Leading Clinical Paper
Cleft Lip and Palate
110 infants with unrepaired unilateral cleft lip: An anthropometric analysis of the lip and nasal deformities

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2010.04.007Get rights and content

Abstract

The aim of this retrospective study was to correlate the width of the cleft lip with the severity of the nasal deformity in unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) patients before primary lip repair. Preoperative impression casts were made. Measurements were taken of the width of the cleft lip (CW), nose (NW), and nasal floor (NFW), alar base height (ABH), columella length (CL), nasal length (NL) and nasal tip protrusion (NTP). The ratio of the non-cleft side (NFW) to the cleft side (NFWR), the ratio of the non-cleft side (ABH) to the cleft side (ABHR), and the ratio of the cleft side (CL) to the non-cleft side (CLR) were calculated. The average NW, NL and CW were higher in the group with complete clefts. There was a negative linear relationship between CW and NFWR, and a positive linear relationship between CW and ABHR in the complete group. In the incomplete group, negative correlations were obtained between CW and NFWR and between CW and ABHR. These findings show that there are correlations between CW and the transverse and vertical imbalance of nose in both groups but not between CW and anteroposterior imbalance of nose.

Section snippets

Patients and method

Infants with unilateral cleft lip, with and without involving the palate (UCL ± P) were retrospectively enrolled in this study. Plaster casts of the faces in 110 UCL ± P patients, taken preoperatively, were selected in date order of presentation for surgery in the authors’ department. The 110 UCL ± P patients underwent primary lip repair at ages from 6 months to 8 months between 2004 and 2006. Among the 110 cleft children, 69 were complete UCLP patients, and 41 were incomplete UCL ± P patients. The

Mean values and range of values

The mean values for NFWR, ABHR, CLR and NTP were smaller in the complete cleft group. The mean values of NW, NL and CW were greater in this group. These differences were statistically significant (NFWR: P = 0.000; ABHR = 0.001; CLR = 0.000; NTP = 0.004; NW = 0.000; NL = 0.004; CW = 0.000). Means and ranges of values for all parameters in complete and incomplete clefts are shown in Table 1.

In the incomplete group, three ABHRs exceed 100% and five CLRs exceed 100%. No ABHR or CLR in the complete group exceeds

Discussion

Using the measurements of nasal deformity to evaluate the unilateral cleft was clinically useful, as surgical correction of the cleft nose can be one of the most challenging and frustrating aspects of the cleft lip surgery. At the time of primary correction, the difficulty of the correction is partly determined by the degree to which the edges of the cleft lip can be approximated under minimal tension. The width of the cleft lip was thought to be important in determining the degree of severity.

Competing interests

None declared.

Funding

None.

Ethical approval

Not required.

References (20)

  • S.C. Aung et al.

    Evaluation of the laser scanner as a surface measuring tool and its accuracy as compared with direct facial anthropometric measurements

    Br J Plastic Surg

    (1995)
  • J. Whittle

    Preoperative anthropometric analysis of the cleft child's face: a comparison between groups

    Int J Surg

    (2004)
  • C.B. Cutting et al.

    A comparative study of the skin envelope of the unilateral cleft lip nose subsequent to rotation-advancement and triangular flap lip repair

    Plast Reconstr Surg

    (1989)
  • M. Duskova et al.

    The anthropometric verification of corrective surgery outcome in cleft secondary deformities

    J Craniofac Surg

    (2006)
  • H. Enemark et al.

    Lip and nose morphology in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate from four Scandinavia centers

    Scand J Plast Reconstr Hand Surg

    (1993)
  • L.G. Farkas

    Anthropometry of the head and face in medicine

    (1981)
  • L.G. Farkas et al.

    Morphology of adult face after repair of isolated cleft palate in childhood

    Cleft Palate J

    (1972)
  • L.G. Farkas et al.

    Nostril asymmetry: microform of cleft lip palate? An anthropometrical study of healthy North American Caucasians

    Cleft Palate J

    (1979)
  • L.G. Farkas et al.

    Anthropometric and anthroposcopic findings of the nasal and facial region in cleft patients before and after primary lip and palate repair

    Cleft palate Craniofac J

    (1993)
  • L.G. Farkas et al.

    Comparison of the morphology of the cleft face and the normal face-defining the anthropometric difference

    J Craniofac Surg

    (2000)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (11)

  • Three-dimensional analyses of nasolabial forms and upper lip surface symmetry after primary lip repair in patients with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate

    2019, Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery
    Citation Excerpt :

    Furthermore, those with lower values had more asymmetrical contour lines in the visualized surface image, and the surface form of the portion corresponding to the philtrum column of the cleft side appeared flatter than that of the non-cleft side. The 3D scanning system based on stereophotogrammetry used in this study has a short image capturing time and is suitable for taking images of infants and young children (Al-Omari et al., 2005; He et al., 2010; Nakamura et al., 2010; Tse et al., 2014; Liang et al., 2017). Vectra H1® is compact and easily handled, and is able to rapidly capture facial images in clinical settings without the need for sedation.

  • Three-dimensional facial anthropometry of unilateral cleft lip infants with a structured light scanning system

    2013, Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery
    Citation Excerpt :

    MRI often requires a long examination time and general anaesthesia. The fabrication of plaster cast models22,23 has been used for many years, but its production is always associated with the disadvantage of soft-tissue deformation caused by the impression materials24 and the risk of anaesthesia. Recently, 3D imaging systems have played an increasingly important role in the field of craniofacial anthropometry.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text