Elsevier

Gondwana Research

Volume 37, September 2016, Pages 465-503
Gondwana Research

Long-lived, stationary magmatism and pulsed porphyry systems during Tethyan subduction to post-collision evolution in the southernmost Lesser Caucasus, Armenia and Nakhitchevan

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2015.10.009Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Geodynamics, magmatism and metallogeny of the Tethys belt, southern Lesser Caucasus

  • Eocene subduction to Oligo-Miocene post-collision magmatism in a stationary setting

  • Subduction and collision/post-collision porphyry deposits in a composite pluton

Abstract

The composite Meghri–Ordubad and Bargushat plutons of the Zangezur–Ordubad region in the southernmost Lesser Caucasus consist of successive Eocene to Pliocene magmatic pulses, and host two stages of porphyry Cu–Mo deposits. New high-precision TIMS U–Pb zircon ages confirm the magmatic sequence recognized by previous Rb–Sr isochron and whole-rock K–Ar dating. A 44.03 ± 0.02 Ma-old granite and a 48.99 ± 0.07 Ma-old granodiorite belong to an initial Eocene magmatic pulse, which is coeval with the first stage of porphyry Cu–Mo formation at Agarak, Hanqasar, Aygedzor and Dastakert. A subsequent Oligocene magmatic pulse was constrained by U–Pb zircon ages at 31.82 ± 0.02 Ma and 33.49 ± 0.02 Ma for a monzonite and a gabbro, and a late Miocene porphyritic granodioritic and granitic pulse yielded ages between 22.46 ± 0.02 Ma and 22.22 ± 0.01 Ma, respectively. The Oligo-Miocene magmatic evolution broadly coincides with the second porphyry-Cu–Mo ore deposit stage, including the major Kadjaran deposit at 26–27 Ma.

Primitive mantle-normalized spider diagrams with negative Nb, Ta and Ti anomalies support a subduction-like nature for all Cenozoic magmatic rocks. Eocene magmatic rocks have a normal arc, calc-alkaline to high-K calc-alkaline composition, early Oligocene magmatic rocks a high-K calc-alkaline to shoshonitic composition, and late Oligocene to Mio-Pliocene rocks are adakitic and have a calc-alkaline to high-K calc-alkaline composition. Radiogenic isotopes reveal a mantle-dominated magmatic source, with the mantle component becoming more predominant during the Neogene. Trace element ratio and concentration patterns (Dy/Yb, Sr/Y, La/Yb, Eu/Eu*, Y contents) correlate with the age of the magmatic rocks. They reveal combined amphibole and plagioclase fractionation during the Eocene and the early Oligocene, and amphibole fractionation in the absence of plagioclase during the late Oligocene and the Mio-Pliocene, consistent with Eocene to Pliocene progressive thickening of the crust or increasing pressure of magma differentiation. Characteristic trace element and isotope systematics (Ba vs. Nb/Y, Th/Yb vs. Ba/La, 206Pb/204Pb vs. Th/Nb, Th/Nb vs. δ18O, REE) indicate that Eocene magmatism was dominated by fluid-mobile components, whereas Oligocene and Mio-Pliocene magmatism was dominated by a depleted mantle, compositionally modified by subducted sediments.

A two-stage magmatic and metallogenic evolution is proposed for the Zangezur–Ordubad region. Eocene normal arc, calc-alkaline to high-K calc-alkaline magmatism was coeval with extensive Eocene magmatism in Iran attributed to Neotethys subduction. Eocene subduction resulted in the emplacement of small tonnage porphyry Cu–Mo deposits. Subsequent Oligocene and Miocene high-K calc-alkaline and shoshonitic to adakitic magmatism, and the second porphyry Cu–Mo deposit stage coincided with Arabia–Eurasia collision to post-collision tectonics. Magmatism and ore formation are linked to asthenospheric upwelling along translithospheric, transpressional regional faults between the Gondwana-derived South Armenian block and the Eurasian margin, resulting in decompression melting of lithospheric mantle, metasomatised by sediment components added to the mantle during the previous Eocene subduction event.

Introduction

The Tethyan orogenic belt was formed during convergence of the African–Arabian and Eurasian plates, and included abundant microplates (e.g. Golonka, 2004, Barrier and Vrielynck, 2008, Adamia et al., 2011, Rolland et al., 2012). This complex converging system resulted in Jurassic–Cretaceous and Paleogene subduction-related magmatism and ore formation, followed by various collision to post-orogenic magmatic and ore forming events throughout the Cenozoic (e.g. Marchev et al., 2005, Von Quadt et al., 2005, Perelló et al., 2008, Yigit, 2009, Moritz et al., 2014, Hou et al., 2015, Richards, 2015).

The Zangezur–Ordubad region of the southernmost Lesser Caucasus, along the Armenian and Nakhitchevan borders with Iran (Fig. 1), is a unique location along the Tethyan orogenic belt where magmatism remained stationary from an Early Paleogene subduction setting to a Neogene post-collision environment, in a place where a Gondwana-derived terrane collided with the Eurasian margin (Fig. 2). This resulted in a long-lived, Eocene to Pliocene pulsed magmatic system generating the composite Meghri–Ordubad and Bargushat plutons at the contact of the Gondwana-derived South Armenian block with the Kapan zone (Fig. 3). With an area of about 1400 km2, they form the largest pluton cluster along the Lesser Caucasus (Karamyan et al., 1974, Tayan et al., 1976, Babazadeh et al., 1990, Melkonyan et al., 2008). The composite Meghri–Ordubad and Bargushat plutons are also exceptional because they host within a small area several stages of Eocene to Miocene precious and base metal epithermal and porphyry Cu–Mo deposits (Bagdasaryan et al., 1969, Babazadeh et al., 1990, Tayan, 1998, Melkonyan et al., 2010, Moritz et al., 2013). The evolution and setting of the Zangezur–Ordubad region of the southernmost Lesser Caucasus is comparable to the Himalayan setting, where protracted Mesozoic to Cenozoic magmatism was also accompanied by pulsed porphyry deposit emplacement (e.g. Hou et al., 2015).

The Lesser Caucasus is a key area to understand the lateral connection of the Western and Central Tethyan orogenic and metallogenic belt (Jankovic, 1977, Jankovic, 1997, Richards, 2015), including the Balkans, Rhodopes and Taurides–Anatolides with the Iranian belts. In particular, the Meghri–Ordubad and Bargushat plutons, studied in this contribution in the southernmost Lesser Caucasus, constitute the northern extension of the Iranian Alborz and Urumieh–Dokhtar magmatic and metallogenic belts (Fig. 1). The link of the Lesser Caucasus with the later magmatic arcs is still not well understood, as well as the nature of the widespread Eocene to recent magmatic activity along the Lesser Caucasus (Sosson et al., 2010).

This study is based on a comprehensive lithogeochemical study from the Zangezur–Ordubad region, spanning Eocene to Pliocene magmatic rocks, complemented by a whole-rock Sr, Nd, Pb and O isotope geochemistry investigation, and high-precision TIMS U–Pb zircon dating of selected and representative magmatic events. The new major, trace element, isotope and radiometric age data of this study allow us to reconstruct the Eocene to Pliocene magmatic evolution and its link to major, pulsed ore formation events in the Zangezur–Ordubad region. This evolution is discussed within the Tethyan framework, in particular, with respect to the Iranian magmatic belts and the overall geodynamic and metallogenic evolution during the final subduction stages of the Neotethys, and the ultimate collision between Arabia and Eurasia.

Section snippets

Geodynamic setting

The Lesser Caucasus is a segment of the Tethyan orogenic belt (Fig. 1), and is the consequence of north- to northeast-verging Jurassic–Cretaceous subduction of the Neotethys beneath the Eurasian plate (Kazmin et al., 1986, Zonenshain and Le Pichon, 1986, Rolland et al., 2011), followed by Late Cretaceous collision with the Gondwana-derived South Armenian block (Rolland et al., 2009a, Rolland et al., 2009b), and a jump of the active Neotethys subduction zone to the southwest of the Turkish

Tectonic and geological setting of the Zangezur–Ordubad region

The Zangezur–Ordubad region sites astride on the territories of southern Armenia and Nakhitchevan (Fig. 3a). Its eastern boundary along the Kapan block is the northwest-trending, dextral strike-slip Khustup-Giratakh fault, which includes the Zangezur tectonic mélange (Tayan et al., 1976; Fig. 3). The Zangezur–Ordubad region includes the eastern uplifted Zangezur block and the western downthrown Nakhitchevan block, separated from each other by the northwest-trending dextral strike-slip

Metallogenic setting of the Lesser Caucasus and the Zangezur–Ordubad region

Ore deposits were formed during the different stages of the geodynamic evolution of the Lesser Caucasus. The initial metallogenic evolution is related to the long-lasting Jurassic–Cretaceous subduction of the Tethys along the Eurasian margin. Copper-pyrite, Cu–Au and polymetallic stratiform, vein-type and stockwork ore bodies are hosted by Middle Jurassic volcanic and volcano-sedimentary rocks of the Somkheto-Karabakh belt and the Kapan zone in the Alaverdi, Mehmana and Kapan mining districts

Analytical techniques

A total of fifty-three magmatic rock samples from the Zangezur–Ordubad region were selected for whole rock geochemical analyses. Altered and weathered surfaces were removed by a diamond circular saw. The samples were crushed by a hydraulic press and subsequently powdered to < 10 μm using a mortar agate mill. Loss on ignition (LOI) was determined based on the mass difference of 2–3 g of dried powdered rock before and after heating to 1050 °C. Major and some trace elements (from Nb to Ba, Table 2)

Whole-rock major and trace element geochemistry

Major and trace element compositions are listed in Table 2. For petrologic classification and diagram presentation, major oxide data were normalized to a 100% volatile-free basis. Volcanic and sub-volcanic rocks were classified according to the total alkali-silica (TAS) diagram of Le Maître (2002), which also includes the equivalent names for coarse-grained intrusive rocks according to Middlemost (1994) (Fig. 6a). Plutonic rocks were also classified based on modal mineral proportions and

Protracted Eocene to Pliocene magmatism in the Zangezur–Ordubad region

The U–Pb ID-TIMS ages obtained in this study confirm the pulsed magmatic activity from the Eocene to the Miocene in the composite Meghri–Ordubad and Bargushat plutons (Fig. 4). The Eocene calc-alkaline to high-K calc-alkaline intrusive rocks dated in this study (AG-10-06A granodiorite and AG-10-07 granite) agree with the Rb–Sr isochron ages obtained previously by Melkonyan et al., 2008, Melkonyan et al., 2010. In addition, the oldest age of 48.99 ± 0.07 Ma of sample AG-10-06A (Fig. 18) is close to

Conclusions

This study has allowed us to clarify the magmatic, geodynamic and metallogenic evolution of the Zangezur–Ordubad region of the southernmost Lesser Caucasus, which links the Western and Central segments of the Tethyan orogenic and metallogenic belt with its Iranian extensions. Lithogeochemical and radiogenic isotope rock data together with U–Pb zircon TIMS dating, and published Re–Os molybdenite ages allow us to subdivide the magmatic and metallogenic evolution of the Zangezur–Ordubad region in

Acknowledgements

The research was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation through the research grants 200020-121510, 200020-138130 and 200020-155928 and the SCOPES Joint Research ProjectsIB7620-118901 and IZ73Z0-128324. Field work of H. Rezeau was supported by the Augustin Lombard Foundation of the Geneva SPHN Society and a Society of Economic Geology student research grant from the H.E. McKinstry Fund. S. Hovakimyan was supported by a post-doctoral Swiss Government Excellence Scholarship during

References (216)

  • I.N. Bindeman et al.

    Oxygen isotope evidence for slab melting in modern and ancient subduction zones

    Earth and Planetary Science Letters

    (2005)
  • L.P. Black et al.

    Improved 206Pb/238U microprobe geochronology by the monitoring of a trace element-related matrix effect; SHRIMP, ID-TIMS, ELA-ICP-MS and oxygen isotope documentation for a series of zircon standards

    Chemical Geology

    (2004)
  • M.-F. Brunet et al.

    The South Caspian Basin: a review of its evolution from subsidence modelling

    Sedimentary Geology

    (2003)
  • V.S. Burtman

    Meso-Tethyan oceanic sutures and their deformation

    Tectonophysics

    (1994)
  • A. Castro et al.

    Late Eocene–Oligocene post-collisional monzonitic intrusions from the Alborz magmatic belt, NW Iran. An example of monzonite magma generation from a metasomatized mantle source

    Lithos

    (2013)
  • M. Chiaradia

    Adakite-like magmas from fractional crystallization and melting assimilation of mafic lower crust (Eocene Macuchi arc, Western Cordillera, Ecuador)

    Chemical Geology

    (2009)
  • H.-Y. Chiu et al.

    Zircon U–Pb age constraints from Iran on the magmatic evolution related to Neotethyan subduction and Zagros orogeny

    Lithos

    (2013)
  • R.V. Conceição et al.

    Derivation of potassic (shoshonitic) magmas by decompression melting of phlogopite + pargasite lherzolite

    Lithos

    (2004)
  • G. Galoyan et al.

    Evidence for superposed MORB, oceanic plateau and volcanic arc series in the Lesser Caucasus (Stepanavan, Armenia)

    Comptes Rendus Geosciences

    (2007)
  • G. Galoyan et al.

    Geology, geochemistry and 40Ar/39Ar dating of Sevan ophiolites (Lesser Caucasus, Armenia): evidence for Jurassic back-arc opening and hot spot event between the South Armenian Block and Eurasia

    Journal of Asian Earth Sciences

    (2009)
  • I.P. Gamkrelidze

    Terranes of the Caucasus and adjacent areas

    Tectonophysics

    (1986)
  • A.M. Ghazi et al.

    Biostratigraphic zonation and 40Ar/39Ar ages for the Neotethyan Khoy ophiolite of NW Iran

    Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology

    (2003)
  • J. Golonka

    Plate tectonic evolution of the southern margin of Eurasia in the Mesozoic and Cenozoic

    Tectonophysics

    (2004)
  • T.H. Green et al.

    Experimental determination of REE partition coefficients between amphibole and basaltic to andesitic liquids at high pressure

    Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta

    (1985)
  • A.A. Hassanipak et al.

    Petrology, geochemistry and tectonic setting of the Khoy ophiolite, northwest Iran: implications for Tethyan tectonics

    Journal of Asian Earth Sciences

    (2000)
  • M. Hässig et al.

    New structural and petrological data on the Amasia ophiolites (NW Sevan–Akera suture zone, Lesser Caucasus): insights for a large-scale obduction in Armenia and NE Turkey

    Tectonophysics

    (2013)
  • M. Hässig et al.

    Multi-stage metamorphism in the South Armenian Block during the Late Jurassic to Early Cretaceous: tectonics over south-dipping subduction of Northern branch of Neotethys

    Journal of Asian Earth Sciences

    (2015)
  • J. Hermann et al.

    Accessory phase control on the trace element signature of sediment melts in subduction zones

    Chemical Geology

    (2009)
  • Z. Hou et al.

    Porphyry Cu (–Mo–Au) deposits related to melting of thickened mafic lower crust: examples from the eastern Tethyan metallogenic domain

    Ore Geology Reviews

    (2011)
  • S.O. Achikgiozyan et al.

    The Kapan mining district

    (1987)
  • Sh. Adamia et al.

    Evolution of the Late Cenozoic basins of Georgia (SW Caucasus): a review

  • Sh. Adamia et al.

    Geology of the Caucasus: a review

    Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences

    (2011)
  • P. Agard et al.

    Zagros orogeny: a subduction-dominated process

    Geological Magazine

    (2011)
  • M. Aghazadeh et al.

    Post-collisional polycyclic plutonism from the Zagros hinterland: the Shaivar Dagh plutonic complex, Alborz belt, Iran

    Geological Magazine

    (2011)
  • J. Ahmadian et al.

    High magmatic flux during Alpine–Himalayan collision: constraints from the Kal-e-Kafı complex, central Iran

    Geological Society of America Bulletin

    (2009)
  • M. Alavi

    Structures of the Zagros fold–thrust belt in Iran

    American Journal of Science

    (2007)
  • R. Alonso-Perez et al.

    Igneous garnet and amphibole fractionation in the roots of island arcs: experimental constraints on andesitic liquids

    Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology

    (2009)
  • Sh.H. Amiryan

    Gold ore formation of Armenian SSR

    (1984)
  • Sh.O. Amiryan et al.

    Mineralogical–geochemical characteristics of the ores of the Mehgradzor gold deposit

    Izvestia Academy of Sciences Armenian SSR, Nauki o Zemle

    (1964)
  • S.H. Amiryan et al.

    Mineralization stages and ore minerals of the Teghout ore deposit

    Izvestia Academy of Sciences Armenian SSR, Nauki o Zemle

    (1987)
  • A.T. Aslanyan

    Regional geology of Armenia

    (1958)
  • A. Audétat

    Source and evolution of molybdenum in the porphyry Mo(-Nb) deposit at Cave Peak, Texas

    Journal of Petrology

    (2010)
  • A. Avagyan et al.

    Neogene to Quaternary stress field evolution in Lesser Caucasus and adjacent regions using fault kinematics analysis and volcanic cluster data

    Geodinamica Acta

    (2005)
  • V.M. Babazadeh et al.

    Porphyry-copper and molybdenum deposits

    (1990)
  • O. Bachmann et al.

    Insights into shallow magmatic processes in large silicic magma bodies: the trace element record in the Fish Canyon magma body, Colorado

    Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology

    (2005)
  • G.P. Bagdasaryan et al.

    Absolute dating of Armenian ore formations

    International Geology Review

    (1969)
  • G.P. Bagdasaryan et al.

    Comparative study of the age of old metamorphic schists in the Hakhoum River Basin (Armenian SSR) by means of K–Ar and Rb–Sr techniques

    Geochronology of the Eastern-European Platform and Junction of the Caucasian–Carpathian System

    (1978)
  • P. Ballato et al.

    Arabia–Eurasia continental collision: Insights from late Tertiary foreland-basin evolution in the Alborz Mountains, northern Iran

    Geological Society of America Bulletin

    (2011)
  • M.D. Behn et al.

    Diapirs as the source of the sediment signature in arc lavas

    Nature Geoscience

    (2011)
  • Cited by (0)

    1

    Deceased May 7th 2014.

    View full text