A correction in the algorithm of fatigue life calculation based on the critical plane approach

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2015.10.011Get rights and content

Highlights

  • A correction in the algorithm for fatigue life calculation is presented.

  • Constants applied in multiaxial fatigue criteria become function of fatigue life.

  • Improvement of convergence in calculated and experimental fatigue lives is shown.

Abstract

The paper presents the algorithm for calculating the fatigue life taking into account the variability of coefficients occurring in the multiaxial fatigue criterion depending on the number of cycles to failure. The algorithm has been analysed under uniaxial cyclic loads and a combination of bending and torsion for four structural materials. Significant increase of convergence of calculated and experimental fatigue life using the new algorithm as compared to the classical approach for five selected multiaxial fatigue criteria based on a critical plane has been demonstrated.

Introduction

Fatigue defined as the degradation of mechanical properties of the material under loadings which vary in time is one of the main causes of the limited life time of machines and structures. This results in an increase in operating costs and is the reason for ongoing research on the complex phenomenon of fatigue failure. One research areas is the multiaxial fatigue criteria which aim at evaluating the fatigue degradation of the material at any load run. This evaluation is usually carried out by comparing the reduced complex state of stress to a scalar value equivalent to a uniaxial stress (the so-called fatigue limit). The proposed function for reducing the complex stress to a uniaxial state is an essential part of the multiaxial fatigue criterion. Among the many proposed functions, one can distinguish a group characterized by the assumption that the components of the stress associated with the plane of a certain orientation are responsible for the initiation of fatigue cracks. The orientation of the plane should coincide with the plane of the fatigue crack. This proposal, known as the critical plane concept, has gained great interest in the academia [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8]. Despite the considerable amount of literature and research on this concept, there is no proposal of a criterion accepted by the wider group of researchers and applying to different materials and loads.

The reduction functions proposed in the criteria are also used to calculate the fatigue life Ncal by comparing the equivalent value of stress σeq to stress σ(Nf) from the fatigue characteristics (e.g. Wöhler or Basquin), assuming that Ncal = Nf. Fatigue characteristics obtained during cyclic torsion σ(Nf) = τf(Nf), tension–compression, and bending σ(Nf) = σf(Nf) are the most commonly used. Correctly proposed reducing function applied to any case of a uniaxial load, for example torsion, tension–compression, or bending stresses, but with the same fatigue life, brings these stresses to the equivalent state, thusσeq(N,Torsion)=σeq(N,Bending)=σ(N=Nf).

Reducing functions based on the critical plane are usually linear or non-linear function of material parameters and shear τns, normal σn (in the critical plane), or hydrostatic σh stresses (invariant of the stress). Material parameters are determined in such a way that the stress reduction satisfies Eq. (1). Typically, the fatigue criteria in their original form are proposed to assess the limit state, that is, for the so-called fatigue limit. Simplifying the problem by adopting the theoretical fatigue limit (for steel) σaf corresponding to the number of cycles N = 2·106, that is, σ(Nf = 2·106) = σaf, Eq. (1) is reduced toσeq(Torsion)=σeq(Bending)=σaf.

Therefore, the material parameters are relations of fatigue limits from uniaxial stress states. Applying the proposed reduction function to the fatigue life other than the limiting one requires looking for material parameters which satisfy Eq. (1). Unfortunately, the fatigue criteria, or rather the reducing functions used to calculate the so-called reduced fatigue life (N < 2·106 for steel) are usually assumed with coefficients which are the functions of fatigue limits [9], [10], [11], [12], [13]. This approach is valid only for a certain class of materials, for whichσf(Nf)τf(Nf)=const,that is for materials with parallel fatigue characteristics. This fact was noted in several papers including [14], [15], [16].

The aim of this paper is to propose an algorithm for determining the fatigue life by using generally known fatigue criteria, taking into account the correct determination of material parameters which are a function of the number of cycles to failure. Validation of the proposed algorithm is performed using stress based criteria applicable in the high cyclic fatigue regime. However, the main idea of correction could be implemented also in strain or energy based criteria.

Section snippets

Stanfield (1935), Stullen-Cummings (1954), Findley (1959) criterion: C1

Stanfield [17] was the first to propose the calculation of the critical shearing stress value τc (fatigue strength, limiting value for failure) for a multiaxial stress state based on a linear combination of the shear τns and normal σn stresses in the plane of the material at a certain orientationτc=maxn{τns,a+kσn,a},where k is a material constant. According to Stanfield, τc is calculated in a plane (with normal n) on which a linear combination of (4) is at the maximum. Stanfield has not

Generalization of the analysed criteria for a limited number of cycles to failure

The application of fatigue criteria for estimating the fatigue life is based on calculations of the equivalent stress value σeq and comparing it to the accepted material fatigue characteristics f(Nf). This study analyses time-varying loads, but with component variables of the stress which are proportionally relative to each other without the mean value. Accordingly, the equivalent stress can be represented as function of stress amplitudes. The generalized equation which enables to calculate the

Corrected algorithm for calculating the fatigue life under proportional loads

The algorithm for calculating the number of cycles to failure Ncal for proportional loads, which takes into account the variability of the coefficients a and b (according to Table 1) depending on the number of cycles N is shown in Fig. 1a. In order to exhibit the change in algorithm the classical version is presented in Fig. 1b.

In the first step, the stress amplitudes σij,a are loaded for the global coordinate system Oxyz and material constants defining two fatigue characteristics: σf(Nf) and τf

Experimental data

The proposed algorithm has been verified based on experimental data taken from literature, which relate to four materials, i.e. S355J2WP steel [26] (according to PN: 10HNAP), S355J2G3 steel [26], [27] (according to PN: 18G2A), 30CrNiMo8 steel [28], [29] and 2017A-T4 aluminium alloy [30], [31], [32]. All experimental data apply to specimens subjected to: (i) uniaxial cyclic plane bending, (ii) uniaxial cyclic torsion, (iii) proportional cyclic bending and torsion. Only waveforms with a zero mean

Parameters for criteria evaluation

The evaluation of the effectiveness of criteria for multiaxial fatigue of materials for a limited number of cycles to failure typically involves the comparison of the calculated strength Ncal with the experimental one Nexp on a log–log diagram [36], [37], [38], [39], [40], [41] with the additionally calculated parameters of the scatter of results [9], [33], [41]. In order to evaluate the performance of the proposed algorithm, the original function Pr(T) has been proposed along with the

Evaluation of the convergence of the proposed algorithm

The convergence of the proposed algorithm (Fig. 1) has been examined by analysing the waveforms of the objective function (19) by iteratively changing the number of cycles N for uniaxial loads and load combinations. The calculation results shown in Fig. 2 demonstrate the existence of a local minimum of the function Er(N) for all analysed reducing functions (criteria) and all types of applied loads. The occurrence of a local minimum with the value of Er = 0 guarantees the convergence of the

Results and discussion

The number of cycles to failure Ncal has been calculated using two algorithms which, for the clarity of presentation, are designated as: NA – new algorithm proposed in this paper, which takes into account the variability of coefficients a(N), b(N) (Table 1) depending on the number of cycles N; CA – the classical algorithm, wherein the a and b coefficients are constants corresponding to the theoretical fatigue limit, i.e. for N = 2·106 cycles for steel and N = 107 cycles for aluminium alloy. Fig. 3,

Conclusions

We can draw the following conclusions based on the foregoing analyses:

  • 1.

    The proposed algorithm for calculating the fatigue life, which takes into account the variability of the coefficients existing in fatigue criteria depending on the number of cycles is convergent in the analysed areas of proportional cyclic loads.

  • 2.

    A good consistency of experimental and calculated fatigue life has been obtained using the new algorithm for three analysed materials, i.e. S355J2WP and S355J2G3 steel, and 2017A-T4

References (41)

Cited by (47)

  • Fracture surface topography investigation and fatigue life assessment of notched austenitic steel specimens

    2022, Engineering Failure Analysis
    Citation Excerpt :

    Based on the material sensitivity coefficient, various theories and methods have been developed [15–17]. In addition, various models have been created to account for the loading history [18]. The influence of corrosion as well as the technological treatments of the material are also important factors in design [19–21].

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text