Review
Bacterial cellulose: A promising biopolymer with interesting properties and applications

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.08.056Get rights and content

Abstract

The ever-increasing demands for materials with desirable properties led to the development of materials that impose unfavorable influences on the environment and the ecosystem. Developing a low-cost, durable, and eco-friendly functional material with biological origins has become necessary to avoid these consequences. Bacterial cellulose generated by bacteria dispenses excellent structural and functional properties and satisfies these requirements. BC and BC-derived materials are essential in developing pure and environmentally safe functional materials. This review offers a detailed understanding of the biosynthesis of BC, properties, various functionalization methods, and applicability in biomedical, water treatment, food storage, energy conversion, and energy storage applications.

Introduction

Cellulose is one of the highly abundant biopolymers in nature and forms the principal structural component of green plants and wood, along with hemicellulose and lignin. The purest form of cellulose, called bacterial cellulose (BC), is produced by various species of Acetobacter, Rhizobia, Agrobacteria, and the gram-positive genus Sarcina through oxidative fermentation [1]. In 1886, Brown discovered that the bacterial species, Acetobacter xylinum or Gluconacetobacter xylinum produces a tough gelatinous film of pure cellulose. The bacterium was later known as ‘the vinegar plant’ since it forms the principal source of acetic acid [2]. The chemical structure of BC is the same as that of plant cellulose. It displays unusual physio-chemical properties like high crystallinity, better thermal and mechanical properties, excellent tensile properties, ultrafine fiber network, polyfunctionality, hydrophilicity, nontoxicity, transparency, and moldability [3]. These outstanding features of BC make it supreme for potential applications in biomedical, electronic, industrial, food, agricultural, etc. [4], [5], [6].

Hence BC gained ample attention due to these unique physicochemical properties. Many works have been published addressing various synthetic methods, their properties, and their applications in various constraints. A handful of reviews were published recently with discussions on their general characteristics, structure, production, or some of the specific applications [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13]. For instance, Shah et al. [14] had reviewed synthetic approaches for the BC composites elaborately. On the other hand, Gorgieva et al. [15] exclusively reviewed the microbial aspects suitable for the production of BC to be used explicitly in biomedical applications or as medical products. Along the same line, the manufacturing of BC fibers for the specific wound healing application was reviewed by Ahmed et al. [16] while He et al. reviewed various functionalization methods of BC material to be suitable as wound healing materials [17].

On the other hand, in this comprehensive review article, we assemble the prevailing knowledge in the evolution of BC, the biosynthetic pathways, synthetic methods, various modifications methods, and the applicability of BC in water treatment, biomedical, food/food storage, sensor devices, electroconductive materials etc. with critical discussions on the recent progress. Recent developments on general applications of bacterial cellulose with special reference to unique properties have been discussed in detail. Understanding the rationale for developing and applying BC and BC-based functional materials for different applications is another objective of this review.

Section snippets

Historical overview

In 1886, Brown [2] discovered that pure cellulose could be prepared by Bacterium aceti (Acetobacter xylinum or Gluconacetobacter xylinum) as a jelly-like semi-transparent material in the culture medium, and the growth of the gelatinous film increases until the entire surface is capped with the membrane. The aforementioned gelatinous membrane, called BC, attracted more attention in the mid-twentieth century. In 1984, Hestrin and Schramm [18] (HS) successfully synthesized BC using A. xylinum in a

Structural features of BC

The chemical structure of BC is the same as that of plant cellulose; it is a linear homopolymer of glucose monomers linked by β-(1 → 4) glycosidic linkage with the chemical formula (C6H10O5)n. They differ from each other only in degree of polymerization (DP). It is 13,000 to 14,000 for plant and 2000 to 6000 for BC [27]. The single A. xylinum cell can polymerize up to 200,000 glucose molecules into β-1,4-glucan chains per second [28]. These nascent chains associate with the characteristic

Functional properties of BC

Compared to plant cellulose, Bacterial cellulose possesses several advantages in its physical and chemical properties. For instance, BC is chemically pure due to the absence of lignin, pectin, and hemicelluloses, and it has the dynamic capabilities to form the fibers. Thus it is composed of naturally occurring thinnest fibers as ribbon-shaped fibrils with a width of around 1.5 nm. Furthermore, during fermentation, the membranes can be easily molded into any shape and size/thickness, and the

BC biosynthesis

The biosynthesis of BC consists of four enzymatic steps; i) phosphorylation of glucose by glucokinase ii) glucose-6-phosphate (G6P) isomerizes into glucose-1-phosphate (G1P) by phosphoglucomutase (PGM) iii) UDP-glucose (UDP-Glc) synthesis by UDP-glucose pyrophosphorylase (UGP) and iv) cellulose synthase reaction [29]. Glucose metabolism occurs through the pentose phosphate pathway, and the precursor for cellulose synthesis is UDP-glucose obtained from glucose-6-phosphate (carbon source:

BC chemical functionalization

The properties of BC can be enhanced by modifying it with suitable functional moieties. Two methods are available for BC modification: i) in situ and ii) ex-situ modification which is represented in Fig. 4.

In situ modification is done by adding reinforcement materials or varying the culture conditions during bacterial culture. The ex-situ modification method incorporates different additives into the BC polymer matrix. These modifications change BC composite's morphological, physicochemical, and

Water treatment

Water pollution introduces contaminants into water bodies' heads to a disastrous result for all living organisms and the environment. The contaminants include industrial organic and inorganic waste, accidental oil leakage, chemical fertilizers and pesticides, sewage and wastewater, etc. Several methods are available for extracting contaminants from polluted water. BC forms a worthy candidate for this purpose with a biological origin, high porosity, and large surface area. Modifying BC with

Miscellaneous applications of BC composite materials

Nanocomposite membranes procured from BC and poly(4-styrene sulfonic acid) (PSSA) show high storage modulus and protonic conductivity. The high ionic exchange capacity of the composite membranes stems from the large concentration of sulfonic acid groups in PSSA [250]. A nitrogen-doped carbon nanofiber/MoS2 (pBC-N/MoS2) nanocomposites prepared through the oxidative polymerization of aniline on the BC surface, high-temperature carbonization process hydrothermal growth of MoS2 nanosheets exhibits

Conclusion

Over the past few years, the number of research works done in this domain has increased, and BC has gained a wide range of applicability since it is a cheap material with a biological origin. The yield and the shape of BC can be altered by tuning the culture medium with different carbon sources and by varying the shape of the container, respectively. The applicability of BC arises due to the presence of chemically modifiable hydroxyl groups on the surface. The biomedical applications of BC

Acknowledgment

We acknowledge support from CSIR-CLRI project MLP13. Varnakumar Gayathri acknowledges an INSPIRE fellowship from the Department of Science Technology (DST) (fellowship code no. IF170645). CSIR-CLRI communication number is 1721.

References (294)

  • F.X. Nascimento et al.

    Functional and genomic characterization of Komagataeibacter uvaceti FXV3, a multiple stress resistant bacterium producing increased levels of cellulose

    Biotechnol. Rep.

    (2021)
  • H. Gao et al.

    Comparison of bacterial nanocellulose produced by different strains under static and agitated culture conditions

    Carbohydr. Polym.

    (2020)
  • U. Geyer et al.

    Formation, derivatization and applications of bacterial cellulose

    Int. J. Biol. Macromol.

    (1994)
  • J.W. Hwang et al.

    Effects of pH and dissolved oxygen on cellulose production by acetobacter xylinum BRC5 in agitated culture

    J. Biosci. Bioeng.

    (1999)
  • J.-M. Wu et al.

    Thin stillage supplementation greatly enhances bacterial cellulose production by Gluconacetobacter xylinus

    Carbohydr. Polym.

    (2012)
  • Z. Li et al.

    Production of nano bacterial cellulose from waste water of candied jujube-processing industry using acetobacter xylinum

    Carbohydr. Polym.

    (2015)
  • A. Kurosumi et al.

    Utilization of various fruit juices as carbon source for production of bacterial cellulose by Acetobacter xylinum NBRC 13693

    Carbohydr. Polym.

    (2009)
  • F. Hong et al.

    An alternative carbon source from konjac powder for enhancing production of bacterial cellulose in static cultures by a model strain acetobacter aceti subsp. Xylinus ATCC 23770

    Carbohydr. Polym.

    (2008)
  • X. Zeng et al.

    Statistical optimization of culture conditions for bacterial cellulose production by acetobacter xylinum BPR 2001 from maple syrup

    Carbohydr. Polym.

    (2011)
  • L. Chen et al.

    Biotransformation of wheat straw to bacterial cellulose and its mechanism

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2013)
  • S.M. Keshk

    Vitamin C enhances bacterial cellulose production in gluconacetobacter xylinus

    Carbohydr. Polym.

    (2014)
  • S. Keshk et al.

    Influence of lignosulfonate on crystal structure and productivity of bacterial cellulose in a static culture

    Enzym. Microb. Technol.

    (2006)
  • T.R. Stumpf et al.

    In situ and ex situ modifications of bacterial cellulose for applications in tissue engineering

    Mater. Sci. Eng. C

    (2018)
  • H.-C. Huang et al.

    Nano-biomaterials application: in situ modification of bacterial cellulose structure by adding HPMC during fermentation

    Carbohydr. Polym.

    (2011)
  • A. Żywicka et al.

    Modification of bacterial cellulose with quaternary ammonium compounds based on fatty acids and amino acids and the effect on antimicrobial activity

    Biomacromolecules

    (2018)
  • Q. Lin et al.

    Protein adsorption behaviors of carboxymethylated bacterial cellulose membranes

    Int. J. Biol. Macromol.

    (2015)
  • I. Sulaeva et al.

    Fast approach to the hydrophobization of bacterial cellulose via the direct polymerization of ethyl 2-cyanoacrylate

    Biomacromolecules

    (2019)
  • T. Oshima et al.

    Phosphorylated bacterial cellulose for adsorption of proteins

    Carbohydr. Polym.

    (2011)
  • P. Cazón et al.

    Composite films with UV-barrier properties of bacterial cellulose with glycerol and poly (vinyl alcohol): puncture properties, solubility, and swelling degree

    Biomacromolecules

    (2019)
  • J.-F. Revol et al.

    Helicoidal self-ordering of cellulose microfibrils in aqueous suspension

    Int. J. Biol. Macromol.

    (1992)
  • D.P. Delmer

    Cellulose biosynthesis: exciting times for a difficult field of study

    Annu. Rev. Plant Biol.

    (1999)
  • A.J. Brown

    XLIII.—On an acetic ferment which forms cellulose

    J. Chem. Soc. Trans.

    (1886)
  • M.W. Ullah et al.

    Synthesis, structure, and properties of bacterial cellulose

  • V. Selvaraju et al.

    Insights of bacterial cellulose: bio and nano-polymer composites toward industrial application

  • H.S. Barud et al.
  • D.P. Delmer

    Structure and biosynthesis of cellulose

  • P.R. Chawla et al.

    Microbial cellulose: fermentative production and applications

    Food Technol. Biotechnol.

    (2009)
  • M. Iguchi et al.

    Bacterial cellulose—a masterpiece of nature's arts

    J. Mater. Sci.

    (2000)
  • W. Liu et al.

    Bacterial cellulose-based composite scaffolds for biomedical applications: a review

    ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng.

    (2020)
  • S. Gorgieva et al.

    Bacterial cellulose: production, modification and perspectives in biomedical applications

    Nanomaterials

    (2019)
  • W. He et al.

    Bacterial cellulose: functional modification and wound healing applications

    Adv. Wound Care

    (2021)
  • S. Hestrin et al.

    Synthesis of cellulose by acetobacter xylinum. 2. Preparation of freeze-dried cells capable of polymerizing glucose to cellulose

    Biochem. J.

    (1954)
  • M. Schramm et al.

    Factors affecting production of cellulose at the air/liquid interface of a culture of Acetobacter xylinum

    Microbiology

    (1954)
  • S. Valla et al.

    Cellulose-negative mutants of acetobacter xylinum

    Microbiology

    (1982)
  • R. Steel et al.

    Celluloseless mutants of certain Acetobacter species

    J. Gen. Microbiol.

    (1957)
  • H. Toyosaki et al.

    Screening of bacterial cellulose-producing acetobacter strains suitable for agitated culture

    Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem.

    (1995)
  • A. Ishikawa et al.

    Increase in cellulose production by sulfaguanidine-resistant mutants derived from Acetobacter xylinum subsp. sucrofermentans

    Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem.

    (1995)
  • D.R. Ruka et al.

    Bacterial cellulose and its use in renewable composites

  • J.K. Park et al.

    Production of bacterial cellulose by gluconacetobacter hansenii PJK isolated from rotten apple

    Biotechnol. Bioprocess Eng.

    (2003)
  • P. Ross et al.

    Cellulose biosynthesis and function in bacteria

    Microbiol. Rev.

    (1991)
  • Cited by (0)

    1

    Equal contributions

    View full text