Elsevier

Hearing Research

Volume 415, 1 March 2022, 108396
Hearing Research

Effect of antiepileptic drug levetiracetam on cochlear function

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2021.108396Get rights and content

Highlight

  • Levetiracetam (LEV) has little or no effect on the function of the outer hair cells.

  • High dose LEV can decrease cochlear neural response and increase its threshold.

  • High dose LEV can enhance the forward masking of cochlear neural response.

  • Clinical dose of LEV can prolong the latency of cochlear neural response.

  • Delayed cochlear response may contribute to the treatment of audiogenic seizures.

Abstract

Background

Levetiracetam (LEV, 5–100 mg/kg) has been shown to prevent audiogenic seizures in a dose-dependent manner. This chemical is known to bind to synaptic vesicle protein 2A and inhibit l-type calcium channels, affecting neurotransmitter release. We hypothesize that the drug prevents audiogenic seizures partially by affecting cochlear neural response.

Methods

To test this hypothesis, rats were given 1000, 500, 50, or 0 mg/kg (saline control) LEV-injection. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAE), reflecting outer hair cell (OHC) function, and cochlear compound action potentials (CAP), reflecting cochlear neural output, were recorded and compared pre- and post-LEV.

Results

1000 mg/kg LEV-injection did not significantly affect DPOAE. The high dose LEV-injection, however, significantly reduced CAP amplitude resulting threshold shift (TS), prolonged CAP latency, and enhanced CAP forward masking. CAP latency and forward masking were significantly affected at the 500 mg/kg dose, but CAP-TS remained unchanged after LEV-injection. Interestingly, CAP latency wassignificantly prolonged, at least at the low stimulation levels, although the amplitude of CAP remained constant after a clinical dose of LEV-injection (50 mg/kg).

Discussion

Since the clinical dose of LEV-injection does not reduce CAP amplitude, the reduction of cochlear neural output is unlikely to be the underlying mechanism of LEV in the treatment of audiogenic seizure. The delayed cochlear neural response may be partially related to the prevention of audiogenic seizure. However, neuropharmacological changes in the central nervous system must play a major role in the treatment of audiogenic seizure, as it does in the treatment of focal epilepsy.

Introduction

Levetiracetam (LEV) is a widely used antiepileptic drug (Keppra®) approved by the Food and Drug Administration for use in adults and as an adjunctive medication for treatment of focal onset seizures in infants and children (Capovilla et al., 2004; Aeby et al., 2005; Gurses et al., 2008; Mruk et al., 2015; Ahmad et al., 2017; Akiyama et al., 2018; Akter et al., 2018; Han et al., 2018; Kanemura et al., 2018; Ahrens et al., 2019; Rosche et al., 2019; Wani et al., 2019; Zhou et al., 2019; Akhondian et al., 2020; Chu et al., 2020; Liu et al., 2020a; Sadleir et al., 2020; Sarangi et al., 2020). It has also been used to treat startle epilepsies in humans and suppress audiogenic seizures in animals (Gower et al., 1995; Luef and Loscher, 2007; Gurses et al., 2008; Vinogradova and van Rijn, 2008; Dreissen and Tijssen, 2012; Lowrie et al., 2016; Wu et al., 2019). Similar to the audiogenic seizures observed in the animals, musicogenic seizures were observed in humans which were triggered by musical stimuli ranging from simple tones to complex symphonic music (Kaplan, 2003; Cheng, 2016; Maguire, 2017; Tseng et al., 2018; Jesus-Ribeiro et al., 2020), although there are no reports about LEV in the treatment of musicogenic seizures.

The mechanisms by which LEV acts to suppresses seizures are not fully understood. The most likely mechanism is that the drug reduces seizures by binding to synaptic vesicle protein 2A (SV2A) (Kaminski et al., 2012; Loscher et al., 2016; Wu et al., 2019). LEV is known to be the ligand of SV2A (Lynch et al., 2004; Gillard et al., 2006; Nowack et al., 2011), and the synaptic vesicle protein 2 is required to maintain a pool of vesicles available for calcium-stimulated exocytosis regulating neurotransmission (Xu and Bajjalieh, 2001; Madeo et al., 2014). In addition, LEV has been reported to suppress voltage-operated L-type calcium channels and potassium channels in the isolated hippocampal neurons (Madeja et al., 2003; Yan et al., 2013) leading to a decrease in the total number of action potentials and prolonging the latency between spikes (Madeja et al., 2003).

LEV application in the rat brain slice has been reported to inhibit glutamate release, reducing the amplitude of the excitatory postsynaptic currents (EPSCs) (Lee et al., 2009). Glutamate serves as the neurotransmitter between the inner hair cells (IHCs) and the cochlear afferent nerve fibers (Peppi et al., 2012). The release of the neurotransmitter from the IHCs is regulated by L-type calcium channels (Zhang et al., 1999; Robertson and Paki, 2002), which mainly presents in the IHCs and pillar cells (Layton et al., 2005) and a small amount in the outer hair cells (OHCs) (Chen et al., 1995). Blockage of L-type calcium channels has been shown to reduce the cochlear compound action potential (CAP) (Chen et al., 2006). Therefore, treatment with LEV is expected to alter the neural output of the cochlea. The expected LEV-induced reductions in the neural output of the cochlea could potentially aid in the suppression of audiogenic seizures that occur in many strains of rodents and other mammals (Maxson et al., 1977; Henry, 1984; Loscher, 1984; Reigel and Faingold, 1993; Faingold et al., 1994; Lowrie et al., 2017) or suppression of musicogenic seizures observed in humans (Kaplan, 2003; Cheng, 2016; Maguire, 2017; Tseng et al., 2018; Jesus-Ribeiro et al., 2020).

To determine the effects of LEV on the cochlear functions, we treated rats with different doses of LEV and measured CAP generated by the auditory nerve to determine the extent to which the drug altered the neural output of the cochlea. To test the possible nonspecific effects of LEV on OHCs, distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAE), which provide a noninvasive method for assessing OHC electromotility and functional integrity of the OHCs (Abdala and Visser-Dumont, 2001) were also evaluated.

Section snippets

Subjects

Thirty-nine male Sprague–Dawley rats (Charles River Laboratories Inc. ∼4 months of age and an average of 390 g bodyweight) were used in this study. The rats were housed in the Laboratory Animal Facility of the University at Buffalo and given free access to food and water. The colony room was maintained at 22 °C with a 12-h light-dark cycle. All procedures regarding the use and handling of animals were reviewed and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at the University at

The effect of LEV on DPOAE

DPOAE, reflecting OHC electromotility, were measured in a group of 7 rats pre- and post-LEV injection (1000 mg/kg) and in a group of 8 rats receiving saline injection to determine the effect of LEV on the OHC function. Fig. 2A presents the DPOAE I/O function (2F1-F2 as a function of L2) whenF2 was set to 16 kHz and F1 to 13.3 kHz. The mean DPOAEs (±SEM) measured 3 h post-LEV (red open circles) were slightly lower than the pre-LEV levels (black filled circles), but remained largely within the

Effect of LEV on CAP latency

In the isolated neurons, LEV application has been found to delay the occurrence of the first action potential (AP) elicited by current injection, prolong the interval between the first and the second spikes, and to broaden the AP duration (Madeja et al., 2003). The changes of the neuronal action potential induced by this chemical may be through binding to the synaptic vesicle protein 2 and inhibiting voltage-operated L-type calcium channels (Zhang et al., 1999; Xu and Bajjalieh, 2001;

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare no competing financial interests or conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (R01DC014693, R01DC014452).

Dear Dr. Canlon

The revised manuscript (HEARES-D-21-00220) “Effect of antiepileptic drug levetiracetam on cochlear function” is resubmitted for consideration of publication in the journal of Hearing Research.

The manuscript has not been published or under consideration by any other journal.

This manuscript is in accordance with the ethical guidelines for journal publication.

We declare that the

References (73)

  • S.G. Kujawa et al.

    Synaptopathy in the noise-exposed and aging cochlea: primary neural degeneration in acquired sensorineural hearing loss

    Hear. Res.

    (2015)
  • L. Li et al.

    The increase in the degree of neural forward masking of cochlea following salicylate application

    Hear. Res.

    (2021)
  • L. Li et al.

    Temporal characteristics of the cochlear response after noise exposure

    Hear. Res.

    (2021)
  • M. Madeja et al.

    Reduction of voltage-operated potassium currents by levetiracetam: a novel antiepileptic mechanism of action?

    Neuropharmacology

    (2003)
  • M. Madeo et al.

    The human synaptic vesicle protein, SV2A, functions as a galactose transporter in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (2014)
  • S.C. Maxson et al.

    Pharmacogenetic differences in audiogenic seizure priming of C57BL/6Bg and DBA/1Bg-asr mice

    Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav.

    (1977)
  • L.G. Sadleir et al.

    Levetiracetam efficacy in PCDH19 girls clustering epilepsy

    Eur. J. Paediatr. Neurol.

    (2020)
  • S.C. Sarangi et al.

    An interaction study of Ocimum sanctum L. and levetiracetam in pentylenetetrazole kindling model of epilepsy

    J. Ethnopharmacol.

    (2020)
  • M. Szonyi et al.

    Intracellular calcium and outer hair cell electromotility

    Brain Res.

    (2001)
  • T. Wu et al.

    Mode of seizure inhibition by sodium channel blockers, an SV2A ligand, and an AMPA receptor antagonist in a rat amygdala kindling model

    Epilepsy Res.

    (2019)
  • H.D. Yan et al.

    Inhibitory effects of levetiracetam on the high-voltage-activated l-type Ca(2)(+) channels in hippocampal CA3 neurons of spontaneously epileptic rat (SER)

    Brain Res. Bull.

    (2013)
  • C. Abdala et al.

    Distortion product otoacoustic emissions: a tool for hearing assessment and scientific study

    Volta Rev.

    (2001)
  • A. Aeby et al.

    Levetiracetam efficacy in epileptic syndromes with continuous spikes and waves during slow sleep: experience in 12 cases

    Epilepsia

    (2005)
  • K.A. Ahmad et al.

    Changing antiepileptic drug use for seizures in US neonatal intensive care units from 2005 to 2014

    J. Perinatol.

    (2017)
  • S. Ahrens et al.

    Status epilepticus in the neonate: updates in treatment strategies

    Curr. Treat. Options Neurol.

    (2019)
  • J. Akhondian et al.

    Levetiracetam (levebel) versus carbamazepine monotherapy for focal epilepsy in children: a randomized clinical trial

    Iran. J. Child Neurol.

    (2020)
  • K. Akiyama et al.

    Comparison of levetiracetam with phenytoin for the prevention of intravenous busulfan-induced seizures in hematopoietic cell transplantation recipients

    Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol.

    (2018)
  • N. Akter et al.

    A randomized controlled trial of phenobarbital and levetiracetam in childhood epilepsy

    Mymensingh Med. J.

    (2018)
  • C. Batrel et al.

    Mass potentials recorded at the round window enable the detection of low spontaneous rate fibers in gerbil auditory nerve

    PLoS ONE

    (2017)
  • G. Capovilla et al.

    Efficacy of levetiracetam in pharmacoresistant continuous spikes and waves during slow sleep

    Acta Neurol. Scand.

    (2004)
  • J.Y. Cheng

    Musicogenic epilepsy and treatment of affective disorders: case report and review of pathogenesis

    Cogn. Behav. Neurol.

    (2016)
  • Y.E. Dreissen et al.

    The startle syndromes: physiology and treatment

    Epilepsia

    (2012)
  • J.J. Eggermont et al.

    Cochlear adaptation in guinea pigs. A quantitative description

    Audiology

    (1973)
  • G.I. Frolenkov

    Regulation of electromotility in the cochlear outer hair cell

    J. Physiol.

    (2006)
  • A.C. Furman et al.

    Noise-induced cochlear neuropathy is selective for fibers with low spontaneous rates

    J. Neurophysiol.

    (2013)
  • D.M. Harris et al.

    Forward masking of auditory nerve fiber responses

    J. Neurophysiol.

    (1979)
  • Cited by (1)

    This article is part of the Special Issue Outer hair cell Edited by Joseph Santos-Sacchi and Kumar Navaratnam.

    View full text