Elsevier

Human Pathology

Volume 39, Issue 5, May 2008, Pages 731-739
Human Pathology

Original contribution
Membrane-type-1 matrix metalloproteinase, matrix metalloproteinase 2, and tissue inhibitor of matrix proteinase 2 in prostate cancer: identification of patients with poor prognosis by immunohistochemistry

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humpath.2007.09.021Get rights and content

Summary

Overexpression of the matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) 2 is associated with poor prognosis in many tumor types. Membrane-type-1 MMP (MMP14) activates MMP2 using pro-MMP2 specific inhibitor, tissue inhibitor of matrix proteinase 2 (TIMP2), as a receptor. We evaluated, by immunohistochemistry on 189 T3N0-2M0 prostate cancer (Pca) cases, the influence of MMP2, MMP14, and TIMP2 expression, individually and in association, on Pca disease-free survival (DFS). We evaluated marker expression separately in cancer, stromal, and benign epithelial (BE) cells according to a percentage scale (0%, <10%, 10%-50%, and >50%). Median follow-up was 4.61 years. In BE cells, there was an inverse relationship between initial prostate-specific antigen serum level and T3 stage with MMP14 expression (P = .003) and between pN stage and TIMP2 expression (P = .04). The most significant results with survival were obtained by dichotomizing the cases between those with less than 10% and at least 10% of cells expressing the marker, the latter category representing overexpression. TIMP2 overexpression in stromal cells was associated with a longer DFS with a hazard ratio of 0.573 (P = .02) for time to recurrence. MMP2 overexpression by BE cells correlated with a shorter DFS using a multivariate trend test (hazard ratio = 1.46, P = .02). Stromal cells expressing less than 10% TIMP2 and MMP2 overexpression was the only combination that was significantly associated with a shorter DFS (log-rank test, P = .0001). This study suggests that MMP14 is involved mostly in Pca implantation and that MMP2 and TIMP2 expression by reactive stromal cells might be used as predictors of DFS in T3N0-2M0 Pca.

Introduction

With 300 000 new cases every year, prostate cancer (Pca) is the most common cancer in North American men [1]. However, only 2.9% die of their disease [1]. Therefore, more conservative therapies instead of standard radical treatments, such as radical radiotherapy and prostatectomy, may represent an alternative for elderly patients with high-risk surgical conditions. Tumor behavior cannot be accurately and reliably predicted by our current prognostic factors. The identification of new prognostic factors may allow the development of new treatment strategies with less morbidity.

Matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) 2 is part of the MMP family, which includes more than 20 zinc-dependant endopeptidases that degrade various components of the extracellular matrix [2]. MMPs have also been shown to be involved in the release of growth factors that enhance tumor growth and aggressiveness [3]. Because of their proteolytic and growth-factor–releasing activities, MMPs are thought to be involved in cancer progression.

Pro-MMP2 is a 72-kd protein [2] that is cleaved into an active form of 62 kd. Active MMP2 is mostly involved in type IV collagen and gelatin proteolysis [2]. MMP2 has been demonstrated to be up-regulated in many tumor types and is associated with prognosis in most of them [4]. Whereas most MMPs are transcriptionally regulated, MMP2 is constitutively expressed by stromal cells [2]. MMP2 is mainly regulated by its zymogen inhibitor, tissue inhibitor of matrix proteinase 2 (TIMP2), and by its major activator, membrane-type-1 MMP (MMP14) [2]. MMP14 is a membrane-type nonsoluble MMP. According to Strongin et al [5], who showed in 1995 that MMP2 was activated by MMP14, TIMP2 inhibits successively MMP14 and pro-MMP2 molecules, TIMP2 being the link between MMP14 and MMP2. A free adjacent MMP14 then cleaves pro-MMP2 (Asn37-Leu38), leading to an intermediate molecule. A nearby active MMP2 can finally cleave the intermediate form of MMP2 (Asn80-Tyr81), leading to another active MMP. Because of the unique MMP2 activation mode, TIMP2 is involved in MMP14 inhibition when expressed at high levels and in MMP2 activation when expressed at lower levels [5].

We have previously shown that MMP2 overexpression by cancer cells was associated with a poor prognosis in T3N0-2M0 Pca [6]. Our current project was aimed at testing the hypothesis that the balance between MMP2 and the main molecules involved in its activation and/or in its inhibition—MMP14 and TIMP2—are related to Pca disease-free survival (DFS). We hoped that this study might help to identify new potential targets to treat a subset of patients, such as those with a high surgical risk, with a more conservative approach.

Section snippets

Population

The patients included in this retrospective study underwent a radical prostatectomy at l'Hôtel-Dieu de Québec hospital (Quebec City, Canada) between 1991 and 1997 for a pT3N0-2M0 disease, followed by prostate-specific antigen (PSA) serum measurements. Patients were excluded from the study if they had received neoadjuvant hormonal therapy. Patients' charts were reviewed by experienced research nurses to retrieve clinical information (age, tumor stage, initial and follow-up serum PSA level,

Population and tumor characteristics

The initial study population consisted of 207 cases of stage pT3N0-2M0 Pca. Of these, 18 cases were excluded because adequate follow-up was lacking or because the paraffin-embedded specimen was inadequate for analyses, leaving 189 patients for MMP14 analyses, 188 for TIMP2 analyses, and 187 for MMP2. Characteristics of the patient population are shown in Table 1. Median patient age was 64 years (range, 44-74 years), and the mean serum PSA level was 14.5 ng/mL (range, 1.7-126 ng/mL). Thirty-four

Discussion

There is a need to identify new prognostic factors in Pca. However, the influence of MMP expression on Pca survival has rarely been investigated despite growing evidence linking MMP overexpression and poor survival of many tumor types [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19]. Wood et al [15] and Ross et al [16] both reported the association between MMP2 and TIMP2 expression and Pca prognosis, but these studies were carried out on small populations with limited follow-up. Boag and

References (35)

  • M. Egeblad et al.

    New functions for the matrix metalloproteinases in cancer progression

    Nat Rev Cancer

    (2002)
  • B. Fingleton

    Matrix metalloproteinase inhibitors for cancer therapy: the current situation and future prospects

    Expert Opin Ther Targets

    (2003)
  • D. Trudel et al.

    Significance of MMP-2 expression in prostate cancer: an immunohistochemical study

    Cancer Res

    (2003)
  • L. Vaillancourt et al.

    Effect of neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (combined androgen blockade) on normal prostate and prostatic carcinoma. A randomized study

    Am J Surg Pathol

    (1996)
  • F.H. Schroder et al.

    The TNM classification of prostate cancer

    Prostate Suppl

    (1992)
  • S.M. Hsu et al.

    Use of avidin-biotin-peroxidase complex (ABC) in immunoperoxidase techniques: a comparison between ABC and unlabeled antibody (PAP) procedures

    J Histochem Cytochem

    (1981)
  • M. Hollander et al.
  • Cited by (47)

    • Targeting of MMP2 activity in malignant tumors with a <sup>68</sup>Ga-labeled gelatinase inhibitor cyclic peptide

      2015, Nuclear Medicine and Biology
      Citation Excerpt :

      In the present study, only the ovarian tumor model was selected as a major research object. But, as mentioned above, not just the ovarian tumor, a variety of tumors, including brain, prostate, colorectal, pancreatic, and breast tumors also have a high MMP2 expression [3,4,27–31]. Therefore, in theory, these tumors likewise can be imaged using 68Ga-NOTA-C6 PET.

    • The value of MMP-9 for breast and non-small cell lung cancer patients' survival

      2013, Advances in Medical Sciences
      Citation Excerpt :

      MMPs regulate signaling pathways that control cell growth, survival, invasion, inflammation and angiogenesis [1]. Results of many studies have demonstrated a positive correlation between the expression of MMPs and the invasive and metastatic potential of various malignant tumors including breast [2], lung [3], laryngeal [4], prostate [5], cervical [6] and gastric [7] cancer. The MMPs comprise a family of 24 zinc dependent endopeptidases with broad spectrum of enzymatic activity against all components of the extracellular matrix (ECM) and basement membrane.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text