Elsevier

Human Pathology

Volume 63, May 2017, Pages 1-13
Human Pathology

Progress in pathology
Immunohistochemical approach for the diagnosis of a liver mass on small biopsy specimens

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humpath.2016.12.025Get rights and content

Highlights

  • HCC shares overlapping histological features with benign hepatocellular lesions.

  • Metastatic tumors can be indistinguishable from HCC on histologic grounds.

  • IHC markers play an important role in establishing an accurate diagnosis.

Summary

Well-differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) shares overlapping histological features with benign hepatocellular lesions, including hepatocellular adenoma and focal nodular hyperplasia in non-cirrhotic liver, and with high-grade dysplastic nodule in cirrhotic liver. Several metastatic tumors, such as neuroendocrine tumor, renal cell carcinoma, adrenocortical carcinoma, melanoma, and epithelioid angiomyolipoma, can be indistinguishable from HCC on histologic grounds. Since this distinction has important therapeutic implications, judicious use of immunohistochemical markers plays an important role in establishing an accurate diagnosis, especially when limited material of tumor is available on cell block or a small core biopsy. This review describes commonly used immunohistochemical markers used in the diagnosis of HCC, highlighting advantages and disadvantages of each marker, and suggests appropriate immunohistochemical panels for specific clinicopathologic situations.

Introduction

The distinction of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) from intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma or metastatic tumor can be challenging on cell block or core biopsy specimens. This review summarizes the challenges in the use of immunohistochemistry for the diagnosis of HCC and suggests specific panels depending on the clinical setting. The review is divided into five parts:

(A) Advantages and pitfalls of commonly used antibodies.

(B) Selection of antibody panel for diagnosis of HCC.

(C) HCC versus other polygonal cell tumors.

(D) Immunohistochemistry in histologic variants of HCC and other related settings.

(E) HCC versus benign hepatocellular lesions.

Section snippets

Hepatocyte paraffin-1

Hepatocyte paraffin-1 (Hep Par-1) is a monoclonal antibody developed using formalin-fixed tissue from failed liver allografts [1]. It recognizes a hepatocyte-specific antigen, which is now known to be carbamoyl phosphate synthetase I, a urea cycle enzyme [2]. Hep Par-1 is a useful marker for diagnosis of HCC with sensitivity and specificity exceeding 80% [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8]. It shows a diffuse cytoplasmic granular staining pattern, which is easy to interpret. Most adenocarcinomas

Selection of antibody panel for diagnosis of HCC

If hepatocellular differentiation is obvious based on histologic features (e.g., bile production), immunohistochemistry is not necessary for diagnosis, especially in the setting of cirrhosis. In most other situations especially in non-cirrhotic liver, a panel of 4 antibodies is recommended, including two hepatocellular markers (preferably Arg-1 and GPC-3) and two markers that are more commonly seen in adenocarcinoma (such as CK19 and MOC-31). If limited tissue is available, a two-stain approach

HCC versus other polygonal cell tumors

The term polygonal cell tumors refers to tumors that morphologically resemble HCC and includes epithelial neoplasms like RCC and NET as well as non-epithelial tumors like melanoma, ACC, AML, and sarcomas with epithelioid morphology.

Scirrhous HCC

Scirrhous HCC is a rare variant of HCC characterized by a prominent stromal component, which comprises more than 50% of the tumor (Fig. 2A) [9], [64], [65], [66]. Hep Par-1 and pCEA have low sensitivities in scirrhous HCC (26% and 37%, respectively) [9]. Scirrhous HCC is positive for CK7, CK19, and MOC-31 in more than half of the cases (Fig. 2B). The abundant stroma and aberrant immunophenotype can lead to an erroneous diagnosis of metastatic adenocarcinoma or intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma [9]

Hepatocellular adenoma

The absence of cytologic atypia (small cell change, nuclear pleomorphism), lack of architectural abnormalities (thick cell plates, prominent pseudoacinar change), and an intact reticulin framework distinguish HCA from HCC [75], [78], [79]. Immunohistochemistry can be helpful in distinguishing HCA from HCC in small samples, and also helps in the classification of HCA into four categories based on the WHO 2010 classification.

References (92)

  • S.K. Lau et al.

    Comparative immunohistochemical profile of hepatocellular carcinoma, cholangiocarcinoma, and metastatic adenocarcinoma

    Hum Pathol

    (2002)
  • M. Chuma et al.

    Expression profiling in multistage hepatocarcinogenesis: identification of HSP70 as a molecular marker of early hepatocellular carcinoma

    Hepatology

    (2003)
  • L. Di Tommaso et al.

    The application of markers (HSP70 GPC3 and GS) in liver biopsies is useful for detection of hepatocellular carcinoma

    J Hepatol

    (2009)
  • T.B. Nguyen et al.

    Combined use of heat-shock protein 70 and glutamine synthetase is useful in the distinction of typical hepatocellular adenoma from atypical hepatocellular neoplasms and well-differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma

    Mod Pathol

    (2016)
  • A. Karabork et al.

    The best immunohistochemical panel for differentiating hepatocellular carcinoma from metastatic adenocarcinoma

    Pathol Res Pract

    (2010)
  • N.G. Ordóñez

    The diagnostic utility of immunohistochemistry in distinguishing between mesothelioma and renal cell carcinoma: a comparative study

    Hum Pathol

    (2004)
  • N.G. Ordóñez

    Value of the MOC-31 monoclonal antibody in differentiating epithelial pleural mesothelioma from lung adenocarcinoma

    Hum Pathol

    (1998)
  • V.S. Chandan et al.

    Arginase-1 is frequently positive in hepatoid adenocarcinomas

    Hum Pathol

    (2016)
  • L.A. Murakata et al.

    Clear cell carcinoma of the liver: a comparative immunohistochemical study with renal clear cell carcinoma

    Mod Pathol

    (2000)
  • P.R. Mazal et al.

    Expression of aquaporins and PAX-2 compared to CD10 and cytokeratin 7 in renal neoplasms: a tissue microarray study

    Mod Pathol

    (2005)
  • D.M. Haninger et al.

    Hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the lung: report of five cases and review of the literature

    Mod Pathol

    (2014)
  • L. Wang et al.

    Clinical and pathological features of hepatoid carcinoma of the ovary

    World J Surg Oncol

    (2013)
  • M. Osada et al.

    Combination of hepatocellular markers is useful for prognostication in gastric hepatoid adenocarcinoma

    Hum Pathol

    (2014)
  • N. Shafizadeh et al.

    Hepatocellular carcinoma: histologic subtypes

    Surg Pathol Clin

    (2013)
  • H.M. Ross et al.

    Fibrolamellar carcinomas are positive for CD68

    Mod Pathol

    (2011)
  • R.P. Graham et al.

    DNAJB1-PRKACA is specific for fibrolamellar carcinoma

    Mod Pathol

    (2015)
  • C.H. Wu et al.

    Combined hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma: diagnosis and prognosis after resection or transplantation

    Transplant Proc

    (2016)
  • P. Bioulac-Sage et al.

    Pathological diagnosis of liver cell adenoma and focal nodular hyperplasia: Bordeaux update

    J Hepatol

    (2007)
  • S.J. Cho et al.

    Expression of liver fatty acid binding protein in hepatocellular carcinoma

    Hum Pathol

    (2016)
  • N.M. Joseph et al.

    Diagnostic utility and limitations of glutamine synthetase and serum amyloid-associated protein immunohistochemistry in the distinction of focal nodular hyperplasia and inflammatory hepatocellular adenoma

    Mod Pathol

    (2014)
  • K.J. Evason et al.

    Atypical hepatocellular adenoma-like neoplasms with β-catenin activation show cytogenetic alterations similar to well-differentiated hepatocellular carcinomas

    Hum Pathol

    (2013)
  • G. Hale et al.

    Correlation of exon 3 β-catenin mutations with glutamine synthetase staining patterns in hepatocellular adenoma and hepatocellular carcinoma

    Mod Pathol

    (2016)
  • C. Pilati et al.

    Genomic profiling of hepatocellular adenomas reveals recurrent FRK-activating mutations and the mechanisms of malignant transformation

    Cancer Cell

    (2014)
  • P. Bedossa et al.

    Well-differentiated hepatocellular neoplasm of uncertain malignant potential: proposal for a new diagnostic category

    Hum Pathol

    (2014)
  • S. Kakar et al.

    Well-differentiated hepatocellular neoplasm of uncertain malignant potential: proposal for a new diagnostic category--reply

    Hum Pathol

    (2014)
  • S. Kakar et al.

    Best practices in diagnostic immunohistochemistry: hepatocellular carcinoma versus metastatic neoplasms

    Arch Pathol Lab Med

    (2007)
  • A.E. Wennerberg et al.

    Hepatocyte paraffin 1: a monoclonal antibody that reacts with hepatocytes and can be used for differential diagnosis of hepatic tumors

    Am J Pathol

    (1993)
  • M.I. Minervini et al.

    Utilization of hepatocyte-specific antibody in the immunocytochemical evaluation of liver tumors

    Mod Pathol

    (1997)
  • S. Kakar et al.

    Immunoreactivity of Hep par 1 in hepatic and extrahepatic tumors and its correlation with albumin in situ hybridization in hepatocellular carcinoma

    Am J Clin Pathol

    (2003)
  • T. Nguyen et al.

    Comparison of 5 immunohistochemical markers of hepatocellular differentiation for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma

    Arch Pathol Lab Med

    (2015)
  • K. Fujikura et al.

    BSEP and MDR3: useful immunohistochemical markers to discriminate hepatocellular carcinomas from intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas and hepatoid carcinomas

    Am J Surg Pathol

    (2016)
  • D.T. Timek et al.

    Arginase-1, HepPar-1, and glypican-3 are the most effective panel of markers in distinguishing hepatocellular carcinoma from metastatic tumor on fine-needle aspiration specimens

    Am J Clin Pathol

    (2012)
  • M. Fujiwara et al.

    Arginase-1 is a more sensitive marker of hepatic differentiation than HepPar-1 and glypican-3 in fine-needle aspiration biopsies

    Cancer Cytopathol

    (2012)
  • B.C. Yan et al.

    Arginase-1: a new immunohistochemical marker of hepatocytes and hepatocellular neoplasms

    Am J Surg Pathol

    (2010)
  • D. Baumhoer et al.

    Glypican 3 expression in human nonneoplastic, preneoplastic, and neoplastic tissues: a tissue microarray analysis of 4,387 tissue samples

    Am J Clin Pathol

    (2008)
  • L. Libbrecht et al.

    Glypican-3 expression distinguishes small hepatocellular carcinomas from cirrhosis, dysplastic nodules, and focal nodular hyperplasia-like nodules

    Am J Surg Pathol

    (2006)
  • Cited by (32)

    • Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Role of Pathology in the Era of Precision Medicine

      2020, Clinics in Liver Disease
      Citation Excerpt :

      IHC stain is typically seen as a diffuse cytoplasmic granular pattern. HepPar-1 is a useful marker for diagnosis HCC and is positive in about 80% HCCs.14 HepPar-1 has low sensitivity in poorly differentiated (50%–60%) and scirrhous subtype (20%–30%) HCCs.25,26

    • Carcinoma of unknown primary. Case no. 4

      2018, Annales de Pathologie
    • Diagnostic Pathology: Cytopathology

      2018, Diagnostic Pathology: Cytopathology
    • Optimizing small liver biopsy specimens: a combined cytopathology and surgical pathology perspective

      2020, Journal of the American Society of Cytopathology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Most liver pathologists no longer use alpha-fetoprotein as a diagnostic immunostain, given that the more recently discovered markers discussed here have greater sensitivity and specificity. CD34 may be used to accentuate aberrant sinusoidal endothelialization in HCC (Fig. 9A).41 Unfortunately, although this change is often seen in HCC, benign hepatic lesions such as focal nodular hyperplasia and hepatocellular adenomas may also show aberrant sinusoidal endothelialization (Fig. 9B).42

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Disclosures: None Declared.

    View full text