Comparative effectiveness of rivaroxaban versus a vitamin K antagonist in patients with renal impairment treated for non-valvular atrial fibrillation in Germany — A retrospective cohort study

Abstract

Background

The risk of thromboembolic events is increased in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) and renal impairment. The risk of bleeding events is increased if these patients are treated with anticoagulants and further increased in those with active cancer.

Methods

RELOAD, a retrospective database study, assessed the outcomes of patients with NVAF prescribed rivaroxaban versus phenprocoumon. Here, we present a subgroup analysis evaluating effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban versus phenprocoumon in patients with NVAF and renal impairment. Analyses were additionally stratified by patients with and without evidence of cancer at baseline.

Results

When using the ‘one tablet per day’ definition of estimating drug exposure time, the incidence of the primary endpoint of ischaemic stroke was significantly lower in patients (without evidence of cancer at baseline) receiving rivaroxaban 15 mg or 20 mg once daily versus those receiving phenprocoumon (2.40 vs 3.51 events per 100 patient-years, respectively; hazard ratio [HR] = 0.72, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.55–0.94, p = 0.015); with the incidence of the primary safety outcome of intracranial haemorrhage being numerically lower (0.57 vs 0.89 events per 100 patient-years, respectively; HR = 0.66, 95% CI 0.38–1.14, p = 0.14). Similar results were observed when using the ‘empirical defined daily dose’ definition to estimate drug exposure time and when including patients with evidence of cancer.

Conclusion

The prescription of rivaroxaban in patients with NVAF and renal impairment was associated with a lower incidence of ischaemic stroke and intracranial haemorrhage versus phenprocoumon in patients without evidence of cancer.