Audiologic testing in children with Down Syndrome: Are current guidelines optimal?

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2020.110017Get rights and content

Abstract

Introduction

Down Syndrome (DS) is a Tier 1 risk factor for hearing loss. Guidelines exist to ensure close monitoring of children with DS for hearing loss. It is important to consider the timing of testing in order to obtain meaningful audiologic data in this high-risk population. The purpose of this study is to present hearing outcomes for children with DS during the first 8 years of life and to assess these outcomes in the context of current screening guidelines.

Methods

Retrospective review of audiometric outcomes was conducted for children with DS age 8 or younger who presented to a multidisciplinary DS clinic between January 2014 to June 2017. Age at the time of testing, as well as test success rate and hearing loss type and severity were noted.

Results

131 patients were included in the study, 52% of which were male. 36% of the patients failed their newborn hearing screening and only 9% of those subjects had normal hearing on subsequent testing. Most hearing loss identified was mild and conductive in nature. Inconclusive results were most likely to be obtained at 6–10 months of age.

Conclusion

Hearing loss is common among children with DS. To optimize the quality of testing and avoid the need for sedation in followup testing, routine follow-up hearing screening should be performed either before 6 months of age or after 10 months of age.

Introduction

Down Syndrome (DS) is the most common chromosomal disorder and the leading cause of intellectual disability in the United States [1]. 1 in every 700 babies are born with DS resulting in a US incidence of about 6000 babies each year [2]. DS is characterized by developmental delay, characteristic facial features, and hypotonia. Other medical disorders, such as congenital heart defects, leukemia, obstructive sleep apnea, gastrointestinal issues, vision problems and hearing loss, are present in a smaller subset of patients with DS [3].

The incidence of hearing loss in children with DS is much higher compared to the general population, and DS is considered a Tier 1 risk factor for hearing loss [4]. According to the CDC, up to 75% of DS children are affected by hearing loss [2]. Hearing loss is well known to impact speech and language development in children, and can be especially detrimental to children with DS who are already at risk for speech and language delay. Children with DS are more likely to have narrow ear canals, Eustachian tube dysfunction, and chronic otitis media, thereby increasing their risk of conductive hearing loss [5].

To identify congenital hearing loss, all states have implemented a newborn hearing screening program and approximately 95% of infants are screened before hospital discharge [6]. In 2001, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) recommended that all children with DS be screened for hearing loss at birth or by 3 months of age. The AAP also suggested that these infants be tested every 2 months for the first 6 months of life, then again at 9 and 12 months of age using either subjective or objective testing methods [7]. These recommendations were updated in 2011, removing the recommendation for testing every 2 months until age 6 months and instead recommending that children with DS who pass their newborn hearing screening have an audiology evaluation at 6 months of age [8].

Given the challenging nature of performing hearing testing in young infants and children, it is important to consider the time of testing, especially for this vulnerable population. There are two primary methods utilized to screen newborns for hearing loss. Auditory brainstem response (ABR) testing can detect sensorineural hearing loss using electrodes placed on the scalp while the patient is asleep or sedated [9]. To avoid exposing infants to sedation, most guidelines recommend that patients undergo ABR testing before 6 months of age, as it is typically easier for young babies to tolerate the test under natural sleep conditions [10]. Another method to evaluate hearing loss is evoked otoacoustic emissions (OAE) which can detect hearing loss caused by abnormalities of the inner or middle ear. However, unlike an ABR, OAE cannot detect certain neural abnormalities that can cause hearing loss [11]. Once children are 9 months or older, behavioral testing, such as visual reinforcement audiometry (VRA) and conditioned play audiometry (CPA), becomes feasible as a method to obtain audiometric data [11].

Because children with DS are at an increased risk for hearing loss, they should be monitored closely in order to identify any hearing loss as early as possible to optimize speech and language outcomes. It is important to consider the time of testing in order to obtain meaningful results while also reducing patient exposure to sedation or anesthesia. The purpose of this study is to present our experience with hearing testing in children with DS that underwent routine testing at a multidisciplinary DS clinic and to assess whether the existing AAP guidelines for hearing testing are optimal for successful testing and diagnosis of hearing loss in this population.

Section snippets

Materials and methods

This study was approved by the Massachusetts Eye and Ear Institutional Review Board. A retrospective review of audiometric outcomes was conducted for children with DS age 8 years or younger who presented to a multidisciplinary DS clinic at a tertiary care center between January 2014 and June 2017. Patients were included if they had DS and a minimum of one hearing evaluation performed at our institution. Patients were excluded if they did not have any hearing test results available. For each

Newborn hearing screening (NBHS)

There were 131 patients that met the inclusion criteria; 68 (52%) were male, 109 (83%) lived in a primarily English-speaking household, and 115 (88%) had clinical documentation of having a newborn hearing screening. Among the 115 patients who had NBHS data available, 74 (64%) passed their NBHS. Of those who did not pass, 12 referred for one ear (29%) and 29 referred for both ears (71%) on NBHS. Results are summarized in Table 1.

Subsequent ABR testing

Further audiologic testing was performed using ABR. Of the 74

Newborn hearing screening and ABR

Our cohort consisted of children presenting to a multidisciplinary DS clinic who had audiometric testing during the first few years of life. According to American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) guidelines, children with DS should have ABR or OAE at birth or by 3 months of age [8]. The majority (88%) of patients in our cohort had clinical documentation of having a NBHS. Because our institution serves many international families, some reported not having a NBHS in their native country. According to

Conclusion

Children with DS experience hearing loss at a substantially higher rate than the general population. Children with DS should have subsequent objective hearing testing after the NBHS regardless of initial testing results. Given the challenges of successfully testing children with DS between 6 and 10 months of age with any modality, the current AAP recommendation for hearing testing referral at 6 months of age should be reconsidered.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Declaration of competing interest

There are no conflict of interests.

References (20)

  • V. Manickam et al.

    Hearing loss in Down Syndrome revisited–15 years later

    Int. J. Pediatr. Otorhinolaryngol.

    (2016 Sep)
  • K.L. Kreicher et al.

    Characteristics and progression of hearing loss in children with Down Syndrome

    J. Pediatr.

    (2018 Feb)
  • S.L. Sherman et al.

    Epidemiology of Down syndrome

    Ment. Retard. Dev. Disabil. Res. Rev.

    (2007)
  • Data statistics on Down Syndrome. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

  • A. Perkins

    The lowdown on Down syndrome

    Nurs. Made Incred. Easy

    (2017)
  • Updates on newborn hearing screening and follow-up recommendation from the early hearing detection and intervention (EHDI) program. The Massachusetts chapter of the American Academy of pediatrics newsletter

  • E. Nightengale et al.

    Understanding hearing and hearing loss in children with Down Syndrome

    Am. J. Audiol.

    (2017)
  • Year 2007 position statement: principles and guidelines for early hearing detection and intervention programs

    Pediatrics

    (2007)
  • M. Feingold et al.

    Health supervision for children with Down syndrome

    Pediatrics

    (2001 Dec 1)
  • M.J. Bull

    Health supervision for children with Down syndrome

    Pediatrics

    (2011)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (2)

  • Otolaryngologic Disease in Down syndrome

    2022, Pediatric Clinics of North America
    Citation Excerpt :

    Recent studies have suggested that patients with DS may benefit from more frequent hearing evaluations even if they pass the newborn hearing screen. Given the high likelihood of developing middle ear effusions and conductive hearing loss, it has been suggested that it would be optimal to perform a natural sleep ABR by 3 months of age, even if the newborn hearing screen was normal.54 If this evaluation is abnormal, further testing under sedation can be performed.

This paper was presented as a poster at: American Society of Pediatric Otolaryngology 2018 Spring Meeting at COSM; 2018 Apr 18–22; National Harbor, MD.

View full text