Environmentally conscious machining of difficult-to-machine materials with regard to cutting fluids

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2012.02.002Get rights and content

Abstract

Machining difficult-to-machine materials such as alloys used in aerospace, nuclear and medical industries are usually accompanied with low productivity, poor surface quality and short tool life. Despite the broad use of the term difficult-to-machine or hard-to-cut materials, the area of these types of materials and their properties are not clear yet. On the other hand, using cutting fluids is a common technique for improving machinability and has been acknowledged since early 20th. However, the environmental and health hazards associated with the use of conventional cutting fluids together with developing governmental regulations have resulted in increasing machining costs. The aim of this paper is to review and identify the materials known as difficult-to-machine and their properties. In addition, different cutting fluids are reviewed and major health and environmental concerns about their usage in material cutting industries are defined. Finally, advances in reducing and/or eliminating the use of conventional cutting fluids are reviewed and discussed.

Highlights

► A review of the issues and solutions for difficult-to-machine materials. ► Different types of coolants/lubricants are also reviewed and classified. ► The environmental and health issues of conventional cutting fluids are also studied. ► Advanced machining methods to remove or reduce the use of cutting fluids are identified. ► Studies related to dry, MQL, cryogenic and chilled air machining are reviewed.

Introduction

Material cutting also known as machining is one of the most used techniques for producing different components. In the machining processes a cutting tool removes material from a workpiece of a less resistant material. The removed material called chip or swarf slides on the tool face and leaves the workpiece material. As a result of this process the cutting tool would be subjected to high normal and shear stresses [1]. Fig. 1 shows a schematic view of a typical cutting operation also known as the single shear plane model. Although from the modelling point of view this model is a matter of debate and suffers from a lack of accuracy [2] it provides sufficient information required for this paper. As shown the chip formation is categorised into two zones, namely primary and secondary shear zones. In the primary shear zone, the material is being cut by elasto-plastic deformation. The majority of the energy used for cutting in this section is transformed into heat. At the secondary shear zone the produced chip slides on the rake face of the cutting tool resulting in high frictional force and heat. In addition to these zones, sliding of the tool flank face on the machined surface at the tertiary deformation zone generates friction and heat and could cause flank wear on the flank face [3], [4]. Furthermore friction and heat on the rake face could result in chipping and crater wear leading to tool failure.

Machining advanced engineering materials is usually associated with high machining costs and low productivity. This is due to the excessive generation of heat at the cutting zone and difficulties in heat dissipation due to relatively low heat conductivity of these materials. High material hardness and strength together with high temperatures at the cutting zone could result in excessive tool wear and thus short tool life and poor surface quality. Most components produced from advanced materials such as titanium and nickel based alloys have high buy-to-fly ratio as most of them are made to be used in aerospace, engine and gas turbine industries [5].

Section snippets

Difficult to machine material

Titanium and nickel based alloys are readily regarded as difficult-to-machine or hard-to-cut materials. Commonly, wider categories of materials defined as difficult-to-machine are super-alloys and refractory metals which consisted of titanium, nickel, steel, molybdenum, rhenium, tungsten, cobalt, tantalum, niobium, chromium, etc. alloys [6]. However, materials which are hard to machine are not limited to these alloys and also consist of structural ceramics, composites, polymers and magnesium

Coolants and lubricants (CLs)

Shaw [89] defines that one of the main issues that affects machinability is the heat generated during machining. Cutting fluids have been used in machining operations for decades in order to increase the machinability through lubricating the contact areas between rake face and chips, flank face and machined surface and reducing the friction induced heat and removing the generated heat from the cutting zone as a result of severe plastic deformation [1], [2].

Based on the first law of metal

Environmentally conscious machining

As mentioned previously using cutting fluids in the cutting operations becomes a major problem due to the associated economical, environmental and health problems. The best approach to eliminate the effects of cutting fluids is to eliminate their usage completely which is known as dry cutting [100]. However dry cutting is not applicable in all machining operations mainly due to excessive tool wear or low surface quality. In order to improve machinability a minimum quantity lubricant (MQL) could

Critique and research gaps

In this section the findings of the review of difficult-to-machine materials and their properties together with coolants commonly used in material cutting operations are critiqued. In addition, the problems associated with the use of conventional coolants and different techniques to reduce or eliminate the use of conventional cutting fluids in material cutting are discussed. Furthermore, the areas which require more study and investigation are identified.

Conclusions

In this paper materials which are generally known as difficult to machine have been reviewed and classified into three major categories namely, hard materials, ductile materials and non-homogeneous materials. Furthermore the material properties which make these types of materials difficult to machine have also been identified. In general, the materials which have one or more of the machining characteristics bulleted below, could be defined as difficult-to-machine, however these criterion need

References (154)

  • E. Ezugwu

    Key improvements in the machining of difficult-to-cut aerospace superalloys

    International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture

    (2005)
  • M. Alauddin et al.

    Optimization of surface finish in end milling Inconel 718

    Journal of Materials Processing Technology

    (1996)
  • Z.Y. Wang et al.

    Hybrid machining of Inconel 718

    International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture

    (2003)
  • M. Alauddin et al.

    Cutting forces in the end milling of Inconel 718

    Journal of Materials Processing Technology

    (1998)
  • Y. Liao et al.

    Behaviors of end milling Inconel 718 superalloy by cemented carbide tools

    Journal of Materials Processing Technology

    (2008)
  • B. Kaya et al.

    Force–torque based on-line tool wear estimation system for CNC milling of Inconel 718 using neural networks

    Advances in Engineering Software

    (2011)
  • A. Devillez et al.

    Cutting forces and wear in dry machining of Inconel 718 with coated carbide tools

    Wear

    (2007)
  • H. Krain et al.

    Optimisation of tool life and productivity when end milling Inconel 718TM

    Journal of Materials Processing Technology

    (2007)
  • A. Sharman et al.

    Tool life when high speed ball nose end milling Inconel 718 (TM)

    Journal of Materials Processing Technology

    (2001)
  • D. Dudzinski

    A review of developments towards dry and high speed machining of Inconel 718 alloy

    International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture

    (2004)
  • C.E. Leshock et al.

    Plasma enhanced machining of Inconel 718: modeling of workpiece temperature with plasma heating and experimental results

    International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture

    (2001)
  • S.Y. Hong et al.

    Improving low carbon steel chip breakability by cryogenic chip cooling

    International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture

    (1999)
  • M. Nalbant et al.

    Effect of cryogenic cooling in milling process of AISI 304 stainless steel

    Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China

    (2011)
  • J.L. Endrino et al.

    Hard AlTiN, AlCrN PVD coatings for machining of austenitic stainless steel

    Surface and Coatings Technology

    (2006)
  • I. Korkut et al.

    Determination of optimum cutting parameters during machining of AISI 304 austenitic stainless steel

    Materials & Design

    (2004)
  • J. Paro et al.

    Tool wear and machinability of HIPed P/M and conventional cast duplex stainless steels

    Wear

    (2001)
  • S. Dolinšek

    Work-hardening in the drilling of austenitic stainless steels

    Journal of Materials Processing Technology

    (2003)
  • J.D. Thiele et al.

    Effect of cutting edge geometry and workpiece hardness on surface generation in the finish hard turning of AISI 52100 steel

    Journal of Materials Processing Technology

    (1999)
  • J. Rech et al.

    Surface integrity in finish hard turning of case-hardened steels

    International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture

    (2003)
  • W. Grzesik et al.

    Wear phenomenon in the hard steel machining using ceramic tools

    Tribology International

    (2008)
  • C.C. Tsao et al.

    Taguchi analysis of delamination associated with various drill bits in drilling of composite material

    International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture

    (2004)
  • A. Koplev et al.

    The cutting process, chips, and cutting forces in machining CFRP

    Composites

    (1983)
  • D. Bhattacharyya et al.

    A study of hole drilling in Kevlar composites

    Composites Science and Technology

    (1998)
  • C. Lin et al.

    Machining and fluidity of 356Al/SiC (p) composites

    Journal of Materials Processing Technology

    (2001)
  • J.P. Davim

    Diamond tool performance in machining metal–matrix composites

    Journal of Materials Processing Technology

    (2002)
  • M. El-Gallab et al.

    Machining of Al/SiC particulate metal–matrix composites: Part I: Tool performance

    Journal of Materials Processing Technology

    (1998)
  • Z. Wang et al.

    Cryogenic PCBN turning of ceramic (Si3N4)

    Wear

    (1996)
  • H. Chen et al.

    Sliding wear map for the magnesium alloy Mg–9Al–0.9Zn (AZ91)

    Wear

    (2000)
  • F. Witte et al.

    In vivo corrosion of four magnesium alloys and the associated bone response

    Biomaterials

    (2005)
  • M.P. Staiger et al.

    Magnesium and its alloys as orthopedic biomaterials: a review

    Biomaterials

    (2006)
  • E. Gariboldi

    Drilling a magnesium alloy using PVD coated twist drills

    Journal of Materials Processing Technology

    (2003)
  • K. Weinert et al.

    Dry machining and minimum quantity lubrication

    CIRP Annals—Manufacturing Technology

    (2004)
  • Y. Song et al.

    Mirror finishing of Co–Cr–Mo alloy using elliptical vibration cutting

    Precision Engineering

    (2010)
  • H. Ohmori et al.

    Investigation on grinding characteristics and surface-modifying effects of biocompatible Co–Cr alloy

    CIRP Annals—Manufacturing Technology

    (2006)
  • S. Aykut et al.

    Modeling of cutting forces as function of cutting parameters for face milling of satellite 6 using an artificial neural network

    Journal of Materials Processing Technology

    (2007)
  • K. Kalyankumar et al.

    Investigation of tool wear and cutting force in cryogenic machining using design of experiments

    Journal of Materials Processing Technology

    (2008)
  • P. Sreejith et al.

    Dry machining: machining of the future

    Journal of Materials Processing Technology

    (2000)
  • S.Y. Hong et al.

    New cooling approach and tool life improvement in cryogenic machining of titanium alloy Ti–6Al–4V

    International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture

    (2001)
  • F.M. Kustas et al.

    Nanocoatings on cutting tools for dry machining

    CIRP Annals—Manufacturing Technology

    (1997)
  • D. Sarma et al.

    A comparison of dry and air-cooled turning of grey cast iron with mixed oxide ceramic tool

    Journal of Materials Processing Technology

    (2007)
  • Cited by (694)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text