Elsevier

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Volume 94, Issue 3, September 2021, Pages 627-638.e1
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Original article
Clinical endoscopy
Artificial intelligence−enhanced white-light colonoscopy with attention guidance predicts colorectal cancer invasion depth

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2021.03.936Get rights and content

Background and Aims

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and EMR are applied in treating superficial colorectal neoplasms but are contraindicated by deeply invasive colorectal cancer (CRC). The invasion depth of neoplasms can be examined by an automated artificial intelligence (AI) system to determine the applicability of ESD and EMR.

Methods

A deep convolutional neural network with a tumor localization branch to guide invasion depth classification was constructed on the GoogLeNet architecture. The model was trained using 7734 nonmagnified white-light colonoscopy (WLC) images supplemented by image augmentation from 657 lesions labeled with histopathologic analysis of invasion depth. An independent testing dataset consisting of 1634 WLC images from 156 lesions was used to validate the model.

Results

For predicting noninvasive and superficially invasive neoplasms, the model achieved an overall accuracy of 91.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 89.6%-92.4%), with 91.2% sensitivity (95% CI, 88.8%-93.3%) and 91.0% specificity (95% CI, 89.0%-92.7%) at an optimal cutoff of .41 and the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve of .970 (95% CI, .962-.978). Inclusion of the advanced CRC data significantly increased the sensitivity in differentiating superficial neoplasms from deeply invasive early CRC to 65.3% (95% CI, 61.9%-68.8%) with an AUROC curve of .729 (95% CI, .699-.759), similar to experienced endoscopists (.691; 95% CI, .624-.758).

Conclusions

We have developed an AI-enhanced attention-guided WLC system that differentiates noninvasive or superficially submucosal invasive neoplasms from deeply invasive CRC with high accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity.

Section snippets

Data preparation and sample distribution

WLC images of nonpolypoid advanced colorectal adenoma and CRC from the Department of Gastroenterology of Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, China, were retrospectively collected. The study protocol was approved by the Nanfang Hospital Institutional Review Board (NFEC-2019-160). There was no restriction on the instruments used. However, all images used in this study are nonmagnified. Ethics approval was provided by Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, China.

Lesions were

Histopathologic characteristics of the patient cohort

A summary of patient clinical profiles in the training and testing datasets are shown in Table 1. Of 657 lesions included in the training dataset, with patient ages ranging from 20 to 90 years, 424 (64.5%) were group 1 cases, 42 (6.4%) group 2 CRC, and 191 (29.1%) group 3 cases. Four hundred twenty four superficial lesions (64.5%) were defined as P0 and 233 (35.5%) as P1. To assess the classification performance of the AI model, we used an independent testing dataset consisting of 1634

Discussion

Endoscopic discrimination of noninvasive or superficially invasive tumors from deeply invasive CRC is essential to determine the optimal treatment strategy for patients. Unfortunately, the accurate identification of lesion features associated with deep submucosal invasion is challenging in clinical practice even for experienced endoscopists. In recent years, an increasing body of work has demonstrated the potential of computer-aided systems for improving clinicians’ diagnosis and work

Acknowledgment

Data can be acquired upon request to the authors.

References (38)

  • N. Yoshida et al.

    Importance of histological evaluation in endoscopic resection of early colorectal cancer

    World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol

    (2012)
  • Y. Hashiguchi et al.

    Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (JSCCR) guidelines 2019 for the treatment of colorectal cancer

    Int J Clin Oncol

    (2020)
  • C. Hassan et al.

    A resect and discard strategy would improve cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening

    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol

    (2010)
  • M. Li et al.

    Kudo's pit pattern classification for colorectal neoplasms: a meta-analysis

    World J Gastroenterol

    (2014)
  • H. Ikehara et al.

    Diagnosis of depth of invasion for early colorectal cancer using magnifying colonoscopy

    J Gastroenterol Hepatol

    (2010)
  • S. Tanaka et al.

    Endoscopic assessment of colorectal cancer with superficial or deep submucosal invasion using magnifying colonoscopy

    Clin Endosc

    (2013)
  • N. Kakushima

    Endoscopic diagnosis for the depth of early colorectal cancer

    J Gastroenterol Hepatol

    (2010)
  • T. Matsuda et al.

    Efficacy of the invasive/non-invasive pattern by magnifying chromoendoscopy to estimate the depth of invasion of early colorectal neoplasms

    Am J Gastroenterol

    (2008)
  • Y. Sano et al.

    Japan NBI Expert Team classification: Narrow-band imaging magnifying endoscopic classification of colorectal tumors

    Dig Endosc

    (2018)
  • Cited by (26)

    • The role of artificial intelligence in colonoscopy

      2024, Seminars in Colon and Rectal Surgery
    • pT1 colorectal cancer: A treatment dilemma

      2023, Best Practice and Research: Clinical Gastroenterology
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    DISCLOSURE: All authors disclosed no financial relationships. Research support for this study was provided in part by Guangdong Provincial Science and Technology Research Program (2020A1414010265,) funding to Xiaobei Luo and Guangdong Provincial Science and Technology Research Program (2019A141405016, and 2017B020209003) funding to Side Liu. This work was also supported in part by the Institute of Bioengineering and Nanotechnology, Biomedical Research Council, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A∗STAR; Project Number IAF-PPH18/01/a0/014, IAF-PP H18/01/a0/K14, MedCaP-LOA-18-02); MOE ARC (MOE2017-T2-1-149); IAF (H18/01/a0/017); SMART CAMP; The Institute for Digital Medicine (WisDM); and Mechanobiology Institute of Singapore (R-714-106-004-135) funding to Hanry Yu.

    If you would like to chat with an author of this article, you may contact Dr Side at [email protected] and Dr Hanry at [email protected].

    Drs Luo, Wang and Han contributed equally to this article.

    View full text