ReportTattoos and body piercings in the United States: A national data set
Section snippets
Methods
After a series of pretests, trained interviewers from the Public Opinion Laboratory at Northern Illinois University administered a telephone survey to 500 respondents aged 18 to 50 years between February 11 and April 18, 2004.
The respondents were selected using random digit dialing (RDD) to obtain a national probability sample within the 48 contiguous United States with approximately equal numbers of men and women. RDD allows for very wide coverage of an area, as it includes numbers for
Results
Respondents were equally distributed throughout the age range (median and mean ages, 36 years [standard deviation 9.44 years]). They were representative of the nation according to race, Hispanic ancestry, marital status, household size, median household income, educational status, and religious affiliation. (Table I, column 1). There was an increase in the total number of people with or considering getting body art (tattoos and body piercings) in each successive age group. (Table I and Fig 1).
Discussion
The 33% response rate for this RDD survey is within the expectable range given the known increasing difficulties of doing telephone surveys.6 Importantly, refusals were not related to the body art content of the questionnaire and, as such, should not have contributed to any systematic bias in the results.
Our findings of a national prevalence rate of 24% tattooing among people 18 to 50 years old are very similar to the findings of two 2003 national probability samples, both of which asked only a
References (48)
- et al.
Tattooing: another adolescent health risk behavior warranting health education
Appl Nurs Res
(1997) - et al.
Prevalence of body art (body piercing and tattooing) in university undergraduates and incidence of medical complications
Mayo Clin Proc
(2002) - et al.
Contemporary college students and body piercing
J Adolesc Health
(2004) - et al.
Body piercing and high-risk behavior in adolescents
J Adolesc Health
(2004) - et al.
Tattooing and body piercing among adolescent detainees
J Subst Abuse Treat
(2001) - et al.
Role of body piercing in the induction of metal allergies
Am J Contact Dermatitis
(2001) - et al.
Body piercing as a risk factor for viral hepatitis: an integrative research review
Am J Infect Control
(2001) - et al.
Investigation of infection control practices and knowledge of hepatitis C among body-piercing practitioners
Am J Infect Control
(2003) - et al.
Monitoring and educational feedback to improve the compliance of tattooists and body piercers with infection control standards: a randomized controlled trial
Am J Infect Control
(2004) State and territorial regulation of tattooing in the United States
J Am Acad Dermatol
(1995)
Bodies of inscription: a cultural history of the modern tattoo community
The eloquent Surma of Ethiopia
National Geographic
Medical problems of ear piercing
NY State J Med
Tattooing should be regulated
N Engl J Med
Behavioral risks associated with tattooing
Fam Med
College students with tattoos and piercings: motives, family experiences, personality factors, and perception by others
Psychol Rep
Tattooing and high-risk behavior in adolescents
Pediatrics
Tattoos: their relationship to trauma, psychopathology, and other myths
Minn Med
Behavioral and self-concept differences in tattooed and nontattooed college students
Psychol Rep
Career-oriented women with tattoos
Image J Nurs Sch Winter
Cited by (466)
Heavy metals in cosmetics and tattoos: a review of historical background, health impact, and regulatory limits
2024, Journal of Hazardous Materials AdvancesInvolvement of type-1 pathway in phototoxicity of benzo[ghi]perylenean ingredient of tattoo ink at ambient exposure of UVR and sunlight
2023, Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: BiologyMicroneedle patch tattoos
2022, iScienceOral manifestations arising from oral piercings: A systematic review and meta-analyses
2022, Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral RadiologyCitation Excerpt :Five reports were not retrieved in full15-19 from the main databases. Thirty records were excluded: 6 studies presented a sample size lower than 10 participants20-29; 10 did not report oral outcomes31-40; 3 reported mixed outcomes (oral piercing with piercing in other areas)40-44; 3 did not attest to PICO criteria30,45-48; and 1 had sample overlapping from another study included for eligibility.49 Additionally, 115 articles were retrieved through alerts from the database (duplicates were manually removed before they were added to the flow chart).
Lack of minority enrollment in lasers for tattoo removal clinical trials: a cross‐sectional analysis and call to action
2024, Archives of Dermatological Research
Supported by the Portes Center administered through the Institute of Medicine of Chicago and the Sage Foundation.
Conflicts of interest: None identified.
- ∗
Current affiliation: Department of Dermatology, Northwestern University; data collected while in the Section of Dermatology, University of Chicago; analysis started while at the University of Chicago and continued while at Northwestern University.