A new hybrid simulation integrating transient-state and steady-state models for the analysis of reversible DC traction power systems
Introduction
In a Traction Power Supply System (TPSS), several traction substations are powered by one or two main substations through three-phase medium voltage distribution networks (MVDN). The traction substations include transformers, diode rectifiers and switchgears. The merits of traditional TPSS are simplicity, robustness and low-cost. However, some obvious drawbacks exist:
- •
waste of regenerative braking energy. Especially when a small number of trains travel on the line, the regenerative braking energy cannot be reused within the DC network. It is usually dissipated by on-board braking resistors, causing temperature rise in tunnels and at the stations.
- •
fluctuation of DC voltage. Because of the unregulated characteristic of diode rectifiers, the output voltage has large fluctuations with variable loads.
- •
low power factor problem at AC grid interface. Studies indicate that it is usually caused by the equivalent capacitance of large amount of grid cables [1], [2].
Some solutions have been proposed to overcome the above-mentioned drawbacks. In [3], [4], [5], thyristor-based inverters are introduced to feed the regenerative braking energy back to the MVDN. With the development of power semiconductors and converter control technology, IGBT inverters have been increasingly employed in TPSSs [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], which allows not only energy recovery, but also active power filtering [13], [14], [15], [16]. Traction substations with IGBT inverters are called inverting substations or reversible substations. In order to reduce the voltage fluctuation of the DC network and improve the energy efficiency, the conventional diode rectifier is replaced by the controlled rectifiers in [8], [9], [17]. The installation of storage devices (such as super-capacitors or flywheels) [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25] at substations or tracksides could be a good way to absorb the surplus regenerated energy and regulate DC voltage. However, compared with inverters, storage devices require more installation space, higher cost, and more safety constraints [17]. To improve power factor under light load condition, the traditional schemes based on Static Var Compensator (SVC) and Static Var Generator (SVG) are usually adopted in the TPSS [1], [2], [26], [27], [28]. The total capacity of SVGs in a typical line is normally several MVars.
The above solutions lead to an increase of equipment cost, system complications and increase of maintenance cost. Considering the excellent characteristics and fast development of Four-Quadrant Converters (4QC) [29], [30], a reversible traction power supply system (RTPSS) equipped with pure high-power 4QC is recommended in this paper.
A simulation approach is indispensable to study and assess the performance of the RTPSS. According to the time duration and objectives of the simulations, three categories of models can be considered for the study of RTPSS: multi-train motion model, steady-state model (average static model) and transient-state model (instantaneous dynamic model) [31], [32]. Multi-train motion simulation is used to model train movement and traction power requirements [33]. Trains require different traction power while they travel along the power supply network. Kinetic train motion, track alignment, and operation timetable are usually considered in formulating the multi-train operation simulations [34]. Based on the steady-state mathematical model and iterative calculations, the steady-state simulation can be used to analyze power flows [20], [35], [36], evaluate energy consumption [31], [32], [33] and design the power supply system [4], [37]. Steady-state simulations do not depend on specific software environment, and no control loops are required in the model. Moreover, the time step of steady-state simulations is relatively long, typically Ts = 1 s [38], [39], [40]. Steady-state simulations provide a global overview of the system during a whole day with short computational time [20]. Transient-state simulations study the control and dynamic performance during a shorter time step, typically 20 ms or less). Transient-state simulations, which are based on the electrical circuit model and closed-loop control, can be used instead to verify control algorithms, evaluate power quality, and analyze system stability. Transient-state simulations usually rely on the specific simulation software or tools, such as Simulink, Psim, and Pspice. Transient-state simulations are mainly used in equipment-level simulations [41], [42] or occasionally in short-circuit simulations [43].
In most previous studies, train motion simulation, steady-state simulation and transient-state simulation are carried out separately. The study of multi-train motion has not considered the capacity of TPSS. The study of steady-state power flow has not considered the response ability of the control loops and cannot provide information on instantaneous waveforms, harmonic content, ripple and so on. The study of the transient-state simulation usually focuses on limited devices during short time, which cannot be used to study the system performance. Therefore, the previous studies lead to inefficiency on the system study and performance evaluation. Firstly, it is time-consuming to build these three simulation models on different software environment and platforms. Secondly, it has not realized data interaction and sharing between different simulations. In this paper, a hybrid simulation method integrating steady-state and transient-state models is proposed to achieve a combination of train motion, steady-state and transient-state simulation. It can be used as an efficient tool for the study of the power supply system based on controllable converters and accomplish the verification and assessment of the system performance with consideration of multi-train operations.
This paper is structured as follows; the Section 2 introduces the system schematic and advantages of the RTPSS, as well as the topology of the reversible traction substation. In Section 3, the structure of the hybrid simulation system is proposed, and the modeling of train motion, steady-state and transient-state are illustrated. In Section 4, a case study is carried out to verify the function and validity of the proposed hybrid simulation method. The conclusions are presented in Section 5.
Section snippets
System schematic
A RTPSS normally employs controllable converters to achieve a flexible energy conversion. The topology of a typical RTSS is shown in Fig. 1. With 4QCs, the energy can be transmitted between AC and DC in both directions and the power factor is adjustable.
The advantages of the proposed system are demonstrated below:
- (1)
The regenerative braking energy of the trains can be inverted back to the AC grid for reusing, as shown in Fig. 2a. 4QCs work in the inverter mode. Thereby it can effectively reduce
Hybrid simulation scheme
The hybrid simulation method proposed in this paper is carried out on the software platform MATLAB, in order to combining the large-time scale of the steady-state simulation and the small-time scale of transient-state simulation. The steady-state simulation is implemented through M file in MATLAB, meanwhile the transient-state simulation is accomplished by Simulink in MATLAB.
Fig. 4 shows the simplified network topology of the RTPSS. Considering that the up and down rails are bound together
Case study
The objective of this section is to validate the function performance of the proposed hybrid simulation for a RTPPS.
Conclusion
In the paper, the RTPSS based on 4QC has been recommended as a comprehensive solution for DC railway to improve regenerative braking energy recovery, DC voltage regulation, reactive power compensation, and catenary deicing. In order to undertake a systematic study of the RTPSS, a novel hybrid simulation method integrating train motion, steady-state and transient-state model has been proposed. The structure and signal flow of the hybrid simulation system has been introduced and the methodology
Acknowledgments
The work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program [Grant NO. 2017YFB1200802]; and the Beijing Science and Technology project [Grant NO. Z171100002217025].
References (44)
- et al.
An assessment of available measures to reduce traction energy use in railway networks
Energy Convers Manage
(2015) - et al.
Sustainable urban rail systems: Strategies and technologies for optimal management of regenerative braking energy
Energy Convers Manage
(2013) - et al.
Review of application of energy storage devices in railway transportation
Energy Procedia
(2017) - et al.
Analysis of the demand charge in DC railway systems and reduction of its economic impact with Energy Storage Systems
Int J Electr Power Energy Syst
(2017) - et al.
An integrated metro operation optimization to minimize energy consumption
Transport Res Part C: Emerg Technol
(2017) - et al.
System energy optimisation strategies for metros with regeneration
Transport Res Part C: Emerg Technol
(2017) - Liu R, Liu W, Cui H, Zhang J, Liao J. Capacity optimization design of reactive compensation device in urban rail...
- et al.
Comparative study of effectiveness of different var compensation devices in large-scale power networks
J Central South Univ
(2013) DC power-supply system with inverting substations for traction systems using regenerative brakes
IEE Proc B - Electric Power Appl
(1982)- et al.
Simulation study of DC transit systems with inverting substations
IEE Proc B - Electric Power Appl
(1984)
Electric network solutions of DC transit systems with inverting substations
IEEE Trans Veh Technol
Braking energy recuperation
IEEE Veh Technol Mag
Energy Storage That May Be Too Good to Be True: Comparison Between Wayside Storage and Reversible Thyristor Controlled Rectifiers for Heavy Rail
IEEE Veh Technol Mag
Recent developments and applications of energy storage devices in electrified railways
IET Electr Syst Transp
Cited by (32)
Power flow modelling and loss analysis of urban rail traction power supply system considering cross-bonding cables
2024, Electric Power Systems ResearchA new distributed voltage control method for MVDC electric railway systems with renewable energy sources
2024, International Journal of Electrical Power and Energy SystemsComparison of regenerative braking energy recovery of a DC third rail system under various operating conditions
2024, International Journal of Electrical Power and Energy SystemsOptimal clustering-based operation of smart railway stations considering uncertainties of renewable energy sources and regenerative braking energies
2022, Electric Power Systems ResearchCitation Excerpt :Since trains are categorized as moving loads, the electrical parameters of the ERS's traction grid, such as the Y-bus impedance matrix, vary at each time interval [43]. Therefore, in order to simulate the power flow of the traction grid, the Y-bus admittance matrix must be updated due to the new topology of the traction grid at each time interval, which corresponds to the new position of trains [39]. In Fig. 2, the step-by-step procedure of modeling the trains’ motion has been shown.
Multi-stage optimization of the installation of Energy Storage Systems in railway electrical infrastructures with nature-inspired optimization algorithms
2021, Engineering Applications of Artificial IntelligenceCitation Excerpt :To enable this change of paradigm, urban rail networks must become more attractive and, above all, more efficient. Among the possible ways to enhance MTSs, the installation of improvements in the electrical infrastructure, specifically the installation of Reversible Substations (RSs) (González-Gil et al., 2013; Mellitt et al., 1984; Gelman, 2013; Ibaiondo and Romo, 2010; Zhang et al., 2019) and Energy Storage Systems (ESSs) (Gao et al., 2015; Lee et al., 2013; Iannuzzi et al., 2012; Roch-Dupré et al., 2017; Khodaparastan et al., 2019), are within the measures with the highest energy-saving potential. However, they require a high initial investment that, in some cases, may question their profitability.
Determining the optimum installation of energy storage systems in railway electrical infrastructures by means of swarm and evolutionary optimization algorithms
2021, International Journal of Electrical Power and Energy SystemsCitation Excerpt :For this reason, it can be necessary to increase the receptivity of the system (its capability to accept regenerated energy) by installing infrastructure improvements, the main ones being: Reversible Substations (RSSs): they allow bidirectional power flows (from the utility grid to the catenary and vice versa) so that the excess of regenerated energy may be used in the operator’s network or eventually sold back to the energy provider if the legislation allows it ([5–9]). Energy Storage Systems (ESSs): they store the excess of regenerated energy and give it back to the catenary when needed ([10–14]).