Elsevier

Food Research International

Volume 120, June 2019, Pages 726-732
Food Research International

Controlled fermentation of rapeseed presscake by Rhizopus, and its effect on some components with relevance to human nutrition

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2018.11.031Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Rapeseed presscake was fermented by Rhizopus oligosporus.

  • Relevant proportions of polyphenols, glucosinolates, and some polysaccharides are degraded.

  • Quality and safety of final product depends on fermentation time and is affected by structure.

  • Monitoring the fermentation process is necessary and feasible.

Abstract

The use of rapeseed protein could contribute to meeting the increasing demand for plant proteins with high biological value in human nutrition. In order to make rapeseed presscake fit for human consumption, the presscake was fermented by using the tempeh mould, Rhizopus microsporus var. oligosporus. Fermentation was satisfactory at initial levels of added acetic acid of 40–60 mmoles/Kg, aw of 0.97, pasteurization, surface inoculation and incubation at 32 °C and 90–95% relative humidity. It was crucial to stop the fermentation once the mould had grown and metabolized sufficiently but before a major rise in pH and subsequent growth of acid-sensitive sporeforming bacteria occurred. Some degradation of glucosinolates, cell wall polysaccharides and phenolic compounds was found, but there was some evidence that growth and metabolism of the mould also depended on the texture of the presscake, as these factors affect the oxygen supply to the mould. In conclusion, it is possible to ferment rapeseed presscake by using the “Tempeh starter” Rhizopus oligosporus, but in order to use the resulting product to enrich various foods with protein or replace other proteins, the degree of degradation of undesired compounds should be further standardized, especially by the control of the pH, oxygen supply, and fermentation time.

Introduction

High amounts of rapeseed presscake are produced as a consequence of the increasing demands for rapeseed oil for use in human nutrition or biofuel production. In the European Union (5 years average 2012–2017), 21.0 million tons of rape were produced on about 6.5 million hectares, and 23.8 million tons were crushed and processed into 9.6 million tons of oil and 13.5 million tons of meal (European Commission, 2017). Assuming a level in rapeseed meal of 33% of crude protein (von der Haar, Müller, Bader-Mittermaier, & Eisner, 2014), this means that as much as 4.5 million tons of crude rapeseed protein are produced in the European Union annually.

At present, rapeseed presscake (produced with or without solvent extraction) is mainly used for animal feed or outside the food/feed sector. However, rapeseed protein also has potential to be used in human nutrition because of its favourable amino acid composition, biological value, and high digestibility (Aider & Barbana, 2011; Barth & Metges, 2007; Campbell, Rempel, & Wanasundara, 2016; Fleddermann et al., 2013; Tan, Mailer, Blanchard, & Agboola, 2011). On the other hand, rapeseed meal and presscakes contain many undesired compounds that negatively affect the nutritive value and sensory properties. These include

  • Phenolic compounds, which may interfere with protein absorption and digestibility and deliver a bitter and/or astringent taste to the meal (Naczk, Amarowicz, Sullivan, & Shahidi, 1998)

  • Glucosinolates, which also convey a bitter taste to the foods. Compounds generated from the degradation of glucosinolates, especially thiocyanates, isothiocyanates and nitriles formed by myrosinase, react with proteins and reduce their digestibility (see von der Haar et al., 2014, for review) and have negative (e.g. goitrogenic) physiological effects (Heaney & Fenwick, 1995). Even though there is evidence for positive effects of some of these compounds (see e.g. Vig, Rampal, Thind, & Arora, 2009; Watzl, 2001), their presence in rapeseed products should be minimized, to ensure use for multiple foods.

  • Oligosaccharides (mainly stachyose, raffinose), which cause flatulence (Siddiqui & Wood, 1977)

  • Phytate, which interferes with mineral absorption (Nair & Duvnjak, 1991)

Various studies have been performed to remove undesired compounds from rapeseed meal. Some of these compounds, such as phenolics, mainly occur in the husks. Their levels can be lowered by a dehulling process before pressing (Raß & Schein, 2017). From presscakes, undesired compounds may be removed by various extraction procedures (see Krause, Kroll, & Rawel, 2007; von der Haar et al., 2014; Chéreau et al., 2016, for reviews). Extraction by aqueous alcoholic solutions has been optimized in order to minimize protein denaturation (Pickardt et al., 2010). A patent was granted for “Soluble canola protein isolate production”, the process involving the aqueous extraction of defatted rapeseed meal (Schweizer, Green, Segall, & Logie, 2014, 2017; Schweizer, Segall, Medina, Willardsen, & Tergesen, 2007). The protein isolate was positively evaluated by EFSA (2013), granted GRAS status in the US, and approved as a “novel food” in the EU. However, to date, products containing these protein isolates are, to our knowledge, not yet marketed to a significant extent.

The main drawbacks of the processing methods mentioned are that they only work with rapeseed meal with a low oil content (< 3%) which can be obtained by solvent extraction only (Natsch, 2006). For small, decentralized oil mills that have no extraction facilities or other necessary, but expensive, equipment available, this is a major obstacle to their application. Moreover, standards for the organic sector do not permit solvent extraction. These disadvantages may be overcome by fermentation methods.

Given the wide array of fungal metabolic activity, fungal fermentations appear to be promising for not only removing phenolic and other complex secondary plant metabolites from rapeseed meal, but also for a possible bio-fortification of substrates through the formation of proteins and vitamins, as well as compounds with positive health effects (Sutter, Thevenieau, Bourdillon, & De Goninck, 2017). Some strains of white-rot fungi were found to degrade sinapic acid (Żuchowski, Pecio, Jaszek, & Stochmal, 2013), and the degradation of glucosinolates by fungal strains has also been demonstrated (Croat, Berhow, Karki, Muthukumarappan, & Gibbons, 2016; Croat, Gibbons, Berhow, Karki, & Muthukumarappan, 2016; Shi et al., 2015; Wang et al., 2012). Rhizopus oligosporus / microsporus strains have a long history of use in Indonesia for manufacturing “tempeh”, from mostly soybeans (Astuti, Meliala, Dalais, & Wahlqvist, 2000; Hachmeister & Fung, 1993; Hesseltine & Wang, 1972; Nout & Kiers, 2005; Shurtleff & Aoyagi, 2011) and thus the strains may be regarded as food-grade. As discussed in the cited publications, there is ample evidence for the favourable effects of the fermentation on nutritional and health value of the resulting product (tempeh).

Various substrates other than soybeans may be fermented by Rhizopus (summarized by Nout & Rombouts, 1990; Hachmeister & Fung, 1993; Feng, 2006), particularly and mostly other legumes, but also some by-products from coconut and oilseed processing. Cereals have been fermented on an experimental and pilot scale (Berg, Eriksson, Olsson, Schnürer, & Svanerg, 2007; Cuevas-Rodríguez, Milán-Carrillo, Mora-Escobedo, Cárdenas-Valenzuela, & Reyes-Moreno, 2004; Feng, 2006; Hachmeister & Fung, 1993; Nowak, 1992) but apparently, the resulting products have not yet been commercialized. The fermentation of rapeseed presscake by Rhizopus was shown to reduce the levels of various undesired compounds (Bau et al., 1994; Rozan et al., 1996; Vig & Walia, 2001). Studies by Ahlert et al. (2008) showed that certain foods can be enriched with fermented rapeseed presscake. However, these studies did not provide information about the conditions for reproducible growth and metabolism of Rhizopus on rapeseed presscake.

The aim of the present study was to define conditions for the reproducible small-scale solid-state fermentation of rapeseed presscake by using Rhizopus, and to find simple methods for controlling this fermentation. The results may be useful in assessing both the prospects and limitations of this process for providing food-grade rapeseed proteins.

Section snippets

Materials and methods

Rapeseed presscake was provided by Teutoburger Ölmühle GmbH, Ibbenbüren, Germany. It was prepared from dehulled rapeseed (Schneider & Raß, 1997) but still contained about 4% residual husk fragments. Unless otherwise noted, “Raps-Kernmehl” (presscake), article no. 12210×, with about 14% oil left in the cake, obtained by double pressing, was used. According to the manufacturer's specification, it contained 6–10% moisture. For some experiments, presscake from a single pressing (about 23% residual

Design and monitoring of the fermentation process

A comparison of different starter cultures revealed that all cultures grew on rapeseed presscake but that Tempeh starter Type A (TopCultures) gave the most consistent results. Inoculation by “back-slopping” of material from a previous batch gave inconsistent results and was not pursued further while cultivation of the inoculum on cooked rice (1%) proved to be a good method for propagation of the Rhizopus culture, as observed by Rusmin and Ko (1974) and Shambuyi, Beuchat, Hung, and Nakayama

Conclusions

This study has shown that it is possible to ferment rapeseed presscake by using the “Tempeh starter” Rhizopus oligosporus and to reduce the levels of some undesired constituents. Pasteurization of the substrate is necessary, and to inhibit growth of spore-forming bacteria while still permitting growth of the mould, the pH of the substrate must be adjusted to about 5.1 by adding 40–60 mmoles of acetic acid/Kg. Favourable fermentation conditions were an aw of 0.97, a temperature of 32 °C, and

Declarations of interest

None.

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Natallia Kazlouskaya-Disagio, Myat Thu Moe, Bahar Çetinbakιş, Lu Gao and Dessy Wijaya for their assistance; to Teutoburger Ölmühle GmbH, Ibbenbüren, for providing the presscake, and to Heike Hollenbach for statistical analysis. This study was supported by grant no. P 631 / 70602101 from Wi-Bank Hessen, Wiesbaden, Germany.

References (81)

  • M.J.R. Nout et al.

    Ecology of controlled soyabean acidification for Tempe manufacture

    Food Microbiology

    (1987)
  • M. Shambuyi et al.

    Evaluation of substrates and storage conditions for preparing and maintaining starter cultures for tempeh fermentation

    International Journal of Food Microbiology

    (1992)
  • N.V. Thanh et al.

    Dormancy, activation and viability of Rhizopus oligosporus sporangiospores

    International Journal of Food Microbiology

    (2004)
  • Q. Tian et al.

    Quantitative determination of intact glucosinolates in broccoli, broccoli sprouts, Brussels sprouts, and cauliflower by high-performance liquid chromatography

    Analytical Biochemistry

    (2005)
  • A.P. Vig et al.

    Bio-protective effects of glucosinolates a review

    LWT - Food Science and Technology

    (2009)
  • Y. Yoshie-Stark et al.

    Functional and bioactive properties of rapeseed protein concentrates and sensory analysis of food application with rapeseed protein concentrates

    LWT - Food Science and Technology

    (2006)
  • Ahlert, B. et al. (2008). Vegetable food product rich in protein and method for its preparation. European Patent no. EP...
  • M. Ashenafi et al.

    Growth of Bacillus cereus in fermenting tempeh made from various beans and its inhibition by Lactobacillus plantarum

    Journal of Applied Bacteriology

    (1991)
  • M. Astuti et al.

    Tempe, a nutritious and healthy food from Indonesia

    Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Nutrition

    (2000)
  • M.A. Azeke et al.

    Purification and characterization of two intracellular phytases from the tempeh fungus Rhizopus oligosporus

    Journal of Food Biochemistry

    (2011)
  • C.A. Barth et al.

    Nutzung von Rapsprotein in der Humanernährung

    UFOP-Schriften

    (2007)
  • H.M. Bau et al.

    Effect of a solid-state fermentation using Rhizopus oligosporus sp.T-3 on elimination of antinutritional substances and modification of biochemical constituents of defatted rapeseed meal

    Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture

    (1994)
  • Berg, S., Eriksson, A., Olsson, J., Schnürer, J., & Svanerg, M. (2007). Methods for production of fermented cereal food...
  • L. Campbell et al.

    Canola/rapeseed protein: Future opportunities and directions—workshop proceedings of IRC 2015

    Plants

    (2016)
  • D. Chéreau et al.

    Combination of existing and alternative technologies to promote oilseeds and pulses proteins in food applications

    Oilseeds and Fats, Crops and Lipids (OCL)

    (2016)
  • J.R. Croat et al.

    Conversion of canola meal into a high-protein feed additive via solid-state fungal incubation process

    Journal of the American Oil Chemist Society

    (2016)
  • J.R. Croat et al.

    Enhancing the nutritional value of canola (Brassica napus) meal using a submerged fungal incubation process

    Journal of Food Research

    (2016)
  • D. von der Haar et al.

    Rapeseed proteins – Production methods and possible application ranges. Oilseeds & Fats

    Crops & Lipids (OCL)

    (2014)
  • DIN (Deutsches Institut für Normung)

    DIN 10164–2:1986–08 Microbiological examination of meat and meat products - Determination of Enterobacteriaceae - part 2: Drop plating method

    (1986)
  • DIN (Deutsches Institut für Normung)

    DIN 10186:2005–10 Microbiological analysis of milk - Enumeration of yeasts and moulds - Reference method

    (2005)
  • DIN (Deutsches Institut für Normung)

    DIN 10161:2016–12 Microbiological analysis of meat and meat products - Aerobic count at 30 °C - Drop plating method

    (2016)
  • EC (European Commission)

    Oilseeds and protein crops market situation

  • EFSA (European Food Safety Authority)

    Scientific opinion on the safety of “rapeseed protein isolate” as a novel food ingredient

    EFSA Journal

    (2013)
  • EFSA (European Food Safety Authority)

    Opinion on the maintenance of the list of QPS biological agents intentionally added to food and feed (2017 update)

    EFSA Journal

    (2017)
  • EU (European Union)

    Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2011 on the provision of food information to consumers

    Official Journal L

    (2011)
  • X.M. Feng

    Microbial dynamics during barley tempeh fermentation

    (2006)
  • X.M. Feng et al.

    Image analysis for monitoring the barley tempeh fermentation process

    Journal of Applied Microbiology

    (2007)
  • A.J. Graffham et al.

    Nutrition of Tempe moulds

    Letters in Applied Microbiology

    (1995)
  • K.A. Hachmeister et al.

    Tempeh: A mold-modified indigenous fermented food made from soybeans and/or cereal grains

    Critical Reviews in Microbiology

    (1993)
  • B.-Z. Han et al.

    Effects of temperature, water activity and gas atmosphere on mycelial growth of Tempe fungi Rhizopus microsporus var. microsporus and R. microsporus var. oligosporus

    World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology

    (2000)
  • Cited by (23)

    • Effects of fermentation and enzymatic treatment on phenolic compounds and soluble proteins in oil press cakes of canola (Brassica napus)

      2023, Food Chemistry
      Citation Excerpt :

      Wang et al. (2022) observed an increase in total phenolic content during 72 h of fermentation of rapeseed meals with mixed strains of Bacillus subtilis and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Lücke et al. (2019) reported that total content of phenolics in rapeseed press cakes was reduced by 26% after 30–48 h of fermentation using Rhizopus microsporus strains. Olukomaiya et al. (2020) found that 7 days of fermentation (using Aspergillus sojae, Aspergillus ficuum, and their co-cultures) led to a 14–19% decrease in total phenolic content of canola meals, but no significant difference was observed among the treatments using single Aspergillus strains or their co-culture.

    • Impact of enzymatic pre-treatment on composition of nutrients and phytochemicals of canola (Brassica napus) oil press residues

      2022, Food Chemistry
      Citation Excerpt :

      Likewise, approximately 3900 mg/100 g DW of phytic acid was presented in our CPC samples (Table 1). Total content of glucosinolates in the studied material was up to 771 mg/100 g DW (Table 1, the value equals to 19 μmol/g DW, sinigrin hydrates as external reference standard, molecule weight 397.46 g/mol), whereas previous research suggested the total content of glucosinolates varied from 1 to 76 μmol/g DW (Ashayerizadeh et al., 2018; Lücke et al., 2019; Mohammadi et al., 2020; Wang et al., 2019). It is noticed that, in the present study, no inactivation of myrosinase (e.g. by heating at 70 °C or boiling water bath) was applied before determination of glucosinolates from the CPC raw material.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text