Quantifying Australian forest floristics and structure using small footprint LiDAR and large scale aerial photography

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2005.11.021Get rights and content

Abstract

Light detection and ranging (LiDAR) data and large scale (1:4000) photography (LSP) were investigated for their potential to quantify the floristics and structure of mixed species forests near Injune, central east Queensland, and to scale these up to the region for purposes of baseline assessment and on-going monitoring. For a 220,000 hectare (ha) area, LiDAR and LSP were acquired over 150 500 m × 150 m (7.5 ha) primary sampling units (PSUs) located on a ∼4 km systematic grid. Based on LSP interpretation, 292 species combinations were observed, although forests were dominated or co-dominated primarily by Callitris glaucophylla, Eucalyptus melanaphloia, Eucalyptus populnea and Angophora Leiocarpa. Comparisons with species distributions mapped using LSP and in the field suggested a 79% correspondence for dominant species. Robust relationships were observed between LiDAR and field measurements of individual tree (r2 = 0.91, S.E. = 1.34 m, n = 100) and stand (r2 = 0.84, S.E. = 2.07 m, n = 32) height. LiDAR-derived estimates of plot level foliage/branch projected cover (FBPC), defined by the percentage of returns >2 m, compared well (r2 of 0.74, S.E. = 8.1%, n = 29) with estimates based on field transects. When translated to foliage projected cover (FPC), a close correspondence with field measurements (r2 = 0.62, S.E. = 6.2%, n = 29) was observed. Using these relationships, floristics and both height and FPC distributions were estimated for forests contained with the PSU grid and extrapolated to the study area. Comparisons with National Forest Inventory (NFI), National Vegetation Information System (NVIS) and Queensland Herbarium data suggested that sampling using LSP and LiDAR aggregated to the landscape provided similar estimates at the broad level but allowed access to a permanent and more detailed record. Observed differences were attributed to different scales of data acquisition and mapping. The cost of survey was also reduced compared to more traditional methods. The method outlined in the paper has relevance to national forest monitoring initiatives, such as the Continental Forest Monitoring Framework currently being evaluated in Australia.

Introduction

As a signatory to international agreements, including the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) and the Montreal Process for sustainable forest management, Australia is increasingly required to provide accurate and quantitative information on the species/community composition (herein referred to as floristics), structure and condition of it's forests through time (MPIG, 2001, Barrett et al., 2001). In addition, such information is required by governments, industry, private landholders and the public to detect trends in commercial, biodiversity and greenhouse values (NFI, 1998, NFI, 2003, AGO, 2000, Henry et al., 2002), assess the performance of management practices and public policies, guide sustainable development and forecast the future condition of these ecosystems (NFI, 2003). However, undertaking such assessments within Australia represents a significant challenge for two main reasons. First, Australia has an estimated 164 million hectares (ha) of native forests, which are distributed largely around the outer margins of the continent. Second, around 70% of these forests are under private management and less than 10% are in commercial public forest estates (NFI, 2003). In the areas under private management, the information available on structure and condition is especially limited (MPIG, 2001). The development of efficient and cost-effective methods for retrieving this essential information is therefore critical if international obligations are to be better fulfilled and the sustainable development and conservation of forest resources optimised.

The overall objective of this research, therefore, was to evaluate whether large scale (1:4000) stereo aerial photography (herein referred to as LSP) and/or small footprint light detection and ranging (LiDAR) data could be used as tools, either singularly or in combination, for routinely sampling, describing and quantitatively assessing the floristics and structure of these forests. Focusing on areas of agricultural land and mixed species forests in central Queensland, which were considered typical of those occurring across large areas of Australia, the study aimed specifically to evaluate whether: (a) floristics could be described through air photograph interpretation (API) of LSP, (b) measures of structure (e.g., height and canopy cover) could be estimated from LiDAR data, (c) the resulting quantitative estimates of each could be extrapolated to the landscape with levels of reliability comparable to or better than those currently available and (d) data from these sensors combined offered a viable and cost-effective alternative or supplement to methods used currently for on-going regional assessment and monitoring of forests.

Section snippets

Background

Although LSP has been used as a basic forest inventory tool for some time (e.g., Spencer, 1992), the integration of LSP and LiDAR data has only been possible in the past few years due to advances in sensor design and data acquisition and processing. The following sections therefore provide a brief overview of these two systems and their use in Australia.

Study area

To evaluate the use of both LSP and LiDAR for quantifying the floristics and structure of forests, an area of 37 km × 60 km (222,000 ha) of private and public land near Injune, central Queensland (Lat 25°32′S, Long 147°32′E), was selected (Fig. 1). The study area was chosen, as the forests are typical to those of much of Australia1

Image and field data collection

The acquisition of image and field data was undertaken in four main stages (Table 1). In stage I, a systematic sampling scheme (Schreuder et al., 1993) was implemented to guide the acquisition of LSP (stage II) and LiDAR data (stage III). Following collection and initial interpretation of these data, forest inventory data were collected from selected areas (stage IV). The majority of the fieldwork was carried out during the period of LiDAR data acquisition and within 1-month of the LSP data

Post-processing of field and remote sensing

Following collection, the inventory data were analysed primarily to determine the species composition of the forests, so that the API could be better evaluated, and to generate tree and stand level estimates of height and cover that could be regressed against LiDAR data. For this purpose, further stages of LSP (stage V) and LiDAR data (stage VI) processing were necessary (Table 1).

Data analysis

To provide summary information on the forests, their floristic composition was described using LSP (stage VII) whilst estimates of tree and stand height and cover were retrieved from LiDAR data (stage VIII).

Results: tree and stand level estimates

Based on the analysis outlined above, the use of both LSP and LIDAR for tree and stand level assessment, in terms of floristics, tree height and canopy cover was evaluated.

Scaling up to the landscape

On the basis of the plot level relationships established with LSP (floristics) and LiDAR (height and canopy cover), predictions of mean attribute values and distributions at both the PSU (150 predictions) and SSU (4500 predictions) level for the entire 220,000 ha study area were generated. The following sections present a summary of the extrapolations and then compare the sampled distributions with the mapped distributions based on datasets currently used by both the Queensland and Federal

Discussion

The study has shown that LSP and LiDAR can provide estimates of stand level floristics and structure (e.g., canopy cover) which are more comprehensive, precise and of greater number compared to field measurements alone. Through API and the development of empirical relationships with LIDAR data, regional level estimates can be generated through simple extrapolation. This approach provides options for operational mapping of such attributes. These options are discussed in greater detail in the

Conclusions and recommendations

The research has demonstrated that sampling using LSP and/or LIDAR can provide quantitative assessments of floristics and key structural attributes (height, cover) which can be extrapolated across the landscape. These estimates are comparable to those generated using traditional wall-to-wall mapping approaches although absolute comparison is limited because of the coarser level of detail associated with many existing datasets. This feature highlights then the additional information that can be

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the support provided by the Australian Research Council, under their SPIRT program, the Cooperative Research Centre for Greenhouse Accounting, and Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry Australia. We would also like to thank Kerstin Jones, Robert Denham, Norm Good, and the staff of UNSW, QDNR&M, BRS, QUT and QDPI Tropical Beef Centre.

References (49)

  • A. Wehr et al.

    Airborne laser scanning—an introduction and overview

    Photogram. Eng. Remote Sens.

    (1999)
  • A.H. Aldred et al.

    Application of Airborne Laser to Forest Surveys, Information Report PI-X-51, Canadian Forestry Service

    (1985)
  • Australian Greenhouse Office, 2000. National Greenhouse Gas Inventory: Land Use Change and Forestry Sector 1990–1999,...
  • D.J. Barrett et al.

    Quantifying uncertainty in estimates of C-emissions from above-ground biomass due to historic land-use change to cropping in Australia

    Global. Ch. Biol.

    (2001)
  • Bureau of Meteorology, 2004....
  • Bureau of Rural Sciences, 2003. A Continental Forest Monitoring Framework for Australia – Background, Concept and...
  • W.H. Burrows et al.

    Growth and carbon stock change in eucalypt woodlands in north-east Australia: ecological and greenhouse sink implications

    Global. Ch. Biol.

    (2002)
  • Carnahan, J.A., 1990. Vegetation. Atlas of Australian Resources, vol. 6, Third Series. Australian Surveying and Land...
  • Commonwealth of Australia, 2002. Implementation of Montreal Process Criteria and Indicator Reporting–An operational...
  • R. Dowling et al.

    Vegetation classification of the riparian zone along the Brisbane River, Queensland, Australia using light detection and ranging (lidar) data and forward looking digital video

    Can. J. Remote Sens.

    (2003)
  • R.J. Fensham et al.

    Estimating clearance of Acacia dominated ecosystems in central Queensland using Land-system mapping data

    Aust. J. Bot.

    (1998)
  • M.R. Harris et al.

    An investigation into the possible inhibitory effects of white cypress pine (Callitris glaucophylla) litter on the germination and growth of associated ground cover species

    Aust. J. Bot.

    (2003)
  • B.K. Henry et al.

    A review of the potential role of greenhouse gas abatement in native vegetation management in Queensland rangelands

    Rangeland J.

    (2002)
  • J. Hyyppa et al.

    A segmentation-based method to retrieve stem volume estimates from 3-D tree height models produced by laser scanners

    IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens.

    (2001)
  • Cited by (64)

    • Multi-resolution time series imagery for forest disturbance and regrowth monitoring in Queensland, Australia

      2015, Remote Sensing of Environment
      Citation Excerpt :

      Both LiDAR datasets were processed to a 1 m spacing. These data were used to obtain estimates of height and cover for each PSU for the years 2000 and 2009 based on the methods outlined in Tickle et al. (2006). A comparison of these data allowed areas that had remained undisturbed or otherwise to be identified.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    Tel.: +61 2 62499111.

    2

    Tel.: +61 7 38969832.

    View full text