Friend or foe? Reactive oxygen species production, scavenging and signaling in plant response to environmental stresses

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2018.01.011Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Biotic and abiotic stresses induce ROS production in different subcellular compartments.

  • In plant cells, different ROS have various degrees of reactivity toward molecules.

  • ROS scavengers keep ROS homeostasis and are involved in ROS-dependent signaling.

  • Within a cell, ROS cross talk with RNS, hormones, and Ca2+ ions.

  • ROS transduce SAA signal together with NPQ, hormones, Ca2+ and electrical waves.

Abstract

In the natural environment, plants are exposed to a variety of biotic and abiotic stress conditions that trigger rapid changes in the production and scavenging of reactive oxygen species (ROS). The production and scavenging of ROS is compartmentalized, which means that, depending on stimuli type, they can be generated and eliminated in different cellular compartments such as the apoplast, plasma membrane, chloroplasts, mitochondria, peroxisomes, and endoplasmic reticulum. Although the accumulation of ROS is generally harmful to cells, ROS play an important role in signaling pathways that regulate acclimatory and defense responses in plants, such as systemic acquired acclimation (SAA) and systemic acquired resistance (SAR). However, high accumulations of ROS can also trigger redox homeostasis disturbance which can lead to cell death, and in consequence, to a limitation in biomass and yield production. Different ROS have various half-lifetimes and degrees of reactivity toward molecular components such as lipids, proteins, and nucleic acids. Thus, they play different roles in intra- and extra-cellular signaling. Despite their possible damaging effect, ROS should mainly be considered as signaling molecules that regulate local and systemic acclimatory and defense responses. Over the past two decades it has been proven that ROS together with non-photochemical quenching (NPQ), hormones, Ca2+ waves, and electrical signals are the main players in SAA and SAR, two physiological processes essential for plant survival and productivity in unfavorable conditions.

Introduction

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are reactive forms of molecular oxygen, including singlet oxygen (1O2), superoxide radical (O2), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and hydroxyl radical (OH). In the classical view, they emerged on Earth along with atmospheric oxygen around 2.5 billion years ago and since then have accompanied all of aerobic life [1]. However, oxygen and water were produced in the Universe during supernova explosion, long before rocky planets like Earth were shaped [2]. Moreover, many anaerobic organisms also generate ROS and are equipped with ROS scavenging systems [3]. Therefore, the evolution of both prokaryotic and eukaryotic organisms could proceed in the presence of ROS long before an oxygenic atmosphere appeared. This left an imprint in all kingdoms of life in the context of multiple ROS functions. In physiological conditions they are indispensable for proper cellular metabolism, regulating processes such as cell proliferation, differentiation, signaling reactions, and the ultimate end of the cell cycle, namely the programmed cell death [4], [5], [6], [7].

Contrary to animals, plants demonstrate a sessile life habit and their developmental program is to some extent indeterminate, which means that it is more flexible and dependent on the growing conditions. In this context, ROS are excellent signaling molecules regulating plant metabolic pathways in the proximity of stimuli, but also in the more distal tissues and organs. However, their production and accumulation must be strictly controlled because of their high reactivity and toxicity in higher concentrations.

The origin of programmed cell death in plant and animal kingdoms is common, so as are some morphological and biochemical features such as chromatin condensation, nuclear DNA fragmentation, mitochondria swelling, and plasma membrane collapse [8]. Programmed cell death is conserved in both kingdoms, but plants and animals evolved different, specific mechanisms. In animals, mitochondria and plasma membrane-bound NADPH oxidases are the major source of ROS, playing a central role in the induction of cell death [9]. As opposed to animals, in plant cells ROS are generated in different subcellular compartments, mainly in the chloroplasts and peroxisomes, but also in the mitochondria, plasma membrane, cell wall, endoplasmic reticulum and nuclei [10], [11].

In plants, programmed cell death onset can be the consequence of genetically conserved, developmental processes involved in the formation tracheary elements during xylem differentiation, root cap shedding, generation of perforated leaves, both female and male germline formation, and seed development and germination [12], [13], [14]. However, programmed cell death also constitutes a natural process of replacing old cells by new ones or can be caused by external factors. In the natural environment, plants are simultaneously exposed to a variety of unfavorable conditions, including both biotic and abiotic factors. Biotic stress takes place in response to the invasion of living organisms such as insects, parasites, fungi, bacteria or viruses, while abiotic stress is caused by the negative impact of inanimate nature, such as excessive irradiation, UV radiation, the ozone, drought, flooding, or either low or high temperatures. All of these adverse conditions lead to ROS homeostasis disturbance in plant cells, which in turn evokes acclimatory responses such as systemic acquired acclimation (SAA) and systemic acquired resistance (SAR) [4], [15], [16], [17].

Section snippets

ROS production in response to environmental stresses

In the natural plant habitat, environmental stresses such as excess light, UV, drought, chilling, high temperature, root hypoxia, and others can evoke a disturbance in cellular redox homeostasis, leading in extreme cases to cell death and, in consequence, to a limitation in biomass production. The involvement of ROS in plant response to a pathogen attack is also well documented. ROS are formed in the apoplast by plant NADPH oxidases, but their accumulation has also been observed in

ROS-mediated changes in cellular components

Different ROS have various lifetimes and degrees of reactivity toward molecular components. At early step of stress signal perception, ROS activate plasma membrane-localized Ca2+ influx and K+ efflux channels, which propagate stress signals [73], [74], [75]. Activation of K+ efflux by adverse conditions has been shown to trigger programmed cell death both in animals and plants [76]. The main downstream targets of ROS during oxidative stress are nucleic acids, proteins, and lipids [6].

1O2 has a

ROS scavenging

The ROS-scavenging system components and mode of action were discovered in the last three decades of the 20th century [42], [61], [93], [94], [95], [96], [97], [98], [99], [100]. Initially, ROS scavengers were considered only as a protection mechanism against ROS toxic influence. However, recent discoveries have proven that ROS-scavenging enzymes and non-enzymatic antioxidants function not only to keep ROS homeostasis but are also involved in ROS-dependent signaling during plant acclimatory

Pathways involved in ROS perception and redox-mediated signaling - compartmentalization of ROS-derived signals

In the course of evolution, plants formed complex and integrated signaling pathways that enable communication between cells and the environment as well as signal transduction within the cell (Fig. 2) and to neighboring cells (Fig. 3). This communication is to perform the required adjustments and thus to increase the possibility of survival in adverse conditions. ROS are essential elements of this network. However, molecular pathways employing ROS have still not completely been discovered. This

Interconnection of subcellular compartments in ROS, Ca2+, hormonal, and electrical signal propagation in systemic acquired acclimation (SAA)

Systemic responses to environmental stimuli are essential for plant survival in unfavorable conditions. They are initiated in response to many different signals, including abiotic stresses, wounding, and pathogens, e.g. the systemic signal from high light-exposed leaves is rapidly transmitted to distal shaded leaves, resulting in an acclimatory response that enhances tolerance to oxidative damage. Recent studies identified several different signaling pathways involved in systemic acquired

Conclusions

Although potentially harmful to plant cells, ROS should be considered beneficial messengers that lead to oxidative signaling, systemic acquired acclimation, and systemic acquired resistance in cooperation with hormones, non-photochemical quenching, Ca2+, and electrical signals. Despite the scientific effort that has been made in the last two decades, our understanding of ROS mode of action is still far from being fully explained. Further studies on these aspects will help us to better

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the ‘Maestro 6’ project (2014/14/A/NZ1/00218) granted to SK by the Polish National Science Centre.

References (264)

  • O. Van Aken et al.

    Licensed to kill: mitochondria, chloroplasts, and cell death

    Trends Plant Sci.

    (2015)
  • D. Marino et al.

    A burst of plant NADPH oxidases

    Trends Plant Sci.

    (2012)
  • D. Jakubowska et al.

    Modification of plasma membrane NADPH oxidase activity in cucumber seedling roots in response to cadmium stress

    Plant Sci. Int. J. Exp. Plant Biol.

    (2015)
  • D. Camejo et al.

    Reactive oxygen species, essential molecules, during plant-pathogen interactions

    Plant Physiol. Biochem. PPB

    (2016)
  • G.P. Bienert et al.

    Specific aquaporins facilitate the diffusion of hydrogen peroxide across membranes

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (2007)
  • B. Meriga et al.

    Aluminium-induced production of oxygen radicals, lipid peroxidation and DNA damage in seedlings of rice (Oryza sativa)

    J. Plant Physiol.

    (2004)
  • H. Garcês et al.

    Mechanical stress elicits nitric oxide formation and DNA fragmentation in Arabidopsis thaliana

    Ann. Bot.

    (2001)
  • C.H. Foyer et al.

    The presence of dehydroascorbate and dehydroascorbate reductase in plant tissues

    FEBS Lett.

    (1998)
  • A.D. Anbar et al.

    A whiff of oxygen before the great oxidation event?

    Science

    (2007)
  • K. Knie et al.

    60Fe anomaly in a deep-sea manganese crust and implications for a nearby supernova source

    Phys. Rev. Lett.

    (2004)
  • I. Ślesak et al.

    Oxygen and hydrogen peroxide in the early evolution of life on earth: in silico comparative analysis of biochemical pathways

    Astrobiology

    (2012)
  • S. Karpiński et al.

    Light acclimation, retrograde signalling, cell death and immune defences in plants

    Plant Cell Environ.

    (2013)
  • C.H. Foyer et al.

    Redox signaling in plants

    Antioxid. Redox Signal.

    (2013)
  • S. Gilroy et al.

    ROS, calcium, and electric signals: key mediators of rapid systemic signaling in plants

    Plant Physiol.

    (2016)
  • H. Yu et al.

    Plant and animal organelles in cell death

    Oncotarget

    (2015)
  • K. Das et al.

    Reactive oxygen species (ROS) and response of antioxidants as ROS-scavengers during environmental stress in plants

    Front. Environ. Sci.

    (2014)
  • B. Karpinska et al.

    Inhibitor-induced oxidation of the nucleus and cytosol in Arabidopsis thaliana: implications for organelle to nucleus retrograde signalling

    Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci.

    (2017)
  • K. Oracz et al.

    Phytohormones signaling pathways and ROS involvement in seed germination

    Front. Plant Sci.

    (2016)
  • P. Mühlenbock et al.

    Chloroplast signaling and LESION SIMULATING DISEASE1 regulate crosstalk between light acclimation and immunity in Arabidopsis

    Plant Cell

    (2008)
  • M. Szechyńska-Hebda et al.

    Evidence for light wavelength-specific photoelectrophysiological signaling and memory of excess light episodes in arabidopsis[W][OA]

    Plant Cell

    (2010)
  • S. Karpinski et al.

    Systemic signaling and acclimation in response to excess excitation energy in Arabidopsis

    Science

    (1999)
  • F. Van Breusegem et al.

    Unraveling the tapestry of networks involving reactive oxygen species in plants

    Plant Physiol.

    (2008)
  • F.J. Corpas, D.K. Gupta, J.M. Palma, Production sites of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in organelles from plant cells,...
  • S. Kangasjärvi et al.

    Photosynthesis, photorespiration, and light signalling in defence responses

    J. Exp. Bot.

    (2012)
  • S. Chaouch et al.

    Peroxisomal hydrogen peroxide is coupled to biotic defense responses by ISOCHORISMATE SYNTHASE1 in a daylength-related manner

    Plant Physiol.

    (2010)
  • C.H. Foyer et al.

    Redox regulation in photosynthetic organisms: signaling, acclimation, and practical implications

    Antioxid. Redox Signal.

    (2009)
  • W. Wituszyńska, S. Karpiński, Programmed Cell Death as a Response to High Light, UV and Drought Stress in Plants, 2013....
  • P. Pospíšil

    Production of reactive oxygen species by photosystem II as a response to light and temperature stress

    Front. Plant Sci.

    (2016)
  • M.J. Fryer et al.

    Control of Ascorbate Peroxidase 2 expression by hydrogen peroxide and leaf water status during excess light stress reveals a functional organisation of Arabidopsis leaves

    Plant J. Cell Mol. Biol.

    (2003)
  • P.M. Mullineaux et al.

    Spatial dependence for hydrogen peroxide-directed signaling in light-stressed plants

    Plant Physiol.

    (2006)
  • B.C. Tripathy et al.

    Reactive oxygen species generation and signaling in plants

    Plant Signal. Behav.

    (2012)
  • A. Krieger-Liszkay et al.

    Singlet oxygen production in photosystem II and related protection mechanism

    Photosynth. Res.

    (2008)
  • J.B. Rossel et al.

    Systemic and intracellular responses to photooxidative stress in Arabidopsis

    Plant Cell.

    (2007)
  • M. Havaux

    Carotenoid oxidation products as stress signals in plants

    Plant J. Cell Mol. Biol.

    (2014)
  • C. Triantaphylidès et al.

    Singlet oxygen is the major reactive oxygen species involved in photooxidative damage to plants

    Plant Physiol.

    (2008)
  • N.E. Holt et al.

    Carotenoid cation formation and the regulation of photosynthetic light harvesting

    Science

    (2005)
  • T. Golan et al.

    Photoprotection mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana acclimate to high light by increasing photosynthesis and specific antioxidants

    Plant Cell Environ.

    (2006)
  • M. Białasek et al.

    Evidence for the involvement of electrical, calcium and ROS signaling in the systemic regulation of non-photochemical quenching and photosynthesis

    Plant Cell Physiol.

    (2017)
  • V. Petrov et al.

    ROS-mediated abiotic stress-induced programmed cell death in plants

    Front. Plant Sci.

    (2015)
  • K. Asada

    The water-water cycle as alternative photon and electron sinks

    Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci.

    (2000)
  • Cited by (413)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text