Elsevier

Food Control

Volume 64, June 2016, Pages 196-201
Food Control

Short communication
Evaluation of a novel antimicrobial solution and its potential for control Escherichia coli O157:H7, non-O157:H7 shiga toxin-producing E. coli, Salmonella spp., and Listeria monocytogenes on beef

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2015.12.007Get rights and content

Highlights

  • A novel antimicrobial solution showed good antimicrobial results as a marinade.

  • Marination time has an impact on the antimicrobial results.

  • Antimicrobial results were dependent on the cocktails and the inoculation levels.

  • The efficacy of the original concentration AMS is better than commercial marinades.

Abstract

The goal of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a novel antimicrobial solution made with chitosan, lauric arginate ester, and organic acids on Escherichia coli O157:H7, Salmonella spp., Listeria monocytogenes, and non-O157 shiga toxin-producing E. coli cocktails and to test its potential to be used as a marinade for raw beef. Fresh beef top round steaks were surface-inoculated with the pathogen cocktails at approximately 2.5 or 4.5 Log CFU/cm2, marinated with the antimicrobial solution (AMS), and then stored at 4 °C for 6, 24, and 48 h. Three commercially available marinades were used for comparison. Results revealed that AMS had the most antimicrobial effect regardless of the type or inoculation level of pathogens (P < 0.05). After 6 h, the AMS marination reduced all pathogens to levels below the limit of detection (<1 Log CFU/cm2), resulting in a 3.5 Log CFU/cm2 reduction. When AMS was diluted with autoclaved distilled water by 5 times (AMS 1:5) or 10 times (AMS 1:10), its antimicrobial efficacy was impacted by marination time, the inoculated pathogens, and the inoculation levels. This study demonstrates that the developed antimicrobial solution has a great potential to be used during marination by consumers to ensure better food safety.

Introduction

Foodborne pathogen involved outbreaks have been of public concern. Listeria and Salmonella (nontyphoidal) are pathogens that cause the most death according to the CDC (CDC., 2011). Escherichia coli O157:H7 has been one of the top five pathogens that contribute to domestically acquired foodborne illness resulting in hospitalization (CDC., 2011). In 2012, six additional shiga toxin producing E. coli serovars, including E. coli O26, O111, O103, O121, O45, and O145, were placed on the zero tolerance adulterant list (USDA., 2011).

Since 1993, the beef industry spent more than $420 million on beef safety research which generated a significant amount of information and usable best practices (Muras, Lucia, Hardin, Savell, & Harris, 2009). The development of novel antimicrobial solutions is one of the major achievements. Among those solutions, a novel antimicrobial solution made with generally recognized as safe (GRAS) antimicrobial compounds was first proposed to be used as a ready-to-eat turkey breast surface treatment in 2014 (Guo, Jin, Wang, Scullen, & Sommers, 2014). In 2015, Wang, Zhao, Yuan, and Jin (2015) evaluated its application on roast beef and their results showed that this antimicrobial solution made with chitosan, lauric arginate ester (LAE), and organic acids inhibited the growth of inoculated Listeria monocytogenes. The sensory evaluation conducted (Wang et al., 2015) showed that although a slightly bitter taste was noticed by panelists immediately after the application of the solution, panelists were not able to tell the difference between the treated and untreated samples after 15 days of storage. The proposed antimicrobial also had a color protective effect on roast beef. The treated samples had a fresher looking color than the untreated samples after 30 days of storage at 4 °C.

The goal of this study was to investigate the efficacy of the antimicrobial solution against foodborne pathogens, including E. coli O157:H7, Salmonella, L. monocytogenes, and non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing E. coli, and to evaluate its efficacy on fresh meat when using it as a meat marinade at 4 °C.

Marination of meat is an emerging industrial technique for improving meat tenderness, flavor and extending meat shelf life (Pathania, McKee, Bilgili, & Singh, 2010). Marination provides the opportunity to allow potential antimicrobial components to be in contact with pathogenic bacteria. Thus, marination becomes one food preparation step which not only adds product value but also provides an opportunity to achieve better food safety (Pathania et al., 2010). This study also used three commercially available marinades (a balsamic & roasted onion classic marinade, a lemon & cracked pepper marinade, and a classic steakhouse marinade) for comparison. The specific objectives of this study were to 1) determine the effectiveness of three concentrations of an antimicrobial solution used during marination at 4 °C, and 2) compare its antimicrobial effects with three retail marinades.

Section snippets

Bacteria culture

Four bacterial cocktails were used in the study: an E. coli O157:H7 cocktail (ECO157), a non-O157 shiga toxin-producing E. coli cocktail (STEC), a Salmonella spp. cocktail (SAL), and a L. monocytogenes cocktail (LM). The strains included in each cocktail are listed in Table 1. All strains were obtained from the Food Microbiology and Safety lab at Auburn University. To prepare each cocktail, individual strains were grown in 9 mL of sterile tryptic soy broth (TSB) at 37 °C for 24 h, they were

Results and discussion

The effect of AMS on four different bacteria cocktails is shown in Table 2; the antimicrobial effect was clearly identified by comparing the numbers of surviving cells from the antimicrobial treated samples with the water control (P < 0.05). The AMS showed the strongest antimicrobial effect regardless of microorganisms inoculated. After being marinated with AMS for 6 h, more than a 1.5 Log CFU/cm2-and a 3.5 Log CFU/cm2-reduction were achieved from samples inoculated with 2.5 Log CFU/cm2 and 4.5

Conclusion

The proposed antimicrobial solution effectively reduced the pathogens inoculated on fresh top round beef steaks during marination at 4 °C for up to 48 h. Antimicrobial effects were seen from three concentrations of the AMS tested. However, the antimicrobial effects of the diluted AMS (1:5 or 1:10) were impacted by bacteria culture used, the inoculation levels, and the marination time. The non-diluted AMS showed the best antimicrobial activity among all three concentrations and showed better

Acknowledgment

The authors thank Ms. Patty Tyler for her help with the preparation of antimicrobial solutions and Mr. Dong Han for his help with statistical analysis.

Cited by (11)

  • The relevance of electrolyzed water to infectious and chronic diseases

    2022, Viral, Parasitic, Bacterial, and Fungal Infections: Antimicrobial, Host Defense, and Therapeutic Strategies
  • Recent advances on research of electrolyzed water and its applications

    2021, Current Opinion in Food Science
    Citation Excerpt :

    The good news is that recently there’s increasing study and focus on organic-compatible sanitizing approach to guarantee organic food security, and EW treatment alone or in combination with others is one of the hot points of the research. Generally, most of organic acids (such as lactic acid, levulinic acid, citric acid, fumaric acid) are recognized as safe to meet the strict regulations of organic food, and exhibit strong bactericidal effects on various pathogens, in which the disinfection efficacy depends on the pKa with non-dissociated form, as well as donated hydrogen ions in an aqueous system [27]. Recently, the combined treatment of EW and organic acids was developed and showed synergetic effects on inhibiting pathogens growth, and then significantly improve microbial safety for various food products.

  • Synergistic action of electrolyzed water and mild heat for enhanced microbial inactivation of Escherichia coli O157:H7 revealed by metabolomics analysis

    2020, Food Control
    Citation Excerpt :

    Escherichia coli O157:H7 is a pathogen that commonly causes foodborne illness, often from the consumption of contaminated fruit and vegetables (Adhikari, 2018; Cui, Bai, Yuan, Surendhiran, & Lin, 2018; Han et al., 2018; Ngnitcho et al., 2018). Various sanitization techniques have been adopted by the food industry to improve the microbial safety and quality of fresh produce (Fisher et al., 2016; Joshi, Salvi, Schaffner, & Karwe, 2018; Montville & Schaffner, 2004). Recent studies have highlighted that electrolyzed water (EW) is one potential substitute for traditional chlorine washing (Gil, Gómez-López, Hung, & Allende, 2015; Liu, Jin, Feng, Yang, & Fu, 2019; Liu, Tan, Yang, & Wang, 2017; Tango, Mansur, Kim, & Oh, 2014).

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text