Invited review
Navigating parasite webs and parasite flow: Emerging and re-emerging parasitic zoonoses of wildlife origin

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpara.2005.07.003Get rights and content

Abstract

Wildlife are now recognised as an important source of emerging human pathogens, including parasites. This paper discusses the linkages between wildlife, people, zoonotic parasites and the ecosystems in which they co-exist, revisits definitions for ‘emerging’ and ‘re-emerging’, and lists zoonotic parasites that can be acquired from wildlife including, for some, estimates of the associated global human health burdens. The paper also introduces the concepts of ‘parasite webs’ and ‘parasite flow’, provides a context for parasites, relative to other infectious agents, as causes of emerging human disease, and discusses drivers of disease emergence and re-emergence, especially changes in biodiversity and climate. Angiostrongylus cantonensis in the Caribbean and the southern United States, Baylisascaris procyonis in California and Georgia, Plasmodium knowlesi in Sarawak, Malaysia, Human African Trypanosomiasis, Sarcoptes scabiei in carnivores, and Cryptosporidium, Giardia and Toxoplasma in marine ecosystems are presented as examples of wildlife-derived zoonotic parasites of particular recent interest. An ecological approach to disease is promoted, as is a need for an increased profile for this approach in undergraduate and graduate education in the health sciences. Synergy among scientists and disciplines is identified as critical for the study of parasites and parasitic disease in wildlife populations. Recent advances in techniques for the investigation of parasite fauna of wildlife are presented and monitoring and surveillance systems for wildlife disease are discussed. Some of the limitations inherent in predictions for the emergence and re-emergence of infection and disease associated with zoonotic parasites of wildlife are identified. The importance of public awareness and public education in the prevention and control of emerging and re-emerging zoonotic infection and disease are emphasised. Finally, some thoughts for the future are presented.

Introduction

Historically, appreciation of the ubiquity and significance of links between infectious diseases in human and animal hosts developed slowly, and domestic animals were naturally the initial focus of interest as sources of zoonoses (Hardy, 2003). More recently, however, with ongoing discoveries of new infectious agents and diseases, it has become clear that free-ranging animals and birds are a major source of emerging human pathogens (Daszak et al., 2000).

Among the emerging and re-emerging infectious agents that people can acquire from wildlife, viruses and bacteria are the subject of intensive study because of their frequently severe clinical effects in people and because of the complexities of treatment and control. For parasites, other than major pathogens, including Trypanosoma, Leishmania and Cryptosporidium, there seems less global concern. This may be because while some of these parasites have high regional prevalence, their effects are less dramatic, with fewer sudden outbreaks involving substantial human mortality. Interestingly, of two recently published overviews of wildlife and emerging zoonoses, one included no parasites (Bengis et al., 2004), and the second mentioned only Echinococcus multilocularis (Kruse et al., 2004).

The aims of this paper are: (i) to discuss definitions of ‘emerging’ and ‘re-emerging’ as they apply to zoonotic parasites derived from wildlife; (ii) to identify parasites for which wildlife have been reported as sources of human infection; (iii) to review new information on interesting wildlife-derived emerging and re-emerging zoonoses not included elsewhere in this issue: and (iv) to review recent literature on fundamental themes for the associations between emerging and re-emerging zoonotic parasites, their human and wildlife hosts, and the ecosystems in which they co-exist.

Section snippets

Towards definitions for emerging and re-emerging

Persistent among the published definitions of ‘emerging infections’ is that from the 1992 US Institute of Medicine (IOM) report Emerging Infectious Diseases: Microbial Threats to Health in the United States, which states that they are: “those whose incidence in humans has increased within the past two decades or threatens to increase in the near future. Emergence may be due to the spread of a new agent, to the recognition of an infection that has been present in the population but has gone

Wildlife as sources of zoonotic parasites

For most of the emerging and re-emerging parasitic zoonoses reviewed in this issue, wildlife are known to be a potential source of human infection, and for some are among the more important sources (Table 1, Table 2, Table 3, Table 4). For example: cougars may have contributed to the 1994 water-borne outbreak of human toxoplasmosis in Victoria, BC (Bowie et al., 1997); wildlife are important reservoirs for human leishmaniasis (Jacobson et al., 2003) and for Trypanosoma cruzi (Rodrigues Coura et

Routes of zoonotic transmission: parasite webs and parasite flow

The presence of parasites in any ecosystem generates complex parasite webs within the system, and it is through these webs that zoonotic parasites move from wildlife to people (Fig. 1). Typically, each species of parasite has its own web, parts of which may be shared with other parasites, for example, multiple tick-transmitted pathogens infecting a host species within a geographic area. Some parasite webs include alternative transmission routes, and which of these is used in a particular

A global context

The landmark paper by Daszak et al. (2000) reviewed an array of emerging infectious diseases (EIDs) affecting people and discussed some of the mechanisms underlying emergence and the potential consequences of EIDs for human, domestic animal and wildlife health, and for biodiversity. Of the 18 EIDs identified, only three are parasitic: cryptosporidiosis, sarcoptic mange, and avian malaria. Of these only the first is considered a zoonosis of major importance, but the significance of wildlife

Drivers of emergence and re-emergence

In 2003 the IOM updated its 1992 report on emerging infectious diseases, and included 13 ‘factors in emergence’: microbial adaptation and change; human vulnerability; climate and weather; changing ecosystems; economic development and land use; human demographics and behaviour; technology and industry; international travel and commerce; breakdown of public health measures; poverty and social inequality; war and famine; lack of political will; and intent to harm (Lederberg and Morgan, 2003).

Biodiversity

A knowledge of the phylogeny of hosts and parasites, and of the history of the biodiversity of an ecosystem, can provide important clues to understanding the emergence and re-emergence of parasites and other pathogens (Brooks and Hoberg, 2000). Emerging and re-emerging infectious diseases are commonly viewed as threats to biodiversity because of their potentially erosive effects on host populations, with the risk of extirpation or extinction of host species (Daszak et al., 2000). This concern

Climate change

The scenarios proposed for global climate change, including extreme weather events, strongly suggest impacts on infectious disease, including those associated with zoonotic parasites, although the nature and magnitude of these effects will depend on the nature of the change, the parasites involved, and the region (Fayer, 2000, Patz et al., 2000, Dobson et al., 2003, Sutherst, 2001, Sutherst, 2004). Climate change may alter hosts—including vectors, as well as parasites, vegetation, abiotic

Some recent examples of emergence and re-emergence

This issue of the International Journal for Parasitology contains detailed updates for most of the major emerging zoonotic parasites transmissible from wildlife. What follows is an overview of recent reports of other such parasites that illustrate key features of emergence or re-emergence.

Disease ecology: an emerging or re-emerging science

The complexities of the relationships among infectious agents, including parasites, their human and animal hosts and the environment have renewed movement towards an all-encompassing approach to the study of infectious disease. Such an approach is sometimes referred to as disease ecology (Real, 1996), although a clear definition of this term remains elusive and it is sometimes used in a sense indistinguishable from disease epidemiology. Disease ecology is more, and implies consideration of all

Synergy for access and analysis

As already outlined, essential for success in an ecological approach to disease is synergy among key players, bringing together different perspectives and areas of expertise. This approach to the study of parasitic zoonoses in wildlife should include three special considerations. First, accessing wildlife for the collection of data and/or samples is often complex and expensive, particularly in remote areas. Other than in disease-crisis situations, biologists and others interested in the overall

Defining the parasite fauna of wildlife

Alongside the frequent difficulties in accessing wildlife, especially those that are remote or secretive, is the paucity of information regarding the host and geographic distributions of their zoonotic parasites, and the lack of validation of some of the diagnostic tests used for these infections in wildlife, particularly those based on serology. Fortunately, newer laboratory techniques show considerable promise in advancing monitoring and surveillance capabilities. For example: a coproantigen

Expect the unexpected, or the expected?

The discovery of E. multilocularis in Norway (Henttonen et al., 2001) is a good example of the surprises inherent in the study of zoonotic infectious disease in wildlife. In an analysis of the unexpected nature of emerging diseases in general, Stephen et al. (2004) applied descriptors for emerging phenomena in business: they are often unpredictable and counterintuitive; seemingly minor changes in the action of one component of the system can have profound effects on the whole system; and there

Monitoring and surveillance

Assessing the status of infectious agents, including parasites, in wildlife populations is a foundation of disease monitoring and, if subsequent intervention is planned, surveillance (Salman, 2003). Such assessments may be passive or active and retrospective or prospective. They require one or more points of assembly for wildlife disease data, on appropriate geographic scales, and ideally they should facilitate proactive detection and management of emerging and re-emerging infections and

Predictions of emergence and re-emergence

Among zoonoses transmitted from wildlife, the discovery rate of new parasites is currently low relative to new bacteria and viruses. Thus we have greater familiarity with the organisms. Despite this it is sometimes difficult to identify, in advance or with hindsight, the events leading to emergence or re-emergence of a wildlife-derived zoonotic parasite in a particular ecosystem. In some instances, an increase in the incidence of human infection or disease associated with a wildlife-derived

Public awareness

Public education can be very helpful for the prevention and control of human infections with many of the parasitic zoonoses acquired from wildlife. Usually efforts are focussed on making people aware of possible sources of the parasites and on measures to lessen or remove the risk of human infection. This type of awareness enhancement is more easily achieved in the developed world, but there are significant opportunities elsewhere. A pioneering example is the testing program for Trichinella in

Looking forward

While at present some emerging and re-emerging wildlife-derived zoonotic parasites and diseases are perhaps behind the forefront of societal concern, planning for the effective management of these diseases will result in benefits for global ecosystem integrity and for human health and well being. Identifying priorities for society's scientific resources at this complex intersection of people, domestic animals, wildlife and pathogens is difficult, but the following certainly merit attention: (i)

Acknowledgements

The development of this review benefited greatly from conversations with Dr Susan Kutz and Dr Emily Jenkins, Research Group for Arctic Parasitology, Dr Alvin Gajadhar, Head, Centre for Animal Parasitology, Canadian Food Inspection Agency, and especially with Dr Eric Hoberg, Chief Curator, US National Parasite Collection, United States Department of Agriculture.

References (103)

  • R.W. Sutherst

    The vulnerability of animal and human health to parasites under global change

    Int. J. Parasitol.

    (2001)
  • R.C.A. Thompson

    The zoonotic significance and molecular epidemiology of Giardia and giardiasis

    Vet. Parasitol.

    (2004)
  • N.J. White

    Sharing malaria

    Lancet

    (2004)
  • P.N. Acha et al.

    Zoonoses and Communicable Diseases Common to Man and Animals

    (2001)
  • K.O. Barrow et al.

    Eosinophilic meningitis: is Angiostrongylus cantonensis endemic in Jamaica?

    West Indian Med. J.

    (1996)
  • R.G. Bengis et al.

    The role of wildlife in emerging and re-emerging zoonoses

    Rev. Sci. Tech.

    (2004)
  • F. Berrilli et al.

    Ribosomal and mitochondrial DNA sequence variation in Sarcoptes mites from different hosts and geographical regions

    Parasitol. Res.

    (2002)
  • E. Bonabeau

    Predicting the unpredictable

    Harv. Bus. Rev.

    (2002)
  • S. Bornstein et al.

    Sarcoptes scabiei and sarcoptic mange

  • D.R. Brooks et al.

    Triage for the biosphere: the need and rationale for taxonomic inventories and phylogenetic studies of parasites

    Comp. Parasitol.

    (2000)
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

    Diagnosis and management of foodborne illnesses: a primer for physicians and other health care professionals

    MMWR

    (2004)
  • W. Chin et al.

    A naturally acquired quotidian malaria in man transferable to monkeys

    Science

    (1965)
  • J.P. Chretien et al.

    African trypanosomiasis: changing epidemiology and consequences

    Curr. Infect. Dis. Rep.

    (2005)
  • S. Cleaveland et al.

    Diseases of humans and their domestic mammals: pathogen characteristics, host range and the risk of emergence

    Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci.

    (2001)
  • D.W.T. Crompton

    How much human helminthiasis is there in the world?

    J. Parasitol.

    (1999)
  • J.H. Cross

    Angiostrongylosis

  • P. Daszak et al.

    Emerging infectious diseases of wildlife—threats to biodiversity and human health

    Science

    (2000)
  • P. Daszak et al.

    Conservation medicine and a new agenda for emerging diseases

    Ann. NY Acad. Sci.

    (2004)
  • P. Desjeux et al.

    Leishmania/HIV co-infections: epidemiology in Europe

    Ann. Trop. Med. Parasitol.

    (2002)
  • A. Dobson

    Population dynamics of pathogens with multiple host species

    Am. Nat.

    (2004)
  • A. Dobson et al.

    Pathogens and parasites in a changing climate

  • M.L. Eberhard et al.

    Baylisascaris procyonis in the metropolitan Atlanta area

    Emerg. Infect. Dis.

    (2003)
  • J. Eckert et al.

    Biological, epidemiological, and clinical aspects of echinococcosis, a zoonosis of increasing concern

    Clin. Microbiol. Rev.

    (2004)
  • R. Fayer

    Global change and emerging infectious disease

    J. Parasitol.

    (2000)
  • R. Fayer et al.

    Zoonotic protozoa: from land to sea

    Trends Parasitol.

    (2004)
  • J.K. Frenkel et al.

    An apparent role of dogs in the transmission of Toxoplasma gondii

    Ann. NY Acad. Sci.

    (1996)
  • A. Hardy

    Animals, disease, and man

    Perspect. Biol. Med.

    (2003)
  • S.I. Hay et al.

    Climate change and the resurgence of malaria in the East African highlands

    Nature

    (2002)
  • H. Henttonen et al.

    Echinococcus multilocularis on Svalbard: introduction of an intermediate host has enabled the local life-cycle

    Parasitology

    (2001)
  • E.P. Hoberg

    Foundations for an integrative parasitology: collections, archives and biodiversity informatics

    Comp. Parasitol.

    (2002)
  • J. Howard

    Challenges facing the adoption of ecosystem health as a core component in professional curricula

    EcoHealth

    (2004)
  • R.L. Jacobson et al.

    Outbreak of cutaneous leishmaniasis in northern Israel

    J. Infect. Dis.

    (2003)
  • T. Jelinek et al.

    Cluster of African trypanosomiasis in travelers to Tanzanian national parks

    Emerg. Infect. Dis.

    (2002)
  • Jenkins, E.J., Appleyard, G.D., Hoberg, E.P., Rosenthal, B.M., Kutz, S.J., Veitch, A.M., Schwantje, H.M., Elkin, B.T.,...
  • S. Jongwutiwes et al.

    Naturally acquired Plasmodium knowlesi malaria in human, Thailand

    Emerg. Infect. Dis.

    (2004)
  • H. Kassa et al.

    Cryptosporidiosis: a brief literature review and update regarding Cryptosporidium in feces of Canada Geese (Branta Canadensis)

    J. Environ. Health

    (2004)
  • K.R. Kazacos

    Baylisascaris procyonis and related species

  • K.R. Kazacos et al.

    Baylisascaris larva migrans

    J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc.

    (1989)
  • D.Y. Kim et al.

    Parastrongylus (=Angiostrongylus) cantonensis now endemic in Louisiana wildlife

    J. Parasitol.

    (2002)
  • H. Krauss et al.

    Zoonoses: Infectious Diseases Transmissible from Animals to Humans

    (2003)
  • Cited by (91)

    • General Aspects of Helminths

      2022, Encyclopedia of Infection and Immunity
    • Zoonotic nematodes of wild carnivores

      2019, International Journal for Parasitology: Parasites and Wildlife
      Citation Excerpt :

      For a long time, zoonotic diseases transmitted to humans have primarily been attributed to livestock throughout food consumption with a few exceptions such as in the case of rabies and echinococcosis. In addition, the emergence or the re-emergence of zoonotic infections (e.g., West Nile Virus) has emphasized the importance of wildlife in spreading new agents to humans (Polley, 2005). Since the industrial revolution in the mid 18th century, human activities and politics (e.g., industrialization, urbanization, fragmentation of the environment, land use) have consistently favoured at different extent and in almost all latitudes, the encroachment of urban areas upon wild environments.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text