Living on the boundary of a post-disturbance forest area: The negative influence of security cover on red deer home range size
Introduction
Ecosystem-based management requires thorough knowledge of the patterns of natural disturbances (Morgan et al., 1994, Cissel et al., 1999, Landres et al., 1999). Such knowledge is also needed for conservative management of forest ecosystems (Atwill, 1994). Global warming is likely to increase the rates of forest disturbance, and changes in weather patterns will result in more forest fires caused by drought, wind and natural ignition, more convective windstorms, coastal flooding and hurricanes (Overpeck et al., 1990). In densely populated habitats, cervids exert a considerable effect on forest ecosystems, in particular young tree stands (McShea et al., 1997, Côté et al., 2004), and forests may be difficult to re-establish, naturally or artificially, after a large-scale disturbance. In Europe, the relationships between deer and post-disturbance forests have been studied by several authors (Gaillard et al., 2003, Borkowski, 2004, Widmer et al., 2004, Saïd and Servanty, 2005, Storms et al., 2006, Richard et al., 2011, Borkowski and Ukalski, 2012), however, most of the existing studies analysed the areas affected by hurricane Lothar. This paper deals with a forest area damaged by a large-scale fire and the surrounding undisturbed forest in southwestern Poland (see Study area).
Effective management of deer populations and forests in post-disturbance areas requires an understanding of the relationships between animals and space use. Large-scale, stand-replacing disturbances create two contrasting habitats: a relatively undiversified post-disturbance area where forests regenerate and an undisturbed forest characterized by significantly higher heterogeneity. Individuals use the space within their home range which is defined as the “area travelled by the individual in its normal activities of food gathering, mating and caring for young” (Burt, 1943), therefore, the factors that influence the size of the home range and its establishment patterns have to be identified. In general, animals use space which is a combination of various habitats. The use of habitats by ungulates reflects coping with main limiting factors (i.e. predator avoidance and forage quality/quantity) (e.g., Fryxell et al., 1988, Rettie and Messier, 2000), therefore their home ranges include habitats providing security cover and food. If so, habitat heterogeneity is an important feature of the space used by ungulates (Kie et al., 2002, Saïd and Servanty, 2005), because in highly heterogeneous habitats, even a small home range offers both food and cover.
If a forest fire increases availability of high quality forage, the attractiveness of the burned area for deer grows (Sachro et al., 2005). However, domination of a burned area shortly after a disturbance by tree species of relatively low palatability, e.g., Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) or silver birch (Betula pendula L.), along with the existing poor cover conditions, contributes to the relatively low use of such an area by deer (Borkowski, 2004). Little is known about the attractiveness of such areas for red deer in subsequent stages of forest succession. It was found that in pre-thicket and thicket stages (for details see Material and Methods), post-disturbance areas provide ample security (concealment) cover, but are less abundant in food resources than undisturbed forests (Gmitrzuk and Obidziński, 2007).
Our overall objective was to assess the effects of a large scale forest fire on space use of red deer at different temporal scales. Home range size is usually negatively correlated with food availability/habitat structure (Tufto et al., 1996, Relyea et al., 2000, Saïd and Servanty, 2005). Therefore, the size of red deer home ranges should be positively correlated with the percentage of a post-disturbance area in pre-thicket and thicket stages (P1a). However, little is known about the influence of increased security cover (burned area) on home range size and its seasonal variability. This point is of importance since it has been documented that for sedentary (non-migrating) ungulates, predation avoidance is a determinant of their space use (Fryxell et al., 1988; Rettie and Messier, 2000).
In winter, cervids reduce their food intake and live to a remarkable extent off fat reserves (Putman, 1988). In that season, cover availability is especially important for red deer (Borkowski and Ukalska, 2008). Consequently, we predicted that in winter, home range size should be negatively correlated with the percentage of the post-disturbance area in pre-thicket and thicket stages (P1b). We also expected home ranges that contained higher proportions of post-disturbance area to be smaller in autumn (P1c) although for a different reason. In autumn, due to hunting season, cover availability is particularly important (Naugle et al., 1997).
Habitat attractiveness may be difficult to define in areas combining contrasting habitats. Due to habitat dissimilarities, home range size in post-disturbance and undisturbed areas may be influenced either by different environmental factors or in different ways by the same factors. Since as mentioned earlier, cervids tend to include in their home ranges the habitats that provide both food and cover, our general prediction is that the percentage of the home range occupied by the two contrasting areas will be determined by habitat type. We specifically predicted that the size of the part of the home range size located in the undisturbed forests1 (more abundant in food) should be negatively correlated with the percentage of habitats providing food as well as the percentage of habitats offering security cover (P2a). The post-disturbance forest home range size (less food, abundant cover) should be negatively correlated with the percentage of habitats abundant in food and should be independent of the percentage of habitats providing cover (P2b). The reason why the post-disturbance area home range size should be independent of habitats providing cover is that the cover due to its amount is probably not a limiting factor. In autumn, due to hunting, cover-providing habitats should be negatively correlated with the size of the home range in both post-disturbance and undisturbed forests due to hunting pressure (P2c).
As mentioned above, one of the factors affecting space use by ungulates is habitat heterogeneity. It has been shown that patch number and edge density negatively influence the size of deer home ranges (Kie et al., 2002, Saïd and Servanty, 2005) and in heterogeneous habitats, even within small home range they can satisfy their needs for both food and cover. Therefore, we predicted that the length of the boundary between the post-disturbance forest (offering ample cover and probably used mostly for resting) and the undisturbed forest (more abundant in food) will negatively influence home range size (P3a) because it will provide the animals with instant access to feeding and resting areas. The previous studies focused mostly on patches of distinct habitats offering either food or cover (forest clearings or ecotones between a forest and farm fields), especially on a larger spatial scale (Kie et al., 2002, Saïd and Servanty, 2005). However, much less is known about the influence of habitat heterogeneity on a smaller scale and, consequently, about relatively undiversified habitats in the forest interior. This is an interesting consideration because deer were found to respond even to small patches of different forest habitats (Borkowski, 2004, Borkowski and Ukalska, 2008). We predicted that in the more heterogeneous, undisturbed forest, home range size will be negatively correlated with habitat patch density and edge density (P3b), whereas in the post-disturbance area, home range size will not be influenced by habitat heterogeneity (P3c). The last prediction is based on the fact that the area in question is quite homogenous and we believe that in such conditions home range size should be independent of habitat heterogeneity. The predictions tested in this study are listed in Table 1.
Section snippets
Study area
The study was carried out in the Forest District of Rudy Raciborskie with an estimated area of 17,500 ha in southwestern Poland. In 1992, nearly 10,000 ha of forest area burnt down in three adjoining forest districts. Rudy Raciborskie sustained the greatest loss with nearly 5000 ha of forest burned to the ground. After the fire, the remaining trees were cut down, the stumps were removed, and the area was regenerated in 1993–1997.
Habitat composition in the post-disturbance forest was much less
Influence of sex and percentage of the post-disturbance area on home range size
In total, the yearly HRS of each individual was calculated on the basis of 140–191 (mean = 164) relocations. The relative numbers of relocations for the seasonal home ranges were as follows: spring – 34–53 (mean = 42), summer – 46–59 (mean = 52), autumn – 36–46 (mean = 42), winter 19–36 (mean = 28). Since HRS estimated by MCP method tends to increase with increasing number of points (e.g. Kenward, 2001), we checked the relation between both variables using linear regression model. Since autumn was the
Discussion
This study attempted to determine red deer space use along the boundary separating post-disturbance and undisturbed parts of a forest. Individuals whose home ranges encompassed a higher percentage of the post-disturbance area could keep their home ranges smaller. Interestingly, many habitat features in the post-disturbance forest encouraged deer to expand their home ranges. For instance, food-providing habitats (open areas) delivered such an effect in yearly home ranges, whereas seasonal home
Conclusions
The importance of security cover for red deer was demonstrated by earlier studies of Rudy Raciborskie which compared the use of habitats in post-disturbance and undisturbed areas (Borkowski, 2004), habitat use in both areas (Borkowski, 2004, Borkowski and Ukalska, 2008), and bark stripping in pine pre-thickets in the post-disturbance area (Borkowski and Ukalski, 2012). The results of this study revealed that the presence of post-disturbance areas increased the attractiveness of forest habitats
Acknowledgements
The study was supported by General Directoriate of State Forests (BLP-267 “Rules of deer management on post-disturbance areas – Rudy Raciborskie Forest District as an example”) We are grateful to the Headquarters of the Rudy Raciborskie Forest District for assistance given and the friendly atmosphere engendered. We also greatly appreciate the constructive and helpful comments from an anonymous reviewer.
References (56)
Distribution and habitat use by red and roe deer following a large forest fire in South-western Poland
For. Ecol. Manage.
(2004)- et al.
Winter habitat use by red and roe deer in pine-dominated forest
For. Ecol. Manage.
(2008) - et al.
Bark stripping by red deer in a post-disturbance area: the importance of security cover
For. Ecol. Manage.
(2012) - et al.
Kernel-based home range method for data with irregular sampling intervals
Ecol. Model.
(2006) - et al.
Linking habitat heterogeneity to space use by large herbivores at multiple scales: from habitat mosaics to forest canopy openings
For. Ecol. Manage.
(2012) - et al.
Prescribed burning effects on summer elk forage availability in the subalpine zone, Banff National Park, Canada
J. Environ. Manage.
(2005) - et al.
Influence of hurricane Lothar on red and roe deer winter diets in the northern Vosges, France
Forest Ecol. Manage.
(2006) - et al.
The effects of hurricane Lothar on habitat use of roe deer
Forest Ecol. Manage.
(2004) - et al.
Factors influencing female home range sizes in elk (Cervus elaphus) in North American landscapes
Landsc. Ecol.
(2005) Uninformative parameters and model selection using Akaike’s information criterion
J. Wildl. Manage.
(2010)
The disturbance of forest ecosystems: the ecological basis for conservative management
Forest Ecol. Manage.
Describing breeding territories of migratory passerines: suggestions for sampling, choice of estimator, and delineation of core areas
J. Anim. Ecol.
Habitat quality influences population distribution, individual space use and functional responses in habitat selection by a large herbivore
Oecologia
Effects of nonconsumptive leisure disturbance to wildlife
Revue d’Ecologie (Terre et Vie)
Habitat use under predation risk: hunting, roads and human dwellings influence the spatial behaviour of roe deer
Eur. J. Wildl. Res.
Effects of sampling regime on the mean and variance of home range size estimates
J. Anim. Ecol.
Home range size and habitat use in radio-collared female sika deer at high altitudes in the Tanzawa Mountains, Japan
Ann. Zool. Fen.
Territoriality and home range concepts as applied to mammals
J. Mammal.
Landscape management using historical fire regimes: blue river
Oregon. Ecol. Appl.
Red Deer: Behavior and Ecology of Two Sexes
Ecological impacts of deer overabundance
Ann. Rev. Ecol., Evol., Syst.
Effects of hurricane Lothar on the population dynamics of European roe deer
J. Wildl. Manage.
Why are ungulate so abundant
Am. Naturalist
Nocturnal activity of female desert mule deer
J. Wildl. Manage.
Home range and body weight – a reevaluation
Ecology
Seasonal migration of male red deer (Cervus elaphus) in southern Sweden and consequences for management
Eur. J. Wildl. Res.
Home ranges of red deer in a European old-growth forest
Am. Midl. Nat.
Cited by (11)
Antimicrobial resistant Escherichia coli in Scottish wild deer: Prevalence and risk factors
2022, Environmental PollutionCitation Excerpt :Livestock or human population density was calculated as the number of individuals present within a 2 km, 3 km, and 5 km radius of the sample. These distances were chosen given existing literature indicating that typical home ranges for roe deer were smaller than for red deer (2–3 km or less), while a 5 km range would likely only apply to male red deer (Borkowski et al., 2016; Lovari et al., 2017). Ranges up to 5 km were explored for all deer in an effort to account for possible direct or indirect (via the environment) interactions between deer in close proximity to each other, since these are potential routes for ARG or ARB (antimicrobial resistant bacteria) transfer.
High density of keystone herbivore vs. conservation of natural resources: Factors affecting red deer distribution and impact on vegetation in Słowiński National Park, Poland
2019, Forest Ecology and ManagementCitation Excerpt :Apart from food, however, also security cover is of fundamental importance in deer ecology (Mysterud and Østbye, 1999). Although the security cover is especially important in hunted deer populations (Borkowski and Ukalska, 2008; Borkowski et al., 2016), also non-consumptive leisure disturbance leads to increased use of refuge (less disturbed) areas (Blanc et al., 2006). Since, beside forests, a main source of the security cover in the SNP are reeds and swamps, we predict (P2.3) that the availability of the non-forest vegetation sites providing security cover will be another factor positively affecting the deer distribution in the Park’s forests.
Home range sizes of red deer in relation to habitat composition: a review and implications for management in Sweden
2023, European Journal of Wildlife Research