Aggregate height—A composite measure of stand density for tree seedling populations

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2005.11.014Get rights and content

Abstract

Aggregate height, a composite measure of seedling size and number per unit area, is proposed for describing stand density of seedling populations during early stand development. Aggregate height is analogous to other stand density measurements, such as basal area, that incorporate both size and number of trees into a single value. A large scale dataset (3452 subplots in 33 stands) from the central Appalachians and a long-term dataset (six stands from pre- to 20-years post-harvest) from the Missouri Ozarks were used to compare the utility of number of seedlings, mean height, aggregate height squared, and aggregate height for examining patterns of stand development. Comparisons of coefficients of determination (r2) indicate that aggregate height produces more deterministic models for describing the early development of tree seedling populations than do number of seedlings, mean height, and aggregate height squared. Stand developmental paths based on number of seedlings, basal area, and aggregate height reveal that the onset of the self-thinning stage coincides with the shifting of mean stand aggregate height, but not other measurements. The results indicate that aggregate height is an efficient measure of stand density to describe the relative prevalence of a species at a given stage of development and its ability to persist into future stages.

Introduction

The measurement of stand density has been one of the major research topics in forestry. Stand density is any numerical quantity obtainable by measurement of a stand and expressible on an area basis, such as number of trees, total basal area, total volume, stand density index, or other criteria per unit area (Ford-Robertson, 1971). Compared to a relative standard or normal condition, stand density measurements provide a means to assess the level of competition, area occupancy, and stand closure (Curtis, 1970). Basal area is often regarded as the standard unit for measuring stand density and has the sanction of long usage (Bickford et al., 1957). It is not only simple, objective, and easy to use; but it also efficiently describes overall stand conditions and the abundance of individual species. However, basal area is obviously not applicable to stands that are too young to take the standard measurement of stem DBH (diameter at the breast height (1.37 m)).

Increasing interest in hardwood regeneration, particularly in eastern mixed-oak stands in North America, has created a need to understand and predict stand density changes in young developing stands better. Early stand development is a seemingly chaotic period characterized by rapid tree growth and rapid changes in species composition. The environment, growth pattern, and size of each plant change more dramatically during this stage than during any other period (Oliver and Larson, 1996). Monitoring and understanding this critical period of stand development is difficult and challenging because young forest stands are often highly complex and exhibit seemingly unpredictable responses to a multitude of important factors. Hence, an appropriate measure of young stand density that can serve a similar role as basal area in older stands is desirable.

Although the standard measure of stem diameter is not applicable to very young stems, seedling height can be easily and accurately measured until the trees are large enough to take DBH measurements. Tree height has been used to measure stand density (Wilson, 1946). In this paper, we propose aggregate height as an alternative measure of stand density for young stands. Aggregate height is defined as the total height of all individuals of a species or species group per unit area. We argue that aggregate height is a useful approach for describing stand density in the early stage of stand development. We demonstrate that aggregate height more predictably describes stand density than do alternative measure of stand density. We also show that aggregate height has the useful property of increasing monotonically with stand development until approximately the point of maximum stand density, after which it decreases.

Section snippets

Data collection

Two datasets were used in this study. The first was collected in 33 mixed-oak stands in Pennsylvania. Depending on stand size, 15 to 30 permanent plots with 8.02 m radii (0.05 acre) were systematically installed in a square grid to represent the whole stand. Four permanent subplots with 1.13 m radii (0.001 acre) were established within each plot at a fixed distance from plot center. In total, 3452 subplots were established in the study area. On each subplot, tree seedlings (<5.1 cm in DBH) were

Results

Regression coefficients (b) and coefficients of determination (r2) for linear regression models comparing mean number of trees, mean height, mean aggregate height squared, and mean aggregate height between measurement periods are shown in Table 1. With one exception (red maple aggregate height squared 01 versus 00), aggregate height exhibited the strongest correlations between measurement periods based on coefficients of determination.

Changes in stand density were most variable between

Discussion and conclusions

Early stand development following major disturbances is a chaotic period characterized by rapid changes in tree number and size. Compared to other stages of development, this period is poorly understood partially because of the difficulty of measuring the relative potential of different species for future site occupancy. Our results indicate that aggregate height is a promising variable for measuring stand density in the early period of stand development. Aggregate height reveals the relative

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the Pennsylvania Bureau of Forestry. We are grateful to the personnel of the Bureau of Forestry who provided the stands and field assistances. The authors also thank Daniel Dey of the U.S. Forest Service North Central Research Station for supplying the Missouri Ozark regeneration data.

References (13)

  • Q.M. Ketterings et al.

    Reducing uncertainty in the use of allometric biomass equations for predicting above-ground tree biomass in mixed secondary forests

    For. Ecol. Manage.

    (2001)
  • Bailes, W.W., J.R. Brooks. 2004. A comparison of two double sampling auxiliary variables with inventories of varying...
  • C.A. Bickford

    Stocking, normality, and measurement of stand density

    J. For.

    (1957)
  • R.O. Curtis

    Stand density measures: an interpretation

    For. Sci.

    (1970)
  • Dey, D.C. 1991. A comprehensive Ozark regenerator. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Missouri, Columbia, MO. 283...
  • S.F. Gingrich

    Measuring and evaluating stocking and stand density in upland hardwood forests in the Central States

    For. Sci.

    (1967)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (23)

  • Northern hardwoods seedlings respond to a complex of environmental factors when deer herbivory is limited

    2023, Forest Ecology and Management
    Citation Excerpt :

    Both species groups are considered at least moderately palatable to deer and of moderate to high shade tolerance as seedlings (Godman et al., 1990; Kennedy, 1990; Schlesinger, 1990; Brown and Doucet, 1991; Latham et al., 2005; Bradshaw and Waller, 2016). Aggregate height – the summed height of all seedlings within a given sampling frame – combines elements of seedling size and number and has been shown superior to seedling density or average height for modeling seedling community development (Fei et al., 2006). Although we focused only on two species groups, we used seedlings of all arborescent species to calculate measures of aggregate height (AggHt) within each quadrat by summing seedling height measurements (cm) made in 2009 (Table 1 and Table 2).

  • Predicting oak regeneration success at the stem exclusion stage of stand development in upland hardwood forests

    2020, Forest Ecology and Management
    Citation Excerpt :

    The principal source of unpredictability was random (i.e., unexplained) stand effects, as illustrated in Figs. 2 and 3. Our results corroborate previous findings (Gould et al., 2006; Fei et al., 2006) that aggregate height is a useful index of oak seedling density (a composite of number and size) in predicting regeneration success. Given the possibility of non-linear allometric relationships between different size-related variables contributing to competitive advantage (e.g., height vs. leaf area), we expected that models could be improved by calculating aggregate height using some exponent other than 1.0.

  • Drivers of persistent post-fire recruitment in European beech forests

    2020, Science of the Total Environment
    Citation Excerpt :

    Further, belowground competition for water and nutrients (Bílek et al., 2009) was estimated by calculating the basal area (BA) of trees surviving the fire, which were identified by visible fire scars and DBH larger than the means. The aggregated height of already-established post-fire beech (aggHeightBeech) and pioneer tree (aggHeightPioneer) regeneration (with a height < 1.3 m) was calculated as a measure of the competing stand for the newly incoming seedlings (Fei et al., 2006). Since light is one of the main factors influencing establishment of beech recruitments (Ammer et al., 2002), we estimated canopy cover (in %) as a surrogate for light transmission for the lower (1.3–5 m, layer.I) and upper (>5 m, layer.II) stand layers, separately, as well as for the sum of both (i.e., layer.I + layer.II = layer.III).

  • Using a tree seedling mortality budget as an indicator of landscape-scale forest regeneration security

    2019, Ecological Indicators
    Citation Excerpt :

    When empirical mortality models are lacking, generalized approximations of mortality trends can be substituted. The Reliability Index used for the case studies is simply a generalized approximation of a size-mortality relationship where large reproduction is more reliable than small reproduction based on the aggregate height hypothesis (Fei et al., 2006). The accuracy of the specific weights is unknown.

  • Calibrating the self-thinning frontier

    2009, Forest Ecology and Management
View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text