysis of data collected as part of a randomised controlled trial on Recovery focused therapy for bipolar disorder, reported in detail elsewhere (Jones et al., 2015).
Depression, mania and self-reported creativity in bipolar disorder
2019, Psychiatry ResearchCitation Excerpt :Bipolar disorder (BD) is the fifth leading cause of disability worldwide affecting up to 2.4% of the population (Merikangas et al., 2011; WHO, 2008). Despite this, many who experience BD also report positive aspects of the illness, such as increased range and depth of emotional experience, amplified perceptual states, heightened connection with others and the natural world (Lobban et al., 2012), enhanced empathy, self-awareness, self-confidence, productivity and heightened creativity (Galvez et al., 2011; Parker et. al., 2012). Creativity in particular, is subjectively valued by many people living with BD and may be an important resource for treatment and useful for reducing stigma for those living with the disorder (Johnson et al., 2016).
Mood as a lock gate canalizing multiple creativity: A heuristic single-case study
2019, Neurology Psychiatry and Brain Research‘The Button Question’: A mixed-methods study of whether patients want to keep or remove bipolar disorder and the reasons for their decision
2019, Journal of Affective DisordersCitation Excerpt :However, we need to investigate this question in a bigger, widely representative, sample to be able to draw conclusions that are more accurate. Bipolar disorder is presented both positively and negatively within the research literature (Forgeard et al., 2016; Taylor et al., 2015; Lobban et al., 2012; Crowe et al., 2012; Rusner et al., 2009; Inder et al., 2008; Michalak et al., 2006). On the negative end, some people with bipolar disorder appeared to have issues with control, self-esteem, stigma and forming identities (Crowe et al., 2012; Inder et al., 2008; Michalak et al., 2006).
Effective self-management strategies for bipolar disorder: A community-engaged Delphi Consensus Consultation study
2016, Journal of Affective DisordersCitation Excerpt :Given that 6–10% of people with BD are at high risk of suicide (Nordentoft et al., 2011) and that, on average, they lose 9 years of life (Crump et al., 2013), the condition represents a serious personal and public health concern that should not be downplayed. Yet, there is also evidence that people with BD can flourish (Lobban et al., 2012; Michalak et al., 2012a; Michalak et al., 2006; Murray et al., 2011; Russell and Browne, 2005; Suto et al., 2010). Living well with BD typically requires more than pharmacological approaches alone; psychosocial interventions are also key (Miklowitz, 2008a), but frequently underutilized, in part because of inaccessibility of formal services (Hickie et al., 2006; Hickie and McGorry, 2007), skepticism about particular interventions (Joukamaa et al., 1995; Jorm, 2000), lack of perceived need for treatment (Meadows and Burgess, 2009; Meadows et al., 2002), self-stigma (Bayer and Peay, 1997), lack of insight (Kessing et al., 2006), and a preference for self-management (Andrews et al., 2001).
Positive beliefs about mental illness: Associations with sex, age, diagnosis, and clinical outcomes
2016, Journal of Affective Disorders