A phenomenological form of the q2 parameter in the Gurson model
Introduction
Micro-mechanical modeling of material damage helps to overcome some of the inherent limitations of conventional fracture mechanics. A number of models exist within the framework of micro-mechanical modeling, which address various phenomena of material behavior during material damage ranging from ductile to cleavage fracture. Ductile rupture follows the nucleation, growth and coalescence of micro-voids with significant plastic deformation. This consumes much more energy due to plastic deformation. Modeling is done using two independent methodologies. The model of Rice and Tracey [1] for ductile crack initiation is based on a critical cavity growth. This is calculated by using stresses and strains surrounding the crack tip obtained from a conventional elastic–plastic finite element analysis. Many authors used a similar concept by using different damage potentials to characterize crack initiation [2], [3], [4], [5]. An effort has been made in [5], [6] to overcome mesh dependency of such models by using a modified form of the Rice and Tracey integral.
On the other hand, the “coupled” constitutive models of Gurson [7] and Rousselier [8] affect the yield behavior. Specific material subroutines are required to perform FE analysis. In order to account for the effects of void nucleation and coalescence, and to obtain better agreement between the experimental results and numerical simulations, the original Gurson model was modified and extended into a semi-phenomenological form by Needleman and Tvergaard [9]. The material input parameters of the micro-mechanical models should be obtainable from metallurgical observations. However, the determination of damage parameters is still predominantly a phenomenological fitting procedure and is done by combining test results and numerical simulations. An international numerical round robin exercise on micro-mechanical modeling was conducted by the European Structural Integrity Society (ESIS), Phase-II, Task-A [10]. A number of participants (including the present authors) made efforts to come up with an appropriate combination of damage parameters for 22NiMoCr37 material, which can compute the complete J-R curve. The damage parameters adjusted for this purpose are f0, fn, fc and element size. The conclusions drawn through this international exercise have been summarized in [11], which concludes that “no generally accepted recommendations are available for the choice of q parameters or the parameters specifying the void nucleation. It is not even clear, if an optimized parameter set is unique and transferable to all other geometries”.
As an extension to this work, the present authors continued the investigations to ascertain Gurson material parameters for SA333 Gr.6 material used in the primary heat transport (PHT) piping system of Indian nuclear reactors. The results obtained from such a study and a suggestion to introduce an extra constant in the q2 parameter of the Gurson model to facilitate the agreement between computed and experimental results are shown below.
Section snippets
A brief theoretical background of the Gurson material constitutive model
A short review of the Gurson-based material constitutive model is presented here, which will be referred to subsequently in the present paper. Based on the work of Berg [12] (which shows that a porous medium is governed by the normality rule), Gurson [6] derived a constitutive model “φ” for materials containing either cylindrical or spherical voids.
Here is the macroscopic effective stress, sij represents the stress deviator
Characterization of SA333 Gr.6 carbon steel material
The SA333 Gr.6 carbon steel material is used as the piping material for the PHT system of Indian pressurized heavy water reactors. Therefore, material characterization is mandatory for demonstrating integrity of piping systems under all possible scenarios [14] and to qualify the system for leak-before-break. Table 1 shows the chemical composition and Table 2 shows the metallography data of this material.
Tensile tests were conducted on three tensile specimens. The tests were performed using a
Analysis of a TPB specimen using the Gurson constitutive model
A European numerical round robin was carried out to simulate tearing of ferritic steel using constitutive equations for ductile damage. The results of this exercise are reported in [10], [11], [15], [16]. The present authors participated in the exercise using their in-house damage mechanics code MADAM [17]. Following the procedure of the round robin exercise, analyses have been carried out on a TPB specimen to ascertain Gurson parameters for SA333 Gr.6 material.
Analysis of CT specimen of SA333 Gr.6 material using the present modification
A CT specimen has been analyzed to verify the above damage parameters along with the new form of q2. The experimental load–displacement and J-R curves are available in [14]. The salient dimensions of this specimen are shown in Fig. 6. The same figure also shows the finite element mesh used in this analysis. The size of the elements along the crack line is taken as twice the characteristic length lc. This ensures the average distance between the two Gauss points as lc. The analysis has been
Analysis of CT specimen of 22NiMoCr37 material
To check the suitability of the present modification in Gurson parameter q2, another analysis has been carried out on a CT specimen made of 22NiMoCr37 material. The load–displacement and J-R curves of this 1T-CT specimen were provided to all the participants of the ESIS international bench mark study [10]. The dimensional details of this specimen are shown in Fig. 16. The finite element mesh used for this purpose is the same as shown in Fig. 16. The Gurson parameters used are shown in Table 4.
Test specimens
An experimental database has been generated over the years in the present organization by testing a number of reactor-grade piping components with flaws. The details of these experiments are available in [18], [19]. Test specimens consist of straight pipes and elbows made of SA333 Gr.6 carbon steel material with through-wall circumferential cracks. These pipe specimens are subjected to four-point bending load: in the case of straight pipes and closing bending moment in the case of elbows. The
Conclusions
The following conclusions may be drawn from the present study:
- 1.
Difficulty is encountered while computing J-initiation and J-R curves of fracture specimens using the Gurson model in agreement with the experimental data.
- 2.
Such an anomaly may be due to the requirement of much smaller elements (in comparison to the element size based on characteristic length “lc”) near the crack tip to model the sharp stress gradient.
- 3.
A new phenomenological form of the q2 parameter is suggested, which helps the
References (19)
- et al.
On the ductile enlargement of voids in triaxial stress fields
J Mech Phys Solids
(1969) - et al.
- et al.
A modified damage potential to predict crack initiation: theory and experimental verification
Eng Fract Mech
(2004) - et al.
Application of a modified damage potential to predict ductile crack initiation in welded pipes
Int J Press Vessels Piping
(2005) Ductile fracture models and their potential in local approach of fracture
Nucl Eng Des
(1987)- et al.
An analysis of ductile rupture in notched bars
J Mech Phys Solids
(1984) - et al.
Analysis of the cup–cone fracture in a round tensile bar
Acta Metall
(1984) - et al.
Experimental and analytical study of three point bend specimens and through-wall circumferentially cracked straight pipe
Int J Press Vessels Piping
(2000) - et al.
Load bearing capacity of flawed piping components—comparison of experiment with calculation
Int J Press Vessels Piping
(2004)
Cited by (29)
Micromechanical modelling of API X80 linepipe steel
2022, International Journal of Pressure Vessels and PipingFracture Modeling Of Cracked Pipe Under Monotonic And Cyclic Loading
2020, International Journal of Mechanical SciencesCitation Excerpt :For instance, Ruggieri et al. [10] performed crack growth simulation of the crack behavior of the external surface-cracked pipe under internal pressure condition. Dutta et al. [11] simulated the pipe fracture behavior of the straight and elbow with a through-wall crack under bending. They focused on predicting fracture toughness or ductile tearing in the pipe under monotonic loading condition using a damage model.
Ductile tearing simulation of STS410 pipe fracture test under load-controlled large-amplitude cyclic loading: Part I—Effect of load ratio
2020, Engineering Fracture MechanicsHybrid approach for calculation of J-R curve using R6
2019, Engineering Fracture MechanicsDuctile fracture behavior of ECAP deformed AZ61 magnesium alloy based on response surface methodology and finite element simulation
2019, Materials Science and Engineering: ADetermination of J-initiation toughness using pre-cracked small punch test specimens
2019, Procedia Structural Integrity