Case Study
Osteomyelitis variolosa: A probable mediaeval case combined with unilateral sacroiliitis

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpp.2013.05.008Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Few osteoarticular sequelae of smallpox are described in paleopathological literature.

  • Our case represents a late stage of the disease affecting the elbows.

  • Well preserved bones supply osteologists with useful pathological data.

  • Our mediaeval case is the oldest known.

  • It holds great interest for paleoepidemiology.

Abstract

Osteoarticular sequelae of smallpox (osteomyelitis variolosa) are uncommon today. Such lesions may be observed occasionally, however, in countries where the disease has been endemic. Without other forms of documentation, it is possible to suggest a diagnosis of smallpox in ancient skeletal remains and thus make a significant contribution to understanding the history of this disease. We have examined a subadult male (Skeleton 833), 15–17 years old at the time of death, who presents bilateral bone manifestations of the elbows suggestive of smallpox. No other bone is similarly affected. In addition, he presents a left sacroiliitis deemed to be a brucellar manifestation. Skeleton 833 is one of at least 730 individuals from an exhaustive excavation of a mediaeval necropolis at Pont-sur-Seine (Aube, north-eastern France). Radiocarbon dating of his bones yields a date of between AD 1022 and 1155 (calibrated), thus apparently the oldest case described to date. The other published cases correspond to more recent periods with a well established historical context. We argue that this example of osteomyelitis variolosa.

Introduction

Smallpox is a disease no longer taught in medical schools. Last diagnosed in Somalia during 1977, declared eradicated by the World Health Organization on 8 May 1980, and sometimes considered a potential biological weapon (Geddes, 2006), this deadly infectious epidemic disease is unique to humans and leaves rare osteoarticular sequelae attesting to its presence in clinically diagnosed individuals. Such recent orthopaedic curiosities are still published, most often after fortuitous discovery or fracture of fragile bone (Nema et al., 2012). Such recent cases supplement research conducted during epidemics in Africa (Cockshott and MacGregor, 1958, Cockshott and MacGregor, 1959, Davidson and Palmer, 1963, Eeckels et al., 1964). Paleopathologists may use such knowledge in studies of the rare archaeological cases of smallpox; we found only three references to this diagnosis in archaeological materials, all published since the disease was eradicated (Jackes, 1983, Ortner, 2003, Ortner, 2007, Powers and Walker, 2008). It is likely that other paleopathological cases have gone unnoticed. This is why we present a skeleton with several lesions suggesting late-stage smallpox.

Section snippets

Materials and methods

The subject described here is one of at least 730 individuals from an exhaustive excavation of an early mediaeval necropolis at Pont-sur-Seine (Aube, north-eastern France). This necropolis, along the ancient Roman road between Troyes and Paris, has been dated from the end of the 5th century to the later mediaeval period (possibly extending to the 10–12th centuries, concurrent with a settlement located a few hundred metres to the north). Skeleton 833, radiocarbon dated using 41 g of ribs with

Pathological assessment

Skeleton 833 was a subadult male, 15–17 years old at the time of death. Both elbows were severely affected. The proximal epiphysis of the right humerus is not fused to the diaphysis, and the enthesis of the right M. pectoralis major is very pronounced across 35 mm of its length. The distal metaphysis is broadened, with bony ankylosis of the humeroulnar joint and 115° flexion of the elbow (Fig. 1, Fig. 2, Fig. 3). There is hypertrophy of the recently fused lateral epicondyle, which extends 1.5 cm

Discussion

Reported for the first time by Bidder in 1873, osteoarticular lesions due to smallpox were included in disease classifications at the end of the 19th century, but they never became part of the diagnostic features of smallpox due to their rarity and their low visibility in smallpox-related deaths. A review of the literature was undertaken by Cockshott and MacGregor, 1958, Cockshott and MacGregor, 1959. They reported 15 new cases, plus five additional cases, during the major smallpox epidemic of

Conclusion

Given the impact of smallpox on human populations and despite the rarity of its manifestation in bone with sequelae, paleopathologists should be attentive to this diagnosis. Our case corresponds to the period when the disease began spreading throughout Western Europe and provides the oldest osteological evidence reported to date.

References (35)

  • J. Bruzek

    A method for visual determination of sex, using the human bone

    American Journal of Physical Anthropology

    (2002)
  • M. Chakroun et al.

    Brucellosis: a topical zoonosis

    Revue Tunisienne d’Infectiologie

    (2007)
  • P. Cockshott et al.

    Osteomyelitis variolosa

    Quarterly Journal of Medicine

    (1958)
  • J.C. Davidson et al.

    Osteomyelitis variolosa

    Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery

    (1963)
  • R. D’Anastasio et al.

    Origin, evolution and paleoepidemiology of brucellosis

    Epidemiology & Infection

    (2011)
  • M. Doita et al.

    Acute pyogenic sacroiliitis without predisposing conditions

    Spine

    (2003)
  • R. Eeckels et al.

    Bone lesions due to smallpox

    Archives of Disease in Childhood

    (1964)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text