Elsevier

Icarus

Volume 295, October 2017, Pages 89-109
Icarus

Neptune long-lived atmospheric features in 2013–2015 from small (28-cm) to large (10-m) telescopes

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2017.06.009Get rights and content

Highlights

  • We demonstrate capabilities of amateur astronomers to observe and track large cloud systems in Neptune's atmosphere presenting data from 2013 to 2015.

  • Two bright discrete features Neptune's South mid-latitudes in 2014 seem to have collided into a single bright feature observed over 2015.

  • A bright large feature at planetographic latitude −40° in 2015 was linked to a dark spot observed in Hubble Space Telescope images.

  • We present zonal wind results from a long-term tracking of several cloud systems in 2013–2015.

Abstract

Since 2013, observations of Neptune with small telescopes (28–50 cm) have resulted in several detections of long-lived bright atmospheric features that have also been observed by large telescopes such as Keck II or Hubble. The combination of both types of images allows the study of the long-term evolution of major cloud systems in the planet. In 2013 and 2014 two bright features were present on the planet at southern mid-latitudes. These may have merged in late 2014, possibly leading to the formation of a single bright feature observed during 2015 at the same latitude. This cloud system was first observed in January 2015 and nearly continuously from July to December 2015 in observations with telescopes in the 2-10-m class and in images from amateur astronomers. These images show the bright spot as a compact feature at −40.1 ± 1.6° planetographic latitude well resolved from a nearby bright zonal band that extended from −42° to −20°. The size of this system depends on wavelength and varies from a longitudinal extension of 8000 ± 900 km and latitudinal extension of 6500 ± 900 km in Keck II images in H and Ks bands to 5100 ± 1400 km in longitude and 4500 ± 1400 km in latitude in HST images in 657 nm. Over July to September 2015 the structure drifted westward in longitude at a rate of 24.48 ± 0.03°/day or −94 ± 3 m/s. This is about 30 m/s slower than the zonal winds measured at the time of the Voyager 2 flyby. Tracking its motion from July to November 2015 suggests a longitudinal oscillation of 16° in amplitude with a 90-day period, typical of dark spots on Neptune and similar to the Great Red Spot oscillation in Jupiter. The limited time covered by high-resolution observations only covers one full oscillation and other interpretations of the changing motions could be possible. HST images in September 2015 show the presence of a dark spot at short wavelengths located in the southern flank (planetographic latitude −47.0°) of the bright compact cloud observed throughout 2015. The drift rate of the bright cloud and dark spot translates to a zonal speed of −87.0 ± 2.0 m/s, which matches the Voyager 2 zonal speeds at the latitude of the dark spot. Identification of a few other features in 2015 enabled the extraction of some limited wind information over this period. This work demonstrates the need of frequently monitoring Neptune to understand its atmospheric dynamics and shows excellent opportunities for professional and amateur collaborations.

Introduction

Early studies of the planet Neptune showed that, in spite of its large distance to the Sun, and unlike Uranus, its atmosphere is very dynamic with several sources of variability (Belton et al., 1981, Hammel, 1989, Ingersoll et al., 1995 and references therein). Historically, the small angular size of Neptune (maximum diameter of 2.3′') resulted in a lack of spatially resolved observations of the planet until the arrival of the Voyager 2 in 1989 (Smith et al., 1989). The launch of the Hubble Space Telescope (HST) and the development of high performance Adaptive Optics (AO) on large ground-based telescopes allowed monitoring the atmospheric activity of the planet at high resolution. Neptune shows rapidly varying cloud activity, zonal bands that change over the years, long-lived dark ovals and sporadic clouds around them (e.g. Limaye and Sromovsky, 1991, Baines et al., 1995, Ingersoll et al., 1995, Karkoschka, 2011, Sromovsky et al., 2001b; Sromovsky and Fry, 2002; Fry and Sromovsky, 2004, Martin et al., 2012.; Fitzpatrick et al., 2014). Recently, spatially resolved observations of the planet have also become possible at thermal infrared (Orton et al., 2007, Fletcher et al., 2014), millimeter (Luszcz-Cook et al., 2013) and radio wavelengths (de Pater et al., 2014) opening the possibility to study the thermal structure of the stratosphere and the structure of the troposphere below the visible clouds (de Pater et al., 2014).

Neptune's global circulation is dominated by a broad retrograde westward equatorial jet with a peak velocity of 350 m/s that diminishes at higher latitudes until it gives way to prograde winds from mid-latitudes to the South Pole (and presumably also in the North polar region not yet observed) in a narrower eastward jet with a peak velocity of +300 m/s at −74°S (Sánchez-Lavega et al., 2017). These winds were first measured in images at visible wavelengths from the Voyager 2 spacecraft in its flyby of the planet in 1989 (Stone and Miner, 1991, Limaye and Sromovsky, 1991, Sromovsky et al., 1993). Later wind measurements were obtained from images acquired by Adaptive Optics instruments on the Keck II telescope operating in the near infrared at 1–2.3 µm (Fry and Sromovsky, 2004, Martin et al., 2012, Fitzpatrick et al., 2014; Tollefson et al., 2017) and from HST images in the visible (e.g. Hammel and Lockwood, 1997, Sromovsky et al., 2001b; Sromovsky and Fry, 2002). These observations are sensitive to clouds and hazes from 0.1 to 0.6 bar (Fitzpatrick et al., 2014). Zonal wind profiles from those measurements are generally consistent with the one derived from Voyager 2. However there is a large dispersion of velocities in analysis of features tracked over short time periods when compared to the Voyager results (Limaye and Sromovsky, 1991, Martin et al., 2012). Part of this variability might be caused by vertical wind shear (Martin et al., 2012, Fitzpatrick et al., 2014), specially close to the Equator where vertical wind shear can be on the order of 30 m/s per scale height from Voyager IRIS data (Conrath et al., 1989) and similarly from IR data in 2003 (Fletcher et al., 2014). Most of this variability seems linked to the different apparent motions of bright and large features observed over long time-scales compared with smaller and fainter clouds observed only for a few hours and in many cases affected by their interaction with large features nearby. Therefore, sources of variability in zonal wind measurements include intrinsic variability of the small clouds, vertical wind shear, and the short time differences from consecutive images used for some measurements that introduce uncertainties that add to the real variability.

Studies of Voyager-2 images in the visible (Baines et al., 1995) and recent observations in the near infrared and at radio wavelengths (de Pater et al., 2014) conclude that the overall cloud structure of the planet consists of different vertical layers that vary with latitude and time (Irwin et al., 2016). The main cloud deck level (made of methane ice crystals), observed only at wavelengths not sensitive to methane absorption is estimated to lie at around the 2–3 bar level (Irwin et al., 2011). At southern tropical to mid-latitudes a belt of hazes, visible in methane absorption bands, is located at P ∼300–600 mbar and is overcast intermittently by a stratospheric haze possibly made of condensed hydrocarbons at 20–30 mbar that could arise from changing temperatures or from materials brought up from the troposphere. The latitudinal position, overall activity and latitudinal extension of this bright belt changes from year to year. For instance, in 2013 it extended roughly from −45° to −27° with diffuse latitudinal limits and it acquired a more compact structure in 2015 with a latitudinal size from −42° to −21° At northern mid-latitudes the main cloud seems quite similar while the stratospheric clouds seem to be located a bit higher, near 10 mbar. Based on maps of the thermal emission and hydrocarbons abundances in Neptune's stratrosphere obtained from Voyager observations in the mid infrared, Conrath et al. (1991) and Bézard et al. (1991) proposed a global circulation of the atmosphere with rising cold air at mid latitudes and overall descent at the Equator and the polar latitudes. This global circulation has been further explored to explain also the cloud structure in the planet by de Pater et al. (2014). This overall structure matches Neptune's distribution of ortho/para hydrogen and thermal structure at the time of the Voyager-2 encounter (heliocentric longitude LS = 236°, Conrath et al., 1989). It also matches the visual aspect at near infrared wavelengths (1.2–2.3 µm) for the last few years, which is characterized by bright belts of clouds at northern and southern mid-latitudes as well as occasionally bright south polar features. This visual aspect of the planet corresponds to early autumn in the south hemisphere (southern summer solstice was in 2005 and heliocentric longitudes from 2013 to 2015 were 287° to 293°). An analysis of vertical wind shear in the equatorial region, however, is consistent with upwelling at P> 1 bar, suggesting a more complex circulation pattern, such as a stacked-cell circulation with reversed flow above and below 1 bar (Tollefson et al., 2017).

A challenge to our understanding of the atmosphere is the sparse temporal sampling of high-resolution images of the planet. Much better temporal sampling has been achieved within the last few years by amateur astronomers using small telescopes of 50 cm or smaller to monitor some of Neptune's atmospheric features (Delcroix et al., 2014b). This revolution in observations of the icy giants has been enabled by the use of new fast CCD cameras with improved sensitivity in the near infrared (650 – 1000 nm) and low-cost long-pass imaging filters, typically starting at 610 – 700 nm and extending until the detector cutoff close to 1 µm (Mousis et al., 2014).

Here we present observations of recent cloud activity from July 2013 to December 2015 (sub-solar latitudes moving from −26.9° in July 2013 to −25.9° in December 2015). We analyze data provided by telescopes with diameters from 28 cm (amateur size) to 10-m (Keck II telescope), including data from HST, performing a long-term tracking of the brightest atmospheric features. We present a description of bright features in 2013, 2014 and 2015. We present a description of our observations in Section 2. Image navigation and measurement techniques are presented in Section 3. Analysis of the images is presented in Section 4. Section 5 presents drift rates of the main cloud features in terms of zonal winds comparing with previous studies. Finally, we present a summary of our findings and conclusions in Section 6.

Section snippets

2013 images

Images of Neptune in the visible range obtained at the 1.06-m telescope at Pic-du-Midi (France) in July 2013 showed a bright cloud feature at southern mid-latitudes. This telescope is frequently used by French amateur astronomers using low-cost commercial imaging cameras (Delcroix et al., 2014a). Due to recent advancements in affordable cameras with high Quantum Efficiency in the short infrared, the bright feature on Neptune was later confirmed by several observers using telescopes of 28–38 cm

Image navigation and cylindrical projections

All images were navigated with the WinJupos free software (http://jupos.org/gh/download.htm). This software contains ephemeris of Solar System planets based on the semi-analytic VSOP87 (Variations Séculaires des Orbites Planétaires) description of their orbits (Bretagnon and Francou, 1988). The ephemeris system in WinJupos and predictions of Triton's position on different dates were compared with the Neptune Viewer tool in the Rings Node of NASA's Planetary Data System (http://pds-rings.seti.org

Analysis of 2013 data

A first analysis suggested that the entire set of amateur and Pic du Midi images from 2013 (Fig. 1) showed the same bright feature at middle south latitudes (Delcroix et al., 2014a, Delcroix et al., 2014b). This interpretation is more difficult to maintain when considering the variety of cloud systems captured in J (1.25 µm) and H (1.65 µm) bands with VLT/SINFONI from October 2013 and Keck observations from July 2013 (Fig. 2). We interpret the mid-latitude discrete features in these

Zonal-wind velocities

Fig. 23 translates the drift rates in values of zonal winds and compares those values with Neptune zonal winds from Voyager 2 (Limaye and Sromovsky, 1991, Sromovsky et al., 1993; for a recent updated review of Neptune's zonal-wind profile see Sánchez-Lavega et al., 2016). Features 2015-N, 2015-P, K1, L1 and L2 have motions that follow closely the wind measurements obtained at the time of Voyager 2. This overall agreement is probably due to the long-term survival of the features tracked, which

Summary and conclusions

  • Amateur observers using telescopes with 28- to 50-cm apertures have been able to repeatedly find bright features on Neptune at its Southern mid-latitudes in 2013, 2014 and 2015. Atmospheric features at other latitudes can also be observed in some of the amateur images. Except for the bright spot 2015-A, which was observed very often, a long-term study of these features requires the use of high-resolution observations acquired by large telescopes to correctly identify most of these features.

Acknowledgments

We thank two anonymous referees from their constructive comments that improved the contents of this paper. We are very grateful to Grischa Hahn for his update on the WinJupos software incorporating the ephemeris of Triton that allowed the measurement of amateur images of Neptune. We are also grateful to many amateur observers that observed Neptune intensively over 2013 to 2015 providing data for this research. We are also thankful to P. Irwin for giving permission to use his VLT/SINFONI

References (50)

  • L.A. Sromovsky et al.

    Dynamics of neptune's major cloud features

    Icarus

    (1993)
  • L.A. Sromovsky et al.

    Clouds and circulation on Neptune: implications of 1991 HST observations

    Icarus

    (1995)
  • L.A. Sromovsky et al.

    Coordinated 1996 HST and IRTF imaging of neptune and triton II. Implications of disk-integrated photometry

    Icarus

    (2001)
  • L.A. Sromovsky et al.

    Neptune's atmospheric circulation and cloud morphology: changes revealed by 1998 HST imaging

    Icarus

    (2001)
  • L.A. Sromovsky et al.

    The unusual dynamics of northern dark spots on neptune

    Icarus

    (2002)
  • P.W. Stratman et al.

    EPIC Simulations of bright companions to neptune's great dark spots

    Icarus

    (2001)
  • B.A. Archinal

    Report of the IAU Working Group on Cartographic Coordinates and Rotational Elements: 2009

    Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astr.

    (2011)
  • K.H. Baines et al.

    Clouds and hazes in the atmosphere of neptune

  • C. Baranec et al.

    Bringing the visible universe into focus with Robo-AO

    J. Vis. Exp.

    (2013)
  • C. Baranec et al.

    High-efficiency autonomous laser adaptive optics

    ApJ

    (2014)
  • B. Bézard et al.

    Hydrocarbons in Neptune's stratosphere from voyager infrared observations

    J. Geophys. Res.

    (1991)
  • P. Bretagnon et al.

    Planetary theories in rectangular and spherical variables – VSOP 87 solutions

    A&A

    (1988)
  • B.J. Conrath et al.

    Thermal structure and dynamics of Neptune's atmosphere from Voyager measurements

    J. Geophys. Res.

    (1991)
  • ConrathB. et al.

    Science

    (1989)
  • M. Delcroix et al.

    Amateur contributions to planetary science with one meter professional telescope at Pic du Midi

  • Cited by (32)

    • Final compilation of photometry of Uranus and Neptune, 1972–2016.

      2019, Icarus
      Citation Excerpt :

      After being alerted by Hammel, we made intensive observations of Neptune in 1989 and were able in that summer to observe the related photometric effects of the Great Dark Spot/Bright Companion as they rotated across the planet's disk. Finally, as he pace of near-IR adaptive optics imaging of Neptune increased in recent years, the discovery of a bright feature in 2013 was followed up by Hubble Space Telescope images (Wong et al., 2018) plus numerous ground-based telescope images as recently reviewed by Hueso et al. (2017) as well as de Pater et al. (2014), Irwin et al. (2016). Table 2 contains the annual mean opposition magnitudes of Neptune and supporting data, with column headings and contents the same as in Table 1.

    • Analysis of Neptune's 2017 bright equatorial storm

      2019, Icarus
      Citation Excerpt :

      Prominent companion clouds were also observed in association with the 1994-96 northern dark spots NGDS-15 and NGDS-32 (Hammel and Lockwood, 1997; Sromovsky et al., 2002). In most images these companion clouds were only observed poleward of the dark spot; however, on 10 October 1994 a very bright, extended cloud feature was observed to the south of NGDS-32 at latitudes < 15°N. Based on this, a companion dark spot might be expected at latitudes ≲ 15°N; however, neither we (Fig. 2) nor Wong et al. (2018) observed a dark spot in the HST OPAL images taken on 6 October 2017, except at ∼ 45°S. Therefore if the clouds we observed were supported by a deep vortex, it was either too small to be detectable by HST or was covered by the bright storm clouds even at blue wavelengths (Hueso et al., 2017; Wong et al., 2018). The fact that the compact cloud remained stable in a region where the Coriolis force approaches zero, that no dark vortex is observed in HST observations in blue wavelengths at these latitudes, and that several similar clouds developed over the studied period, suggest that the bright clouds were not caused by vortices but could have been a manifestation of convective upwellling from different coherent systems in each of the bright equatorial clouds appearing in different epochs.

    • Scientific rationale for Uranus and Neptune in situ explorations

      2018, Planetary and Space Science
      Citation Excerpt :

      Neptune displays both types of discrete cloud activity: episodic and continuous (Baines and Hammel, 1994; Sromovsky et al., 1995). Recently, images taken by the amateur community using improved observing and processing techniques, have been able to capture such features on this planet (Hueso et al., 2017). On the other hand, the images taken in an ample range of wavelengths from about 400 nm to 2.2 μm indicate that the clouds are located at higher altitude levels than in Uranus, with cloud tops at around 20–60 mbar whereas other storms are at the ∼2 bar level (Irwin et al., 2016a,b).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    Deceased.

    View full text