Clinical Investigation
Clinical Outcomes of Patients Receiving Integrated PET/CT-Guided Radiotherapy for Head and Neck Carcinoma

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.10.044Get rights and content

Purpose

We previously reported the advantages of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose–positron emission tomography (PET) fused with CT for radiotherapy planning over CT alone in head and neck carcinoma (HNC). The purpose of this study was to evaluate clinical outcomes and the predictive value of PET for patients receiving PET/CT-guided definitive radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy.

Methods and Materials

From December 2002 to August 2006, 42 patients received PET/CT imaging as part of staging and radiotherapy planning. Clinical outcomes including locoregional recurrence, distant metastasis, death, and treatment-related toxicities were collected retrospectively and analyzed for disease-free and overall survival and cumulative incidence of recurrence.

Results

Median follow-up from initiation of treatment was 32 months. Overall survival and disease-free survival were 82.8% and 71.0%, respectively, at 2 years, and 74.1% and 66.9% at 3 years. Of the 42 patients, seven recurrences were identified (three LR, one DM, three both LR and DM). Mean time to recurrence was 9.4 months. Cumulative risk of recurrence was 18.7%. The maximum standard uptake volume (SUV) of primary tumor, adenopathy, or both on PET did not correlate with recurrence, with mean values of 12.0 for treatment failures vs. 11.7 for all patients. Toxicities identified in those patients receiving intensity modulated radiation therapy were also evaluated.

Conclusions

A high level of disease control combined with favorable toxicity profiles was achieved in a cohort of HNC patients receiving PET/CT fusion guided radiotherapy plus/minus chemotherapy. Maximum SUV of primary tumor and/or adenopathy was not predictive of risk of disease recurrence.

Introduction

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma originating in the upper aerodigestive tract accounts for approximately 5% of malignancies worldwide. Traditionally, CT has been the imaging modality of choice in staging and radiotherapy (RT) planning for head and neck cancer (HNC). Accumulating evidence shows advantages of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) over CT and other imaging modalities for detection of primary tumor, involved lymph nodes, and distant metastatic disease 1, 2, 3, 4. Disadvantages of PET, however, include its often poor correlation to precise anatomic structures and the confounding effect of normal physiologic FDG accumulation in certain areas, such as uninvolved muscles, lymphoid tissue of Waldeyer's ring, vocal cords, and salivary glandular tissue. These limitations have been significantly reduced with the advent of integrated PET/CT, in which subsequent PET and CT scans are obtained on a hybrid scanner and then fused by specialized software. Integrated PET/CT has been shown to be effective in differentiating normal physiologic uptake from tumor and frequently results in changes in radiotherapy planning and patient management 5, 6, 7, 8, 9.

Integrated PET/CT has proven to be especially useful in the staging and radiation therapy planning of head and neck malignancies. Because of the close proximity of several critical structures in this region, accurate detail of tumor and normal anatomy is crucial to ensure delivery of adequate radiation doses to areas of disease, while sparing exposure to as much normal tissue as possible. Studies have shown that PET/CT imaging in RT planning results in significant changes in gross tumor volume (GTV) 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and node volume 10, 11 and detects positive nodes undiagnosed on CT alone 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16. One study (17) reported 97% accuracy in tumor delineation for PET/CT vs. 69% for CT and 40% for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). PET/CT can also be useful in locating unknown primary tumors (18) and distant metastases 10, 13, 16, and it occasionally leads to the diagnosis of previously undiagnosed synchronous primary cancers 13, 14. Reports have suggested that both the sensitivity and specificity of PET/CT are superior to both CT 15, 19, 20 and PET 16, 20 alone. Two studies reported a decrease in the number of PET findings read as equivocal by 60% (16) and 53% (18), respectively. Finally, studies report that the results of PET/CT imaging result in changes in patient management in 12%–31% of cases 10, 13, 16, 17, 18, 21.

One important treatment goal in radiotherapy of HNC is to limit side effects caused by irradiation of normal structures adjacent to tumor. This has become increasingly successful with the advent of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in recent years 22, 23. IMRT permits a steeper dose gradient than traditional RT modalities, allowing clinicians to deliver higher doses of radiation to desired areas while sparing more sensitive neighboring structures. Combined with the advantages of PET/CT planning in determining extent of primary disease and nodal spread, IMRT provides excellent locoregional control with a lower toxicity profile 14, 24.

Most published reports, including those just cited, discuss the feasibility of PET/CT imaging as part of staging and radiation therapy planning for HNC, but there is little data regarding clinical outcomes for these patients. The purposes of this study were (1) to evaluate clinical outcomes including overall survival, disease-free survival, and incidence of recurrence in patients with HNC who received PET/CT-guided radiation therapy and (2) to determine the correlation of these outcomes to maximum standard uptake value (SUV) obtained on PET scan. A secondary aim was to examine the toxic effects reported by those patients receiving IMRT.

Section snippets

Patients and clinical data

From December 2002 to August 2006, 42 patients (median age, 55) with primary squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (3 oral cavity, 24 oropharynx, 3 nasopharynx, 5 larynx, 3 hypopharynx, and 4 cervical adenopathy from unknown primary) received PET/CT imaging for staging and as part of radiotherapy planning. Clinical characteristics of these 42 patients are listed in Table 1. None of these patients underwent surgical resection of their primary disease except for incisional biopsy. All

Results

Follow-up interval from initiation of treatment ranged from 7 to 53 months, with a median follow-up of 32 months. Overall survival and disease-free survival (and their 95% confidence intervals [CI]) were 82.8% (95% CI, 71.9–96.6) and 71.0% (95% CI, 57.8–87.4), respectively, at 2 years, and 74.1% (95% CI, 59.6–92.1) and 66.9% (95% CI, 52.7–84.9) at 3 years. Kaplan-Meier survival curves are shown in Fig. 1A and 1B, respectively. Of the 42 patients, seven treatment failures were identified (three

Discussion

Our findings in this single-institution study demonstrate clear advantages of integrated PET/CT imaging in staging and treatment planning for head and neck carcinoma. The high sensitivity and specificity of PET/CT has been well documented. The important information it provides improves anatomic tumor localization and helps assess the extent of nodal and metastatic spread. This leads to more accurate staging, appropriate changes in radiation therapy planning, and potentially translates into

References (45)

  • S. Adams et al.

    Prospective comparison of 18F-FDG PET with conventional imaging modalities (CT, MRI, US) in lymph node staging of head and neck cancer

    Eur J Nucl Med

    (1998)
  • C. Laubenbacher et al.

    Comparison of fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose PET, MRI, and endoscopy for staging head and neck squamous-cell carcinoma

    J Nucl Med

    (1995)
  • Y. Kitagawa et al.

    Prospective comparison of 18F-FDG PET with conventional imaging modalities (MRI, CT, and 67Ga scintigraphy) in assessment of combined intraarterial chemotherapy and radiotherapy for head and neck carcinoma

    J Nucl Med

    (2003)
  • E. Di Martino et al.

    Diagnosis and staging of head and neck cancer: A comparison of modern imaging modalities (positron emission tomography, computed tomography, color-coded duplex sonography) with panendoscopic and histopathologic findings

    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg

    (2000)
  • P.G. Kluetz et al.

    Combined PET/CT imaging in oncology: Impact on patient management

    Clin Positron Imaging

    (2000)
  • F. Ciernik et al.

    Radiation treatment planning with an integrated positron emission and computer tomography (PET/CT): A feasibility study

    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

    (2003)
  • P. Kluetz et al.

    The Case for PET/CT. Experience at the University of Pittsburgh

    Clin Positron Imaging

    (2000)
  • R. Bar-Shalom et al.

    Clinical performance of PET/CT in evaluation of cancer: additional value for diagnostic imaging and patient management

    J Nucl Med

    (2003)
  • C.D. Roman et al.

    Incremental value of fusion imaging with integrated PET-CT in oncology

    Clin Nucl Med

    (2005)
  • D.E. Heron et al.

    Hybrid PET-CT simulation for radiation treatment planning in head-and-neck cancers: A brief technical report

    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

    (2004)
  • C. Scarfone et al.

    Prospective feasibility trial of radiotherapy target definition for head and neck cancer using 3-dimensional PET and CT imaging

    J Nucl Med

    (2004)
  • T. Nishioka et al.

    Image fusion between 18 FDG-PET and MRI/CT for radiotherapy planning of oropharyngeal and nasopharyngeal carcinomas

    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

    (2002)
  • M. Koshy et al.

    F-18 PET-CT fusion in radiotherapy treatment planning for head and neck cancer

    Head Neck

    (2005)
  • D. Wang et al.

    Initial experience of FDG-PET/CT guided IMRT of head-and-neck carcinoma

    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

    (2006)
  • D.L. Schwartz et al.

    FDG-PET/CT imaging for preradiotherapy staging of head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma

    Int J Radiat Biol Phys

    (2005)
  • E. Goshen et al.

    PET/CT in the evaluation of patients with squamous cell cancer of the head and neck

    Int J Maxillofac Surg

    (2006)
  • W.L. Wong et al.

    Validation and clinical application of computer-combined computed tomography and positron emission tomography with 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose head and neck images

    Am J Surg

    (1996)
  • H. Schoder et al.

    Head and neck cancer: Clinical usefulness and accuracy of PET/CT image fusion

    Radiology

    (2004)
  • M. Zimny et al.

    Combined image interpretation of computed tomography and hybrid PET in head and neck cancer

    Nuklearmedizin

    (2002)
  • H.S. Jeong et al.

    Use of integrated 18F-FDG PET/CT to improve the accuracy of initial cervical nodal evaluation in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

    Head Neck

    (2007)
  • P.K. Ha et al.

    The role of positron emission tomography and computed tomography fusion in the management of early-stage and advanced-stage primary head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg

    (2006)
  • N. Lee et al.

    Intensity-modulated radiation therapy in head and neck cancers: An update

    Head Neck

    (2007)
  • Cited by (80)

    • The Role of Diagnostic Radiology in Head and Neck Cancer

      2017, Maxillofacial Surgery, 3rd Edition: Volume 1-2
    • PET/CT in radiotherapy planning in head and neck cancers

      2015, Medecine Nucleaire
      Citation Excerpt :

      Some works have described that the use of FDG-PET/CT in radiotherapy planning increases the local control and overall survival with less miss failures comparing with CT planning. However, comparisons with historical controls have limitations due to the different inclusion criteria and radiation methodology that can bias the results [40,49,50]. Ideally the benefits of these advances should be tested in well-designed clinical studies, with histological validation where possible.

    • Radiotherapy planning

      2015, PET Clinics
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Conflict of interest: none.

    View full text