Elsevier

Food Control

Volume 59, January 2016, Pages 188-195
Food Control

Inactivation of Brettanomyces bruxellensis by High Hydrostatic Pressure technology

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2015.04.038Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Brettanomyces bruxellensis inactivation by HHP depends on treatment condition.

  • HHP was also influenced by wine conditions and strains.

  • High pH and ethanol wines shortly treated at 100 MPa inactivated B. bruxellensis.

  • B. bruxellensis inactivations at 200 MPa were fairly variable.

  • Every wines treated at 300 MPa managed a complete inactivation of B. bruxellensis.

Abstract

High Hydrostatic Pressure (HHP) technology was tested on two strains of Brettanomyces bruxellensis isolated from Rioja red wines for analyzing the microbial inactivation reached in different oenological conditions. With this purpose, these strains were inoculated in synthetic wine with different pH and ethanol content. The inactivations reached with 100 MPa, 200 MPa and 300 MPa applied from one to seven minutes were tested just after the treatment and after a week.

Current consumers demand quality, free-additive wines. This has made oenological industry search alternative non-thermal technologies. The present results supported that high pH and high ethanol wines shortly treated at 100 MPa made B. bruxellensis undetectable. Moreover, low pH and low ethanol wines content should be at least treated at 200 MPa, and wines with intermediate ethanol content should be carefully analyzed in terms of strain composition before applying HHP. Finally, treatments at 300 MPa managed a complete inactivation regardless of oenological conditions.

Introduction

Winemaking is a complex microbiological and chemical procedure in which the sulphur dioxide addition is the main manner to ensure the wine microbial stability (Ribéreau-Gayon, Dubourdieu, Donèche, & Lonvaud-Funel, 2007).

The employment of sulphur dioxide in vinification is usually aimed to prevent wine oxidation and to ensure the inactivation of most of the wine-borne spoilage microorganisms. Actually, the use of sulphur dioxide occurs in different stages as, for instance, in must, after alcoholic fermentation, after malolactic fermentation and during the ageing in wood barrels and bottles. Specifically, the ageing of wine in wood barrels is the most complex stage because the solid sulphur dioxide has to be burnt inside the barrel, generating an inadequate and non-safe atmosphere for winery workers.

The sanitation of wood barrels is an important problem in wineries if sulphur dioxide could not be burnt inside the recipient (González-Arenzana et al., 2013). In fact, there are several spoilage microorganisms as yeasts, lactic acid bacteria and acetic acid bacteria that are able to survive in wine till ageing causing problems in wine quality (Bartowsky, 2009, Malfeito-Ferreira, 2014). Anyway, the genus of yeast Brettanomyces is actually one of the boldest microorganisms in winemaking, mainly during the ageing and during the storage stages (Sturm et al., 2014, Wedral et al., 2010). The anamorphic yeast Brettanomyces bruxellensis is a non-spore forming and the teleomorphic species Dekkera bruxellensis is spore-forming. Both yeast species have the ability of getting developed in wines and even surviving into the natural wood pores of barrels. They are considered potentially dangerous microorganisms because they could generate undesirable phenolic volatile compounds. For this reason, the inactivation of this species during ageing has been described as a complicated process, more when the future use of sulphur dioxide is being currently questioned (Romano et al., 2008, Romano et al., 2009). Taking into consideration all these information, alternative and new technologies should be investigated, in order to both reduce the sulphur dioxide addition and avoid the infection of wood barrels.

In modern times, there is an increasing concerning about quality healthy food containing low chemical levels. In oenology, this situation is causing an important demand of ecological wine, free of sulphites (Pozo-Bayón, Monagas, Bartolomé, & Moreno-Arribas, 2012).

It is widely known that some beverages as juices or wines are not prepared to be treated by thermal methods because some organoleptic qualities as taste, colour and flavour are completely sensitive to high temperature. The employment of natural substances (García-Ruiz et al., 2013) or different technologies, as pulsed electric field (PEF) (Puértolas, López, Condón, Raso, & Álvarez, 2009), microwaves applied to wood (González-Arenzana et al., 2013), High Hydrostatic Pressure (HHP) (Morata et al., 2012), etc., have been studied in the winery context including B. bruxellensis.

Among them, HHP is considered a promising and attractive technology that is transferred uniformly and instantly in food without heating the system (Mok et al., 2006). The HHP produces the volume reduction of the biological unit causing structural alterations in biomolecules, lipid membranes, protein structure, cell division, etc. (Balny et al., 2002, Bartlett, 2002, Mentré et al., 1999, Winter and Jeworrek, 2009). Hence, HHP could be useful to achieve non-thermal pasteurization and to improve life extension of food products without substantial modification of nutritional, functional and organoleptic properties of foods. Currently, a whole range of products such as fruit juices, (Barba et al., 2014, Buzrul, 2012), garlic (Kim, Kim, Kim, Noh, & Choi, 2014) or table olives (Pradas et al., 2012) have been subjected to HHP. The antiseptic effect of HHP in wines has been demonstrated and described in certain studies (Delfini et al., 1995, Puig et al., 2003). Furthermore, investigations about how HHP affects wine and grape quality have been published since 1994, concluding that this application could be interesting for pasteurization and for increasing the extractability without varying the organoleptic qualities (Buzrul, 2012, Lonvaud-Funel et al., 1994, Morata et al., 2015). The present study was targeted to describe the B. bruxellensis inactivation, with different ethanol content and pH, after being submitted to HHP from one to seven minutes at 100 MPa, 200 MPa and 300 MPa.

Section snippets

Sample preparation

Two strains of B. bruxellensis referred as strain 1 and strain 2, part of the CIDA Collection -Research Centre of the Spanish Northern Region of La Rioja-were employed for HHP treatments. They were recently isolated from Rioja red wines naturally infected with this yeast.

The initial culture of each microorganism was propagated in three steps. Each strain was inoculated in GYP agar, composed by 20 g/L glucose (Merck), 5 g/L yeast extract (Oxoid, Hampshire, UK), 5 g/L peptone (Difco Laboratories,

Results

The results of inactivation of two B. bruxellensis strains previously adapted to different environmental conditions are drawn in Fig. 1. In this Fig. 1, six graphics are displayed corresponding with different situations of pH and ethanol content and both strains −1 and 2- are represented.

Discussion

The current oenology demands healthy wines without chemical additives. The most employed additive during winemaking is the sulphur dioxide. As many authors have described, the yeast B. bruxellensis is relatively sensitive to the sulphur dioxide addition, providing maximum inactivations 10 days after the addition (Agnolucci et al., 2010). These authors also demonstrated that when sulphur dioxide is employed the likelihood of appearing resistant forms and spore-forming yeast as D. bruxellensis

Conclusions

In summary, pressurization at 100 MPa was not be advisable for treating B. bruxellensis in some wine conditions, because the scarce initial inactivation was finally neutralized after a week of storage. Only in wines with low acidity and high ethanol content this treatment was really effective even treating only for 1 min. Treatments of 200 MPa were truly effective in low pH and low ethanol content conditions; furthermore, the initial inactivation generally increased after a week of storage. In

Acknowledgements

This work has been supported by funding and pre-doctoral grant (B.O.E. 12th May, 2012) of the Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria project RTA2011-00070-00-00 and FEDER of the European Community. We also thank Prof. Dr. Dipl.-Ing. Dietrich Knorr for his excellent technical assistance in the HHP treatment and for his kind help in this work.

References (32)

Cited by (26)

  • Application of natural and synthetic zeolites in the oenological field

    2021, Food Research International
    Citation Excerpt :

    Several methods have been studied to prevent this defect, mainly based on the control of Brettanomyces growth (Dias, Pereira-da-Silva, Tavares, Malfeito-Ferreira, & Loureiro, 2003). As an alternative to the conventional sanitisation treatments of barrels using sulphur dioxide (Stadler & Fischer, 2020), new approaches such as high-power ultrasounds (Stadler & Fischer, 2020; Yap, Bagnall, & Bagnalli, 2009), or high hydrostatic pressure technology (González-Arenzana et al., 2016) have been adopted. Other methods are based on the removal of 4-EP and 4-EG from wine (Filipe-Ribeiro, Milheiro, Matos, Cosme, & Nunes, 2017; Larcher, Puecher, Rohregger, Malacarne, & Nicolini, 2012; Milheiro, Filipe-Ribeiro, Vilela, Cosme, & Nunes, 2019).

  • Emerging technologies to control Brettanomyces spp. in wine: Recent advances and future trends

    2020, Trends in Food Science and Technology
    Citation Excerpt :

    Moreover, the yeast inactivation generally increased after one week of storage. This latter effect was affected by the treatment time, the pH value and the ethanol concentration; the highest yeast inactivation rate has been achieved by applying the treatment for 3–6 min, at pH 4 and 12% ethanol (González-Arenzana et al., 2016b). Van Wyk and Silva (2017a, b) found that increasing the treatment time and the pressure, lead to increased B. bruxellensis inactivation; the best result have been obtained following 400 Mpa-5 s treatments, but the inactivation rates have been affected by the different strains as well as by the wine type.

  • Nonthermal preservation of wine

    2019, Preservatives and Preservation Approaches in Beverages: Volume 15: The Science of Beverages
View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text