Review
A review on surface modification of activated carbon for carbon dioxide adsorption

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2010.07.006Get rights and content

Abstract

The influence of surface modification of activated carbon with gaseous ammonia on adsorption properties toward carbon dioxide (CO2) was reviewed. It was apparent from the literature survey that the surface chemistry of activated carbon strongly affects the adsorption capacity. In general, CO2 adsorption capacity of activated carbon can be increased by the introduction of basic nitrogen functionalities into the carbon surface. Accordingly, in this review the impact of changes in surface chemistry and formation of specific surface groups on adsorption properties of activated carbon were studied. Two different methods, heat treatment and ammonia treatment (amination) for producing activated carbon with basic surface were compared. Amination was found to be suitable modification technique for obtaining efficient CO2 adsorbents. Finally, the common characterization methods were also mentioned.

Introduction

Global warming is widely attributed to an increase in atmospheric level of greenhouse gases. Carbon dioxide (CO2) is considered as the most important greenhouse gas with the largest impact on climate change [1]. The gradual increase in the atmospheric concentration of CO2 due to burning of fossil fuels is becoming a serious environmental problem [2]. CO2 capture and sequestration from point source emissions has been recognized as a potential way to stabilize CO2 in the atmosphere [3], [4], [5]. Various processes, such as liquid solvent absorption, cryogenic techniques, membrane separation, solid sorbents, and pressure (and/or temperature) swing adsorption have been proposed for the separation and recovery of CO2 emitted by power plants [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11]. To date, most of commercial CO2 capture plants use amine-based processes and wet scrubbing systems [12], but they are energy intensive due to the large amount of water needed in these systems [2], [3]. Other problems associated with these processes are amine degradation by oxidation leading to corrosion of process equipments [13], [14], [15].

The goal in reducing CO2 emissions on an industrial scale is the development of cost-effective techniques for the separation and capture of CO2 [16]. Adsorption is considered as one of the potential options because of the low energy requirement, cost advantage, and ease of applicability over a relatively wide range of temperatures and pressures [2], [17]. However, the success of this approach is dependent on the development of easily regenerable and durable adsorbent with a high CO2 selectivity and adsorption capacity [4], [18]. Zeolites have shown promising results for separating CO2 from gas mixtures. However, the presence of water inhibits the CO2 adsorption capacity of zeolites [19], [20], [21]. Activated carbons are being proposed as suitable candidates for CO2 capture: they do not require any moisture removal, present a high CO2 adsorption capacity at ambient pressure and, moreover, they are easy to regenerate [22]. It has been recognized that the surface chemistry of activated carbon can strongly affect the adsorption capacity [7]. Due to acidic role of CO2 (weak Lewis acid), it is expected that the introduction of Lewis bases onto the activated carbon surfaces may favour the CO2 capture performance of these materials [18].

One of the popular ways used for the preparation of activated carbon with increased basicity is to remove or neutralize the acidic functionalities, and other way is to replace acidic groups with proper basic groups (e.g., basic nitrogen functionalities). It has been shown that introduction of nitrogen functional groups into the carbon surface can increase the capacity of activated carbon to adsorb CO2 [1], [3], [7], [15], [16], [17], [23], [24], [25], [26]. Nitrogen containing functionalities can be introduced through either reaction with nitrogen containing reagents (such as NH3, nitric acid, and amines) or activation with nitrogen containing precursors [17], [27], [28], [29], [30], [31], [32], [33], [34]. The objective of ammonia treatment is to increase the basicity of activated carbon by introducing basic nitrogen functionalities to the carbon surface [31], [32], [35], [36], [37]. When the carbon materials are treated with ammonia at high temperatures, ammonia will decompose to free radicals such as NH2, NH, and atomic hydrogen and nitrogen. Those free radicals attack the carbon to form nitrogen containing functional groups [38], [39], [40]. Several authors have studied thermal treatment of carbons in an ammonia atmosphere [30], [31], [32], [38], [39], [40], [41], [42]. Economy et al. [43] treated activated carbon fibers (ACF) using NH3 at elevated temperature to obtain a product with basic characteristics. Plaza et al. [18], [22] proposed the modification of activated carbon with gaseous ammonia as a suitable technique to produce efficient CO2 adsorbents. Various characterization methods have been used to detect and verify the existence of surface functional groups of the activated carbons [44], [45]. The most common of these methods are chemical titration, temperature programmed desorption (TPD), X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS) and Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FT-IR).

The main objective of this review is how activated carbon should be modified to enhance surface basicity for carbon dioxide adsorption.

Section snippets

Activated carbon surface chemistry

The chemical characteristics of activated carbons are largely determined by a certain degree of surface chemical heterogeneity, which is related to the presence of heteroatoms, i.e. atoms present in the carbon structure that are not carbon, such as oxygen, nitrogen, hydrogen, sulfur, and phosphorus. The type and quantity of these elements are derived either from the nature of starting material or introduced during the activation process [46], [47]. Surface functional groups (which are formed

Preparation of activated carbon with basic surface

In the presence of a large number of oxygen containing acidic groups on carbon surface, the contribution of resonating π-electrons to carbon basicity is overshadowed. Therefore, one way of increasing basicity is to remove or neutralize the acidic functionalities, and other way is to replace acidic groups with proper basic groups (e.g., basic nitrogen functionalities).

Characterization of activated carbon surface chemistry

Characterization of functional groups on porous carbon is complicated due to the complexity of surface functional groups and incomplete understanding of their behaviour on the carbon surface. Elemental analysis is the primary method to obtain the elemental kinds and it amount. This method is employed in most studies because it is convenient, easy and inexpensive, but it cannot give the functional groups, so the results from this test should not simply be treated as a reflection of surface

Conclusion

In this study the impact of changes in surface chemistry on adsorption properties of activated carbon was reviewed. Two methods for producing activated carbon with basic surface were considered: heat treatment and ammonia treatment. It was found that decomposition of oxygen containing acidic groups and introduction of basic nitrogen functionalities on the carbon surface improved CO2 adsorption ability of activated carbons. Amination is an alternative pathway to increase the adsorption ability

Acknowledgement

This study was carried out with the aid of a research grant from University Malaya Research Fund.

References (195)

  • A. Arenillas et al.

    Fuel

    (2005)
  • M.G. Plaza et al.

    Fuel

    (2007)
  • X. Xu et al.

    Fuel Process. Technol.

    (2005)
  • S. Kazama et al.

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2002)
  • C. Pevida et al.

    Appl. Surf. Sci.

    (2008)
  • F. Dong et al.

    Sep. Purif. Technol.

    (1999)
  • X. Xu et al.

    Mesopor. Mater.

    (2003)
  • A.L. Chaffee et al.

    Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control

    (2007)
  • C.L. Leci

    Energy Convers. Manage.

    (1996)
  • M.L. Gray et al.

    Fuel Process. Technol.

    (2005)
  • M.L. Gray et al.

    Sep. Purif. Technol.

    (2004)
  • T.C. Drage et al.

    Fuel

    (2007)
  • M.G. Plaza et al.

    Energy Proceed.

    (2009)
  • I. Majchrzak-Kuceba et al.

    Thermochim. Acta

    (2005)
  • M.G. Plaza et al.

    Fuel

    (2009)
  • M.M. Maroto-Valer et al.

    Fuel Process. Technol.

    (2005)
  • J. Przepiórski et al.

    Appl. Surf. Sci.

    (2004)
  • F. Stoeckli et al.

    Carbon

    (1996)
  • P.J.M. Carrott et al.

    Carbon

    (2001)
  • R.J.J. Jansen et al.

    Carbon

    (1994)
  • S. Biniak et al.

    Carbon

    (1997)
  • P. Vinke et al.

    Carbon

    (1994)
  • C.L. Mangun et al.

    Carbon

    (2001)
  • C.U. Pittman et al.

    Carbon

    (1997)
  • R.J.J. Jansen et al.

    Carbon

    (1995)
  • J.R. Pels et al.

    Carbon

    (1995)
  • H.P. Boehm et al.

    Fuel

    (1984)
  • B. Stöhr et al.

    Carbon

    (1991)
  • K.B. Bota et al.

    Fuel

    (1994)
  • G.M.K. Abotsi et al.

    Carbon

    (1990)
  • P. Burg et al.

    Carbon

    (2002)
  • J.H. Zhou et al.

    Carbon

    (2007)
  • Y. El-Sayed et al.

    J. Colloid Interface Sci.

    (2004)
  • K. László et al.

    Carbon

    (2001)
  • Y. Otake et al.

    Carbon

    (1993)
  • S.S. Barton et al.

    Carbon

    (1997)
  • R.C. Bansal et al.

    Carbon

    (1974)
  • G.S. Szymański et al.

    Carbon

    (2002)
  • V.L. Snoeyink et al.
  • H.P. Boehm

    Carbon

    (1994)
  • J.L. Figueiredo et al.

    Carbon

    (1999)
  • L. Li et al.

    Carbon

    (2002)
  • J.S. Noh et al.

    Carbon

    (1990)
  • V. Gómez-Serrano et al.

    Thermochim. Acta

    (1997)
  • M.A. Montes-Morán et al.

    Carbon

    (2004)
  • C.A. Leon y Leon et al.

    Carbon

    (1992)
  • M.F.R. Pereira et al.

    Carbon

    (2003)
  • H.P. Boehm

    Carbon

    (2002)
  • A.F. Pérez-Cadenas et al.

    Carbon

    (2003)
  • H. Darmstadt et al.

    Carbon

    (2003)
  • Cited by (887)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text