Elsevier

Food Policy

Volume 104, October 2021, 102141
Food Policy

Trend analysis of sustainability claims: The European fisheries and aquaculture markets case

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2021.102141Get rights and content

Highlights

  • The share of FAPs with sustainability claims (SC) is increasing across Europe.

  • Sustainability and packaging claims drive the market, not organic or animal welfare.

  • SC on the resource is effective for species not subject to overexploitation.

  • For wild fish SC relate mainly packaging and not the resource management.

  • Consumers’ awareness of the sustainable management claims for FAPs is needed.

Abstract

The future of European fisheries and aquaculture depends not only on their capacity to innovate (e.g., introduce new products) but also on their ability to realize sustainable production given the environmental concerns surrounding fisheries. Market tools can be used to signal sustainability to consumers by balancing sustainability and competitiveness. The purpose of this paper is to explore the trends related to the introduction of fishery and aquaculture products (FAPs) with sustainability attributes among 32,215 products commercialized in Europe between 2000 and 2019 using Mintel’s Global New Products Database (GNPD). The data provide information on a variety of sustainability claims on product packages. Of all the FAPs, 35.21% included at least one sustainability claim. We used trend analysis to investigate the countries and species that lead the introduction of new products associated with sustainability to understand the drivers of sustainability in the European FAP markets. The results indicated that the share of FAPs launched in the market with sustainability claims was increasing across Europe, mainly driven by sustainability on raw material and sustainable packaging, while sustainable products with organic or animal welfare claims were not market drivers of sustainability. In addition to differences in the sustainability claims by country, we highlighted some heterogeneity in the market across species. Nevertheless, market incentives to promote sustainability, while matching consumer expectations, also seemed efficient in effectively promoting sustainable resources.

Introduction

The consumption of fishery and aquaculture products (FAPs) in Europe has increased substantially in the past few years and reached 24.36 kg per capita in 2018 (EUMOFA, 2020). In 2019, this consumption represents a household expenditure of approximately 56.6 billion euros. Within these countries, the Romania showed the largest increase (8% of household expenditures between 2018 and 2019), while Italy, Spain and France represented larger markets in terms of value (11.686, 10.055 and 8.724 million euros, respectively, in 2019) (EUMOFA, 2020). In terms of household expenditure per capita in 2019, the average in Europe was 110 euros. Portugal remained at first place in the European consumption chart (approximately 371 euros per capita), while eastern countries recorded lower FAP expenditures (15 euros per capita in Hungary and 27 euros in Bulgaria) (EUMOFA, 2020). The increase in FAP consumption was more important for aquaculture products than for captured products. Nevertheless, the European market remained mostly derived from capture fisheries production, which represented 74% of the total apparent consumption in 2018 (EUMOFA, 2020). Furthermore, the self-efficiency of FAPs European market is about 42.5% (EUMOFA, 2020).

It is important to note that the increase in FAP consumption had environmental impacts, such as overfishing or impacts on the ecosystem. In both capture fisheries and aquaculture, the answer to sustainability issues also necessitates matching market expectations and maintaining competitiveness. Nevertheless, investing in more sustainable practices can lead to an increase in production costs, which must be offset by the price to remain competitive in an internationalized market. In addition, the absence of certification can become an entry barrier to trade. In either case, companies need to remain competitive while resolving sustainability issues.

Innovation is an important factor that supports the competitiveness of European companies. It is a driver of FAP consumption and represents an opportunity for companies to match consumers’ new expectations and distinguish themselves from competitors (Menrad, 2004, EUMOFA, 2017a, Thong and Solgaard, 2017). Innovation includes product innovations, process innovations, marketing innovations and organizational innovations (OECD, 2005). Furthermore, innovations are not necessarily disruptive changes but can be incremental (OECD, 2005), and they may be firm dependent. A new product or innovation for a firm does not necessarily mean a new product for the market. In the framework of this paper, we focus on innovation that aims to create new products at the firm level. Innovation is either incremental or disruptive and perceptible by the final consumer. Innovation does not always equal a new product but rather is a much broader concept, and we will focus on the latter.

Launching new products on the market is strategic for companies. Both suppliers and retailers need to be competitive, but competitiveness cannot be based only on price and may be based on the ability to answer consumers’ needs. Indeed, the competitiveness of the European FAP industry is a major issue for companies, and product differentiation can lead to greater competition. Sustainable positioning is a way to remain competitive, but sustainability is not the only determinant of consumer preferences. Convenience, health, ethics, quality, and price, among other things, drive consumers’ preferences for FAPs (Carlucci et al., 2015). Innovation is driven by consumer expectations and company anticipation of future consumption trends (Blezat Consulting et al., 2017). Environmental issues require solutions that can maintain the state of the environment by preventing negative impact while maintaining market competitiveness and answering consumers’ needs and expectations. Through the trend analysis of new products, we can extract information regarding retailers and suppliers on their expectations about what consumers want. The aims of this study are to determine whether the European market succeeds in reconciling both imperative innovation (via new product) and sustainability and whether innovation by firms favor sustainability. Using Mintel’s Global New Product Database (GNPD) on new products (Solis, 2016), it is possible to track the launch of new FAPs in the European market. Thus, we can analyze whether the new FAPs in the European market followed a trend toward sustainability.

The structure of the paper is as follows: We present the role played by market tools to signal sustainability to consumers and the trend in Europe in terms of FAPs and sustainable consumption. Then, we present the data used to analyze new FAP trends, the method used, and the results of the trend analysis. Finally, we discuss the results and provide the conclusions.

Section snippets

Signaling sustainability to consumers

It is important to note that the aforementioned increase in FAP consumption is not without impacts on the environment, although the impacts may be less consequential than those of meat products (Vieux et al., 2018). If a fish-based diet produces less CO2 than a meat-based diet (Irz et al., 2018, Perignon et al., 2017), the environmental impact of a fish-based diet cannot be estimated by a unique indicator because it depends on the mode of production (for example wild or farmed).

Indeed, fish

Sustainability of fisheries and consumption in Europe

In Europe, the total household expenditure on FAPs was EUR 56.6 billion in 2019 (EUMOFA, 2020), and fish consumption has increased in the past few years. The average consumption evolved from 13.90 kg/capita/yr in the 1960 s to 21.60 kg/capita/yr in 2017 (FAO Stat, 2020). Together with sustainability issues in fisheries, a potential increase in the number of new FAPs with sustainable positioning at the European level has been observed. Indeed, this increase in the number of sustainable FAPs

Database

To analyze the evolution of sustainable new products in the European market, we looked at the evolution of sustainable products between 2000 and 2019 across European countries covered by the GNPD4. The main objective of the GNPD is to provide data on the depth of resources necessary to track trends in product innovation and retail success. Product innovation is tracked in shops and online across 62 of

Diversity of claims related to sustainability across European countries

The evolution of sustainable products across Europe was positive and significant, meaning that the launch of FAPs with SC increased faster than the overall launch of FAPs (Table 3). This assessment was true for every European country7. The fastest growth was in Ireland, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom, where the slope was the highest. The eight countries with the fastest growth in the share of sustainable products (Ireland – 6.025, Netherland –

Conclusion and policy implications

To consider sustainability in their food choices, consumers need information because sustainability issues are credence attributes that need to be signaled at the point of sale. The difficulties of signaling the sustainability of food products are a major concern for producers, policy makers, and non-governmental organizations (Van Loo et al., 2014). In this framework, product claims are a useful tool. Sustainability claims need to be supported in all markets and for all attributes (packaging,

Funding

Financial support from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation project “PRIMEFISH’ (Developing Innovative Market Orientated Prediction Toolbox to Strengthen the Economic Sustainability and Competitiveness of European Seafood on Local and Global Markets; grant agreement No 635761) is acknowledged.

Code availability

Stata 14′s time-series operators have been used.

Availability of data and material

Disaggregated data cannot be available as subject to restriction.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Sterenn Lucas: Conceptualization. Louis-Georges Soler: Conceptualization. Cesar Revoredo-Giha: Conceptualization.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References (74)

  • L.J.L. Veldhuizen et al.

    Fish welfare in capture fisheries: a review of injuries and mortality

    Fish. Res.

    (2018)
  • P. Xu et al.

    Chinese consumers’ willingness to pay for green-and eco-labeled seafood

    Food Control

    (2012)
  • Accenture Development Partners (ADP), 2009. Assessment of On-Pack, Wild-Capture Seafood Sustainability Certification...
  • Agence BIO, 2016. La Bio Dans l’union Européenne. Les carnets de l’Agence BIO....
  • Altintzoglou, T., Honkanen, P. van Haaster-de Winter, M., Olesen, I., 2015. Consumer aspects: Report on consumer...
  • Bensley, N., Stobutzki, I., Woodhams J., Mooney, C., 2010. Review of Wildlife Bycatch Management in Commonwealth...
  • Blezat Consulting, Credoc, Deloitte Développement Durable, 2016a. Tendances et Impacts - Alimentation Durable (Trends...
  • Blezat Consulting, Credoc, & Deloitte Développement Durable, 2016b. Tendances et Impacts - Prêt à Manger (Trends and...
  • Blezat Consulting, Credoc, & Deloitte Développement Durable, 2017. Etude prospective sur les comportements alimentaires...
  • Boreman, S., 1992. Dolphin-Safe Tuna: What's in a Label? The Killing of Dolphins in the Eastern Tropical Pacific and...
  • Boude, J.P. (supervised by). (2006). Régulation de l’accès à La Ressource (Regulation of resources access). Les...
  • Bourgneuf, C., 2016. Le chalutage en eau profonde enfin interdit par l’UE (Deep see trawling finally banned in the UE)....
  • D. Brécard et al.

    Consumer preferences for eco, health and fair trade labels. an application to seafood product in France

    J. Agric. Food Industrial Organization

    (2012)
  • Brunner, T.A., Horst (van der) K., Siegrist, M., 2010. Convenience Food Products. Drivers for Consumption. Appetite,...
  • Brunsø, K., Hansen, K. B., Scholderer, J., Honkanen, P., Olsen, S.O., Verbeke, W., 2008. Consumer attitudes and seafood...
  • E. Charles

    Eco-labelling: a new deal for a more durable fishery management?

    Ocean Coast. Manage.

    (2009)
  • Costa-Font, M., Revoredo-Giha, C., 2016. Introduction of new food and drink products in the UK: is there a trend...
  • M. Darby et al.

    Free Competition and the Optimal Amount of Fraud

    J. Law Econ.

    (1973)
  • Diggles, B.K., 2018. Review of some scientific issues related to crustacean welfare. ICES Journal of Marine Science 76...
  • K. Ellingsen et al.

    Who cares about fish welfare? A Norwegian study

    Brit. Food J.

    (2015)
  • EUMOFA, 2016a. Case study: Smoked Salmon in France. Ed. European Commission, Directorate-General for Maritime Affairs...
  • EUMOFA, 2016b. The EU Fish Market. Ed. European Commission, Directorate-General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries,...
  • EUMOFA, 2017a. EU consumer habits regarding fishery and aquaculture products. Final report. Ed. European Commission,...
  • EUMOFA, 2017b. EU Organic Aquaculture. Ed. European Commission, Directorate-General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries,...
  • EUMOFA, 2017c. The EU Fish Market 2017. Ed. European Commission, Directorate-General for Maritime Affairs and...
  • EUMOFA, 2017d. Database from the website....
  • EUMOFA, 2019a. Case Study Seabass in Europe. Ed. European Commission, Directorate-General for Maritime Affairs and...
  • View full text